Willie Nelson, Snoop Dog and the College Voter Marijuana Conspiracy
The recent surge in marijuana advocacy across the United States has caught many social conservatives off guard. In states like California and Massachusetts, proponents of so-called “medical pot” are opening the door to a much larger push to decriminalize cultivation and personal use across the country. At first this movement appeared to be a grassroots effort, yet as time passes it is becoming increasingly obvious that this is a well-funded and profoundly political campaign. Even more shocking is the strategy now being employed by America’s drug apologists on campuses from coast to coast. By registering students as local voters in an effort to stuff ballot boxes in their favor, they have become highly successful in pushing their alarming schemes through state legislatures. Ultimately, this dope debacle raises important questions about our health, our security and our nation’s most sacred franchise.
At the center of this storm are two men who have long, tortured histories with marijuana. Country music star Willie Nelson and black rapper Snoop Dog have been tireless proponents of drugs in their personal lives. As both transitioned into the national spotlight, they conspired to bring their subversive ideals with them. Today, the two are the most influential activists in this campaign. By recklessly demanding that their fans join them in this redefinition of health and safety laws, they have needlessly tapped into that youthful urge to rebel against authority. Their efforts have paid off. Marijuana possession is now legal in over a dozen states and album sales have made them millions.
Mr. Nelson and Mr. Dog believe in drastically limited moral responsibilities, minimal narcotics enforcement budgets and far less oversight of the domestic pot trade –especially on college campuses. These views dovetail with their musical interests. For Nelson, his woeful honky tonk strummings are meant to touch the hearts of the unemployed, the outcasts and those who have rejected the love of their better-informed communities. They cry for what they lack in their souls and the skanky pot joint fills them up with pungent dreams that some lonely night they may chance upon a painless, empty death. For Dog, rap music is about violence. He seeks to give voice to the angry black man who feels betrayed by a society that has moved out of the ghettoes and into the suburbs. Marijuana fuels this inexplicable hatred, giving one an hallucinogenic stage on which to act out inner-city frustrations with gold-plated weaponry and loud, busty women.
College campuses have become a surprising focus for efforts both musical and political to legitimate dangerous lifestyle choices. In California, students were instrumental in getting Health & Safety Code 11357b passed into law last month, effectively legalizing the deadly narcotic. To contain this crisis, states like New Hampshire are seeking to curtail students’ voting rights. A bill has just been introduced in the legislature in Concord that would require, “that ‘the domicile for voting purposes’ of a college student would be the town or city ‘in which such person had his or her domicile immediately prior to matriculation even though his or her intent to return thereto is uncertain.’” According to one expert, the threat to communities is that university students “are basically doing what I did when I was a kid and foolish, voting as a liberal.”
While precise data detailing the extent to which Willie and Snoop finance marijuana movement has not yet been released, it is clear that they are using their musical millions to underwrite a huge network of foundations, think tanks, and political front groups. Indeed, their supporters have funded opposition campaigns so powerful, that drug laws across the nation are collapsing. While Mr. Dog operates in a secretive world of backroom deals and paid enforcers, Willie Nelson has publicly taken the reigns of the “Teapot Party.” This is a political group with a simple one line mission statement: “Cannabis should be legalized — period.” In tight races from Texas to Kentucky, Nelson has used his indomitable political power to intervene on behalf of pot candidates.
Included in this effort have been several high profile arrests that both men use as platforms to spread their quixotic message. As these angry activists of abuse anarchy use their music to secretly promote an illegal agenda, should there not be greater governmental oversight of their work? At the very least, should they not be regulated under campaign finance laws like any political action committee?
In an investigative article released this past fall, marijuana was identified as one of the most crucial challenges facing young people today. The report showed that pot, “finances the worst sorts of criminal hedonists who prey on children. Once in a young person’s hands, the drug wrecks hopes and dreams. It crushes one’s mental development and makes a person incapable of hard work. Our youth addicts lack the ability to face complex problems and lose all interest in physical exercise. It is a gateway to a life deferred, desperate and alone.” As one health leader described it, smoking a joint is like, “throwing sand in a delicate machine and hoping nothing goes wrong.” Further studies have revealed that other musical acts are now enlisting in the Nelson/Dog fight. These groups profit financially from the widescale intoxication of their audiences, for a “stoned” fan will be far more receptive to low-quality acoustics and the bacchanal of a concert hall.
For young people, there is an undeniable sexual component to marijuana abuse. They lack the maturity to master their raging hormones and supple bodies. Drugs cloud over any sense of morality and responsibility, giving them permission to experiment in the most perverse of ways. Women often fall into regretful intimate encounters. Blinded by that yellow haze of smoke, they permit acts as foul as sodomy just to “score” another dose from a roomful of scheming hipster friends. Heterosexual men will be drawn to the convenience of a buddy’s shoulder. Jostling and jokes inevitably lead to hugs and distressing encounters on musty dormroom cots.
Teens will hide away in bathrooms where lowered dungarees, medicine cabinet moisturizers and mirrors are the perfect excuse to gratify oneself. Yes, masturbation addiction is one of the greatest secrets of the pot smoker. They simply cannot resist letting their soft hands explore every crevasse and peak below the belt, teasing and then probing, chafing and then clenching until that last drip of innocence is released, leaving tacky puddles for shocked mothers to discover in the morning.
In the practice of marijuana usage, Mr. Nelson’s adherents in the group NORML (National Organization for the Repeal of Marijuana Laws) favor elaborate water pipes (popularly known as “bongs”). Bongs fit into the suburban consumerist nature of the upper and middle classes, a fact that these eco-friendly activists would be loath to admit. Deep inside, they delight in spending money on elaborately-decorated new possessions that they can brag about to their comrades in the underground. Gripping a long, glassy device and pressing it to one’s lips reveals the confused sexuality of these types of people. The phallic fallacy betrays their painful need to debase their souls in the rough role-play world of the flamboyant homosexual. Even when one bong hit will suffice, the thrill of holding that firm, slimy shaft is too tempting and they will return again and again for mouthfuls of deliciously frothy kicks while companions eye them nervously, anxious for their own private encounters with these rigid simulacra of manhood, shamefully calling out “My turn!” when the ache becomes too harsh.
Members of Snoop Dog’s fanbase have pioneered the use of brown tobacco paper to roll up “blunts.” They prefer this form of delivery device because it reflects the musky hues of their own skin. For ghetto dwellers, the advantage of the blunt is that it can hold far more drug than the normal white-papered joint. This large size insures a high much more intense than that enjoyed by the addict’s Caucasian peers. It also allows for the generous passing around so common in city parks. This type of smoking is a decidedly aggressive act, quite unlike a white boy’s deep lung bong hits in the parking lot of an abandoned factory. Blunts produce irritating clouds that harass the faces of passerby, dominating stretches of busy sidewalks or entire playground benches. This offensive territorial maneuver echoes the use of boomboxes in the 1970s, when roving bands of afro-haired youths laid claim to urban spaces with loud music and break dancing in an effort to denounce “the man.”
We live in a world of conspiracies. Yesteryear’s hippies attacked William Randolph Hearst’s role in the illegalization of drugs. Today’s liberal activists see the Koch brothers as the only reason the Tea Party is front and center on the national political stage. But when faced with a genuine plot to overthrow our morality, should we not rise up and call out those pulling the strings? Most college students suffer from amnesia once they leave the homefront. They forget their concerned mothers and passionate pastors. They embrace horrendous lifestyle choices and get taken advantage of by unscrupulous and untalented musical acts. Their drug-fueled voting efforts and skanky dorm room encounters ultimately threaten the next generation of our beautiful children. And yes, behind this whole maudlin performance it is Willie Nelson and Snoop Dog pulling our children’s puppet strings, getting them to wave their arms in protest and dance foolish jigs pumped into frenzies of liberalism by grievous marijuana joints. As we survey those violated bodies strewn across the battlefields of the drug war, we must act now to protect the future of this nation. Please do the right thing and tell your children!
http://www.sobercollege.com/drugs/marijuana
- Sinful
- Suspicious
- Scared
- Sad
- Amused
- Laughing Out Loud
Author: Stephenson Billings
Stephenson Billings is an Investigative Journalist, Motivational Children's Party Entertainer and Antique Soda Bottle Collector all in one special, blessed package! Facebook me here or Fanmail me: StephensonBillings@yahoo.com !
12:33 pm
But why u mad tho?
Praise or Condemn:
6 
3
12:38 pm
“Willie Nelson, Snoop Dog and the College Voter Marijuana Conspiracy” sounds like the name of a Scooby Doo episode.
Praise or Condemn:
7 
0
12:42 pm
Don’t they realize that the smoking of that pot will give them cancer as well?????
Praise or Condemn:
3 
14
1:11 pm
Actually there has not been one case of cancer ever attributed to smoking marijuana. Not one. EVER.
Maybe you should work on getting your facts straight before using them to justify your racist agenda.
Praise or Condemn:
8 
2
12:46 pm
Stephenson,
I am stunned by this piece. Once again you serve only the relevant need to know nutrition from a buffet of factual offerings and provide the ChristWire readers a satisfying plate to nourish our minds. You deserve a great deal of praise for this effort. In a word, perfection.
It is so sad that American Moms must endure the heartache of finding stiff socks and stained tissues tucked between mattresses when our children are lead to this chute of remorseless moral decline by a skinny-black pied piper like Snoop.
Thank you again for an engaging and enlightening example of the highest journalistic integrity and investigative methods.
Praise be,
BB
Praise or Condemn:
4 
17
3:34 pm
Blanche, all I need is your gentle words of support to get me through the day. You’re both smart and kind. God bless my friend.
Praise or Condemn:
3 
9
7:40 pm
When did you stop beating your wife?
Praise or Condemn:
9 
0
4:02 am
Your article is grossly unfounded, unnecessarily explicit and makes me want to register you on a sexual predator list. Nothing Christ-like about it! It’s disgusting and disrespectful of the sanctity of Christ. I hope you fear for your soul and are truly repentent.
Praise or Condemn:
9 
1
12:46 pm
There was a lyric sang by the gang rapper Two-pack going “Both black and white is smoking the crack tonight” and we can see it going on here. They pervert the message of a decent black like Martin Luther King by making his dream a nightmare. Where King dreamed of the day a little chocolate morsel could run down the street with a white child of a suburb, here we see this degenerate gangsters manipulating older white people to feel guilty unless they smoke of their tribal herb. What Willie Nelson doesn’t know is that these black drugs are often laced with all sorts of bad chemicals, as if ‘smoked weed’ was not already dangerous enough.
Praise or Condemn:
2 
8
3:56 pm
You are a registered sex offender, Pedophile perhaps, regular church goer, almost certainly.
I bet you tell people you believe in God.
I bet your lying when you do.
Praise or Condemn:
7 
2
12:48 pm
“our nation’s most sacred franchise.”
Being what, exactly?
“Country music star Willie Nelson and black rapper Snoop Dog”
Why did you feel the need to put the color of Snoop Dog’s skin, but not Willie Nelson’s?
“In an investigative article released this past fall, marijuana was identified as one of the most crucial challenges facing young people today. The report showed that pot, “finances the worst sorts of criminal hedonists who prey on children. Once in a young person’s hands, the drug wrecks hopes and dreams. It crushes one’s mental development and makes a person incapable of hard work. Our youth addicts lack the ability to face complex problems and lose all interest in physical exercise. It is a gateway to a life deferred, desperate and alone.””
You have to link to a LEGITIMATE news source and/or study, not your own poorly-written “article”.
“They lack the maturity to master their raging hormones and supple bodies.”
Was the “supple bodies” really necessary?
“They simply cannot resist letting their soft hands explore every crevasse and peak below the belt, teasing and then probing, chafing and then clenching until that last drip of innocence is released, leaving tacky puddles for shocked mothers to discover in the morning.”
REAL journalists do not write erotica.
“Even when one bong hit will suffice, the thrill of holding that firm, slimy shaft is too tempting and they will return again and again for mouthfuls of deliciously frothy kicks while companions eye them nervously, anxious for their own private encounters with these rigid simulacra of manhood, shamefully calling out “My turn!” when the ache becomes too harsh.”
See above comment.
“Members of Snoop Dog’s fanbase have pioneered the use of brown tobacco paper to roll up “blunts.” They prefer this form of delivery device because it reflects the musky hues of their own skin. For ghetto dwellers, the advantage of the blunt is that it can hold far more drug than the normal white-papered joint. This large size insures a high much more intense than that enjoyed by the addict’s Caucasian peers. It also allows for the generous passing around so common in city parks. This type of smoking is a decidedly aggressive act, quite unlike a white boy’s deep lung bong hits in the parking lot of an abandoned factory.”
Do you have a source for these racist accusations?
Praise or Condemn:
10 
3
12:51 pm
Why do you hate Jesus?
Praise or Condemn:
1 
8
12:52 pm
You can’t hate something that you don’t believe existed.
Praise or Condemn:
7 
1
1:22 pm
Denying him IS hating him.
Praise or Condemn:
2 
7
1:43 pm
Kin I hate you instead?
Praise or Condemn:
6 
2
3:59 am
NO! I deny Santa Clause, but I don’t hate him. I’m a Christian and don’t feel the need to defend God, nor his son. He’s God. He only asks for and wants my love – that relationship is enough. So, I’m not bothered by the idea of allowing others the freedom to find their way in their own time. Just like God and his son do.
Praise or Condemn:
2 
1
2:50 pm
Claire, your a socialist.
Are you not aware of the assumption of innocence until proven guilty? Well its the same thing really, you assume someoness a proud white anglo saxon protestant male, until confirmation they’re unfortunately black, brown, yellow, red, semetic or female.
Praise or Condemn:
3 
4
3:38 pm
I bet you tell people you’re not a bigot.
I bet you’re lying when you do…
Praise or Condemn:
6 
1
4:03 pm
We prefer Christian Conservative, but I’ll take Bigot.
Praise or Condemn:
3 
5
9:07 am
We are all born sinners.
It is through our acceptance of Christ as our Lord and saviour that we prove our innocence.
It is only *after* that act that we can be assumed innocent… unless of course we are proven guilty once again.
At which point the only way to absolve ourselves from that sin is to repent our sins to our Lord and saviour, J. Christ.
Only then are we once again innocent.
Praise or Condemn:
0 
0
1:36 pm
Franchise:: Noun, the right to vote: “to guarantee the franchise of every citizen.”
Praise or Condemn:
3 
2
3:57 pm
Ok, I’ll give you this, you DID use the word right, but the way you phrased it, you can’t exactly say that you aren’t guilty of confusing people. Not only that, but considering how the alternate meaning to ‘franchise’ is NOT widely known, you should have known better than to use it without having the sentence help define it.
Praise or Condemn:
0 
0
9:09 am
Claire, Claire, my dear Claire…
If you were indeed as perceptive as you seem to think you are you would be able to better recognize satire.
Praise or Condemn:
0 
0
12:51 pm
Snoop Dog is a “black rapper”?!?! HOLY SHIT!!!
Praise or Condemn:
9 
0
3:44 pm
….Wow, Stevie. Just… just wow.
It’s funny, how a good number of the articles you linked to, claiming them to be “investigative reports” are, in fact, articles on THIS SITE, mainly written by yourself, which have been proven to not have had once ounce of research behind them. A real journalist doesn’t link back to themselves, and doesn’t make up facts.
Besides that: what’s wrong with college students voting? I myself am a registered voter in my state, and I vote on issues that directly affect me. What do you have against politically-active young people? Aren’t we the future of America?
Oh, wait. Because we might vote in a way that makes you sad, Stevie, that makes us bad.
Praise or Condemn:
7 
2
3:55 pm
College students should vote in their home locations, close to parental supervision and neighborhood involvement. Most campuses exist in bubbles, far removed from the communities in where they’re located. When peer pressure and radical experimentation mount, these young people may be forced into voting for ballot measures and candidates that violate traditional standards and do not truly serve the locales in which they’re based. I wouldn’t want a bunch of kids in some high-priced ivy tower shouting out the voice of the people of Dyersburg, just because they want cheaper beer and free pot.
Praise or Condemn:
2 
7
4:04 pm
I agree, that college students should vote in their home locations, as voting in their collegiate regions does not represent those locales properly.
However, I WILL argue that “parental supervision and neighborhood involvement” destroy the pretense of voting. My parents hand me my ballot when it arrives, because I only vote IF I consider myself to be well-informed. I will ask for their OPINIONS on certain matters, but not on the entire ballot, because guess what? I’m an ADULT. I don’t need my parents to tell me what I can and cannot vote for.
“Most campuses exist in bubbles, far removed from the communities in where they’re located. When peer pressure and radical experimentation mount, these young people may be forced into voting for ballot measures and candidates that violate traditional standards… I wouldn’t want a bunch of kids in some high-priced ivy tower shouting out the voice of the people of Dyersburg, just because they want cheaper beer and free pot.”
Some. But not all. I attend college in a rather conservative town. The campus is one of the few places where I, along with the others in the queer community here, feel safe to express affection with our same-sexed partners. However, many campuses encourage, and even support, the towns they exist in, having students volunteer to aid those in the community on a regular basis.
Most students who are voting for the legalisation of marijuana are doing so not because they “want free pot”, as you allege, but because we can see the benefits of its legalisation. Many people are arrested each year simply for smoking, or being in possession of, marijuana. By legalising and taxing it, it lowers the number of felonies, helps lower overcrowding in prisons, provides money for the government, and, in fact, allows for regulation of marijuana. Even my parents, who are social conservatives, see the benefits of this; it was my father who first encouraged this in my household.
Praise or Condemn:
6 
2
12:22 pm
“College students should vote in their home locations, close to parental supervision”
You mean they should vote conservative just like their ill-informed bible beating parents? I feel sorry for people like you. There is no secret underground marijuana fueled ballot stuffing campaign. In case you didn’t notice the last election. I could say the same about fox news, but conspiracy implies a secret and its no secret that places like this website and anything owned by Rupert Murdoch want nothing more than to scare the votes out of as many people as possible.
Praise or Condemn:
3 
0
1:32 pm
“Mr. Dog” is actually Mr. Dogg.
http://www.snoopdogg.com/
Please, when writing an article source out your writings properly. It is obvious in so many areas that you are generating purely hypothetical material. The drones reading this are not only mislead by a false deity but an ignorant columnist who is clearly writing material from his delusional fantasies.
Praise or Condemn:
2 
2
3:22 pm
Please don’t be so obnoxious.
Praise or Condemn:
0 
3
3:25 pm
How about a valid rebuttal, Billings? Or do you not have a rebuttal?
Praise or Condemn:
3 
1
4:01 pm
Why should I get dragged into some silly discussion about how to spell the word dog with some mental incompetent?
Praise or Condemn:
3 
5
4:19 pm
Because “Dog” and “Dogg” are two entirely different things. “Dog” is an animal, while “Dogg” is the last name of a human being. What you effectively said was “I don’t care if I got someone’s name wrong, even though I continuously call myself an investigative journalist so I should have known that in the first place” OR “I don’t want to admit that I got someone’s name wrong, even though I should have known better”.
Praise or Condemn:
4 
2
4:35 pm
Because the rapper spells his name as “Dogg”, not “Dog”. Any real journalist would be sure to spell it correctly when referring to the rapper.
Praise or Condemn:
4 
2
5:53 pm
Well I have chosen to spell his name CORRECTLY. I don’t want to perpetuate his mistakes in ruining the minds of children with drugs and poor spelling.
Praise or Condemn:
0 
5
6:36 pm
“Well I have chosen to spell his name CORRECTLY. I don’t want to perpetuate his mistakes in ruining the minds of children with drugs and poor spelling.”
You spelled the WORD, correctly, you spelled his NAME incorrectly. How do you like it when people call you Stephen? Because after all, Stephenson isn’t a real name.
Praise or Condemn:
4 
1
7:57 pm
idgaf about the spelling i just wanna smoke weed with Snoop DOGG and Willies nelson! :O
Praise or Condemn:
3 
1
12:08 am
call me up and i’ll go with you. it’ll be a blast.
Praise or Condemn:
0 
0