Atheists, When You Croak Where Will You Go? – Wonderlific Sample Test to Determine Spiritual Fate
When you croak, where will you go?
This is an important, memorable question that can be asked to many people. Within our lives, there are choices we make that can lead to life or death.
If one of your friends develop a drug addiction, you would tell them that if they do not stop smoking their crack rock or marijuana, it will collude to lead them to a point of addictive death. Every drug gateways to a harder drug and more destructive lifestyle.
Some of you may be dealing with other issues, such as high blood pressure from eating too many salty, greasy cultural foods to being careless risk takers. It is known that life is precious and the most silly act of carelessness can take it all away.
More careless than anything is ignoring the needs of your deeper self. Within every person on Earth, we are made by divine design. You are here and reading this right now due to divine design.
An atheist right now may get angry and balk. They will say there is no such thing as God or Heaven. Wonder if they are right? When you die, you just go and decompost in the dirt. Fine.
But wonder if they are wrong. Your eternal fate will be your teeth gnashing again and again and then being stoked over the slow-roasting firepits of hell.
This is a terrible fate. To test your aptitude and if you will gain enough altitude to float in heaven after death, please take the following quiz and report your code so a trend can be noticed.
[QUIZZIN 2]
- Sinful
- Suspicious
- Scared
- Sad
- Amused
- Laughing Out Loud
Author: Abe
If you don't like what you just read here you can just get out of my country. Now how about that smart-alack.
Follow me on twitters. Poke me as your New Friend on Facebook!!
1:45 pm
This is just bull.
You make it so that there is only one “right” answer for each question. Why would I want to go to heaven if it’s just going to land me with a bunch of people with abhorrent ideas?
Praise or Condemn:
9 
3
2:12 pm
“You make it so that there is only one “right” answer for each question.”
Do you say that to your professors to? Or when you took your SAT’s?
It’s his quiz, on this site targeted to a specific audience. Go make your own quiz on your own site. You can even make it so everyone is right and feels good about it.
I missed two myself, I’m not mad about it, I learned from it.
Praise or Condemn:
3 
3
2:17 pm
Drama seems to follow some wherever they go. Great response, MeAwesome.
Praise or Condemn:
3 
3
2:20 pm
“It’s his quiz, on this site targeted to a specific audience.”
He seemed to target the quiz at a broad group of people (as he included atheists and agnostics as a choice). But he also put forth questions like:
“Do gays have the right to marry?
Yes, it is normal for a man to find an attraction to another man. It is perfectly normal for two women to proudly adopt a child and train it to hate their body’s natural roles.
No, a man’s reproductive system is designed in such a way it contains the elements to create a life when procreation with a female occurs.
I do not know.”
If I marry a woman, and we choose to adopt children, why would we “train it to hate their body’s natural roles”? We’d love our child, just as YOU would love YOUR child. End of story.
And then there’s this “gem”:
“Should only normal people be allowed in the military?
Yes, the battlefield is a place for normal men and depending on job a woman.
No, gays should not be allowed in the military.”
What do you mean, “depending on job a woman”? What is an “acceptable” job for women in the military? And, a person is only “normal” if they are heterosexual? What sort of crap is that? He also fails to provide an answer that says that homosexuals should be allowed in the military; the answers both point to disallowing any non-heterosexual individuals from joining the military. Just because someone is the same gender as you and identifies as homosexual doesn’t mean they want to have sex with you. We find partners the same way you heterosexual people do: by dating, by meeting people, and being attracted to people based on their appearance and personality. Just because I identify as a lesbian doesn’t mean I want to have sex with every girl I see; hell, I don’t even WANT to have sex with ANY person.
Praise or Condemn:
3 
2
3:44 pm
“Just because I identify as a lesbian doesn’t mean I want to have sex with every girl I see; hell, I don’t even WANT to have sex with ANY person.”
Again with the prejudice against the Ambras Syndrome girl!!!
Please stop!
Praise or Condemn:
2 
3
3:52 pm
Tell me how RD’s statement was AT ALL related to the girl with Ambras Syndrome, other than the fact that they both have two X chromosomes?
Praise or Condemn:
3 
1
3:54 pm
She was referring to that poor girl in her “any”.
Praise or Condemn:
1 
3
2:28 pm
Finaly, a pole we can put our faith in. If you don’t know the kerrect answers then your dammed to hell as sure as God made little green apples. But remember, going to hell will only seem like an eternity.
Praise or Condemn:
1 
3
2:29 pm
Shut your lie hole, RD. The sewer stench is offensive. I missed one because I misread the question.
And there is nothing normal about gay people. If they were normal, we could just call them people.
Praise or Condemn:
1 
4
2:43 pm
“Shut your lie hole, RD. The sewer stench is offensive.”
Right, because you can smell things through the computer. How delusional are you?
“And there is nothing normal about gay people. If they were normal, we could just call them people.”
There’s nothing normal about Christian people, either, or we could just call them people.
Nothing wrong about bigoted people, or we could just call them people.
Your god is one hell of a jerk.
Praise or Condemn:
2 
0
3:47 pm
Adam, go fuck yourself with something hard and sandpapery.
Praise or Condemn:
4 
1
2:55 pm
I like how if you answer you’ve never dated or been married your wrong or if you dont care your wrong. Makes sense, right?
Praise or Condemn:
1 
0
3:58 pm
“She was referring to that poor girl in her “any”.”
Wow, you sure are grasping for straws, MeAwesome. I personally am not interested in sexual relations with anybody. That means I’m discriminating against the girl with Ambras Syndrome?
Praise or Condemn:
4 
0
4:09 pm
Rd, being homosexual is not normal. Do a quick experiment.
Go into your bathroom. Strip off all of your clothing and close the door behind you. Look in the mirror. Give yourself a hard look up and down and don’t give into sin.
Just study and you will see you have the capability to procreate. You have been given the parts with which to procreate and create a child. Even by your evolutionist standards, this is the product of millinos of years. Your body is created to continue our species. One of the points to life is procreation. It is written into the definition.
Next, let your eyes look upon your chest. You will see mammalian ludicrosities. They are prominent. After you give birth to a child, you are to use these to feed it. Your body has been designed to nourish a child, even after birth.
Lesbianism flies in the face of all this. Your DNA is hardwired to develop you into a beautiful female, yet you’re rejecting all of this and trying to convince humanity it is normal. You are trying to say that despite ignoring your body and the course of human nature, and 6 billion people on this Earth, that you are somehow normal and deserve marriage. You cannot created a child from sliding into the tepid pools of lesbianism, RD.
If you get married to a lesbian, you two can shack all you want. You will never be able to create life and that is not normal. Normal would be for you to marry a man and know the pleasure of motherhood. Normal would be for you to not ignore nature.
Praise or Condemn:
0 
5
4:16 pm
Under your logic, then, marriages that do not produce offspring within a certain period of time (let’s arbitrarily say 5 years) AND marriages of the elderly should be made null and void since the sole basis for marriage is child rearing.
Also, couples where one or both persons are sterile or are otherwise unable to produce children should be prevented from marrying.
Marriage is MORE than providing an environment to raise a child. First and foremost it is to care for one another. I’ve attended many weddings and NEVER have the couple been asked to swear they will procreate in order to affirm their vows.
Praise or Condemn:
4 
2
4:20 pm
No more dudes nude! This is our last request.
Praise or Condemn:
1 
6
4:36 pm
Wah. My pussy has sand in it, too.
Praise or Condemn:
5 
0
4:40 pm
….enter a state of your choosing you could pick MA at random
Praise or Condemn:
0 
6
7:30 pm
“Dudes Nude, you’re ruining the efforts of homosexuals everywhere and you’re being offensive with your name. If you don’t stop, I will cyber-stalk you and post your personal information because somehow in my mind, that shows that gay people are nice and good and not evil like many, many conservatives say we are, and I will in no way be proving them right by breaking the law!”
Praise or Condemn:
4 
0
7:57 pm
Haha, good one Comedian!
DWTSFan thinks that he is doing good for gays, when in reality he’s the one harming them, not Fake Adam and me. He’s making gays out to look like a bunch of whiny bitches who get mad and stomp their little feet when their favorite show is made fun of. Of course, we both know that most gays are not like that, only this little douche and his gang of buttercups who saw their precious show mentioned on their beloved twitter and are now stomping around this site throwing a hissy, demanding apologies.
Something else occurred to me. Is it possible that DWTSFan WANTS to make people hate gays? He could either be a homophobe in disguise as a gay, OR he could be a self-loathing gay who enjoys getting his balls stomped on by stilettos when he’s not making enemies on the internet.
Or he just needs to get the fuck over himself. “Ooh, look at me, look at me, I’m good at computers and stuffs.”
Praise or Condemn:
3 
1
8:10 pm
Nothing illegal about going to yahoo search typing in a last name http://christwire.org/2010/06/its-official-stephenson-billings-is-a-blogger/ a city and state and getting results.
1. Claire, the day your parents gave you a keyboard is a dark day indeed. Your posts and quotes and emails amount to nothing. I am far too old to engage in these silly games with you and I believe it’s highly inappropriate that your “works” are published on Christwire. This is not the place, nor the time to make wild, childish accusations. I understand that you are a teenager and in my book, that makes you a child. Maybe I shouldn’t expect any less than that a child should be childish.
I love Jack Gould and this is America and Christwire’s open publishing policy has had its benefits. But there are times when freedom of speech crosses the line. This is one of them. Fortunately most visitors to this page will see that you’re being pedantic (that means petty).
And for everyone else, for the official record: I am an Investigative Journalist. I am not a blogger. Bloggers write about shampoos and what’s happening at rock concerts. I am a journalist who investigatives and writes on important cultural topics today from a Christian perspective. Please don’t let this young woman Claire’s personal vendetta against me cloud your judgement about what’s right and righteous in this world.
I am yours in Christ,
Stephenson Billings, Investigative Journalist
Praise or Condemn: 3 5
Reply
o Claire says:
June 9, 2010 at 4:30 pm
“Claire, the day your parents gave you a keyboard is a dark day indeed.”
It’d be awfully silly if my parents gave me JUST a keyboard.
“Your posts and quotes and emails amount to nothing.”
Actually they amount to quite a bit. Namely, the provide PROOF that you are nothing more than a blogger.
“But there are times when freedom of speech crosses the line.”
Actually, when freedom of speech crosses the line is when people like you write articles that condemn and demonize entire groups of people who have never hurt you (i.e. homosexuals).
“Fortunately most visitors to this page will see that you’re being pedantic (that means petty).”
I know what pedantic means, dipshit. Just because you’re old doesn’t mean you have the right to patronize me.
“And for everyone else, for the official record: I am an Investigative Journalist.”
You’ve proven that you did not attend school NOR did you take any sort of course for journalism. You do NOT have credentials and you are NOT an investigative journalist. You CANNOT continue to claim that you are if you also continue to deny us documentation of your credentials.
Conclusion: You are a BLOGGER, until proven otherwise.
Praise or Condemn: 2 4
Reply
Colin Walker says:
June 14, 2010 at 5:49 pm
Maybe he is just a blogger, but at least he has some form of communication ability unlike you appear to have. I’m not really sure why you are so angry at him and frankly I don’t care, but he showed you how it’s done. Classically done and eloquently phrased.
To put it basically for you …. you just got owned!
Praise or Condemn:
1 
4
5:03 pm
No, name defiler. You should change your name to something else so people can tell us apart.
Aside from that, the point is that a union between male and female is normal. A man’s reproductive part is developed to fit inside a woman’s reproductive part. Without errant coding in DNA, a man and woman who attempt reproduction should eventually succeed. Two lesbians will not create a child. Two men will never create a child. They violate natural order by virtue of using their reproductive parts to enter the same gender.
That is the point; the development of our bodies are meant to compliment the other gender.
Praise or Condemn:
1 
6
5:43 pm
“A man’s reproductive part is developed to fit inside a woman’s reproductive part.”
Are you referring to the penis and vagina, Mr. Doctor?
Praise or Condemn:
4 
0
6:45 pm
No, your point was that gay and lesbian couples cannot by themselves produce children. And for this fact alone, marriage should be denied to those couples.
*My point* was: if your entire basis for denying marriage to two loving adults in a consensual relationship is because they cannot produce children then the government should deny marriage to any couple that cannot produce children. To take that a step further, once a married couple is no longer able to bare children their marriage should be nullified.
Civil marriage is what most gay and lesbian couples seek. I think most could probably give a rat’s behind about holy/religious marriage.
Praise or Condemn:
2 
1
7:06 pm
… you then type a city name
some suggested city names are found here
http://christwire.org/2009/04/god-now-hates-vermont-they-passed-gays-marriage/comment-page-1/#comment-7177
Praise or Condemn:
0 
4
4:18 pm
Adam, for crying out loud, shut the fuck up! This is the 21st Century – not only do women have the RIGHT to choose not to procreate, but those of us with brains are aware that there are so many children in the world in need of parents. Nothing that you say is going to change the fact that some women in the world simply do not want to push a kid out of their vaginas. Deal with it.
Oh, and someone claiming to be a “doctor” shouldn’t refer to breasts as “mammalian ludicrosities”.
“They are prominent.”
Not in women with small breasts, they’re not. Not every woman looks like a porn star, you know. Many of us are blessed with small boobs.
Praise or Condemn:
4 
2
8:10 pm
“Rd, being homosexual is not normal. Do a quick experiment.
Go into your bathroom. Strip off all of your clothing and close the door behind you. Look in the mirror. Give yourself a hard look up and down and don’t give into sin.”
You mean, don’t masturbate while looking at myself naked? Really, how retarded are you?
“Just study and you will see you have the capability to procreate. You have been given the parts with which to procreate and create a child. Even by your evolutionist standards, this is the product of millinos of years. Your body is created to continue our species. One of the points to life is procreation. It is written into the definition.”
Yes, I have a functioning uterus, a functioning vagina, and functioning ovaries. But guess what? If I wanted to, I could give birth to a child and still be a lesbian. I would never have to deal with a penis. It’s called “artificial insemination”, dumbass.
“Next, let your eyes look upon your chest. You will see mammalian ludicrosities. They are prominent.”
Most people, especially doctors, call those “breasts”. I’ve seen men who have larger breasts than women. Does that mean that they should be rearing children?
“Lesbianism flies in the face of all this. Your DNA is hardwired to develop you into a beautiful female, yet you’re rejecting all of this and trying to convince humanity it is normal. You are trying to say that despite ignoring your body and the course of human nature, and 6 billion people on this Earth, that you are somehow normal and deserve marriage.”
So, if a pair of people love either other, and are genuinely good people, they don’t “deserve marriage” if they’re of the same gender, but two people of the opposite sex who couldn’t care less about other people CAN? I have every right to marry the person I love, regardless of their gender. By being attracted to women, I’m not “rejecting” that I’m a female at all. I enjoy being female, and I find other females attractive. End of story.
“You cannot created a child from sliding into the tepid pools of lesbianism, RD.”
Bullshit. I just mentioned artificial insemination, you prick. You claim to be a doctor; how can you NOT know about that?
“If you get married to a lesbian, you two can shack all you want. You will never be able to create life and that is not normal. Normal would be for you to marry a man and know the pleasure of motherhood. Normal would be for you to not ignore nature.”
Normal would be for me to do whatever I please with my life. If that involves marrying another woman, adopting children, and raising them to be good people who aren’t ashamed of their identities, then that is just dandy. What’s not “normal” is for pricks like you to tell people that, if they aren’t heterosexual, they’re not normal, and they should either “stop being gay” or die.
Praise or Condemn:
2 
1
4:12 pm
On point to this question, when atheists croak they will find themselves frying in hell.
Praise or Condemn:
3 
2
4:35 pm
Seems there are a lot of atheists bitter because they are going to hell.
Praise or Condemn:
2 
2
4:57 pm
If going to heaven meant that I’d have to spend eternity with the likes of Real Adam, Abe, Tyson, and other asshats like that, I’d much rather go to hell. Satan throws Luaus, you know.
Praise or Condemn:
6 
2
7:27 pm
Yeah, but he expects you to bring the punch, the little prick…
Praise or Condemn:
3 
1
8:23 pm
What an incredible find, DancingROX! Would you like a medal for that outstanding achievement?
Praise or Condemn:
3 
2