Do Not Let Merry Gays Marry in Maryland, Keep it Pure
The gays have long been a terrible scent in the nose of God. The only way he can Febreze their foul fecal wafts from his nose is by spraying them with eternal hellfire. The scent of suffering gay make Satan yip with pleasure and is a victory for morality in America, so every one wins.
Did you know that for every one gay, four children will get dallied? This number means that every gay marriage couple in Maryland would be twice the threat. Let alone that gay marriages do not help America. For everyone on gay marriage couple, there are two more adults who will never have proper children. Is that the type of numbers that will allow America to keep a big enough population to fight off the Chinese?
My gentle friends, please do all you can to join us in Maryland. We must ban gays from marrying for the sake of our children and our country. If you do not like people dead due to sick gay diseases, then you will support our red cape crusade. Let us be heroes for this nation and stand up to the gay menace.
httpv://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=GnjH4xznN1w
- Sinful
- Suspicious
- Scared
- Sad
- Amused
- Laughing Out Loud
Author: Abe
If you don't like what you just read here you can just get out of my country. Now how about that smart-alack.
Follow me on twitters. Poke me as your New Friend on Facebook!!
11:24 pm
“The scent of suffering gay make Satan yip with pleasure and is a victory for morality in America, so every one wins.”
But, wait. Doesn’t making Satan happy count as doing something BAD?
Oh, I forgot. You don’t actually believe anything unless it helps your little agenda. Hell, if some pagan said that homosexuality was bad, you’d praise them as a hero.
“Did you know that for every one gay, four children will get dallied?”
Can you stop making up things? I’m an openly gay female, and I’ve never once had thoughts about molesting a child, or touching one inappropriately. I know a number of homosexuals, in fact, and we all agree: paedophilia is sick and wrong. I’ve seen more heterosexual paedophiles than homosexual paedophiles, as a matter of fact.
“For everyone on gay marriage couple, there are two more adults who will never have proper children.”
So, does that mean that infertile couples or couples who remain childless shouldn’t be allowed to marry? Never mind that your grammar is terrible. “For everyone on gay marriage couple”? Don’t you mean, “For every gay couple”?
Oh, and lesbians can have children via artificial insemination; I have a close male friend who has volunteered to be a sperm donor, if I choose to give birth to a child myself. Gay men and lesbians can also adopt; there are a large number of children in this country, and across the world, without any parents to care for them.
“Is that the type of numbers that will allow America to keep a big enough population to fight off the Chinese?”
I’m sorry, I didn’t know we needed to fight off the Chinese since, you know, we aren’t at war with China. Besides, there’d have to be a nationwide military draft to make that argument even VAGUELY sensible.
“We must ban gays from marrying for the sake of our children and our country. If you do not like people dead due to sick gay diseases, then you will support our red cape crusade. Let us be heroes for this nation and stand up to the gay menace.”
Then we should ban infertile couples, or couples with no intent to have children, from marrying, too. Good luck banning a huge population of people from existing based purely on their sexuality; homosexual marriages were allowed in ancient cultures, including Greece and Rome.
What “gay diseases”? AIDS? Heterosexual people can get it, too, without ever TOUCHING a homosexual individual. Banning people based PURELY on their romantic and sexual attractions isn’t “heroic”. It’s barbaric and cruel. Just like you, actually.
Praise or Condemn:
5 
2
11:27 pm
“I’m an openly gay female”
Did you do something last weekend….?
Praise or Condemn:
3 
3
11:38 pm
I hung out with my female friends (oddly, all heterosexual, and many with boyfriends) and went out for coffee with them. I’ve always been open about my sexuality since I came out of the closet last spring. It has nothing to do with whether I’ve experienced sexual intimacy with another female-identified person or not. Rather, I feel that I have every right to say that I am attracted to members of the same sex as heterosexual people have the right to state their attraction to members of the opposite sex.
Praise or Condemn:
1 
1
11:44 pm
Good answer. How did your play go?
Praise or Condemn:
2 
1
11:51 pm
Wonderfully. We aren’t quite certain just how much money we raised for women in Haiti and for the local domestic violence shelter, but the show itself went wonderfully.
Praise or Condemn:
1 
1
11:56 pm
Well done. Haitian people still need our support. People in Idaho have a well-publicized relationship with them.
Praise or Condemn:
2 
1
11:46 pm
I recently learned that the fecal matter from poorly cleansed hands after gay-sex relations is a transmitter for many diseases. One person that doesn’t wash and sanitize well can pass along meningitis, staph, ecoli and a host of other very nasty problems.
There’s a reason why we don’t fertilize our gardens with human waste – many animal diseases don’t jump from one species to humans.
Praise or Condemn:
2 
4
11:52 pm
BB, your knowledge of fecal matters always amazes me. I recently read an old article about how countries without a Judeo-Christian background fertilize in a ungodly manner.
http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2008/08/080821-human-waste.html
PC4U
Praise or Condemn:
3 
1
12:03 am
It’s also why ALL people wash their hands after using the restroom.
You also know that anal sex can be performed just as easily by heterosexual people, and can have just as many side effects?
Praise or Condemn:
1 
0
7:08 am
ALL people</strong? RD? Really?
Then why do we need federal guidelines and web sites devoted to hand washing? http://www.donteatpoop.com/about.html
The truth is the flamboyant sex on the run lifestyle of many homosexuals means poo is everywhere spreading disease and pestilence. Don't start any threads on the benefits of those hand sanitizers – they do not work as well as hand washing and are ineffective against HIV and other specific nastiness.
http://foodsafety.ksu.edu/en/article-details.php?a=3&c=32&sc=419&id=1136
Praise or Condemn:
0 
0
2:32 am
Maryland, not FAIRYland
Praise or Condemn:
1 
6
4:02 am
If being lesbian was natural, you would not need “artificial insemination”. You’d be able to slap flap and pop up with a baby. That’s not the case, because you need a man. That shows you right there that lesbians are against nature and God.
Praise or Condemn:
0 
5
12:04 pm
“If being lesbian was natural, you would not need “artificial insemination”.”
Funny, because heterosexual women require the same basic thing; artificial insemination simply means that the sperm is inserted into my vagina via a medical instrument, not a penis. But I guess that means that heterosexual women aren’t natural, either.
“You’d be able to slap flap and pop up with a baby.”
There’s no such thing as a flap. And you call yourself a doctor? Hah!
“That’s not the case, because you need a man.”
Only if I intend to give birth to a child myself. Otherwise, I can easily adopt a child.
“That shows you right there that lesbians are against nature and God.”
Explain that to my two best friends, who are both lesbians and have been together for over two years and are both Christians. As one put it, “God didn’t want me to have kids, which is why I’m a lesbian with no desire to have kids. Population control on the human race.”
Praise or Condemn:
1 
1
1:35 pm
Artificial insemination requires a male and female partner
Adoption requires male and female parents.
Its biological, its natural.
Praise or Condemn:
0 
1
1:59 pm
Yes, RD, and heterosexual women have nothing against the creators of semen. Stop clinging and comparing yourself to a normal woman.
Answer this: can you and whatever lesbian slapper you go to bed with tonight, tomorrow night or any other night ever produce life-creating material while you are having sex? No, you cannot. You know why? You are both women. You are sick because you are violating nature.
Sure, there are some women who may need artificial insemination so she and her HUSBAND, a man, can produce a child. There is nothing wrong with that; she has a genetic disorder. Are you comparing yourself to women who have genetic disorders, RD? Are you saying there is something genetically wrong with you and that’s why you have to be a lesbian?
I doubt you will agree with that and know this; you choose to be a lesbian. You’re choosing to go out and bait women to go scuba diving into your sinful waves of portly sin. You’re choosing a life of sweaty stewed lesbianism and you cannot think that when you are in bed, shreaking in ecstasy with some other women, that it is natural and the way life is created.
Praise or Condemn:
0 
2
2:23 pm
“Answer this: can you and whatever lesbian slapper you go to bed with tonight, tomorrow night or any other night ever produce life-creating material while you are having sex?”
No, they cannot, but WHY DO YOU CARE? Similarly, WHY DO YOU CARE whether I, a heterosexual female, choose not to have children? You shouldn’t care; it’s none of your business. That’s what I hate about religious freaks like you – you think you have the right to “care” about people who have said time and again that we don’t want you “caring” about us.
Praise or Condemn:
1 
0
2:28 pm
Claire, patients do ask about family planning. It is a part of the job. I’ve yet to have a lesbian couple but I can’t wait for the opportunity to come, because I will question why if they think it is normal to be lesbians, then why do they need semen to have a child?
You are caught in a corner with that one. If two women choose to be lesbians and think it is normal, then why do they still have to come running back to a sperm bank or adoption to have a kid. It is all the result of a normal scientific process: reproduction. It takes a male and female to create children, Claire.
And lesbian women are not normal. Is there something wrong with a lesbian woman’s body or genes? Are you saying genetic women may have a disorder that requires them to use artificial insemination, Claire? Is there something wrong with lesbians at a genetic level?
If so, well let’s research that some more. We can name the disorder or already use the existing name: Lesbian Syndrome – a woman who has an insatiable urge to touch the genitalia of another female, then cry when she wants a child and still try to claim it is normal for two women to think they should be in a relationship, when they still have to go semen seeking to produce a child.
Praise or Condemn:
0 
1
2:47 pm
“Claire, patients do ask about family planning. It is a part of the job.”
Well good for you, but we’re NOT asking for your advice, so what’s your point?
“I can’t wait for the opportunity to come, because I will question why if they think it is normal to be lesbians, then why do they need semen to have a child?”
I can’t wait for the opportunity to come, either, because hopefully they will report you to your superior and you’ll get kicked out on your ass.
“If two women choose to be lesbians”
Nobody chooses to be gay! As my best friend (a gay male) says: “Why would I choose to be a member of one of the most discriminated-against groups on the planet?”
“It takes a male and female to create children, Claire.”
Dude, don’t patronize me. I’m well aware that it takes semen, which only males produce, and eggs, which only females produce, to create a child, dipshit.
“Is there something wrong with lesbians at a genetic level?”
There are many different theories as to what causes homosexuality, and one of the ones that many gays subscribe to is that yes, it could be something genetic.
“We can name the disorder or already use the existing name: Lesbian Syndrome – a woman who has an insatiable urge to touch the genitalia of another female, then cry when she wants a child and still try to claim it is normal for two women to think they should be in a relationship, when they still have to go semen seeking to produce a child.”
I did a google search for “Lesbian Syndrome” and the only somewhat reliable source I found was from Oprah. No medical websites, no psychology websites. Nice try, you wanker.
Praise or Condemn:
3 
0