Scientists Claim African Was First European?!
Scientists are up to their rotten atheist shenanigans again, this time trying to convince everyone that the earliest people in Europe were Africans and ‘arrived’ into existence 35,000 years ago.
35,000 years ago, the Earth was still without form and void. There is substantial proof that the Eath is 6,000 years old.
Britain’s leading ‘forensic scientist’ Richard Neave, however, will try to convince you otherwise. With a team of other forensic scientists, Neave used fossilized fragments of skull and jawbone that was found in a cave seven years ago to purportedly recreate the skull and face of the first man in Europe.
Rest assured that Satan is in hell right now, laughing it up, as he planted the ‘skull and bones’ in that cave years ago, all to trick these gullible scientists into thinking cavemen were real.
Since scientists don’t have the true holy spirit leading their heart, they cannot see past the devil’s veil of deception. They think these bones are authentic and think they have reconstructed a model of the ‘first’ Europeans. Let’s see what they have created:
This is crude science and does not match the artist rendition in my pictorial edition of the Bible. They do not match because the scientists are spreading lies about the origin of man. Here are the true facts.
The first people on Earth were created in Eden about 6,000 years ago, and were named Adam and Eve (Genesis 2). Adam and Eve sound like pretty standard English-speaking names. Here is approximately what the first Europeans really looked like:
You’ll notice they are standing upright, do not look like they are suffering from a degenerative bone disease and are clothed (meaning this rendition is post apple sin). This is how Adam and Eve looked approximately 6,000 years ago, right after the fall of man.
It’s quite troubling that scientists would trust their bone assays and carbon dating when the word of God and our dogma gives us a perfect knowledge of how things looked at the time of creation.
The sin sculpture currently sits on the desk of a mislead anthropologist, Alice Roberts, of Bristol University. Alice had this to say in an interview with the Radio Times:
“‘It’s really quite bizarre. I’m a scientist and objective but I look at that face and think “Gosh, I’m looking at the face of somebody from 40,000 years ago” and there’s something weirdly moving about that.’”
The only thing moving right now is Satan’s diaphragm, as he’s doubled over in chuckles as he and his demons and evolutionists delight at this new monstrosity which is leading people away from the facts of creation.









1:18 pm
“There is substantial proof that the Eath is 6,000 years old.”
Really? Provide some… And I mean TANGIBLE proof of this. Don’t start quoting biblical references — provide some empirical data.
And here’s a definition, in case you need it:
Praise or Condemn:
4
2
1:39 pm
“This is crude science and does not match the artist rendition in my pictorial edition of the Bible.”
Pretty pathetic when someone believes an artist’s rendition in her “pictorial edition” of the bible over the careful research done by scientists. Pathetic and insulting. Amber, I think you’re lacking a few brain cells. For the last time, the bible is NOT evidence.
Praise or Condemn:
6
0
1:42 pm
I leave this site for a week, and…. wow. Just…. wow.
“There is substantial proof that the Eath is 6,000 years old.”
And learn to spell right, Amber. Dumbass….
Praise or Condemn:
4
0
2:52 pm
Africans walked up through Central Asia to get to Europe.
Praise or Condemn:
3
0
3:44 pm
Ok… so let me get this straight…
You really think that the earth is 6,000 years old, that Satan cleverly put goddamn bones in a cave with a carbon dating of 35,000, and you think that all scientists are atheists. AND to top it off, you think that the first “Europeans” were Adam and Eve? Are you really that ignorant? If you’re going to sit and try to feed your readers with this filth, at least get your facts right. The bible was NOT written in English. Adam and Eve were OBVIOUSLY not European, they fucking were “formed” in the Middle East, around the Pishon, Gihon, Tigris, and Euphrates rivers somewhere. Not Europe.
And… it is just disturbing to me that there are people on this planet who really honestly believe that there is this crazy evil guy sitting somewhere in the Earth’s mantle laughing his ass off at us. I mean… Jesus Christ.
Praise or Condemn:
5
1
4:05 pm
It’s a common misconception of atheists that Satan looks like the picture you posted. Also, Satan uses tricks like planting false evidence all the time to lead people astray from the truth.
Praise or Condemn:
3
7
5:29 pm
This has got to be a joke. I don’t believe anyone is this stupid.
Praise or Condemn:
1
0
8:02 pm
This website is craaazy. Someone needs to take a mild sedative and read Romans 5. You guys are waaay too judgemental. Instead of “warning” people about “heathen” MAYBE you should post Godly scripture or peaceful sermons.
It’s all about love my brothers and sister.
Praise or Condemn:
3
1
10:31 pm
You people consider science a sin?
I guess that explains your stupidity.
Praise or Condemn:
5
2
7:34 am
you are an idiot.. like for real.. i don’t know how else to tell you that.. but yea.. you, Hagalaz are about as dumb as people who really believe this stuff
Praise or Condemn:
0
0
11:35 pm
Seriously people, this entire website is a joke. Somebody has played an impressive prank. Just enough plausable to see how much bull everyone would swallow. “They don’t look like the artist rendition in my pictorial bible” is about as blatant a clue as can be handed to you. If it isn’t a joke, then, that statement alone is moronic.
Praise or Condemn:
1
0
11:56 pm
I can respect your belief and I respect the men and women who have died for you to be able to have that belief. My question is whether or not you take offense to the first humans being dark skinned?
Praise or Condemn:
1
0
11:58 pm
BEWARE, WE COME FROM AFRICA!

Praise or Condemn:
7
1
8:06 am
if we all came from adam and eve, and your pictorial edition of the bible, which portrays both adam and eve as white, is fact enough to believe over scientists hard work, then how did we get so many different races on earth? i’m pretty sure we can conclude from this rhetorical question that the entire population of the earth did NOT start with just two people. i mean think about it, thats just fuckin stupid anyway isn’t it, to think that the entire population of earth began from two people. what about all the people in other countries who have never heard of christianity, where did they come from? satan put them there to trick us?
Praise or Condemn:
2
0
11:45 am
Research Ham’s family in the Bible, that started the various ‘races’ and it’s too bad people are so small-minded that they don’t see other races as simply brethren.
Praise or Condemn:
1
1
3:49 am
Yeah Satan’s the reason behind all science. All technology derived from science is the creation of Satan. All hard facts about nature and physics were orchestrated by the Dark Lord himself. Hell, this isn’t even reality. We’re stuck in a virtual simulation, with Lucifer at the computer terminal. The God Particle is not the God Particle at all; it’s Satan’s Particle! All fear the Higgs Boson, for when scientists discover it, all hell will be unleashed on humanity. The Anti-Christ will have been born.
Praise or Condemn:
1
0
3:36 pm
cool story bro
Praise or Condemn:
0
1
7:50 am
i can’t believe that some of you are actually discussing this seriusly, it’s so obvius that this page is a satire, that it pains me…
Praise or Condemn:
1
0
3:09 pm
This is an epic fail.
Whoever came up with this website needs to hang themselves :/ i bet “Jesus”, the christian zombie, hates to be portrayed as a vengeful asshole like this.
Want to know what Christianity really is?
Christianity: the belief that some cosmic Jewish Zombie can make you live forever if you symbolically eat his flesh and telepathically tell him that you accept him as your master, so he can remove an evil force from your soul that is present in humanity because a rib-woman was convinced by a talking snake to eat from a magical tree.
——
Who has killed more in the bible?
God.
Who HASN’T killed in the bible?
Satan.
Does anyone ELSE see the problem with this?
Praise or Condemn:
2
0
12:55 am
Two people could definitely form different races. Anatomically modern humans were around 200,000 years ago in Africa when they first started to spread out. They first hit up the middle east and split to go to Europe and Asia. Then from Asia they went down to Australia and Oceania and eventually crossed the land bridge to North America and eventually spread down to South America. There are only three races, Caucasian, Asian and African. The first people were Africans and either came from Africa or the Middle East and are therefore dark skinned, and most certainly not white.
My one question, is that if Satan planted these bones to mess with us, then why wouldn’t he leave a direct link from homo sapiens to homo erects, because if he did that then we would have really understood our evolution and he would have been messing with us even more?
Praise or Condemn:
0
0
12:16 pm
Hmmm I wonder, how does the Devil look like? Maybe something like Osama? or Kim Jong-il? Or maybe Bush? I think Amber’s daddy might be one? I dunno, someone please stick the cross on my face and tell me the truth or maybe the bible might have some pictorial evidence?
Hmmmmm you know, I think I have seen Jesus before cos he should be from America right? or maybe Europe? Cos apparently people here got the idea that he has also blue eyes and blonde hair. So how does it explain that when Adam took a bite from the apple, he got an Adam’s apple like males have now? I eat apples quite often but I do not see me having another apple in my throat. This is so weird……… I am confused.
Praise or Condemn:
0
0
12:18 pm
Homo sapiens? So are we all homos? Apparently Jesus was a homo. I think I just saw his balls. OMFG
Praise or Condemn:
0
0
10:40 am
hahaha. Amber.
She’s the best writer on this site.
Praise or Condemn:
0
0
6:59 pm
English speaking names? What did you mean by that?
You realize the bible was written in Aramaic/Hebrew? And that the names Adam and Eve are translations?
Praise or Condemn:
0
0
8:31 pm
I don’t know if this is sarcasm or not, but it’s far better than comedy, because we’re not laughing with you, but at you. Thank you for your self-deprecating expressions.
Praise or Condemn:
0
0
8:07 pm
I am very curious on your opinion of this.
So the first humans were Adam and Eve.
In other words, everyone in the world right now are related to each other.
So… we are committing incest?
Praise or Condemn:
0
0
11:03 pm
is this author serious? I think she might be serious!
Praise or Condemn:
0
0
5:17 pm
Ok… So… If the Earth is 6000 years ago, THEN EXPLAIN DINOSAURS!!!!! you are too ignorant for words….
Praise or Condemn:
0
0
7:40 am
dinosaurs and man lived together.. you dumbass… before the flood.. noah even took 2 dinosaurs on the arc but they couldnt handle the post flood climate and went extinct along with a lot of other animals like wooly mammoths
Praise or Condemn:
0
0
4:19 am
why is there a tiger in Europe?
Praise or Condemn:
0
0
3:16 pm
hi!
i am at work currently, so i do not have much time to write… nonetheless! I really appreciated reading through your article. It turned out to be some excellent stuff. thanks! Best regards, Resa
Praise or Condemn:
1
0
3:00 pm
Sunny days are happy days but be cautious excessive sun exposure causes premature aging, tight dry skin, and dark spots which might turn into Squamous cell carcinoma. If you want that tan use Self-Tanning Sprays or Tanning Beds instead.
Praise or Condemn:
0
0
1:38 pm
Because the HISTORICAL FACTS in the BIBLE! Add up all the ages of the people from ADAM to SOLOMON which is right there, unbroken line family tree all the way back, and then the lengths of all the reigns of the Kings later on… it’s all right there plain for the eye to see… I mean it might be off by a couple of years because it’s hard to add up all those numbers right but CREATION happened around 4000 BC so 4000+2000=6000 and the Earth is about six thousand years old! So it might be a few years either way but saying its MILLIONS is just FOOLISH, and some evil atheist scientists say BILLIONS – lol! lol! – even I can add up better than that! And the really clver guy who first added up all the figures says CREATION started on 23 October 4004BC so why don’t you ask him and prove him wrong!!!
Praise or Condemn:
0
2
4:07 pm
The offer to send you a Bible, for free, still stands. The scriptures of Truth are all the empirical observation you’ll need in life.
Praise or Condemn:
0
1
2:25 pm
I ask you for empirical evidence and you source the bible. Not gonna’ fly.
Back up your (and Amber’s) ridiculous claim the Earth is only 6000 years old WITHOUT USING THE BIBLE AS A REFERENCE
I’m looking for science/logic — not superstition.
Praise or Condemn:
1
1
10:35 am
UHM:
It’s a very strange concept to believe that either adam or eve are the first “europeans” The Bible states: “And the name of the second river is Gihon: the same is it that compasseth the whole land of Ethiopia” (Gen, 2:13) and “And the name of the third river is Hiddekel: that is it which goeth toward the east of Assyria. And the fourth river is Euphrates.” Now, these rivers flow from the river of the garden of Eden, and they are all in the Middle East and Africa: Adam and Eve were definitely NOT European. They were tanned, and possibly black, but not white.
Wouldn’t asking archbishop Ussher, the first dedicated biblical chronologist who set out to determine the age of earth, and who established that Genesis occurred in 4004 B.C. be made somewhat difficult by the fact that he has ceased to be, being deceased in march 1656? Rather an archaic concept, that of correlating the ages and dates in the text to determine the age of the world. It was meant as a symbol. A powerful symbol, but a symbol nonetheless. The Holy Church acknowledges evolution, and the age of the universe to be measured in billions of years.
Let’s talk facts:
Take light. Light travels, it bounces off objects and enters the eye, printing an image on the retina at the back of the eye, which allows us to see. Light is not instantaneous. Like sound, it travels from its point of origin until it reaches our eyes. When light is produced by the sun, it is bounced off on the moon, and that allows is to see the moon. The light takes 1.3 seconds to reach us from the moon. So when we look at the moon, we see it as it was 1.3 seconds away. Light takes 8.3 minutes to reach us from the sun. So, when you look at the sun, you see it as it was 8.3 minutes away. Stars, on the other hand are much farther than the sun or the moon. It takes light years to reach us from other stars: Proxima Centauri, the closest star to the solar system is 4.2 light years away, it took light from that star 4.2 years to reach our eyes when we look up at it. It is 4.2 Light years away. I’m guessing by now you know where I’m going with this, but every time you look up at the sky at night and see stars, chances are you can spot stars whose light has taken more than 10000 years. You may spot the Andromeda galaxy, for instance, which is so far away that when you look at it, you see the light it emitted 2.5 million years ago. Look up at a night sky, and there you have it, proof that the world is older than 6000 years.
The Bible does not deny any of this. It has all been proven, these are all facts.
Praise or Condemn:
0
0
2:56 pm
That’s impossible.
Praise or Condemn:
0
1
4:23 pm
“It’s a common misconception of atheists that Satan looks like the picture you posted.”
Oho, aren’t you right for once?
Praise or Condemn:
0
0
5:44 pm
Ok… So I would like to know. What does Satan look like, then?
http://i74.photobucket.com/albums/i262/murciful_mushroom/250pxGustaveDoreParadiseLostSatanPr.jpg
Does he look like that?
Or this?
http://i168.photobucket.com/albums/u190/SmokeDogg2007/satan.jpg
Or maybe this?
http://i74.photobucket.com/albums/i262/murciful_mushroom/satan-1.jpg
Do you know what he looks like, Nelson?
Have you seen him?
http://i74.photobucket.com/albums/i262/murciful_mushroom/stfu-baby.jpg
Praise or Condemn:
1
0
7:47 pm
“It’s a common misconception of atheists that Satan looks like the picture you posted.”
Don’t be such a dumbshit, Adam, atheists are all well aware that Satan does not look like that. We all know that if Satan existed, he would look like this:
However, I much prefer this rendition of Satan:
Praise or Condemn:
1
1
4:29 pm
I’d like to get a free bible— only if I get a free sharpie with it.
Praise or Condemn:
0
1
4:54 pm
If you send me a bible, I’ll just wipe my ass with it and send it back to you. No matter how many you send me, I’ll just keep wiping my ass with them and send them back.
Praise or Condemn:
0
0
5:55 pm
Oh, and one more thing. What makes you think I am an atheist?
Did I say I was one?
Praise or Condemn:
0
0
6:44 pm
Yes it is for we all came from ADAM and EVE who lived in EDEN which I think has been proved to be in the EAST somewhere, anyway all the footprints would have been washed away by THE FLOOD which happened later anyway it wasn’t in Africa that’s silly LOL, but the ARK has been found on a Mountain now, so everyone must have walked from there afterwards
Praise or Condemn:
0
0
12:24 am
Africa was “Eden” before it became savanna. That’s how humans came about. I came from a lab.

Praise or Condemn:
0
0
7:58 pm
Dude, relax. If you don’t believe it don’t come on the website. I’m Christian and I don’t believe everything that’s on here, but I don’t freak out about it. Calm down bro… Geeze…
Praise or Condemn:
0
0
11:14 pm
How crude.
Praise or Condemn:
0
1
11:37 pm
Or perhaps I’ll tear out the pages and wrap up my cat’s poop in them and send that to you instead as little presents. Trust me, my cat Charlie has HORRIBLE smelling shit.
Praise or Condemn:
0
0
12:23 am
I don’t take offense. Like a lot of other people, though, I do take offense with these ‘scientists’ claiming to know what Adam and Eve looked like and saying that they lived 35,000 years ago.
Praise or Condemn:
0
1
12:32 am
Present for Original Adam.

A nice can of,
WHOOP ASS!
Praise or Condemn:
0
0
9:52 am
Well, the Bible doesn’t say what they looked like any more than it says what they DIDN’T look like. There’s no description anywhere about their skin color, their hair (or lack thereof), skull shape, etc. What the Bible DOES say is that man was created in God’s image. Since nobody knows what God looks like any speculation on the part of Christians is just as inaccurate as speculation on the part of non-Christians. My question is: How does what the first humans looked like play any part whatsoever in the overall message of the Bible, i.e. the ability of mankind to obtain salvation through Christ?
As for how long ago the first people walked the earth, again, I’m not sure I understand why the argument over the time frame is relevant to the overall salvation message of the Bible.
Praise or Condemn:
0
0
5:27 am
Yes the Bible is EYEWITNESS report, it’s history and the Word written down by those who were there not made up fantasies like the Atheist Scientists come out with when they say they know what happend BILLIONS OF YEARS ago LOL! like anyone was there to see or they could see EVIL-ution or anyone has seen a Monkey turn into a Person it’s nonsense and besides we have the written down proof that the Earth is six thousand years old and we have found the Ark and people saw Our Lord rise again it’s all history so I don’t get why people try and see what isn’t true it’s just denying GOD
Praise or Condemn:
0
0
12:05 pm
Like seriously, so what if Adam and Eve were Africans? Anyways for your information, there are so many things that exists before Christ so accept it, why are these people so screwed up?
Praise or Condemn:
0
0
8:55 am
Felicia espouses:
“Yes it is for we all came from ADAM and EVE who lived in EDEN which I think has been proved to be in the EAST somewhere, anyway all the footprints would have been washed away by THE FLOOD which happened later anyway it wasn’t in Africa that’s silly LOL, but the ARK has been found on a Mountain now, so everyone must have walked from there afterwards”.
So is the bible allegory or concrete fact? So all races come from two white people? That’s not genetically possible — but you’re not interested in facts, are ya’? Blind faith will do it for you…
The Ark has been found? Really?!?! Scientists differ on where the supposed resting place of the Ark actually is, so where’s your proof the Ark was found? No one came up with the idea until medieval times (i.e. after Christ supposedly lived/preached/died/ascended) that the Ark was on Mt. Ararat.
The Flood? Oh, that’s another rich one. There isn’t enough water in all of the polar ice caps to completely flood the Earth, so, most likely, the flood was a localized event. Remember, 2000 years ago people still thought the Earth was flat and it wasn’t until centuries later (Columbus, Magellan, et al) that the Earth was proven to be round.
I hate to disappoint you, but the bible is not 100% fact, and although you may follow it with blinders on, it should definitely be taken with a grain of salt. I’m not discounting SOME of the historical events chronicled, but you have to take into account the context and time period in which it was written. Here’s a puzzling example: if Adam and Eve were the only two people god created and they had only sons, how was the Earth populated? Did Cain and Able produce children with Eve, thus meaning that humanity was borne of incest?
There are also scores of books that were “chosen” to be omitted from the final works and scholars still bicker about their importance and why they were omitted. The bible in its current form was assembled as a way of controlling the masses and has been mistranslated for centuries.
Those men should be proud; they’ve evidently done their job well…
Praise or Condemn:
0
1
9:18 pm
i still laugh when people say the bible is an eyewitness account of anything. everyone who wrote about jesus, never actually met him. it was written decades after he died.
Praise or Condemn:
0
0
11:56 am
That’s because of assholes like you Original Adam that’s keeping us being one big happy family.

Here’s how it should be.
God: Dad.
Judaism: Big brother.
Christianity: Middle brother.
Islam: Youngest brother.
Praise or Condemn:
0
1
8:51 pm
i’m not about to read the bible because i know i wont find any plausable answers, just an explanation of how two people of the same race began loads of different races all over the world would be fine. no matter what the bible says, that is an absolute imposibillity, two people of one race cannot produce an offspring of another race, its absurd. the reason for different races is, infact, due to different climates on different parts of the earth and different races evolved like they have to cope with those climates. also to add to that, how was there people all over the world before people could cross seas? i mean there are still tribes on secluded islands that have never seen the likes of what we consider modern civilisation, and have no idea what christianity is.
Praise or Condemn:
0
0
3:40 am
Sexist!
Praise or Condemn:
0
0
3:18 pm
Hahahaha, a comedian eh?
Praise or Condemn:
0
0
3:11 pm
Want to hear a joke?
Women’s rights.
Praise or Condemn:
0
0
12:58 am
200,000 years?!?! AAhahahahahahahah.
Praise or Condemn:
0
1
1:33 am
That’s just anatomically modern homo sapiens, trust me there were others way before that. Homo sapiens are only about 35,000 years old don’t worry.
Praise or Condemn:
0
0
2:05 am
They fear science.
Praise or Condemn:
0
0
12:22 pm
So are you Lucifer? Cos I am sure that you were behind the computer terminal when you replied this. You do know what a computer is right? Since science is evil
Praise or Condemn:
0
0
12:59 pm
Praise or Condemn:
0
0
7:11 pm
mt Ararat in Nostlagia (DS ) we found the ark there
Praise or Condemn:
0
0
7:43 am
how does ancient stars proof the EARTH is billions of years old? stars have nothing to do with the earth
Praise or Condemn:
0
0