Democrats Develop Pornographic Airport Security Scanners
As they scramble to make themselves not look bad after a near-terrorist attack, House and Senate democrats have ordered the deployment of a new airport scanning technology.
The technology is allegedly developed to give airport security personnel the ability to more clearly see the secret-parts of an individual, so that he or she may not hide new terrorist underwear bombs in that region.
After taking time to do personal investigation of this technology at LaGuardia Airport, I can truly say I’ve never been so humiliated in my entire life. It is sick.
The technology represents a way for cheap security to get their thrills by just taking a peek at our thingies! What if the airport security is a gay, just getting a good long look at where his eyes don’t belong?
I find this technology very intrusive. And since democrats don’t believe in profiling or doing pre-investigation such as wiretapping and internment camp on suspicious Muslims and their friends, ridiculous. Just because they allowed a terrorist into our country due to weak Obama policy and groveling, gives them NO RIGHT to scan our bodies in such a way.
Some liberals out there will try to say I’m exaggerating and there is no way that much of our bodies can be seen. There is no way they can tell such lies after the following documented photographic evidence and nationwide investigation down this morning.Warning: The following image media contains offensive illustrative material. Please immediately have any women/children leave the room before reviewing.

- Excited
- Fascinated
- Amused
- Bored
- Sad
- Angry





to bad you don’t get to make this argument huh dan?
you can’t complain that airport security isn’t good enough and then also complain that the improved security is degrading and takeing away your rights. you were the one asking for this messure now live with the consequences. or maybe you only wanted increased security for foreigners? yeah thats called racesim.
obama did what you asked him to do and now he’s once again takeing your rights away from you? is there any way you could posibly be pleased?
Praise or Condemn:
4
1
This is an outage! The Constitution forbids Americans to be treated like this.
Praise or Condemn:
1
5
if increasing the security is such a big problem how the hell is it exactly you want the goverment to be able to do anything against terrorists? they can’t really do shit unless they can find them.
Praise or Condemn:
4
0
How do you think this will really help us with protecting ourselves from any attack. If they really wish you harm they’ll find other ways to do it and go about it. This is just another type of arms race and they will find a way around this to. You’d give up your privacy for this to feel safe until they find a way around this to. Those who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety.
Praise or Condemn:
0
0
i didn’t ask for it to begin with. i actually blive that terrorism should be fought in an entirly difrent ways. my problem is that they are complaning that security isn’t good enough and when they then get improved security complain it’s takeing away theire rights. you can’t just jump from one standpoint to another depending on what suits you best in the moment.
i agree that this machine may be a bit to far. i just don’t belive people like dan are alowed to complain about it.
Praise or Condemn:
0
0
If security is THE issue then why isn’t the government placing these scanners at sport stadiums, malls, train terminals?……The almighty govt has done such a great job on security since 9-11 that this seems pointless…..and how about the radiation issue?….personally, any amount of radiation is too much for me. The TSA website uses these cute little pictures to demonstrate the safety of these devices. But are we simply supposed to accept this as truth simply because they claim it to be?….Do you think for a moment that the TSA is going to make any claims stating that these full body scanners are bad for?….not a chance. Knowledge is very important when it comes to these issues. Please visit this site and others http://www.drweil.com/drw/u/id/QAA349106
Praise or Condemn:
0
0
I believe that this technology was first developed before Obama took office. I recall first hearing about it last year.
Praise or Condemn:
4
0
So why didn’t you warn everyone about it then? I’m really appalled if you actually had heard about this since last year and didn’t even alert the government.
Praise or Condemn:
0
2
they were most likely aware you dipshit. just because you don’t listen to the news doesn’t mean the info isn’t available. also didn’t you blame the goverment right up till the point you realised the ones behind it would have been bush and his people?
Praise or Condemn:
2
0
It was on news websites, dipshit. The government was well aware of it, and I’m sure that they had a hand in developing it.
Praise or Condemn:
2
0
You are correct….way before Obama.
Visit http://www.drweil.com/drw/u/id/QAA349106
Praise or Condemn:
0
0
Democrats try to say we don’t need Gitmo. If this Arab lowlife was thrown in there where he belonged, none of this would have happened. Now we see why we need profiling.
These people do not deserve Constitutional rights because they are not American. They do not respect our lofty academia and Obama’s elite, naive words. They only know war and death, so we must realize one thing. This is a war and they need to be tied up.
Praise or Condemn:
0
1
so if a you belong to a group of people that is know for terrorism we need to lock them up? fine haul together the christians they are historys most prominetly know terrorists.
on what basis would you have caught a terrorist before the terror attack without the technology to find a terrorist? truth is a withe person is actually just as likely to be a terrorist as a brown or black therefor there’s no way to judge. maybe they don’t have constitutinal rights but what you deny them is human rights. of and since you don’t respect theire laws why the fuck should they respect your’s . respect is earned and a good way to start is by giveing respect back. you have no claim on any kind of respect. actually people like you needs to be disrespected.
Praise or Condemn:
0
0
Wow. WRONG! First, the airport scanners were already “pornographic.” Second, they have scanners that DON’T show people’s privates in development, and they’re KIND OF EXPENSIVE. Not the perfect time to buy one if the world is in the middle of a recession. Third, You are a hypocrite. Last, just because someone is middle eastern, it doesn’t mean that they want to destroy America because the voices told them to. It probably means that they are SICK OF SECURITY CHECKPOINTS. I wouldn’t know, though, so I might be wrong. Go ask someone.
Praise or Condemn:
0
0
Please, for the love of Christ, give me whatever the fuck it is you’re smoking. Because it’s got to be some seriously high-grade shit to make you trip-shit this hard. I pray you’re just some trolling idiot who wants a cheap laugh, because if you’re being serious, I’ve just lost all faith in humanity.
Btw, since you seem to love the Bible, pull your head out of your ass, read Leviticus and then rethink your views.
I hope God bitch slaps you and sends you to Hell for even typing this article.
Praise or Condemn:
1
0
I feel sad that you would judge a child of God. To curse and damn is the surest way to Hell. If one must kill he should do so with tears in his eyes.
Praise or Condemn:
0
0
isn’t telling people they will go to hell for theire actions cursing and amning(at least one of them)? so you basicly admit that you all going to hell…great now we seetled that.
Praise or Condemn:
0
0
Dan,
You must be insane. The scanners are about security. I do not like the whittling away of our rights either, but I do want to be safe.
If you feel so very “humiliated”, it is not because of someone getting a cheap thrill, but your own deep seated emotional problems, insecurities and ignorance. The technology is not sick, nor the use of it… only you, my friend, are sick. If you say that your modesty has been imposed upon, fine, that makes sense and is understandable…. yet,it is regretably necessary to “try” to provide safety for air travelers. And I for one care about MY (and loved ones) safety more than YOUR modesty issues. However, your feeling humiliated is a much deeper problem better handled by psychological counseling.
On the note of cheap thrills, why… oh why the hell would cheap thrills be the point of security personnel? Being in the medical field.. I can assure you that seeing so many out of shape, over weight Americans is more likely to make one celibate ! ~ AND … What in the World does being gay have to do with anything ?????? (Dan said,”What if the airport security is a gay, just getting a good long look at where his eyes don’t belong?”) you think that a straight person would not peek ?????? … As if there is a hoard of gay people stampeding for the job of AIRPORT SECURITY PEEPER ~ BECAUSE ABUSE WOULD BE OK IF YOU’RE STRAIGHT ~~~~~~~ HA HA HA HA HA !!! Dan, your stupidity amazes me, and it is likely that it is your ignorant misuse of the brains that God gave us that disturbs God the most ! OH MY ! and your language !…. “secret parts” and “thingies” What? Are you 5? If you are going to have an adult conversation, speak like one ! ….
Your picture looks nice, you are probably an ok guy… I know the family name (but hope you are not related !) … seriously, get an education. If you want to do service to God, learn what His Word actually says and means. And, teasing aside, wise up on the true state of affairs with security, politics, sexual orientation … and… your own state of well being. If that picture is you, you are kind of good looking… if you didn’t come across as such an ignorant twit, I would drive upstate and have a cup of coffee with you !
Happy New Year to all…. wishes for peace and wellbeing .
Praise or Condemn:
0
0
Being safe is a cheap illusion. Chasing after that will only loose your freedom. It doesn’t matter what you do as there is always a way to be attacked. Airplanes are just a hot point right now but if there is trillions of dollars and freedoms spent in securing them; what good does that do when the weapon of choice is changed?
Praise or Condemn:
1
0
I’m saddened that I wholeheartedly agree with this. There is no amount of outrage too great for this kind of loss of personal dignity. If airlines are this much of a hazard then we need to start phasing them out and return to boats and trains for our main form of transportation. I’d rather take two days to get somewhere happily then two hours miserably.
Praise or Condemn:
1
0
Weirdo,
I said I do not like the loss of our rights !
And, I made reference to merely “try”ing to provide safety.
And, your own comment about the “weapon of choice” being “changed”
completely negates the concept of phasing out airplanes and going
back to boats and trains… as they would become the next targets.
I am STRONGLY against our giving up of rights and freedoms, however,
your rationale simply makes no sense.
Besides, I was retorting more-so on the ignorance of the original
poster, and the inclusion of totally irrelevant concepts such as the
sexual orientation of the security personnel having anything to do with…
well… anything !
Don’t fall into the same quagmire of ignorance and stupidity.
Praise or Condemn:
0
0
because you can’t blow up a bomb on a boat or a train right dumbass?
Praise or Condemn:
0
0
At first glance, I thought Jazze had it all “bass ackwards”…. but, he got it !
He understood what I referred to in response to “Weirdo” and the fact that if we give up flying… “they” will just go after the boats and trains….
And…. While his response to Adam may not be the most eloquent… He DOES get the idea that these machines are supposed to assist in catching the terrorists IN ORDER to apprehend and detain them !
By the way, Adam ~ we are already allowed to arrest and detain suspected terrorists ! And I will repeat (for those who cannot grasp the simple concept) As “Jazze” said also… THAT IS WHAT THESE MACHINES ARE FOR ! They are intended to assist in catching these terrorists so that we can CONTINUE to fly more safely WITHOUT having to “boycott” !
and NO ! I DO NOOOTTT !!! LIKE giving up my rights…. but… it is important to be safe ! It is indeed a fine line ! Well, consider those who have given their time and efforts, and even their LIVES to go and fight for our freedom ! … The gave up EVERYTHING and some of you are not willing to give up a little “MODESTY” for freedom ??? …. do you think there is much modesty when a guys body is half blown apart and his buddy has to pick up his dismembered parts and help him to an aid station ?????
Dan, Weirdo & Adam, catching these terrorists is more important that your psychological weaknesses and embarrassment of your body… and thus your overwhelming need for modesty ! ~ I say: Use the machines… catch the idiots… and go on living as free as we possibly can IN SPITE of those that wish our destruction ! …. and prosecute them to the full extent of the law as terrorist/war criminals
Praise or Condemn:
0
0
We should boycott flying until these silly machines are taken out and we’re allowed to arrest and detain potential terrorists at well as Bush suggested in the first place.
Praise or Condemn:
0
0
Boycott away. There are several other transportation options: no one is forcing you to fly whenever you travel. I’m sure the airlines will survive without carting your ass around.
Praise or Condemn:
0
0
hello stupid? these machines are made so they can arrest potential terrorists. how the fuck would you arrest terrorists if you have no idea ho is a terrorist. what should we simply arrest anyone who wanna use an airplane they are all potentialy terrorists.
Praise or Condemn:
0
0
~ see my reply just above ~
Praise or Condemn:
0
0
I love the way you treat your women so condescendingly. “Ask women and children to leave the room”. When are you, exactly? 1850s?
Liberal euro here, having a laugh at this site.
Praise or Condemn:
0
0
i just found something hilariously ironic
http://christwire.org/2009/05/traitor-democrats-accuse-airports-of-pornography/
yes this is a post from your own site where you acuse democrats of haveing the wrong priorities for saying what you have said in this article….wow just …wow
Praise or Condemn:
0
0