Microhyla Nepenthicola, Newest Discovered Frog Species is Size of a Pea

Pat Heinkel
• ChristWire
August 28, 2010 10:55 am13 comments

Biological researchers have discovered a new species of frog within the more mountainous region of Borneo Island, Kubah National Park proper. This frog is actually a microfrog, named Microhyla nepethicola. The nomenclature is evident, resulting from this particular species of frogs from the Microhylid genus — micro (small) hylidae (tree frogs) — being observed in the leaves of the novel nepethentes plant for the majority of the life cycle.

Though tree frogs are commonly noted for their demure size and impressive croaks — the croaks of some species, including American native Hyla regilla, loudly resonating and recorded several miles away — this novel species boasts one new impressive attribute: being the smallest of all New World frogs.

Of all observed populations of this frog, there is a normative body measure between 10.6 to 12.8 mm. These frogs have been observed before, and even preserved in several museums worldwide. The problem is that a complete study and of the frog’s phenotypic and genotypic traits and marker was never completed, as to provide grounds for correctly classifying this micro-species as a distinct frog.

For several decades, scientists believed this frog was a juvenile form of known species of Hyla.

With the genome of most animal species, there is allowed a certain degree of phenotypic plasticity. This means that given certain environmental pressures, an animal may develop varying traits within the range of its bodies abilities.

Phenotypic Plasticity: An Objective Look into the Microhyla micro-species

To understand phenotypic plasticity, let us consider an object lesson. We will consider a colony of basic, generic insects.

Within a forest in South America, there exists an arboreal species of insect. These true bugs forage for food on the ground of the rainforest, typically using reinforced pinchers and protracted mandibles in feeding upon nuts from a particular plant in the forest. Every species of this insect typically has a range of pincher and mandible size, ranging from 8 mm – 10 mm.

A environmental catastrophe, such as a blight spreading among the source of the insect’s primary food, causes the primary plants of this particular species to die, aside from ones that produce nuts that are too large for our insects to break apart to consume. These insects are forced to forage and colonize a new biome with a different food source. The result: the new food source stunts the growth of these particular insects, also giving them a different color. This can result in these insects, from the juvenile generation forward, to appear as a new species.

In time, an investigator who found these particular insects may, on a phenotypic level, classify them as a juvenile form or even worse, a new species. This is easy to do in cases of phenotypic plasticity, and shows why in addition to a qualitative analysis, a quantitative molecular assay must be performed to determine the genome of the particular insects, or in our case, frogs.

By genetic analysis, Microhyla neperthicola, is a unique, undiscovered species. It is likely a divergent group of standard Hyla, its unique genetic structure being forged by a founder event, or environmental pressure casuing a genetic bottleneck for an isolated group, that was satisfied for continued species speciation.

Over time, the affect of the environmental pressure may yield a form of allelic exlusion, occlusion, protein upreglation, down-regulation or nullification of germ layer cells, varying traits of the species at a reproductive level. Such events can cause a point-forward micro-speciation, meaning from the original creature produced at the time of Creation, we can have alternate versions that are no longer able to reproduce with one another and are genetically disimilar enough to be considered a new species, or sub-species (as coined and determined by Ernst Mayr).

It is likely our newly discovered friends, some years ago, faced such an event and now are here for us to see and appreciate. Despite its tiny size, it was Hyla neperthicola’s amazingly harsh and loud “tree frog reproductive croak” that caught the ears of seasoned researchers, who noted the call was a bit different and coming from frogs that may have not yet been reproductive age, due to size and apparent age.

With that, the researchers looked into this frog and thankfully, have discovered a very tiny, neat species. For those of you who have never heard a tree frog’s call, here you go:

Blog Widget by LinkWithin
Thanks for rating this! Now tell Facebooked friends and Twitter how you feel through social media. .
How does this post make you feel?
  • Sinful
  • Suspicious
  • Scared
  • Sad
  • Amused
  • Laughing Out Loud

13 Comments

  • Every bit of nature reveals the splendor of God. Every observation lets us get closer to Him.

    Praise or Condemn: Thumb up 3 Thumb down 1

  • The article was Good overall but there is some Point like the Time of creation how do you know this is Not much older than a 6000 years

    But other than that it’s actually Interesting

    Praise or Condemn: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 0

  • Did you guys have a guest writer or something?

    Praise or Condemn: Thumb up 5 Thumb down 0

  • Don’t be lulled by that frog’s cutness. Given the chance, he’ll crawl up your penis-hole and vomit out sulphuric acid and melt your willy from the inside out.

    Praise or Condemn: Thumb up 10 Thumb down 1

  • @Jacky Maille- Well I am not male so I’ll keeps my legs crossed and aawww at this tiny frog’s adorableness anyway!

    :3 It is so tiny and cute!

    Praise or Condemn: Thumb up 3 Thumb down 0

  • Wow, this article contains a few facts, which is rare for this site. It also discusses evolution, which is terribly un-xtian. Lots of grammar, spelling, and usage errors, as usual on christwire. Then there’s:

    “from the original creature produced at the time of Creation…”

    Of course we know that the creation of the universe was 13.7 billion years ago, and there were no creatures then. The author could mean the creation of the earth, about 4.5 billion years ago, or the creation of multicellular organisms about 670 million years ago, or the creation of amphibians, about 400 million years ago. Maybe that last one is what the author meant…

    Praise or Condemn: Thumb up 3 Thumb down 1

    • How do we know that the universe is 13 billion years old? Because we think we are measuring light sources??? If the universe is really expanding – wouldn’t there be new space created or stretched between here and there? Did you know that the so called scientists who came up with the 13 billion number also claimed that the universe was slowing down – only to now claim that the universe is speeding up – and they don’t know why. We don’t really know anything – so to assume that the earth is any age, is closed minded.

      If the dinosaurs lived millions of years ago – why do their bones still stink? Shouldn’t all of that bio-material be turned to stone by now?

      Truth is – we don’t know anything – we have a lot of assumptions based on observation. Unfortunately, we only have a Key-hole to look through.

      Praise or Condemn: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 1

  • You should read Chuck’s “The Lies of Evolution” series, Amused. It proves the Earth’s age. The universe is billions of years old, or more, but the Earth is 6,000.

    Praise or Condemn: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 3

  • No it isn’t u dipshit. Gday sir.

    Praise or Condemn: Thumb up 4 Thumb down 1

  • Finally something on this site that just nice. God took time to create. Days just happened to be what was understood by earlier believes Judism took the story from. A day is still time. Evolution is time. Thus it proves both. Since God is an artist and every layer of life on the planet is a under painting for the next.

    Praise or Condemn: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  • Wow! That penny and that pencil are like 100x normal size! Their HUGE!

    Praise or Condemn: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0