Richard Dawkins Cheers Human Death and Suffering
We all know atheists are Godless people who naturally lack morality and decency. The root of evil on Earth springs from those who don’t truly have God written into their mind, body and soul. So how can a person who believes in no (a-) God (-theist) be a decent human being?
The answer is they cannot and Richard Dawkins is living proof. Each and every day Richard Dawkins wakes up and pledges to mislead humanity about the facts of reality. His teaching about the universe being without an intelligent creator is casting your children into the fire pits of hell!
And he laughs. Dawkins believes in a process called natural selection. It is where, liberal scientists state that only the strong survive and everyone else should die. Can’t you imagine a group of mean atheists stoning a bundled group of crippled, quacking ducklings or perhaps your sickly grandparents to death?
No doubt you can, and that’s because we’ve seen atheists show their evil beliefs time and time again. Adolf Hitler was an atheist who believed in natural selection. As he murdered the handicap, various races and gypsies, his only explanation was, “Ich bin ein Atheist Godless und nur die Starken überleben!”. Which in American, means “I’m a Godless atheist and only the strong survive!”
How sad is it to know people like Darwin and Dawkins are in league with dire Hitler and his hordes of evolution propaganda NAZIs? On one liberal elite site named Onegoodmove.org, they even confess the dark nature of Dawkins, comparing the mad scientist to a steroid pitbull:
If Thomas Henry Huxley was famously “Darwin’s bulldog”, then Richard Dawkins is probably best described as “Darwin’s pit bull”. He gets his teeth into an argument, locks on and shakes it until submission is the only option. There’s a certain glee when he admits to being “the devil’s disciple” or the high priest of “ultradarwinism”, and his admission has an undeniably macho swagger about it. Real men (and women) take the toughest line on natural selection. Suffering and pain in nature and humanity are merely there to service the genes. Anything else is “Sentimental, human nonsense. Natural selection is all futile.” There is something bracing about belonging to this most astringent and clear-sighted set. Deluded theists! Wishy-washy agnostics! Welcome to the Fight Club. One is reminded of lines by Dawkins’s favourite poet, WB Yeats: “Cast a cold eye / On life, on death. / Horseman, pass by.”
Richard Dawkins thinks himself nobility and carries the English title of Sir. I could only wish this were the feudal days, because I’d slap him with a white glove and challenge him to a royal duel!
God would favor me as I climbed upon my high-horse, cross-bearing shield in one hand and a holy lance in the other, and I’d make proper strike right in the crown of Dawkins black knight suit! I’d aim for his heart but it would be useless, since it’s shriveled up and cold from having no love of Christ or fellow humans.
Friends, atheists are hateful people who think it’s funny that people suffer and die from disease. If atheists are pitbulls, I can only hope that Satan watches the NFL and is a fan of the black quarterback Michael Vick. No doubt that he has some kennels sectioned off in his dark domain and shall TORTURE atheists for all time, just because he can. What a sad, scary fate!
Don’t join the atheists in being tortured by Satan for all time and ignore Dawkins. Next time you get sick, remember atheists would just as soon have you die so only the fit survive. Boo, atheists! Stop hating life! Boo you heathens and burn! Burn!
Warning: The following video media contains sick propaganda from noted Godless wonder, Richard Dawkins. Pray and immediately have any women/children leave the room before reviewing this media.
- Sinful
- Suspicious
- Scared
- Sad
- Amused
- Laughing Out Loud
Author: Abe
If you don't like what you just read here you can just get out of my country. Now how about that smart-alack.
Follow me on twitters. Poke me as your New Friend on Facebook!!
11:01 am
“So how can a person who believes in no (a-) God (-theist) be a decent human being?”
I’m an atheist, and I’m a decent human being. I’m a Certified Nursing Assistant, and like helping people, and I’m currently going to school to become a Veterinary Technician, so obviously I love animals. I give money to homeless people and volunteer at an animal shelter.
“And he laughs.”
Unless I’m mistaken, it’s you Christwire authors who are constantly saying that you can’t wait until you go to heaven and laugh at everybody suffering in hell.
“Can’t you imagine a group of mean atheists stoning a bundled group of crippled, quacking ducklings or perhaps your sickly grandparents to death?”
As an animal lover, I have PREVENTED people from stoning goslings (you can see a video of the cute little geese here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L2RZSc2bPOs). And since we’re talking about animal cruelty, it was Adam Nelson who said this:
“I wish we could wipe every single cat off the face of the Earth. Such nasty creatures.”
http://christwire.org/2009/06/satan-gives-cat-a-9th-life/
“Friends, atheists are hateful people who think it’s funny that people suffer and die from disease.”
So then why do you seem to take pleasure out of natural disasters, such as wildfires in California and earthquakes in India?
Praise or Condemn:
7 
0
11:22 am
Why? Why do you help people that you doesn’t know about?
Praise or Condemn:
0 
1
1:22 pm
I really do not like Richard Dawkins. He’s the one that’s delusional.
Praise or Condemn:
3 
12
11:21 am
super, adam
Praise or Condemn:
1 
2
1:10 pm
God, Santa Claus, and the Easter Bunny are in 3 corners of a gymnasium. You are in the fourth. In the middle is a BLT. The question is, who will get there first?
The answer is, you will. The other three are figments of your effing imagination.
Praise or Condemn:
4 
3
1:22 pm
You’re a very delusional old man. Richard Dawkins doesn’t support any kind of death or suffering to anyone, he simply practices the belief of natural selection.
Human beings as a species are now advanced enough to rule out natural selection (until a major catalytical event in the future, maybe) and as such don’t follow a “survival of the fittest” rule to existence. However, back in times when we weren’t sufficiently advanced, only the fittest would survive. Those with terminal illness and disadvantaes would die out quickly, whereas those who were born fit and strong would survive to procreate.
Evolution happens when a certain genetic change occurs in a species’ offspring that proves beneficial to its survival. Because this being survives thanks to its new ability, it is able to procreate, and as such that trait is passed down into its offspring. These offspring are superior to the others, and as such eventually become the only ones of their type.
Although, I’m sure you already knew that.
As I said earlier, our species and society is advanced enough to follow a different path other than the survival of the fittest that other species obey.
Also, isn’t saying all us athiests are immoral a little harsh? I always thought my constant charity donations and helping people out if they ever need it was a good angle in life.
Really Abe, accusing others of being evil. How immoral of you.
Also, wasn’t Hitler a Christian?
P.S. Ever jousted before? I could teach you if you want one day.
Praise or Condemn:
5 
0
6:38 pm
Dawkins would be teaching 1st grade biology if it wasn’t for his English accent and ghost-written books. The man is full of lies and simplifications. Christians and scientists alike agree the man is a fraud.
Praise or Condemn:
1 
7
5:43 am
Sorry, Christians might often disagree with Dawkins (I’m personally surprised, as I see Christian belief and Evolution incompatible), but scientists as a whole do not disagree with Dawkins. There might be some disagreement in details, but that’s like saying a Christian believing Adam ate wild apple completely disagrees with a Christian who believes it’s a domestic apple.
Anyway, accusing atheists of being immoral is unjust. I see plenty of people who do good, which do not believe. (I also see many people who do evil in the name of Christianity (Hitler btw being among them. Though it’s hard to prove/disprove whether he actually believed). While I know that calling oneself Christian is easy, but being one is different (Going to church makes you a christian, just like going into the garage makes you a car), the following statistic is interesting:
http://holysmoke.org/icr-pri.htm
USA’s proportion of atheists in prison: 0.21%, proportion of atheists in the population: 8-16%.
I know morality is not always expressed in the laws, but one should find this statistic interesting anyway.
Praise or Condemn:
4 
1
1:41 pm
Hitler was a religous nut. He beleived he was supposed to rule by divine right. He wa no more an atheist than the pope.
Praise or Condemn:
4 
0
6:36 pm
That’s an utter lie. Adolph was a dictator and a vegan. He harassed the Christian church unmercifully and invaded two fantastically Christian countries- Poland and France. Don’t try to sell your guilt trips here, Franco. The comparison to Hitler is insulting.
Praise or Condemn:
0 
5
1:47 pm
People, this is a satire site. Turn your detectors up a bit.
Praise or Condemn:
0 
0
5:19 pm
Yeah, we know. Debating is fun, though.
Praise or Condemn:
0 
0
5:29 pm
Keep it in your trousers, fella.
Praise or Condemn:
0 
0
2:37 pm
The pathetic thing about Sire Richard Dawkins is that many scientists believe he’s a fool and a hack. His crudely written books are made to be Oprah bestsellers, not intellectual discoveries. He’s an opportunist curmudgeon who takes advantages of the weakest minds of our generation, the desperate lonely people who have voided their bowels of Jesus and need some fresh diet of anti-spiritual oat bran to stuff down their craws. His works aren’t up to the task of winning anyone with more than a high school education, however, and the academic community would throw him to the wolves if they cared enough about his feel-good fairy tales of magic booms and fancy apes.
Praise or Condemn:
1 
0
5:00 am
As spoof sites go, this is one of the best.
We all know that most christians become nasty lying little bigots and this ranting mimics their sick language just enough to attract similar responses from some real nutheads. Reel them in.
Praise or Condemn:
0 
0
10:34 am
I must thank ChristWire for telling me about this book. I would have had no idea Richard Dawkins had written another book otherwise. Thanks!
Praise or Condemn:
0 
0
10:43 am
I see he put a picture of the cosmic space butterfly on his little book.
Praise or Condemn:
0 
0
11:01 am
Oh yes, this man lives in such an obscene fantasy world of magic space holes and crafty apes, I doesn’t surprise me he love him some space insects, too. He sounds like a Dungeons & Dragons player. Grow up, Dawky!
Praise or Condemn:
0 
0
10:11 pm
Wow….Stephenson, you claim to be a journalist, but you have little to no facts. you claim people who don’t accept your grade of god, are weak minded? what the fuck is up with that. I am in 8th grade, and I find myself more intelligent, then a bunch of these god loving stingy little racists. I wrote a thesis this year, and im going to continue a 2nd part for this year, called “Religion the Fall of Man.” Listen, I want you go to go back through time, look at the Crusades, what caused the war religion. look at the Renassiance era, they hung people by their neck, if they didn’t beleive in christ. look at now, the arabs and jewish people, they are at each others throat because of religion, mainly the arabs though. Richard Dawkins happens to be a brilliant man, I went to one of his lectures, he had very interesting points, and was indeed very intelligent, when I saw him match intelligence with the protestors outside. I beleive in Richard Dawkins book, the myth of god, because it is a myth. A myth is a folklore or story past down from generations, yes god is widely accepted, my best friends are christians, I don’t hate them for it, nor do I try to change them, but when it gets to a point, when you call people who don’t have the same views as you, and are labeled stupid, ignorant, heathens, doomed…etc etc… That is all i see in this website, a bunch of immature bullshit, that you red necks pull out of your asses, when you see something you dislike.
Praise or Condemn:
0 
0
8:27 am
This coming from someone who can’t spell “Existentialism”! It makes perfect sense that you like Dawkins, you’re a confused kid and that’s the demographic he’s aiming for. Honestly, he has very little credence with the adult community. Even atheist scientists think he’s full of malarkey. Read “The Dawkins Delusion?” or “Darwin’s Angel”.
Or this criticism from Allen Orr in the NY Review of Books:
“Despite my admiration for much of Dawkins’s work, I’m afraid that I’m among those scientists who must part company with him here. Indeed, The God Delusion seems to me badly flawed. Though I once labeled Dawkins a professional atheist, I’m forced, after reading his new book, to conclude he’s actually more an amateur. I don’t pretend to know whether there’s more to the world than meets the eye and, for all I know, Dawkins’s general conclusion is right. But his book makes a far from convincing case.”
http://www.nybooks.com/articles/19775
Praise or Condemn:
0 
0
10:56 pm
In your other posts, you are quite right, science does have some holes in it, but religion has 100s more. Their is only 5-6 or holes (Missing Link Etc, etc) in science and evolution. Buy religion has dozens, dozens more (if god made people who made god, why did a man write the bible, etc etc…). Their is alot more evidence on evolution, then their is on a man who supposedly created man. Yes stephenson yo are right, I am a 14 year old boy, but i like to beleive I am very mature, my parents beleive it as well, so do all my friends, and my teachers.
Praise or Condemn:
0 
0
5:50 am
It’s funny that you guys are always claiming this person or that person is an atheist. Evolution has given us spirituality. Atheism is a very rare condition. Agnosticism is far more common. This anti-Christian movement we’re seeing today is not atheism. These people are blinded — by bitterness — to the natural inclination of humans as spiritual beings. We are naturally moral, in other words, by self conviction and the feeling that there are consequences to all actions. This also illustrates our scientific propensities, that we believe in the scientific fact that for every action there is a reaction. We are both spiritual and scientific beings. You can’t have one without the other, and continually refusing one extreme only causes imbalances in the greater scheme.
Praise or Condemn:
0 
1
6:11 pm
This site HAS to be satire. I was drawn here by your criticism of Stephen Colbert, one of the most brilliant satirists ever. If you really are being satirical then I’d say you’re in a league all your own – brilliant shit man, keep it up! You perfectly capture the inanity of religious zealots and simpletons with reptilian brains the world over. If not, you are one sad individual. Imagine for one minute that THERE IS NO GOD. C’mon, humor me for one minute! If that WERE the case, then EVERYTHING you spout in this site would be…WRONG, wouldn’t it? Scary thought? I can imagine for a minute that the bible is the true word of a divinity that rules us all and in that case I’d concede you are correct, but that just isn’t the case because:
1. Science is provable, religion is not.
2. Dawkins is a brilliant award-winning biologist respected the world around. You are not. Heck, you’re not even a journalist.
3. You say he spouts lies and hate humans (“Dawkins would be teaching 1st grade biology if it wasn’t for his English accent and ghost-written books. The man is full of lies and simplifications. Christians and scientists alike agree the man is a fraud.”) but each of those parenthetical statements is a LIE. Each one is demonstrably false, but your kind isn’t much for facts, are you?
4. This is NOT a christian nation. You simply can’t prove that statement wrong. The founders were mostly deists (known as secular humanists today) and even included a couple atheists (most notably Thomas Paine).
5. We don’t need a god to be moral. That is a fallacy based on fear of death, manipulation by aristocracy (who claim divine right), and a book of fables written by humans to control other humans. God does not exist, Jesus probably didn’t exist and definitely wasn’t divine, and atheists are not hateful. You say yourself how much you hate this or that or these people and those people… and you say your god hates too. Your creator hates his creations?!?!? You really want to live under a hateful god?!?!?
What a sad, sad, little man.
“When fascism comes to America, it will be wrapped in the flag and carrying a cross.” – Sinclair Lewis.
Praise or Condemn:
1 
1
6:34 pm
Listen hear, genius. I’m not the one who wrote this article so what the heck are you prattling on about? You’re confusing me and Abe which shows how advanced your reading skills are.
Praise or Condemn:
0 
0
6:46 pm
I didn’t mention anybody by name. Is there really more than one of you? I though Abe was the subhuman who posts the comments written in 1st grade grammar (my apologies to 1st graders). So you’re saying you agree with me?
Praise or Condemn:
0 
0
10:10 am
Beedum: You don’t mention either of us by name, but you mix up my quotes and Abe’s article and then my article on Colbert and you start calling us out saying “You,” “You,” “You.” Ie. “Heck, you’re not even a journalist.” So clearly you have a very cloudy mind.
And of course I don’t agree with you. It is a well known truth that Dawkins is a charlatan and that even those in the scientist community believe his science is faulty and hollow. See the above books and article I referenced. The man if a buffoon.
Praise or Condemn:
0 
0
10:58 am
Sure you can seek out some christian scientists (an oxymoron if there ever was one) to call Dawkins a hack (pot calling the kettle black, eh?), but the vast majority of the scientific community respects his work on the science of evolution and the PROOF that god does not exist. Denying evolution is like denying gravity – do you also believe the earth is flat?
I challenge you or anyone else here to refute ANY of my 5 statements in the post above without saying “because the bible says it is so.” Can’t, can ya?
Praise or Condemn:
0 
0
6:19 pm
And I love this quote: “…the desperate lonely people who have voided their bowels of Jesus and need some fresh diet of anti-spiritual oat bran to stuff down their craws.” So oat-bran is anti-spiritual and Jesus is the shit we purge from our bodies because we can’t use it? Brilliant!
And what exactly is a “motivational children’s entertainer” anyway? Is that a euphemism for pedophile?
Praise or Condemn:
0 
0
6:46 pm
Actually, I thought that when i first saw it too. I love christian euphimisms.
Don’t you?
Praise or Condemn:
0 
0
10:11 am
Zip it up, fella. We don’t need children exposed to THAT.
Praise or Condemn:
0 
0
10:39 am
Told ya this Billings nutjob is a pedo.
I also love how this site has the same basic template layout as the Suicide Girls porn site. Coincidence?
Praise or Condemn:
0 
0
10:49 am
This is the biggest load of crap I’ve read in ages
Praise or Condemn:
0 
0
9:30 pm
theraptureright.com is another great religion satire site, btw.
Praise or Condemn:
0 
0
8:38 am
Being a human being, and believing in god have nothing in common. An infant does not believe in god, however it is clearly a human being. The same goes for the senile, the handicapped, and the mentally disabled, none believe yet are all humans. To assume you must believe in god to be a decent human being is equally ridiculous as you’d just as quickly condemn someone for believing in a god other than yours to also be an indecent human being.
Clearly you do not understand the process of natural selection, if you would say “Can’t you imagine a group of mean atheists stoning a bundled group of crippled, quacking ducklings or perhaps your sickly grandparents to death?”. Stoning crippled ducklings to death is not natural, therefore it goes without saying that this is not a process of natural selection. However those same crippled ducklings starving because they were unable to navigate their environment and pursue food would be indeed natural selection.
Again you demonstrate your confusion with the process of natural selection you again misquote or in this case completely fabricate a quote of “hitlers” and say that he murdered people in the name of natural selection?
I find your archaic disclaimer to have “women” leave the room to be hilarious. Children, fine whatever it’s no news that you’re hell bent on indoctrinating the children instead of educating them. However why women? Because you still view them as property, and not people.
Praise or Condemn:
0 
0
12:36 pm
http://www.alternet.org/story/142755/right-wing_hatemongering_fueled_by_christianity?page=entire
Praise or Condemn:
0 
0
5:13 pm
You guys are giving Christianity a bad name.
To non-Christian readers: Very few of us are actually like this. I apologize on their behalf.
Though Dawkins is annoying as hell.
Praise or Condemn:
0 
0
6:53 pm
I hope everyone reading these posts understands that this is a troll site made by non-believers and flat out haters who are trying to make conservatives look as bad as possible. They are very narrow minded left wing hacks that are trying to twist conservatism to the way they see it in society. These are ignorant people, and I would discourage anyone from calling these people progressive or liberal. Their is nothing generous or beneficial to what they are doing…they are liars. I would certainly believe these people are secular obsessed cronies, but I really can’t tell. Look at Colbert, he’s catholic(I’m not), and he still spews hate whenever he gets a chance. I’m sure almost no Christians or conservatives would believe this site, but still this is just a warning…DON’T TRUST ANYTHING BASED ON INSTINCT…PLEASE, JUST USE YOUR BRAIN, HEART, AND SOUL!
Praise or Condemn:
0 
0
11:56 pm
I haven’t read Dawkins books, but I have watch/listened to many of his debates with persons who defend religion of one type or another. I find Dawdins to be thoughtful, well spoken, and seemingly well informed.
I really don’t think he has a mean bone in his body, as it were.
I was raised in the Christian faith by well educated well very well intentioned parents. I have come to the personal opinion that evil does not exist without the hearts and minds of a humans to dwell in – plenty evil, but it’s all human. No devil/satan and maybe no God exist.
And so far as Hitler and the Nazis? Hitler was a Catholic, never denied God, but claimed to be doing his work out of his own mouth – look it up. “God Is With Us” was on the belt buckles of his army. He was seen as God’s gift to the German People.
Religion is both dangerous and virtuous – once again, it’s in the minds of those who believe in it.
And so far a “conservatives” go? Read the sermon on the mount. You will find precious little to none of it in modern/current American conservative thought. Feed the poor? Cloth the naked, heal the sick? What a fu**ing joke.
I could go on and on.
Praise or Condemn:
0 
0
7:08 am
Hitler was a Catholic!!!
Like you, he believed in an imaginary friend who created him.
also, if you think atheist are the root of evil, then explain the crusades, the witch hunts and the inquisition. Thousands of people dies in the name of god.
you make me lol.
http://www.skeptically.org/againstreligion/id13.html
Praise or Condemn:
0 
0
4:56 pm
Abe?
Hey, I just wanted to let you know that someone on YouTube stole a lot from your article and put it in a video.
His/her name is katdanmo2 and the video URL is http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BhWvphVZDCU.
You were not cited, so I just figured you would want to know that someone is stealing your work and taking credit for it.
God bless!
Praise or Condemn:
0 
0
11:29 am
Anyway place is full of dawkins cocksuckers, get a life people
Praise or Condemn:
0 
0