Email
Tumblr
Digg
Youtube
Cute Baby Monkey Eating an Apple Video is Evolutionist Propaganda
Twitter
Facebook
Delicious
Digg
Stumble
Reddit
The crazy evolutionists are at it again, as this time it seems their monthly agenda is focused upon creating videos and images that feature really cute animals.
Last week the cult of crazed scientists released images of two puppies, who were cute, but were the product of cloning. As you know, clones are very evil as they are not the product of natural reproduction between men and women. They are lifeless vessels and an abomination. Therefore, the puppies are evil.
This week, evolutionists went into the dark, backward land of the Africas to abduct a real life monkey. They coerced this poor creature of the jungle into eating an apple on film, using camera work to make it look like a young child enjoying an apple. This propaganda piece is meant to sway your mind into thinking, ‘this is where man evolved from’.
Let’s have a look:
Tasteless exploitation of an innocent creature, all for sinister ends. As you should know, man was created approximately 6000 years ago and given dominion over the beasts and plant life of Earth. While evolution works in a point forward basis, all creatures of Earth have their origins in the Garden of Eden, where Adam named them one by one.
That includes the great-great-great (x 1000s!) grandparents of the monkey being exploited in this video.
3:47 pm
Sometimes, when people vastly overstate their argument, they begin to lose authority. Many people can sense when they are being bullsh*tted.
In this case, you distort your conclusion WAY beyond what inferences allow. This is a running problem throughout your articles, I’ve noticed.
First, you claim that cloned puppies are “lifeless.” Are they machines then in a sense that you and I are not? “Lifeless” here is a totally inept use of the word. The puppies run and play and such. Of course they are alive. Also, I assume you don’t think the puppies in general have souls. So my question to you is what do these puppies lack that other puppies have. Don’t get confused and go way back “10,000 years.” We are examining the qualities of living puppies vs. these “dead” puppies.
Second, the puppies hardly seem evil. There is such a thing as amoral, where things are neither evil nor moral (for example, eating a banana, or simply existing). I think you use such odd definitions of words that you don’t mean the same thing as everyone else who uses that word.
Thirdly, do you really think the intent of the camera man was to portray the monkey as human child and that they did this through “camera work”? Isn’t that a bit far fetched? It’s a zoo commercial! Their intent is to get people to the zoo. There isn’t a conspiracy behind every corner. It may very well be that a Christian creationist produced this video as there is absolutely no evidence to weigh against that (except some far flung notion that monkey is intended to resemble a human child).
Tell us, since this deception played upon us is done with “camera work,” what angle could the video be shot so that it leaves us with a different impression? This is simply how baby monkeys eat apples. Surely, you don’t want to claim that the baby monkey wasn’t trained to eat apples similarly to a human baby.
This must be embarrassing for you. Please think through your posts a little more. I think you can bring a lot of good with them. As they are, I think they hurt the cause more than help it.
Praise or Condemn:
1 
0
12:20 pm
I fully agree with the Josh Indigo. The articles on this site are written in such a way that they seem like satire (and I sort of hope they are). Please tell me you aren’t really this crazy.
Praise or Condemn:
1 
0
1:43 pm
Orangutans aren’t monkeys… They are apes… Get it straight
Praise or Condemn:
0 
0
12:48 pm
Can you tell me where the ’6000′ years reference comes from. I have a couple ‘Saved’ friends who have never been informed of this reference and I would like to be the one who educates them.
Praise or Condemn:
0 
0
10:09 pm
well it’s completely Impossible about the 6000 years since the discovery of fire was like 200 000 years and More and there is More discovery before that and the first civilization was around 15 000 years ago (real civilization not nomadic one)
Praise or Condemn:
0 
0
1:16 pm
What?
I watched this video, and I saw a monkey eating an apple. I didn’t see anything in this video that made me think about evolution, until you said so. But if you see this video as pointing to evolution, when it really doesn’t, what does that say about you?
Praise or Condemn:
0 
0
4:20 am
I’m shocked not only at the display of ignorance here, but at the casual racism of the phrase ‘the dark, backward lands of the Africas’. How dare you?! Have you been there? Have you met Africans? They are human beings just like white people, you disgusting person, and I’m shocked that anyone in this day and age would think otherwise. But then again the rest of your moral compass is clearly horribly archaic due to that nasty little book you think is so important, so I don’t know why I’m surprised.
Praise or Condemn:
0 
0
1:29 pm
Of course puppies aren’t the natural product from a man and a woman. Puppies are the natural product from a female dog and a male dog.
Are the plants, animals, and single-celled organisms that reproduce asexually evil?
Praise or Condemn:
0 
0
12:06 am
Guys, you DO realize this whole site is satire, right?
Praise or Condemn:
1 
0
11:52 am
Poe’s Law!
Praise or Condemn:
0 
0
8:47 pm
i disagree
Praise or Condemn:
0 
0