Obama Seeks to Legalize the 30 Most Disgusting Things Imaginable
From feces fantasies to socks sex, our Kenyan-born president is about to embark on one of the greatest challenges to decency in modern history. At risk are our nation’s economy and the souls of our beautiful children. Yet these things matter little for the liberals of this once fantastic country. No, they are more concerned with the narcotic thrills of nasty sex acts, acts that will astonish and sicken you. They may even make you cry! But brush those hot tears of shame away and pick up the phone! There is still time to call your Congressman and demand that he stop this evil in its path! Tell him to vote “No” on the Pedophile Fetishists Celebration Law, also known as the “Employment Non-Discrimination Act.”
The Employment Non-Discrimination Act (or ENDA) “would prohibit discrimination against employees on the basis of sexual orientation or gender identity for civilian nonreligious employers with over 15 employees.” In essence, it would force all sorts of employers to recognize and celebrate the grotesque horny desires lurking behind every worker. Churches would be forced to hire pedophiles, hospitals would mandated to employ amputee-fetishists, employees could saunter around their offices with feces smeared from ear to ear because, hey it’s my dream and protected under Obama’s law!
This wretched piece of legislation has been introduced to almost every Congress since the wild years of the 1990s and it has been voted down each time. Radical activists have used words like “employment” and “discrimination” to trick the public into thinking this is something good for normal people. Yes, the democrats have once again dug deep into their grimy bag of internet keywords to come up with this one. With the economy in an unmitigated free fall, do we really have the money to waste time on radical liberal ideas like “discrimination”?
Fortunately one man has decided to get verbal about sex in America. Of course I’m talking about handsome Lou Sheldon, that silver daddy of anti-homosexual Christian activism that many of us look up to in utter submission to his bulging fortitude. CEO of the Traditional Values Coalition, Reverend Lou knows a thing or two about the most depraved sexual positions in our country today. Formerly Jewish, Lou has been married since the 1950s and is the father of four children. His delightful daughter Andre Lafferty stands by her man today as co-director of the Traditional Values Coalition. And if I may just return to Lou for a moment, let me tell you how hard like a fighter he is after all these years. If you want to find articles connecting homosexuality with pedophilia, Lou’s your man! If you want to learn more about homosexual recruitment in our public schools, Lou’s got the list! If you want an exorcist to scare the gay away, Lou has his vial of holy water ready! So, without further ado, here is Lou Sheldon’s deeply researched list of the immoral things Mr. Obama wants America to legalize so that the end times may arrive. He calls it the “Dirty 30.”
Reverend Lou’s “Dirty 30”:
Things Obama Wants You To Accept Into Your Personal Life
1. Apotemnophilia – sexual arousal associated with the stump(s) of a helpless amputee
2. Asphyxophilia – sexual gratification derived from activities that involve oxygen deprivation through hanging, strangulation, or other means
3. Autogynephilia – the sexual arousal of a man by his own perception of himself as a woman or dressed as a woman
4. Catheterophilia – sexual arousal by insertion of a cold catheter
5. Coprophilia – sexual arousal associated with feces (human waste)
6. Exhibitionism – the act of exposing one’s genitals to an unwilling observer to obtain sexual gratification (often done on public transportation)
7. Fetishism/Sexual Fetishism – obtaining sexual excitement primarily or exclusively from an inanimate object or a particular part of the body (DSM Code 302.81)
8. Fritters – approaching an unknown woman from the rear and pressing or rubbing the erected penis against her buttocks (DSM Code 302.89)
9. Hypephilia – a sexual attraction to fabrics (or fashion)
10. Hebephilia – sex with pubescent children
11. Gender Identity Disorder – a strong and persistent cross-gender identification, which is the desire to be, or the insistence that one is, or the other sex, “along with“ persistent discomfort about one’s assigned sex or a sense of the inappropriateness in the gender role of that sex
12. Gerontosexuality – distinct preference for sexual relationships primarily or exclusively with an angry elderly partner
13. Incest – sex with a sibling or parent
14. Kleptophilia – obtaining sexual excitement from stealing
15. Klismaphilia – erotic pleasure derived from enemas
16. Necrophilia – sexual arousal and/or activity with a corpse
17. Partialism – A fetish in which a person is sexually attracted to a specific body part exclusive of the person
18. Pedophilia – Sexual activity with a prepubescent child (DSM Code 302.2)
19. Prostitution – the art of offering sexual stimulation or intercourse for money
20. Sexual Masochism – obtaining sexual gratification by being subjected to pain or humiliation (DSM Code 302.83)
21. Sexual Sadism – the intentional infliction of pain or humiliation on another person in order to achieve sexual excitement (DSM Code 302.82)
22. Telephone Scatalogia – sexual arousal associated with making or receiving phone calls
23. Toucherism – characterized by a strong desire to touch the breast or genitals of an unknown woman without her consent; often occurs in conjunction with other paraphilia
24. Transgenderism – an umbrella term referring to and/or covering transvestitism, drag queen/king, and transsexualism
25. Transsexual – a person whose gender identity is different from his or her anatomical gender
26. Transvestite – a person who is sexually stimulated or gratified by wearing the clothes of the other gender
27. Transvestic Fetishism – intense sexually arousing fantasies, sexual urges, or behaviors involving cross-dressing (DSM Code 302.3)
28. Urophilia – sexual arousal associated with urine
29. Voyeurism – obtaining sexual arousal by observing people without their consent when they are undressed or engaged in sexual activity (DSM Code 302.82)
30. Zoophilia/Bestiality – engaging in sexual activity with animals without their consent
http://www.traditionalvalues.org/read/3888/enda-would-normalize-the-dirty-30/
- Sinful
- Suspicious
- Scared
- Sad
- Amused
- Laughing Out Loud
Author: Stephenson Billings
Stephenson Billings is an Investigative Journalist, Motivational Children's Party Entertainer and Antique Soda Bottle Collector all in one special, blessed package! Facebook me here or Fanmail me: StephensonBillings@yahoo.com !
11:35 am
First of all, A lot of these things have been legal for a long time like transseexuals, There is no law that says you can’t get a sex change. There is also no law that says you can’t cross dress
Second of all, I highly dought that Obama is going to make it legal to have sex with a corps, a family member even though it’s been legal in some southern state for hundreds of years, and I highly dought he will make sexual assault legal either.
Well-loved. Like or Dislike:
31 
3
11:38 am
Research things before you write about them!
Hot debate. What do you think?
28 
8
9:07 am
My poor little child, you don’t have the tiniest grasp of what journalism is, do you? This article is very well researched and there are these little things embedded in the piece called “hot links”! Just click on the red bits, go on try it!
Hot debate. What do you think?
4 
27
7:54 pm
1. I’m not a child!
2. Sorry I don’t belive everything I read on the internet because it’s full of nutjobs like you!
Praise or Condemn:
16 
8
4:15 am
Hmm, I have clicked those hot links that are spread throughout your article, and I still have yet to see anything that says this bill is promoting any sort of paraphilia. What I DO see is someone’s attempt to spread lies by picking out 30 paraphilias that sound the most disturbing to them, and saying that a bill they don’t agree with is promoting them. Thusly, the uninformed and ignorant will call congress and put an end to the bill. All this purely because of one person’s personal bias against those that think differently than they do.
Does that sum it up, or did I miss something?
Praise or Condemn:
17 
4
8:54 am
Dear friend, I am impressed with your passion but am concerned that maybe you’re not old enough to be surfing a website for parents. Please be careful online! I am very concerned about children and think as adults, my generation has a responsibility to keep you safe. That said, your comment was rather silly, don’t you think? I know you might not have a lot of experience reading adult newspapers and all, but clearly the information I was referencing is right there on Lou Sheldon’s website. The content is labelled the “Dirty 30″ and it’s an awful thing, it really is.
That you kids keep saying that I’ve “made this stuff up” is starting to annoy me. Please refer to this:
“What you may not know is that ENDA normalizes and provides special federal protection for 30+ bizarre sexual orientations listed by the American Psychiatric Association – the so-called “Dirty 30.” These 30+ fetishes include behaviors that are felonies or misdemeanors in most states.” — Reverend Lou Sheldon.
Praise or Condemn:
4 
14
5:44 pm
so i’m a teenager and i have surfed more websites than my parents ever have and i’m completely normal in every way, with porn as my witness.
Praise or Condemn:
9 
8
5:47 pm
Matt, I really think you shouldn’t go on the computer when your mother’s not in the room.
Praise or Condemn:
4 
15
10:33 pm
Let’s not turn this into a fight. Trying to insult one another isn’t going to do anyone any good and it only serves negative purposes.
No I am not underage, and while yes, you may have a few years on me, I am more than capable to actually read the bill in question, and not rely on one person’s opinion of said bill to draw facts from. I prefer to look at the actual bill, see what it is about, THEN draw conclusions from it.
If you cannot draw conclusions directly from the source, it also helps to have more than one source to back up your opinion. If you could cite exactly where in this bill that this “dirty 30″ is being protected by it, then please do show me and I will apologize in full.
On a side note, when I mention having secondary sources, I do not mean random Joe’s blog, or sites like Media Matters, who have a long history of spin-doctoring and manufacturing their articles in order to get more readers. Having blogs as references can be canceled out by simply posting blogs with an equally opposite opinion put down in them. And I already counteracted Media Matters by actually linking you to a government funded site that has the bill in question on file. The whole bill.
(And if these are simply restated opinions of this “Sheldon” individual, you need to be prepared to take the flak from his critics if you are going to attempt to back him up without knowing how to answer some of the questions presented to you)
So finally, let us have an actual discussion about this, and not try and insult each others intelligence. This means bringing facts to the table, and seeing what can be proven and/or backed up with evidence collected by each contributor.
Praise or Condemn:
4 
7
10:47 pm
Reverend Lou Sheldon is a highly respected American intellectual, who is not only a preacher but the founder of the Traditional Values Coalition. He is absolutely unimpeachable and honestly I need no other source than him.
Praise or Condemn:
5 
11
11:16 pm
Thank you for further proving my point.
“Reverend Lou Sheldon is a highly respected American intellectual”
As true as this may or may not be, even the most respected person on the planet can make up facts in order to further their own ideals. From what you have shown of this person, he is not only not deserving of the respect you speak of, but would need to re-attend school to learn about logical thinking (maybe a college Journalism course). I would recommend you attending a similar course. If only to re-learn how to cite your sources when you are trying to make a point. I am not trying to be insulting, just some friendly advice to make both of your articles articles more credible.
Anything said or written down can be written off as a blind opinion without sources to reinforce what is written. I am only trying to help.
(By the way, with all the reports of pedophiles being ordained as ministers and preachers then committing unspeakable acts with the children of their respectable churches, I think that would sufficiently negate the fact that any preacher is “absolutely unimpeachable”. If pedophiles can be ordained as preachers, why not liars, crooks, or worse?)
Praise or Condemn:
9 
4
8:35 am
I am a fully credentialed Investigative Journalist and you are a pervert.
Praise or Condemn:
5 
11
11:23 pm
Okay, now I am curious. What could possibly lead you to the conclusion that I am a pervert?
Praise or Condemn:
5 
7
11:53 pm
From what I can tell, it would seem that YOU would be the pervert. If you look up the definition, I think many would agree.
Definition 1: to lead into mental error or false judgment.
You post articles like this one that shows many disagreeable paraphilias and just hop on board with some random preacher that says that Obama is going to legalize these things and that we should call congress and stop this bill that has nothing to do with what this preacher says it does. Then you present an article with zero credible evidence to back up his or your claims. Lets check your sources…
First is a link to an article about how Hawaii wouldn’t release his PERSONAL information regarding where he was born. Hmm, I personally wouldn’t want all of my personal information to become public. Especially if I were to become president. A president-to-be would probably not want every single record of his to become public, because then not only will he be vulnerable, but also his family. I don’t see how that has anything to do with your assumption that he is “Kenyan-born”.
Next hot link is to the Wiki page of the bill. Where I have yet to see where Obama is seeking to legalize these paraphilias and force churches to hire pedophiles (frankly, it would appear that they don’t have to. Churches seem to be ordaining them as priests all on their own).
Next link: The Traditional Values Coalition’s website portraying the same baseless lies that I am calling you out on.
I can go through and point out how none of the links you provided have any credible information that back up your claims. In fact the ones that DO have credible information on them actually prove your claims to be FALSE.
So everyone who is reading this… Who sounds like they are perverting the English language to further their own baseless beliefs. Going as far as to deny equal rights for specific groups of people just because they don’t think like he does?
Praise or Condemn:
7 
4
12:08 am
For future reference, don’t quote your reverend as a credible source in law and legal matters. Really, Billings, I want to see this mans credentials when it comes to these matters. Does he have a degree in law?
Praise or Condemn:
1 
1
11:47 pm
From what I can tell, it would seem that YOU would be the pervert. If you look up the definition, I think many would agree.
Definition 1: to lead into mental error or false judgment.
You post articles like this one that shows many disagreeable paraphilias and just hop on board with some random preacher that says that Obama is going to legalize these things and that we should call congress and stop this bill that has nothing to do with what this preacher says it does. Then you present an article with zero credible evidence to back up his or your claims. Lets check your sources…
First is a link to an article about how Hawaii wouldn’t release his PERSONAL information regarding where he was born. Hmm, I personally wouldn’t want all of my personal information to become public. Especially if I were to become president. A president-to-be would probably not want every single record of his to become public, because then not only will he be vulnerable, but also his family. I don’t see how that has anything to do with your assumption that he is “Kenyan-born”.
Next hot link is to the Wiki page of the bill. Where I have yet to see where Obama is seeking to legalize these paraphilias and force churches to hire pedophiles (frankly, it would appear that they don’t have to. Churches seem to be ordaining them as priests all on their own).
Next link: The Traditional Values Coalition’s website portraying the same baseless lies that I am calling you out on.
I can go through and point out how none of the links you provided have any credible information that back up your claims. In fact the ones that DO have credible information on them actually prove your claims to be FALSE.
So everyone who is reading this… Who sounds like they are perverting the English language to further their own baseless beliefs. Going as far as to deny equal rights for specific groups of people just because they don’t think like he does?
Praise or Condemn:
4 
2
12:08 am
SINNERS BURN IN HELL.
Praise or Condemn:
1 
12
5:35 pm
Alright alright, I’ll admit, those last points were mean, but there is no need to state what has been said to us more times than you can possibly imagine. We know we are sinners in YOUR eyes, Billings. But considering how much hatred people like you have for people like us, what makes you think we would have any desire to go to where they think they are going to go? If the choice is to either burn in hell, or reside in a place full of people who all think and do exactly as they are told to, with no free will to speak of. I’d prefer hell. Because according to your teachings, neither place has true freedom of choice.
One has eternal happiness and no discomfort whatsoever for everyone, which would mean that no one there has any individuality. When individuality comes into play, there will be at least a few people who will disagree and will be upset at them for being themselves (sound familiar).
One is full of pain and sin (which we as humans are prone to do on a daily basis, it would seem). Meaning that people are able to choose to sin, meaning freedom of choice.
If the only reward for not sinning is to be sent to a place that sounds to be more of a prison for your mind, where you don’t seem capable of interaction with people with different views, it doesn’t sound worth it to me. Then again, if that is truly what you wish for yourself, by all means, have at it. But don’t assume that everyone would make the same choice.
Praise or Condemn:
8 
0
8:37 pm
how is Sadomasochism Disturbing?
Praise or Condemn:
0 
0
5:26 pm
are you kidding? Billings, no offense dude, but this stuff is bullshit! I thought this was a joke, and you’re serious? Maybe you should reread the Bible because you are making Christians look bad, and to all the stupid ones, you are spoon feeding them bullshit.
Not only that, but these articles are written very badly. :/
Praise or Condemn:
2 
1
11:51 am
making sure employers do not discriminate against people based on their sexual preferences does not mean they suddenly have to hire people that have them.
Your logic, or absence of it, is hilarious
Praise or Condemn:
15 
2
9:10 am
So your answer is yes, then?
Praise or Condemn:
2 
16
6:06 pm
I had to condemn this on the sole basis of your signature. It’s inflammatory. Besides, what a man does in his own home is his own business. As long as he’s not wearing a dress WHILE he’s teaching your children, why should it matter to you?
Praise or Condemn:
15 
1
2:38 am
Did you and the rest of the writers either live under the power lines, live next to a power plant or a chemical plant, eat old paint chips, or was a combination of all four? just curious.
Praise or Condemn:
8 
1
12:33 pm
Just curious, do you think the pedophile employment law while protect those already working for the church?
Praise or Condemn:
15 
0
1:25 pm
“Churches would be forced to hire pedophiles”
Don’t they already?
“hospitals would mandated to employ amputee-fetishists”
Are you aware that just like in schools, places of employment, especially hospitals, have certain rules and codes of conduct? It’s completely asinine to believe that employees would be permitted to display their fetishes while on the job.
“employees could saunter around their offices with feces smeared from ear to ear because, hey it’s my dream and protected under Obama’s law!”
Once again, completely asinine. Just because employers would be required to hire people like that doesn’t mean that it would be appropriate for them to display their fetishes in a professional setting. Not to mention the fact that most people with fetishes would probably want to be hush-hush about their desires.
“30. Zoophilia/Bestiality – engaging in sexual activity with animals without their consent”
Putting the words “animals” and “without their consent” into the same sentence is redundant; animals can not consent to anything. It should just read “engaging in sexual activity with animals.”
Praise or Condemn:
17 
0
1:49 pm
Minor, nitpicky points Claire! I am glad that you agree with the overall premise of this argument, that we are on the threshold of a very dangerous future. So my response:
1. Most churches have nothing to do with pedophilia. And most spend an incredible amount of time fighting it and homosexuality in fact! The incidence of child molestation is less than 1% off all clergy, and most of them have been Catholics. This is a homosexual problem, not a clergy problem as has been explained by the Catholic League’s head, Phil Donahue.
2. Under ENDA and a Liberalist interpretation of “freedom of speech,” such personal sexual activities would be allowed as free expression. As Lou Sheldon has stated, “hristian businesses will be directly impacted by ENDA. They would be forced to hire or retain cross-dressers and individuals who engage in these sinful behaviors. Students will be indoctrinated that “alternative lifestyles” are no different than traditional lifestyles. Young children will be forced to learn about these bizarre sexual fetishes – and you will have no say in the matter.”
3. Perverts are also exhibitionists, see # 6 on the list! They enjoy showing off!
4. I am not intimately familiar with how animal sex works but thank you for sharing from your vast personal knowledge. Still, bestiality is offensive no matter how you do it!
Stephenson
Praise or Condemn:
2 
22
1:52 pm
Sorry Bill Donahue is the head of the Catholic League, not Phil Donahue.
Praise or Condemn:
1 
20
7:16 pm
“I am glad that you agree with the overall premise of this argument, that we are on the threshold of a very dangerous future.”
Where did I say that I agreed with anything that you said?
“This is a homosexual problem, not a clergy problem as has been explained by the Catholic League’s head, Phil Donahue.”
It’s about pedophila, not homosexuality. Boys are simply easier targets than girls in the church.
“I am not intimately familiar with how animal sex works but thank you for sharing from your vast personal knowledge.”
Neither am I “intimately familiar” with animal sex, but any dumbass knows that since animals cannot talk and do not have the same intelligence as adult humans, they cannot consent to sex with a human being. Having sex with an animal, regardless of how old the animal is, is essentially the same as having sex with a child.
Oh and, since when, according to you, do I have “vast personal knowledge”? According to you, in your article on cat ownership, I’m not qualified to argue with you about animals, despite my years of experience with them. I quote: “Claire, I do not think you are qualified to comment accurately on this news report.”
http://christwire.org/2009/10/the-dark-underside-of-americas-obsession-with-cat-ownership/
“Still, bestiality is offensive no matter how you do it!”
No shit, sherlock. Did you figure that out all by yourself? Of course, why do YOU think that bestiality is offensive? You don’t give a flying fuck about animal welfare.
Praise or Condemn:
19 
1
8:31 am
Here’s Bill Donahue’s explanation, Claire. Hope you can understand it.
“The Times continues to editorialize about the ‘pedophilia crisis,’ when all along it’s been a homosexual crisis. Eighty percent of the victims of priestly sexual abuse are male and most of them are post-pubescent. While homosexuality does not cause predatory behavior, and most gay priests are not molesters, most of the molesters have been gay.”
Praise or Condemn:
4 
14
9:34 am
Unless someone bends over and a dog hops on board and starts humping away without any training or further prompting, then Id say the dog pretty much consents to the sex lol
Praise or Condemn:
4 
0
8:58 pm
not like they won’t learn on their own.
better teach them to enjoy inflicting pain on others at an early age.
Praise or Condemn:
0 
0
4:30 pm
Wow, someone had nothing better to do but surf wikipedia looking for sexual fetishes and building compound nouns. That’s pretty sad, Stevie.
Praise or Condemn:
15 
4
4:48 pm
Adam, please don’t be an imbecile. Why don’t you take a minute to actually READ MY ARTICLE! CLICK ON THE LINKS! This is reporting. I am reporting on what Reverend Sheldon has stated. While I am flattered that you think I had the passion to delve into such pits of filth, it actually was Rev. Sheldon who put the list together, you can download it as a PDF from his website. You can also Google search “DIrty 30″ for more info or, for CRYING OUT LOUD, click on the dosen links included in this article to provide background research on this article.
http://www.traditionalvalues.org/read/3888/enda-would-normalize-the-dirty-30/
Praise or Condemn:
3 
18
4:26 am
I have a better idea. Read this:
http://www.govtrack.us/congress/billtext.xpd?bill=h110-2015
It is the bill you are “supposedly” reporting on. Where in it does it state anything about the paraphilias that you mentioned? From what the bill actually says, I can only find that it would give LGBT’s the right not to be discriminated against for who they are.
Disagreeing with such things seems so backwards. What if the government just up and decided that everyone who believed in a particular religion was mentally unstable, and had them committed to a mental institution? That religion could be the Muslims, or it could be Christians, it really doesn’t matter. Discrimination against a group of people that aren’t harming themselves or anyone else is just hateful and wrong.
Praise or Condemn:
9 
5
9:36 am
The bill is about 10 grade levels higher than Steve’s ability to read and comprehend. It was a good try though ^^ but you have to keep it simple for Steve, he’s a special person.
Praise or Condemn:
6 
2
3:02 pm
I don’t necessarily agree with that. I believe he’s fully capable of understanding it, he just refuses to accept the truth about it; because he has noticed that he can get people to believe him, because a lot of people CAN’T understand it. So they just assume he is speaking the truth.
Can’t really blame those people, with all the liars and bigots out there like the “traditional values coalition” and such.
Praise or Condemn:
5 
1
5:20 pm
“What you may not know is that ENDA normalizes and provides special federal protection for 30+ bizarre sexual orientations listed by the American Psychiatric Association – the so-called “Dirty 30.” These 30+ fetishes include behaviors that are felonies or misdemeanors in most states.” — Reverend Sheldon.
Praise or Condemn:
2 
19
11:56 pm
No, it doesn’t. (see my argument further down)
Praise or Condemn:
2 
5
3:23 am
so you and your gay church mates will no longer be breaking the law
Praise or Condemn:
0 
0
5:32 pm
Please stop leaving comments in my name. I was here first and when you do this, you confuse people and make them think I am leaving the comments when in fact it is you leaving the comments in my name. I’ve asked you to stop doing this ample times before yet you continue, so this does amount to identity theft. Please use a different name or if we actually do have the same names, please use your middle initial or perhaps your birthyear so as to differentiate us. I would appreciate it if people know when I”m leaving comments as opposed to yours. Thank you and please start doing this as it is getting very annoying to me and misrespresenting me as well. Thank you.
Praise or Condemn:
5 
11
5:38 pm
Never!
Praise or Condemn:
19 
4
7:20 pm
I think I’ll start doing it too! This is going to be fun! Everybody!! Be Adam Nelson!!
Praise or Condemn:
13 
2
3:46 am
Party at Adam’s house!
Praise or Condemn:
5 
5
9:19 pm
I’ll stick with being Thiefenz, why would I want to be Adam Nelson?
Praise or Condemn:
0 
0
8:53 pm
I’m 14 and i woke up one night dry humping a cat i also like the idea of being aroused by corpses and shit
Praise or Condemn:
15 
1
10:47 pm
Dear Alexander Anarchy,
I feel like we have a lot in common. How would you feel about throwing some fritters in the mix?
Praise or Condemn:
9 
1
9:19 pm
LMAO!!!
Praise or Condemn:
0 
0
3:42 am
OMG funniest thing I have read all day. I think its kinda sad when all you can write about is peoples sexual activities, and then have explainations!! What does peoples sexual fantasys have to do with what type of worker? And how do you find out these things about an employee?? Kinda creepy really. Besides, admit it Stevie, you’ve had yourself a fantasy something like this atleast once…. lol. Sex is a natural thing, some people have different perceptions and desires, but it doesnt mean that those people shouldnt be employed. Oh and its funny because you mentioned the church pedophile thing, and its funny cause of the amount of pastors, ministers and priests have been accused, and often charged with this. Not exactly funny, but you should really think about what you write BEFORE you write it.
Praise or Condemn:
14 
0
8:26 am
Obama is the one writing this into federal law. Why don’t you call him creepy?
Praise or Condemn:
2 
15
4:05 pm
About that, little Ms Stephy.
Praise or Condemn:
0 
7
9:28 pm
Because Obama isn’t the one writing this article.
Praise or Condemn:
9 
1
12:24 am
Nor is Obama even doing that.
Praise or Condemn:
4 
2
12:23 am
Perhaps morality isn’t something that can be legislated. No one seems to fully agree on each others morals, do they? Perhaps morality should simply be something that is guided by society, and not a repressive state apparatus. To each his own, I say.
Sex is a sin when it comes to people stupid enough to believe it. It is called Darwinism.
Perhaps when you are dead, Nelson, someone will engage in Necrophilia with you and skullfuck the shit out of you.
I would watch that porno.
Praise or Condemn:
2 
0
8:47 pm
1% only about pedophile in church you are kidding me right its more like 80% of them who attack the kids
oh and By the way 5. Coprophilia – sexual arousal associated with feces (human waste) ===> is also named scatophilia just In case you didnt Know
Praise or Condemn:
6 
1
4:28 am
Stephenson Billings, INVESTIGATIVE JOURNALIST!, has once again failed to investigate anything. You reference “traditionalvalues.net” as your only real source, and rather than do some work- you know, earn that “.org” title this site uses- you instead rely on someone else to put together your opinions for you.
Besides, if we fired people based on their fantasies, surely the man who posts photoshopped homosexual porn onto a christian website would be the first to go. So, you know, you’re lucky they’re putting this through first.
How does this site manage to keep a .org classification, anyway?
Praise or Condemn:
8 
0
8:56 am
I know you’re obsessed with porn like any teenage son of democrat parents, but please try to conduct yourself with some decency. We are a non-profit religion organization whose mission is to spread the teachings of Jesus Christ, particularly when applied to the sodomistic traits of the US of A. Why must you spend so much energy hating that?
Praise or Condemn:
1 
9
9:05 am
i’m sorry but you’re the one with an unexplained obsesion to post fake gay porn aparently.
you completly evdaded the question and we hate you because you hate us.
you can then go on to rationalise it however you want but we still feel the hate and we still wanna give it back.
Praise or Condemn:
8 
2
9:11 am
I love YOU Jazzy, I truly do! Don’t ever doubt that for a second! I hate your sin, however, and wish to cleanse you of the evil and sodomy in your life. There is just so much socialism and homosexuality out there today, it’s a sin against Jesus. And I am not obsessed with homosexuality nor with male porn, I just think it’s important that Christian activists stay on top of this issue.
Praise or Condemn:
1 
8
9:12 am
And Jesus loves you too!
Praise or Condemn:
4 
1
7:25 pm
It is important that we stay on top of this issue! That is why Stephenson Billings decided to post homosexual pornography onto a Christian website! Because it is important that we know!
That’s also why this site hosts instructions as to how to stalk and abuse children! So that we know how it’s done and can prevent it!
That’s also why this site hosts lists of dirty sexual fetishes! Because it’s important to know just what people are going to be getting away with!
That’s also why this site hosts lists of young children’s addresses and lists the times their parents are out of the home! So that we can protect them!
Oddly enough, only one of the above three is false.
Billings, your site is a perfect example of “have my cake and eat it too.” You post sick, disgusting filth- so that you can be disgusted by it. Not so that you can revel in it, god no, I want to be reminded of all the disgusting stuff out there so that I can know what my faith protects me from. No way is this stuff in any way playing to my fetishes, I’m a good christian man. That’s why this site hosted an image of a teenager getting herself “vagazzled” on the front page, above the fold (didn’t need to scroll to see it)- so that we know just what we’re protected against. Filth, filth, filth
Keep it coming, Billings, I’m sure that God will forgive your indulgence. It’s not like this site is important or anything.
Praise or Condemn:
8 
3
10:18 am
“I know you’re obsessed with porn like any teenage son of democrat parents”
It’s better to be a teen obsessed with porn as a result of having democratic parents than to be a teen obsessed with sex as a result of having republican parents.
Praise or Condemn:
8 
1
7:31 pm
I’d just like Stephenson to know that I’m not obsessed with porn. I’m obsessed with self-righteous hypocritical idiots. And that particular weak point is one that he refuses to defend. So I’m going to keep taking “you posted porn” potshots until he decides to actually acknowledge that he did.
Plus, if he acknowledges the problem, that’s the first step toward solving it- and then maybe this site can become what it was meant to be, a bastion of good, Christian values, rather than an imageboard for Stephenson Billings to host his homosexual pornography and his almost-porn of women being “vagazzled.”
Praise or Condemn:
8 
1
8:29 am
You obsession with me is damaging your brain, my child. I have never posted porn for enjoyment purposes. Any offensive imagery I have written about in my journalism was meant to expose the disgusting and horny character of the atheists or the liberals. I don’t quite understand why your brain is too feeble to grasp that concept, but that’s what it is. You really need to stop focusing on naked internet photos of young men.
Praise or Condemn:
1 
9
6:51 pm
Stephenson, let’s say that this was a medical board, all right? Let’s say that this board hosted discussions about how to treat wounds in various parts of the body. And let’s say that you had worked for a couple years on wounds related to genetalia. It could happen.
Now, the images for those wounds are both offensive and disgusting; you’re pretty sure your readership could get the picture without being shown precisely what wounds you’re talking about.
A normal person, a polite person, would post links to the images with a label warning about their content. This is because some people might want to read about how to treat such wounds without seeing them, but other people might prefer to have a visual aid.
You, Stephenson Billings, would post them at the top of the page, with another image in the “Featured” area, on the front page, above the fold. Why? Because, regardless as to how offensive some people might find these images, you need to post them on a public forum that children might visit.
Now, why you felt the need to post those pictures of homosexual pornography on the front page as well as in your article, when you could have easily used links, is the mystery. The obvious explanation is stupidity- you simply did not know how to link images.
Another explanation is that you had spent a long time looking for the images in question and felt that your hard work should not go unseen- which, given that you were sent the images in an email, is simply untrue.
The third explanation is that you felt the article was incomplete without the images. But there are multiple articles on this site without images, and surely your writing is strong enough to carry such an easy topic? After all, you can muster enough moral outrage for the entire church.
The fourth explanation, which I have decided must be true- assuming that idiocy is not- is that you wanted to warn people against them. The problem is, if you show people the image, they’ve seen it- you’ve tainted them with that memory for ever. You can’t protect people by showing them what you’re protecting them from; it’s like bringing children into a hospital and having sick people cough in their faces to show them what could happen if they get sick. It’s stupid, it’s irresponsible, and it manages to miss the point so badly the point might as well be in another country.
Please, Stephenson, explain why you chose to post homosexual pornography onto a child-friendly .org website. If you can explain it to me, I will not bring the issue up again.
Praise or Condemn:
11 
3
11:56 pm
No explanation. No forgiveness. Billings, you porn-posting wannabe, I gave you a chance. I threw you a lifeline. You pushed it aside. You will wish that you had taken this chance.
Praise or Condemn:
1 
6
11:25 pm
u christians need to die
Praise or Condemn:
6 
4
4:52 pm
“Of course I’m talking about handsome Lou Sheldon, that silver daddy of anti-homosexual Christian activism that many of us look up to in utter submission to his bulging fortitude.”
-Much like your references in past articles to jockstraps and muscular teenage boys, you sound as though you have an unnatural obsession with this man and a BDSM fantasy.
“CEO of the Traditional Values Coalition, Reverend Lou knows a thing or two about the most depraved sexual positions in our country today.”
-I’m sure he does.
Praise or Condemn:
8 
0
9:14 pm
Listen pervert stop reading your dark fantasies into my text.
Praise or Condemn:
4 
3
6:09 pm
Pervert? That makes me laugh, Mr. Billings, as clearly you have more knowledge of sexual perversions than I do. If you disagree with that then I suggest you review your “Dirty 30″ list again and take a good look at the images you posted in this article. Although, I’m sure you already have…many times, in fact.
Praise or Condemn:
3 
2
10:55 am
I thought you said that the law applies to ‘non religious employers’? In that case, how will it affect the church?
Praise or Condemn:
2 
5
11:00 am
I AM SO SICK OF YOU LIBERAL PERVERTS QUESTIONING EVERYTHING.
Praise or Condemn:
2 
8
1:05 pm
Easy there, old timer. If you are the investigative journalist as you claim, you should be used to this by now. Journalists are questioned and criticized at every turn. If you are freaking out at a bunch of liberals calling you out on the flaws in both your article and your logic, maybe you should consider a different hobby/career.
Praise or Condemn:
7 
2
5:58 pm
You’re an investagative journalist who doesn’t like questions?
Isn’t that a bit like a firefighter who doesn’t like water? You should be used to questions by now. You use them every day.
After all, that’s what an investigation is. Which is what investigative journalism requires, Billinbs.
Praise or Condemn:
3 
5
12:33 am
Billings is not a journalist. He writes tabloids. Whatever credibility he may have once had, it was lost a long time ago. Still, he does like draw his “Journalist” card like a gun, doesn’t he? Sometimes he adds “investigative” for added effect. Still, it amounts to little. Everyone can see the garbage he writes now. So sad, yet that darker part of me relishes his misery.
Praise or Condemn:
0 
1
12:41 am
You think you know me but you don’t know me. You little piece of garbage.
Praise or Condemn:
0 
0
12:56 am
“You think you know me but you don’t know me. You little piece of garbage.”
Not a valid argument. Whether I am or I am not a piece of garbage is completely beside the point. It was unrelated to anything I said. Do try harder next time. First, if you are feeling angry or upset, don’t respond out of anger. It only makes you look more foolish. Perhaps you should sleep on it before you post. That will help you relax and allow you to think more clearly. Calling me a piece of garbage is not doing you any favors and is certainly not going to boost your credibility.
It also won’t ever get you out of the realm of tabloids and into real journalism. Real journalists, precious few as there are, actual cross reference their information. They do interviews, check with professionals, do research, and base their articles on tangible evidence. Not superstition and conspiracy theories. The only thing that may say you are an investigative journalist is possible a degree you got. Nothing else. And that is not enough.
This has nothing to do with whether I know you or not. It has entirely to do with your writing.
There is nothing wrong with being a homosexual. There is, however, something wrong if you have to fight so hard to not be yourself.
Enjoy.
Praise or Condemn:
0 
1
9:30 pm
more like a firefighter who is phobic of fire
Praise or Condemn:
0 
0
9:31 pm
PROBLEM?
Praise or Condemn:
0 
0
12:59 pm
Wow.. So does ANYONE agree with Billings? I’m guessing not since I just read through all of this garbage, so my question is: To whom are you writing these articles, Mr. Billings? If it is to “LIBERAL PERVERTS” (who are the only ones responding to your post, though I do not agree with that name) then why would you not be winsome and logical instead of immovable and stuck-up? You do Christ a disservice because the people who read this are people that I am trying to tell, “Christians are not that crazy,” but you are proving me wrong and providing an example for people to justify their rejection of ALL things Christian.
Would it not be better to provoke people to think, then change instead of scare them into thinking the most terrible things are happening, using that power to evoke a change. I would argue the former is much more effective, and what Christ himself exemplified.
Praise or Condemn:
8 
0
3:34 pm
I am writing for the traditional Christians who read and enjoy this site, the ones who write me everyday with thanks and love. I am writing for those of us believe the original intent if the Constitution should be sacred and protected, not twisted into some liberal seal of approval for sodomy and affirmative action. I was upset because of all these lying ghost freaks who really irritate my craw with their lies and witchcraft. You people should be ashamed of yourself.
Praise or Condemn:
0 
7
6:06 pm
Things don’t irritate a craw. They get stuck in it. “Sticks in my craw.”
For a writer, you really don’t have a good grasp of English idiom, Billings.
Anyway, could you please show us a non-Adam Nelson example of someone writing to you with thanks and love?
Praise or Condemn:
3 
4
6:19 pm
Sorry but it would be a violation of email privacy and things can irritate my craw you fool. You didn’t invent the English language.
Praise or Condemn:
6 
1
7:02 pm
Billings is a homosexual! I have proof!
Praise or Condemn:
7 
1
11:47 pm
No. I didn’t. Neither did you. Misusing idioms makes it seem like you don’t know how to speak the language.
The shoe is on the other foot.
Apple of my eye.
Sticks in my craw.
There are certain phrases that are meant to go certain ways. Besides, you’re human. You don’t have a craw- anatomically referred to as a crop (see the wikipedia page http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crop_%28anatomy%29). Birds do. Things that get stuck in the craw make it difficult for the bird to swallow. “Sticks in my craw” means the same thing as “hard to swallow,” which is used to mean you refuse to believe it or have trouble integrating it with your beliefs. Which is a fine thing to say about ghost shows if you’re a christian. Unfortunately, you didn’t mean that.
You both ruined the phrase by swapping “sticks in” with “irritates,” and you used it to mean “irritates me.” An investigative journalist would know basic English facts like what an idiom is, what it means, and whether twisting the idiom is going to help or hinder the writing. Yet again, Billings, you fail at your basic job.
Praise or Condemn:
2 
5
12:01 am
You are intensely obnoxious and let me tell you I’ve been around long enough to speak how I please, despite your intensely immature attempts to derail my train of faith. You are insipid and ridiculous, clueless and tone deaf. You don’t have the soul of a poet, more like the soul of a bank clerk. I would feel sorry for you if I felt there was one iota of decency in your cold, cold heart. I can stick whatever in my craw I please and you know what? It will probably irritate it. It will make my craw sore as the devil. And I will be happy with it. You can’t say otherwise you illiterate fool, you child of the mundane. You will never be a poet, you will never transcend anything but the most childish scratchings of human language. I can stick whatever in my craw I please. Would you rather I say “You’re bloating my goiter?” because you are you scrawny little pervert. I am so sick of you doubters and questioners. You are all destined to a horrible lonely life if you don’t shape up AND QUICK!
Praise or Condemn:
5 
1
12:33 am
Someone grab a stopwatch, I want to know how long until the artery sticking out on his forehead ruptures.
Praise or Condemn:
5 
0
12:51 am
Billings. You’re human. You don’t HAVE a craw. Birds have craws, as do lizards; Dinosaurs had them as well. Humans do not have craws. Simple biology. Do some research.
“Tone deaf” is a bit harsh. I was in a barbershop group for four years, singing bass. I didn’t know that you could hear my singing voice through internet posts.
As it happens, bank clerks have souls that are full of life and meaning. Unless you are saying that one’s profession determines one’s soul. I wonder what the soul of an investigative journalist looks like?
Praise or Condemn:
2 
5
12:20 pm
“Would you rather I say “You’re bloating my goiter?” because you are you scrawny little pervert.”
Eww, gross, you have goiter? Eat some foods with fucking iodine in them, idiot.
Praise or Condemn:
4 
1
9:50 am
Stevey boy, not only do you fail at logic, idioms and biology, you also fail at similes. You cant even put up a decent argument when someone points out your flaws. Instead you attack them, their credibility, or you say something like “BURN IN HELL PERVERT SINNERS WHO WATCH GAY PORN” and completely ignore the glaring errors you make. Good job and keep it up, I hope that gets stuck in the craw you don’t have. Sorry Steve, but you just can’t cut the mustard with your cock and bull stories. Get that chip off your shoulder because any thread with you in it is a field day.
Praise or Condemn:
1 
3
4:06 pm
The message is for liberal heathens, as you may be, so when you’re judged you can’t say ‘no on ever told me’. I appreciate the work Billings and the rest of the journalists here do in upholding media integrity and a fire to the feet of a fallen culture.
Praise or Condemn:
5 
4
11:34 pm
This is exactly the attitude I that is so wrong with all of this. Arguments are not being built around rational presentation of ideas for the purpose of persuading another of your own position, but instead it seems that you feel these “Liberal heathens” are not worth convincing. The reason that this will be my last post is because Liberals are easier to talk to then fine Christians like yourself. Frankly, when I read posts like this (especially this particular Adam Nelson), I feel like my battle is being lost from the rear by the miss placed bullets of my own sincere but over-zealous volunteer militia. To continue this pointless argument will profit me nothing, you nothing, and certainly Christ nothing.
Praise or Condemn:
7 
1
11:42 pm
We will continue to pray for your lost, weak soul.
Praise or Condemn:
1 
6
11:50 pm
Take a lesson from first aid, Billings. Save your own soul before you try to save others. Pray for yourself. Ask for forgiveness for your various sins. Then, and only then, try to save others. Otherwise, you are guilty of Pride- believing that you are so far above sin that you can save without first being saved.
Praise or Condemn:
5 
2
5:17 pm
Its religion, since when has religion EVER been about being rational?
Praise or Condemn:
0 
0
9:38 pm
it was before humanity screwed it up with their greed and agendas
Praise or Condemn:
0 
0
1:40 pm
Thanks, Mr Billings, for showing me my first gay porn image. Now I think I’ll go look for some more…I really don’t see what’s so bad about it!
Praise or Condemn:
7 
0
3:18 pm
Lol Billings got fucked up hahaha
its typical from southern republican since they hate Obama because he is Black ( northern republican will hate his Policy mostly ) and find proper reason than using the Bible
Ever heard of Death Panels folks ? its a Lie the “totalitarian government” also is a Lie ( bushw as a Totalitarian government by the way )
and OBama is a socialist You still live in 1900 or what You have been socialist way before you ever born Billings
Most southern republican doesnt even Know what socialist and communist is it and They “hate” what they don,t understand
Praise or Condemn:
2 
4
8:17 am
“For though by this time you ought to be teachers, you need someone to teach you again the basic principles of the oracles of God. You need milk, not solid food.” –Hebrews 5:12.
Praise or Condemn:
0 
6
8:15 am
STOP TALKING ABOUT CRAWS WOODY!
IT’S AN EXPRESSION FOR CRYING OUT LOUD, LITERARY LICENSE OR ARE YOU TOO DAFT TO COMPREHEND PROSE STYLE WRITING? I CAN’T TEACH YOU ENGLISH IF YOU DON’T HAVE A SOBER SECOND IN YOUR DAY YOU LITTLE FREAK. YOU ARE SO FILLED WITH HATE MY CRAW IS FLAMING UP AGAIN.
Praise or Condemn:
3 
4
9:15 am
Calm down you stupid twat, you can’t teach him English because you don’t know English.
Praise or Condemn:
2 
3
12:22 pm
I just love it how the man screaming and throwing around the word freak is telling other people that they’re filled with hate. Billings, you’re pathetic.
Praise or Condemn:
5 
1
5:31 pm
Billings. Read what I’m about to write.
You don’t have a craw.
All right? You don’t have a vagina, because you’re not a woman. You don’t have gills, because you’re not a fish. You don’t have a craw, because you’re not a bird.
Given that a craw is a noun that can be easily looked up in a dictionary, I’d say that you are probably the least likely person I’d ever want teaching me english.
And again, projecting your own problems- I don’t drink, Billings. Perhaps that’s why I’m capable of holding a conversation without going into all-caps screaming mode.
Good luck.
Praise or Condemn:
1 
4
9:40 pm
Cool Story, bro
Praise or Condemn:
0 
0
5:10 pm
…This type of “journalism” even the national inquirer would laugh at. This sites so-called “journalism” is just an excuse to spread blatant libel, lies, and general idiocy. I also LOVE how, without fail, whenever you righties lose an argument, especially here, you either:
A) Quote a bible verse that most likely doesn’t even apply the the topic,
B) Spew out garbage/hate speech, or
C) ignore the comment altogether, “condemn” it and don’t even try to explain why.
None of you are winning any supporters through this, and most of america realize, frankly, how freakin’ insane you all are, especially when you try to defend the WBC.
Final Note: ROMANS 13:9 NKJ
9 For the commandments, “You shall not commit adultery,” “You shall not murder,” “You shall not steal,” “You shall not bear false witness,” “You shall not covet,” and if there is any other commandment, are all summed up in this saying, namely, “You shall love your neighbor as yourself.”
I find that funny. its one of the bibles most-often repeated commandments, loving your neighbor, yet the most ignored. If you really had any faith at all, you’d SHUT THE HELL UP about how “sick and demented” other people are, pray for them, and KINDLY try to teach them about god. You “journalists” are doing NO FAVOURS for your:
Self
Religion
Reputation
Country
Praise or Condemn:
3 
0
5:28 pm
I have opened my heart to people and only want to share my love for Jesus Christ. Why does that upset you? It really is a beautiful thing, you should not be so afraid of faith and God. He loves YOU!
God bless!
Praise or Condemn:
0 
5
6:05 pm
Interesting, this coming from the guy who just e-shouted at me about, how did he put it?
“SINNERS BURN IN HELL”
Praise or Condemn:
3 
3
7:24 pm
“I have opened my heart to people and only want to share my love for Jesus Christ. Why does that upset you?”
Because we don’t WANT to be preached to by a man who thinks he knows more about our lives than we do. You have NO right, Billings, as I’ve said before, to tell us what’s good for us. If I say my life is fine and that I don’t need Jesus in it, you’d better believe me and shut the fuck up.
“It really is a beautiful thing, you should not be so afraid of faith and God. He loves YOU!”
What about us who don’t believe in god? Huh? Did you ever consider that not everybody in the world believes in god? You have no right to tell us what to believe.
Praise or Condemn:
5 
0
10:36 am
Everyone at Christwire still loves YOU Claire, despite how much you pretend you don’t want us to.
Praise or Condemn:
1 
5
10:54 am
Exactly, you do think you knoe everything about everyone.
Praise or Condemn:
4 
1
6:37 pm
“Everyone at Christwire still loves YOU Claire, despite how much you pretend you don’t want us to.”
As usual fatty, you’re assuming you know more about me than I myself do. I do NOT want anyone at christwire to love me. Why would I, a gay-supporting, feminist, democrat who voted for Obama and Coakley want love from any of you fucks?
Praise or Condemn:
7 
0
9:11 pm
Sometimes i honestly dont know whether i should arm myself with a bible, a textbook, or popcorn when coming here.. the debates are fun to read.
Praise or Condemn:
2 
4
8:42 pm
I have longed for the day that zoophilia would be legalized and now I can go out and fuck as many pigs as I want with out the police getting on my case!
Praise or Condemn:
3 
0
1:21 pm
Maybe then Billings could get a date
Praise or Condemn:
3 
0
2:11 pm
Mr. Billings,
I have to say, for the upright god-fearing and respectable man you claim to be, you deteriorated into name calling rather quickly. Though I dis-agree with your article, I feel that my sinking into such a slanderous argument with these people, you only further there point while casting quite a poor shadow on your own reputation. I just felt compelled to say these things as I thought you would appreciate a calm and rational voice amongst the crowd.
The Clown
Praise or Condemn:
1 
0
2:12 pm
*by sinking
Praise or Condemn:
0 
1
2:15 pm
“My little children, I am writing these things to you so that you may not sin. But if anyone does sin, we have an advocate with the Father, Jesus Christ the righteous. He is the propitiation for our sins, and not for ours only but also for the sins of the whole world. And by this we know that we have come to know him, if we keep his commandments. Whoever says “I know him” but does not keep his commandments is a liar, and the truth is not in him, but whoever keeps his word, in him truly the love of God is perfected. By this we may know that we are in him.” –1 John 2:1-29.
Praise or Condemn:
1 
1
2:17 pm
Ok, yes that is a nice verse. But what does it have to do with why you have taken part in the name calling and insults?
Praise or Condemn:
1 
1
2:17 pm
“Then how did Sarah Jessica Parker’s butt-cheese wind up in Scrotie’s milkshake?” – “South Park”
Praise or Condemn:
1 
1
3:10 pm
I still await your answer Mr. Billings.
Praise or Condemn:
0 
2
1:34 am
copy paste makes your argument invalid billings. you said so yourself.
Praise or Condemn:
0 
1
1:07 am
HG Wellington says: “Not a valid argument. Whether I am or I am not a piece of garbage is completely beside the point. It was unrelated to anything I said. Do try harder next time. First, if you are feeling angry or upset, don’t respond out of anger. It only makes you look more foolish. Perhaps you should sleep on it before you post. That will help you relax and allow you to think more clearly. Calling me a piece of garbage is not doing you any favors and is certainly not going to boost your credibility.”
Listen up, you nasty little piece of work, you have said nothing of consequence here yet you repeatedly come on to me like some arrogant prick. I don’t have the time to deal with freaks like you. You clearly know nothing of faith and have the intelligence of a bowl of jell-o. Why do you find such a thrill pestering me with your atheist riddles? Are you really that lonely?
“It also won’t ever get you out of the realm of tabloids and into real journalism. Real journalists, precious few as there are, actual cross reference their information. They do interviews, check with professionals, do research, and base their articles on tangible evidence. Not superstition and conspiracy theories. The only thing that may say you are an investigative journalist is possible a degree you got. Nothing else. And that is not enough.”
Who in the world are you to tell me how to write? What sort of experience do you have? Let’s take a peek at your journalism, you little fraud? Have a link for us? I thought not. You’re just a hollow shirt, a hollow intellect who gets a cheap thrill harassing older men. You hate me for my faith and yet you offer nothing better. You obviously know little about journalism and little about the world. Crawl outside your basement for once, stop taking money from your Mommy and make a man of yourself and then maybe, MAYBE I will listen to you if you have something interesting to say.
In the meantime, YOU ARE NOTHING. A PIECE OF THE EPITOME OF THE DETRITUS OF MODERN LIFE, A WASTE OF AIR AND SPACE ONLY SPREADING LIES AND DISEASE AMONG THE LIVING AND RIGHTEOUS. YOU ARE A CORRUPTER OF CHILDREN, A BURSTING POD OF BACTERIA FILLING THE LUNGS OF RIGHTEOUSNESS WITH A HEAVY YELLOW PHELGM THAT WE CALL HATE AND DESPAIR.
GET OUT OF MY LIFE!
Praise or Condemn:
0 
0
1:33 am
so because we have not reid being a journalist we can not judge your journalism…hmm… okay then you can’t judge video games since you are not a game, other relgiouns since you have not particed them, atheists because you have not been one homsexuals because…wait scratch that last one you can judge that i guess.
Praise or Condemn:
2 
0
8:32 am
I do find it slightly amusing how, when I posted without anger, without name calling, and without disrespect, Mr. Billings has chosen to ignore my questions and advice and instead continue down the path he is on. I urge you sir, please stop the hateful angry words. they do nothing to further your cause.
Praise or Condemn:
0 
0
2:31 am
Did Billings just Blow up his last brain cell ???
That’s actually funny oh by the way mister Billings it’s not journalism you did why because I studied In journalism even in cinema so I actually Have the right to said that
disease among the world ?? lie and propaganda coming from atheism someone pinch me since 1500 the christians is waging wars left and right destroying entirew civilization for what God purpose ? Bite me it’s was Only because of pure Racism
Your christianity is the EPitom of evilness it’s what make the world bad and evil it’s why the world is in Chaos it’s because of You and your christianity that the world is what is it now In chaos with wars Raging overseas because of stupid christian Like you Billings who just wnat to destroy The actual Freedom
Praise or Condemn:
0 
0
9:31 am
i used to be a call girl i have seen it all.
plus having a fetish can be fun sometimes.
Praise or Condemn:
0 
0
2:13 am
OBAMA’S PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
(non-copyrighted)
I pledge allegiance to the fag of the Benighted States of
America and to the repugnance for its one-night stands, one
abomination (under the god of lust), invisible (before it comes out of the closet), with libertines and Judgment Day for all.
Praise or Condemn:
0 
0
5:03 am
I do accept as true with all of the concepts you have introduced to your post. They’re really convincing and will certainly work. Still, the posts are very brief for novices. Could you please extend them a bit from subsequent time? Thank you for the post.
Praise or Condemn:
0 
0
8:27 pm
20. Sexual Masochism – obtaining sexual gratification by being subjected to pain or humiliation
21. Sexual Sadism – the intentional infliction of pain or humiliation on another person in order to achieve sexual excitement (DSM Code 302.82)
heheheheheh.
Praise or Condemn:
0 
0