Email
Tumblr
Digg
Youtube
America Sends 30,000 More Troops to Afghanistan, Worthless NATO Only Pledges 5,000
Twitter
Facebook
Delicious
Digg
Stumble
Reddit
Once again the Europeans have shown their lack of resolve in the War Against Terror, this time as they have pledged only 5,000 additional troops to help hunt down Osama Bin Laden in Afghanistan.
A U.S. Army cadet reads a book entitled “Kill Bin Laden” as he waits with other cadets for U.S. President Barack Obama to deliver an address on U.S. policy and the war in Afghanistan at the U.S. Military Academy in West Point, New York December 1, 2009. Obama is expected to announce a plan to send 30,000 more U.S. troops to Afghanistan over six months in a bid to beat back the Taliban and bring a quicker end to a costly and unpopular eight-year war.REUTERS/Shannon Stapleton (UNITED STATES POLITICS CONFLICT)
This sickening announcement came upon the heels of America announcing it would send an additional 30,000 highly trained troops who have been highly trained on how to kill Osama Bin Laden, as seen in the image of a fresh American cadet to the right.
US intelligence reports indicate that since former United States President George W. Bush left office, terrorists have been approximately 87% more emboldened (.3-.5% deviation).
These numbers increase in Afghanistan, where the Taliban continues to build activity and numbers in the mountainous Tora Bora region.
The more terrorists are allowed to build numbers, the more unsafe we will be here as there will be more of them to plot ways to infiltrate our Christian nation of peace. That is why this surge is crucial to the safety of all civilized nations. It is a travesty that the Europeans are not sending an equal amount of qualified soldiers to help kill terrorists.
At the NATO summit in Brussels, Anders Rasmussen for some reason took all this lightly and seemed proud of Europe’s insignificant contribution of relatively worthless soldiers: “At least 25 counties will send more forces to the mission in 2010.”
To add insult to injury, of those 25 countries, France and Germany still refuse to send more soldiers to Afghanistan as America has now twice ordered them to do.
[CaRP] XML error: Invalid document end at line 33 -
12:38 pm
Sometimes I wonder if it would have been better for us to nuke Paris and Berlin. Anymore the Japanese are more useful allies than the Euros.
Praise or Condemn:
0 
2
12:52 pm
Gee, that sure sounds like something Shat would say… *coughippocritecough* Oh, excuse me. I seem to be coming down with something…
Praise or Condemn:
0 
1
12:57 pm
I’m not sure if you understand or not, but the Taliban increases regional instability which creates a perfect environment for terror cells to flourish. When that happens, America and her allies incur a greater risk of suffering from yet another terror attack. If it takes giving incentive to our allies to do things our way, so be it.
Praise or Condemn:
0 
0
1:05 pm
Yes, because nuking cities to scare their countries into doing what we want them to do is the solution to world peace. Of course, it’s so simple! Why didn’t anyone ever think of that before? *coughdipshitcough* Excuse me, this cough is getting worse…
Praise or Condemn:
2 
1
1:09 pm
It’s unfortunate but at times we do have to use arms. Japan was a hardened enemy who attacked America for no reason. Now, Japan follows America in many cultural and economic matters.
Praise or Condemn:
0 
0
1:16 pm
I’m not talking about Japan. I’m talking about your statement that we should have nuked Paris and Berlin so that they would be better allies to us.
Praise or Condemn:
0 
0
1:46 pm
How did we end our war with Japan and make them agree to sign a treaty where they followed our orders to never have a standing army again and follow our lead?
Then also consider the implications of M.A.D. and how it has promoted peace in a modern world. Once we’re able to fully end nuclear proliferation and go back to the status of being the only nation with such abilities, M.A.D. will be strengthened even more.
Praise or Condemn:
0 
0
2:08 pm
since when is the US in war with france or germany? thats the big difrence. yes the nukes against japan stopped the war and you could argue they were nececary. but if you fired a nuke anywhere near france or germany it would be a declaration of war and amercia would be the target of NATO’s forces
and no single nation should have that power. USA is NOT the supreme ruler of the world. for taht exact reason. if USA was the only nation with nuclear wepons WTF are we suposed to do if USA is sudenly the enemy(which i’ll remind you you guys seems to wanna be)
Praise or Condemn:
1 
0
1:25 pm
It’s completely THEIR decision to not send troops. The war in terror is AMERICA’s war, not theirs. I appreciate that they send support and troops for us, but if they don’t want to, they have every right to refuse.
Praise or Condemn:
2 
0
1:35 pm
Well, try to compare the vastness of US army to smaller countries ones. Italy just decided to send 1000 more men to Afghanistan. Alright, we already have 2500 men down there, which makes 3500 men in Afghanistan. We have 2500 in Lebanon, 1800 in Kosovo and some other troops are scattered around the world. Now, if you consider that OUR army is composed by no more than 250.000 units, well, there’s a huge difference. You have the biggest army in the world, because you have more than 200 millions of inhabitants and you can afford to have such a huge army! Other countries don’t have such a great source of troops like you.
And Adam, try to say another thing related to nuking Berlin, Paris or whatever other european capital and I swear you’re a dead man!
Praise or Condemn:
1 
1
1:43 pm
I can understand them not wanting to risk the lives of their sons and daughters, it’s the decision every American parent must face too. But the fact of the matter is that if we do not attack them now, they will simply build up and cause massive for our children, and their children, in years to come. We need to fix this NOW.
It’s the tough choice our generation must make. As of now, the allied nations are not at war with one another. We have the means to organize and take care of the terror regions of the war. Why not swoop in with unprecedented force and take care of these rotten sects that have threatened our governments and murdered our people?
And we do get say in where our allies send troops and how many they should send. It is America’s intervention in WW2 that led to the creation of The UN. It is America that brings the muscle and support to the UN and NATO. Europe owes us and beyond that, their nation’s and security are in just as much jeopardy as ours the longer we let these terrorists in Afghanistan go without death at the hands of our troops.
Praise or Condemn:
0 
3
2:21 pm
your intervention saved us? well gee thanks for comeing to our aid when YOU NEEDED ALLIES. the US didn’t join WW2 before 1943 4 years after the start. in those years the allied nations had repeatedly asked for help getting told it wasn’t the US problem. then the japanese attacks and oh sudenly you are all in for an alliance. USA have no rule in europe. you are ALLIES. NOT rulers. yes you have the right to ask for aditional trops but if europe for whatever reason isn’t willing to provide those trops they ahve the right to.
also there’s the big difrence in asking for help repeling an enemy and in asking for help attacking an enemy
and the fact stated over and over again that math don’t just work that way. you have to take into acount how many soldiers NATO actually have ready compared to how many the US have
Praise or Condemn:
2 
0
2:52 pm
The entire CONTINENT of Europe cannot send more than 5,000 troops? Also, don’t forget how the US gave Europe the means for arms and rebuilding their economy after the war.
Praise or Condemn:
0 
3
2:58 pm
Not every nation agreed with this war. And again, consider the vastness of the US Army and all the other armies in Europe. There is a huge difference in the proportion, as I explained just an hour ago or so.
Praise or Condemn:
1 
0
3:05 pm
Who says they won’t be sending more later?
Praise or Condemn:
0 
0
3:13 pm
actually if the idiots read theire own damn post OR the link they provide they’d see that they DO intend to send more
Praise or Condemn:
0 
0
3:17 pm
At the NATO summit in Brussels, Anders Rasmussen for some reason took all this lightly and seemed proud of Europe’s insignificant contribution of relatively worthless soldiers: “At least 25 counties will send more forces to the mission in 2010.”
Lol! Your right, in his own posting it says they intend to send more.
Praise or Condemn:
0 
0
3:56 pm
worthless poor trained soldier …. you said that to european countries who are WILLING TO HELP AMERICA WITH THIS WARS
if it’s was of me after this Insult I would have withdrawn the soldier of america allies and lets them go to waste in this fucking desert called afghanistan
Oh and By the way In canada we withdrea our troops in 2010 because we lack the ressource for that but you surely didnt know that to send soldier and upkeep them cost money
Praise or Condemn:
0 
0
2:29 pm
“who have been highly trained on how to kill Osama Bin Laden”
yes because special traning is needed for killing him. i mean you can’t just fire a gun at him right?
“US intelligence reports indicate that since former United States President George W. Bush left office, terrorists have been approximately 87% more emboldened ”
and i have reports that since most perople turn from christianity the world has been a aproxmatily 99.9% better place to live(or in plain english: thats not how numbers work)
“Europe’s insignificant contribution of relatively worthless soldiers”
dude it’s only 6 times more you sent. if our contribution is incignificant your’s can’t posibly be that great either….also calling them worthless just because they didn’t have the special”how to kill binladen”-traning is uncalled for
“To add insult to injury, of those 25 countries, France and Germany still refuse to send more soldiers to Afghanistan as America has now twice ordered them to do.”
you do not have the power to order them to do anything
Praise or Condemn:
1 
0
10:49 pm
Uhm, you are malinformed Chuck. Osama Bin Laden, if he is still alive is in Pakistan.
Praise or Condemn:
0 
0
9:33 pm
53.4% of uncited statics are made up
Praise or Condemn:
0 
0
9:14 pm
Thanks for forgetting Canada for the THOUSANDTH time. We are in the most dangerous part of Afghanistan (Khandahar for those of you not aware of our involvement can google it) and for Christ’s sake nuclear weapons are not the path to fixing all this. Making a solid effort to understand the people your trying to “help” is the only way we’re ever going to win a war against an insurgency. The fact that ALL nations involved in Afghanistan have a set withdrawl date of 2011 means we have already lost. Would you give up fighting a foreign power which is trying to impose its values, beliefs and form of government on you if they have already publicly stated “this is when were giving up”?
By the way; nuke Paris (that’s in France) or Berlin (that’s in Germany)? France = Nuclear Nation, Germany = Nuclear Nation you would end the entire world duh.
Praise or Condemn:
0 
0
11:39 pm
actually canadian troops are not anymore in kandahar they are in a more dangerous place ( I forgot which one ) since kandahar is Now securised By CANADIAN TROOP and now American take the relay
Praise or Condemn:
0 
0
4:25 pm
The reason the euros aren’t sending many people is that they don’t care about their Escalades and they weren’t the ones who had a major landmark blown up by terrorists. Also, we’re a lot more trigger-happy.
Praise or Condemn:
1 
0
4:24 am
It is so incredibly obvious that this site is an atheist ploy using reverse psychology to inaccurately portray Christian teachings. To those at ChristWire.org, you’re unbelievably juvenile in your actions. If the claims of atheism are legitimate and logical, you should be able to forwardly express your views without attempting to deceive people. It’s not satire. Look at comments from readers; this site is meant purely to deceive.
Praise or Condemn:
1 
0
2:28 pm
I don’t think they are atheist atheist are more Intelligent then them and since I’m atheist myself I’m shocked by those article and most of people here are as well atheist and shocked by those article
as what yous ee they are called fundamentalist
Praise or Condemn:
0 
1
2:04 pm
Heres a thought, as an american, I say the USA should pull all troops, from everywhere in the world. Use that money to build a Great wall along the US/Mexican border and the US/Canadian border, laced with claymore mines. And tell the world to go to hell, and let the world deal with the terroists.
Praise or Condemn:
1 
0
2:30 pm
sur build a Great wall and don’t forget to clsoe airport and Port as well and close every trade route outside your country as well
don’t worry about the terrorist I’m pretty Much sure the world we live betetr without you
Praise or Condemn:
0 
0
2:56 pm
Don’t want to upset you Christwire wankers, but British soldiers recieve better training, like it or not, than troops from the USA, as do Germany, not sure on France.
American troops are a group of Jackasses who cause more friendly fire than any other nation, all they have going for their military as far as skilled goes is the navy SEALS, and Delta.
Don’t want to upset you, but the fact is the British SAS, have, well: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/onthefrontline/2652496/SAS-kill-hundreds-of-terrorists-in-secret-war-against-al-Qaeda-in-Iraq.html
That’s an impressive fucking number for a small military unit with next to no casualtys don’t you think?
Doesn’t matter though, because our troops are cross trained with yours, meaning that they pretty much all have similair training, only most of the American soldiers can’t aim a fucking scoped and lasered AR-12 and hit a truck once with a single round.
SAS are also cross trained with Delta and the SEALS, but each unit does have its one specialty, SAS are elite paratroopers and stealth operatives.
SEALS, amphibious warfare, and Delta are more of outright land battles.
Praise or Condemn:
1 
0