Science Mystics Enable Nonworking, Unmarried Mom to Have Octuplets
This past week I am sure that many of you heart the story of a woman named Nadya Suleman. Through unknown magical evolution rituals and invocation of magics, a cult of scientists were somehow able to let her become pregnant with eight little babies all at once.
Though the babies are here now and by default precious, this sort of science behind the story should scare all of you. Scientists have the ability to impregnate a woman with 8 babies…selectively?
Next, liberals will use this in arguments against the value of the family and marriage. Once again, I find myself quite alarmed at the ability of scientists to use knowledge to toy with life, and the way this story will be twisted by the Liberal Media in their agenda in destroying the traditional family unit.
Now the mom in this story now has 14 children, and indicates that she feels it may be enough. She also clearly loves these kids and seems to be a very nice lady.
- Sinful
- Suspicious
- Scared
- Sad
- Amused
- Laughing Out Loud
Author: Dan Nordgren
Born and raised in upstate New York, Dan Nordgren is currently a film student who enjoys martial arts, mountain climbing and football as components of his very active life. Join Team Sarah TODAY
10:49 am
“Scientists have the ability to impregnate a woman with 8 babies…selectively?
Next, liberals will use this in arguments against the value of the family and marriage.”
That is one of the best slippery slope non sequiturs I’ve ever seen.
Praise or Condemn:
0 
0
6:24 pm
“…and by default precious…”
I’m sorry to disagree with this, but those children were a bequeathment of science and thus must all be evil.
Yes I’m happy Darwin is dead also, but his foul spirit continues to convert the unrighteous into his cult of scientits.
Praise or Condemn:
0 
0
8:55 pm
Um, Darwin has nothing to do with the Octuplet Mom.
Praise or Condemn:
0 
0
3:52 am
She shouldn’t have had those kids… a few of the children she already has have mental disabilities and need constant care. And on top of that 8 newborns? How does she plan to take care of all of them? She should have aborted all but one or two. Or never had the kids in the first place…
Praise or Condemn:
0 
0
10:42 am
You atheists are sick people. DarkSorceress, how dare you say those children are not precious. They are little gifts. Sure, they may be somewhat sinchilds since they don’t have a proper father who is married to their mother, but that does not make them any less human.
I am appalled and Chris, you are not being convicted. You guys need to practice love for everyone and stop being so judgmental. I know atheists celebrate abortion, but in Christianity we practice accepting love and not the hate you liberals spread around at every chance.
Thanks for the article, Dan. Let’s wish the best for these 8 little children.
Praise or Condemn:
0 
0
2:10 pm
“but in Christianity we practice accepting love and not the hate you liberals spread around at every chance.”
So then why are you constantly belittling homosexuals and calling them vile, horrific names?
Praise or Condemn:
0 
0
9:52 am
Im a liberal. Im a Christian. WOOOooOOOAH OMGOAD PARADOX SATANIST ATHEIST ANTICHRIST.
Praise or Condemn:
1 
0
8:00 am
Look, for 1 thing, i am an athiest and im not a “Dark sorceress”. Even though i dont like what has happend, and yes human life is precious, it has nothing to do with darwin or evolution. Have anyone on this website that hates evolution actualy read darwins book “The Origin of Species”? I have read the bible, so i do know about it, however, chances are, you know very little about evolution and yet you feel that you have the right to curse it? Untill you know the full extent of what science actualy is, you have no right to bellitle it. Also, HOW DARE YOU say that those babies must be evil!!! they are human for fucks sake!!! They will grow up, and it’s very likley that they will be normal. Why must the way that they were born effect the way they are as a person?!?
Praise or Condemn:
0 
0
8:17 am
The more children in the world the better, but every child needs ONE MOTHER AND ONE FATHER IN THE HOME. As far as evolution goes, its nothing but liberal propaganda which needs to be taken out of schools. Its a bunch of hogwash.
Praise or Condemn:
0 
0
5:02 pm
Complete hogwash? Can you prove that?
You see, we science types tend to want evidence before we blindly follow a theory. Evidence has been presented for Darwin’s case, can you find anything that says contrary?
20 years from now it may well have been disproved and there may be a new theory, but it will lack any credibility without any evidence to back it up.
Praise or Condemn:
0 
0
9:14 am
Ahhhh, now, as i have said beffore, i HAVE read the bible and know what it teaches. However, have YOU mr scott read “The Origin of Species”? You can’t claim that something like that is bogus just because it goes againts what you think. Darwin was religios, and he had several children and was married. He was a good man, you cant condem him for his thoughts. However i do aggree that it is important for children to have both a mother and a father; however, if it is the parents choice to be a single parrent and that they can do that capabley, who are we to say they cant?
Praise or Condemn:
0 
0