Elena Kagan Sits Like A Boy, Doesn’t Cross Legs
Each and every day since Obama announced she was his pick for Supreme Court, I have devoted countless hours researching into the history of this “female” Elena Kagan.
The most disturbing thing I’ve noticed to date, however, and the most telling, is that Elena Kagan is dowdy and suspiciously ‘boyish’ in her mannerisms.
The most notable of her behavior is that Kagan is frumpy and not very lady-like. Even Pulitzer-prize winning journalist Robin Givhan at the Washington Post notes the brutish behavior of Kagan at events where she should naturally act prim and proper — graceful — like a real lady.
Elena Kagan’s posture is suspiciously lesbian, legs ajar and back hunched like the creature in the Notre Dame movie.
Analyzation of an image taken from a recent sit-down Kagan did, next to a real lady, shows the problem with Kagan and why she is not an appropriate choice for Supreme Court justice.
Do we really need a lesbian Hunchback of the Supreme Court?
Let us start with the head of Kagan. Notice her shorter hair cut, with a thicker top and fading toward the sides. This is the same haircut employed by adulterer and former US president Bill Clinton. This haircut is very brute and masculine, not cute in any way or embracing of a female’s demeanor.
Next, look at how she wears her blouse, jacket and skirt. She is not used to them and she hunches forward, hands resting on knees and highly uncomfortable. She is used to sitting in blue jeans and an old cudoroy flannel shirt, therefore she sits with stumpy legs gapped for all to see.
There is no poise or lady’s elegance here, even though she is wearing a string of likely borrowed pearls. Just contrast this all with the woman sitting next to her. See the difference?
Kagan is trying to veil a fact from all of us, and simply the fact is one thing. Kagan is trying to hide the fact of her being a potential lesbian.
We cannot risk such a person in the Supreme Court. A judge’s heart has to be pure, without an agenda or bias. Just looking at the picture’s of Kagan, it is patently obvious that she’s trying to shroud something about herself, attempting to deceive America.
We do not need a sleeper agent for the homo gay agenda within our nation’s highest court. Even if she just confessed her lifestyle to us, so we can judge her openly and without having to investigate, it would bode well for her character.
Sure, we would still have to protest her being signed as a justice to our Supreme Court, but at least we could say she was honest and didn’t try to hide anything from us. And that would speak volumes about her already marred and borish character.
- Sinful
- Suspicious
- Scared
- Sad
- Amused
- Laughing Out Loud
Author: Abe
If you don't like what you just read here you can just get out of my country. Now how about that smart-alack.
Follow me on twitters. Poke me as your New Friend on Facebook!!
1:45 am
then who would you suigest for the job abe? seeing’ there’s so much wrong with this one? not that you can change anything
Praise or Condemn:
0 
0
9:46 am
Give the woman a break. She just got out of the kitchen.
Praise or Condemn:
2 
1
10:29 am
hi i am hitler from the future after being brought back from hell and ressurected in 3402.
in my time all women and men have penis’s and vaginas therfore their legs must all be spread
HAIL SATAN!
Praise or Condemn:
5 
0
11:58 am
<__>
-.-
lolwut?
Praise or Condemn:
0 
0
7:40 pm
Dear sir,
I’m not complaining about you article but about the “About The Author”.
First of all, If you don’t want smarty comments, you might think about changing your picture.
Second of all, “Smart-alack” is is spelled “Smart-aleck.”
And third of all, which country are you from? Guess what? I’m not in it.
Praise or Condemn:
4 
0
2:35 am
yeah I was thinking …. the Internet is not your country and your constitution and Law doesnt actually affect people OUTSIDE your country
as for the article ITSELF well why not getting a JOB instead of finding COUNTLESS OF HOUR searching for something people doesnt care
Praise or Condemn:
1 
0
2:42 pm
Hims don’t even know how to try to trick with his Bill Clinton haircut and deacon sits stance! Hah!~
Praise or Condemn:
1 
0
1:30 pm
Abe, what does that even MEAN?
Praise or Condemn:
0 
0
8:22 am
Is it worth pointing out that leg-crossing was traditionally considered bad manners-if you were to look at pictures of the royal familey you wouldd never see the queen crossing her legs.
Praise or Condemn:
1 
0
11:08 am
women in Japan usually don’t cross their legs bc it causes your spine to imbalance… also when you are older, if you crossed your legs too much in the past your calves might begin to display very obvious and ugly veins
Praise or Condemn:
1 
0
6:25 am
Abe, you shouldn’t be threatened by a woman who doesn’t care to conform to American social gender standards. I believe that straight or gay, she’s a pretty good representation of most of us, albeit far smarter, and far more capable of handling this very difficult and challenging position. Personally, I also happen to think she’s cute …!
Praise or Condemn:
3 
0
3:39 pm
You people are all crazy and or really stupid. This is a spoof site! None of it is real! It’s like The Onion for religion. Hahahaha!! Get it??
Praise or Condemn:
0 
0
5:09 am
I actually did not know that it was a satirical site – but it’s irrelevant if there is a hateful or cruel message. Nothing funny about insulting someone with this intonation. I found it offensive to women, and specifically to a brilliant incoming supreme court justice. Anyone who would consider this legitimate humor on any level is missing some basic sense…
Praise or Condemn:
0 
0