US National Debt Explained So Even Women, Blacks, Liberals and Gays Understand
As all conservative God fearing men know, water runs downhill not uphill. This fact seems to be lost on certain segments of the population unfamiliar with the natural way of things and Bible scripture. For some, a clear explanation of frequently asked questions is needed to familiarize these groups with successful social mores and the financial sacrifices required for citizens of the greatest nation.
What Really Makes Up the National Debt?
To understand the elements that make up the debt, one must understand that money does not grow on a money tree. Some will be startled and even despondent to discover this well known fact. The truth is liberals’ demands for voters’ rights, clean water, food safety, air safety, workers’ so called rights, and love for entitlements has created this toxic brew of debt.
The situation is similar to a liberal wife spending money on a new car seat for the baby, when the family really needs a gun to shoot wayfaring dark intruders. Here’s a chart that shows the breakdown of evangelical reasons for the $14.131 Trillion (USD) in debt as of January 31, 2011.
Behind these gruesome numbers are the unions, who promote these groups and pick at the carrion of our citizens’ hard work. We would have rebates our wealthiest citizens and zero unemployment if unions could stop complaining about workplace safety and demanding adherence to a work week schedule.
When Did We Get All This Debt? Where Did This Originate?
Under the President Who Is not President Bush, the National Debt has grown $3.56 Trillion dollars. On January 31, 2009, the debt was $10.569 Trillion. On January 31, 2011, the National Debt was $14.131 Trillion. It really doesn’t matter who was president, but just for fun here’s a graphical representation of the Debt increases of $8.3 Trillion from 2001 through 2011 by President.
Some liberals will note that the National Debt increased 75% (from $5.871 Trillion to $10.64 Trillion) under President Bush and only 25% ($10.64 to $14.131 Trillion) under the President Who Is Not President Bush. This is a lack of understanding that needs corrected.
Looking at the graph above, one can plainly see under the scriptural leadership of President Bush, the debt rose only little more in eight years than the two year span of debt under the President who is not President Bush. We also have to remember that President Bush tax cuts for wealthy Americans also created jobs for the blacks, gays and women in flower shops, antique stores and as caddies at the country club. Blacks and women also had the added benefit of military service, but not the gays who could stay home with their power bottoms.
President Bush faced down terrorists with a War in Iraq and even added some Medicare entitlements like a drug program and part D which benefits older liberal women with no husbands and, of course, mostly blacks. In the liberal mind, the increases during their Messiah President’s first two years looks like the chart below.
The liberal mind says the interest belongs to President Bush when these same liberals cheered when The President Who Is Not President Bush was sworn into office. President Bush isn’t President today and no longer has anything to do with this debt. Get some accountability, liberals, interest is the responsibility of this president!
Liberals, blacks and women like to blame the recession on President Bush when it was these same lazy people that decided to stop working as soon as the Food Stamp President was elected.
Liberals like to blame the Medicare Drug Program and Medicare D on President Bush. These programs would not exist if it weren’t for the single spinsters that have no husband to care for their needs and the blacks accustomed to welfare.
The TARP bailout of WallStreet is not President Bush’s problem because if we had less regulation and allowed Investment and Banking to do that voodoo that they do so well, we would never have had a collapse in the first place. Banks were forced to approve housing loans for inappropriate applicants out of fear of backlash from liberals and the unions that might protest.
So, How Can We Get Out of This Mess?
First, we must elect a conservative president that can present a doctrine of austerity for those citizens that have not proven themselves worthy of tax subsidies, like the rich.
Second, we must eliminate the one person – one vote democratic process that leads to the anarchy we see today. The fact that a minority holds the highest office should be proof enough that some people really shouldn’t be allowed to vote. Get out the vote campaigns need to be illegal. Promotion of apathy and malaise that keeps minorities, women and gays’ vote impact emotionally negligible will be helpful with a growing minority population.
Third, women only get paid, on average, for the 70% contribution they make to the gross national product. Certain biological imperatives such as reproductive health need to be the domain of the 100% man earners of the household. Women are not emotionally suited to make decisions about their own healthcare. Funding for reduced cost and free clinics need to be eliminated and access laborious enough to effectively eliminate abortion.
Forth, so called protections like clean air and water need to be let go. We need to return to the free hand of fate days where downed cattle became sausages.
Fifth, marriage must be made a conduit out of poverty rather than the fairy land freedom of a liberal education. Privatization of education and instruction directed toward standardized testing rather than skill building is a great start. Disincentives for achievement by elimination of science fairs and other liberal elitist education festivals are already taking hold.
Sixth – race, gender, age, sexual orientation, and disability discrimination needs to be removed as a legal gateway for entitlements. Businesses cannot hire the best and brightest if they must discriminate by considering the gay, ovulating, geriatric, and lazy.
Just six simple ways to turn America into the proud country she could be and all it takes is electing a God Fearing Conservative with your interests in mind.
- Sinful
- Suspicious
- Scared
- Sad
- Amused
- Laughing Out Loud
Author: Blanche Beecham
"Blanche Beecham lends a soft, learned hand to the fourth estate with incite-full investigations on diverse topics such as Politics, Love, and Lifestyle. Her many years experience as a wife, mother, ladies book club president and financial auditor make her well suited to ferreting out the truth and giving it a sound shake." - Rev. Jackson Lee Whitebelley, Publisher and Editor of "The Incubator" - Follow me on Twitter! @BLANCHEBEECHAM
2:45 am
I am sure this is an intriguing story, unfortunately since I am a woman I did not understand it.
Praise or Condemn:
10 
2
8:14 am
Great article, i think that even our muslim, fascist, dictator Hussein Obama will understand it.
Praise or Condemn:
2 
3
8:19 am
I would like to agree with this, and if the government had done the RIGHT thing and subsidize the Tea Party instead of homosexual sex orgies, then we would not be in this mess that we’re in!
Praise or Condemn:
3 
2
9:14 am
You people will go to any lengths to blame everything that is wrong with this great national on the Liberals, won’t you.
I agree that the “interest” is the responsibility of the President. BUT, which President was it that accrued such a huge debt? (*cough* Iraq war) Not the “so-called” Muslim (wrong), fascist (also wrong) dictator (so VERY wrong) President that is in office now. By the way…dictator?!?! Since he was voted INTO office and can be voted OUT of office, he is not a dictator.
Blanche, Blanche, Blanche. READ what you wrote and tell me that you can actually back your words up with more than just YOUR charts. (I see you’ve mastered Excel though. Nice work on the “fictitious” numbers.) Once again you belittle women by saying that they have NO say in their healthcare. What you’re saying is that if a woman learned that she had cancer, it would be up to the husband to decide whether she lives or dies? (I suppose it could be an easy way to get rid of a shrew, wouldn’t it.) Shame on you. How many women have died out of your….faction because a MAN decided that the household couldn’t afford it? Is a woman THAT worthless, in your “opinion”?
I would think the “failure” of Wall Street would be cheered by you and not lamented. Isn’t it the bastion of the rich? So why should you care if it fails? It would help drive us back to the “dark ages” that you all seem to long for so badly.
Oh yes, by all means, let’s get rid of the “one man, one vote” process. Let’s let the ineffective politicians we have in office NOW decide who should be our President. I hate to break it to you, but it’s already being done. It’s called the “Electoral College”. The Founding Fathers put that in place with the Constitution that we all hold so dear. Why? Because even then, they considered the American people too stupid to make their OWN decisions. I should think you’d embrace that part. That’s ole Dub-yah got voted in in his run against Gore. Which, of course, proves that even the Founding Fathers didn’t anticipate what that would result in. (Hind-sight is 20/20.)
Praise or Condemn:
0 
1
9:26 am
Mainiac58,
Happy to see you willfully changed your avatar.
As populations age, the proportion of women increases dramatically. Is this really fair and equal treatment?
http://www.transgenerational.org/aging/demographics.htm#SexRatio
Praise or Condemn:
1 
0
9:59 am
So the majority of women take better care of themselves. Whose fault is that? What I’m gleaning from your post is that “if more women DIED, it would balance out the numbers”? Is that pretty much it? In order to keep it “fair”, some women have to die?
Shame on your twisted way of thinking. They made a movie called “Logan’s Run” that should surely appeal to you, my dear. It’s about people NOT being allowed to live past a certain age. They “mandated” to commit to euthanasia to “keep the balance”.
Also shame on your for using such a reputable site as a reference point. Since it’s a site that “assists” the elderly, I doubt very much that they would appreciate you using them as a “jumping off point” to reinforce your SICK point.
(Oh and get used to the avatar changes. I have soooo many and I DO love to use them.
)
Praise or Condemn:
0 
0
11:38 am
Next your going to start talking about soilent green! We are talking FACTS here NOT fictitious movies!
I look forward to your future rude uninformed comments and avatar changes. Do you have a pony or unicorn?
Praise or Condemn:
1 
1
8:58 pm
“Next your going to start talking about soilent green! We are talking FACTS here NOT fictitious movies!”
Well, then my movies and your “facts” are going hand-in-hand. They are BOTH works of fiction. I just ADMIT the movies are. Besides, Soilent Green would probably work better. Blanche gave me a link to show me that “there are too many women and not enough men” in our society. What better way to eliminate that problem? At least becoming Soilent Green would give you “held down” women a chance to be……”productive”. Wow! It might even manage to move you one notch above the animals.
“Do you have a pony or unicorn?”
Umm…nope. Besides, you silly woman, everybody knows that unicorns aren’t real. Sort of like the things that you people call “facts”.
Praise or Condemn:
0 
0
9:25 pm
I think it is time for a red bull intervention on our little friend.
Praise or Condemn:
1 
1
10:02 pm
I don’t drink Red Bull either, Blanche, my dear. It’s not healthy for you. Kind of like the “kool-aid” I’m sure YOU people are planning on stirring up. I prefer a nice cold glass of spring water or a glass of milk. You?
Praise or Condemn:
0 
0
10:45 pm
I prefer sweet tea. I meant a pony or unicorn AVATAR!
Praise or Condemn:
1 
0
11:10 pm
“I prefer sweet tea.”
Good to see you keep God’s “temple” clean. You’ll live longer.
“I meant a pony or unicorn AVATAR!”
Now why would I want to have one of those? Those would be for girls. Are you calling me a girl, Susie? If you are, then I’m very offended. If you aren’t, then I apologize for “reading between the lines”.
Praise or Condemn:
0 
0
11:33 pm
Now Mainiac58 is being a misogynist.
“Now why would I want to have one of those? Those would be for girls. Are you calling me a girl, Susie? If you are, then I’m very offended. ”
Typical liberal, calling the ChristWire Fellowship racists and bigots when he is actually the woman hater. Now I’m offended, but I won’t stop praying for you, Mainiac58.
Praise or Condemn:
2 
1
12:11 am
“Now Mainiac58 is being a misogynist”
In what way? Because I was offended if I was being called a girl? You wouldn’t be offended if someone called YOU a girl? (Probably not,) There was NOTHING misogynistic about my statement. Besides, why didn’t you bring the whole statement and not just “pick out” what you needed to make your accusation? Wait, I’ll go get it for you…
“If you aren’t, then I apologize for “reading between the lines”.”
See, that’s how you get the WHOLE facts.
“calling the ChristWire Fellowship racists and bigots…”
Because with EVERY story that you people call “articles” it gets proved. With the responses to questions and posts by others it gets proved. How many times have I seen where EVERYTHING that is wrong with the World and the US is due to the Hispanics, blacks, Asians or the homogays. Oh and let’s not forget the lesbians. Justin Bieber, in particular (by YOUR logic). Go ahead. Deny it. (You’d better be able to read faster and copy and paste faster than me. Out of your league.)
“…when he is actually the woman hater.”
I think we’ve already proven how you twisted this one into place.
“Now I’m offended, but I won’t stop praying for you, Mainiac58.”
Why? Are YOU a woman? Please don’t. Pray for me, that is. I’ll do my own praying, thank you. I’ll keep this site in MY prayers. It might be a test to God’s patience though. It’s okay. Aren’t you in the tornado belt? Remember what you said God’s purpose for tornadoes was? Hey! That must mean this really IS God’s country up here. How many tornadoes have you ever heard of in Maine?
Praise or Condemn:
0 
0
12:48 am
“That must mean this really IS God’s country up here. How many tornadoes have you ever heard of in Maine?”
I know how you like, what you call facts, so here you go:
http://www.maine.gov/mema/prepare/prep_display.shtml?id=163532
“Oh and let’s not forget the lesbians. Justin Bieber, in particular (by YOUR logic). Go ahead. Deny it.”
I don’t deny it. Justine Bieber is the worst lesbian scourge on this planet. She intices little girls to her concerts to have squealing pillow fights which turn in to anal drug taking sex orgies. It disgusts me.
Praise or Condemn:
0 
0
12:51 am
There was even a tornado in Maine on Thanksgiving, and you call it “God’s Country”.
Also, I do not live in the Tornado Belt or anywhere near your made up M-D line.
Praise or Condemn:
0 
0
1:14 am
Ooo… you’re learning. Now THAT I like. FACTS!!! Just a little something from the State’s site you chose (well done)…
“Maine averages one to two tornadoes per year, typically touching down in uninhabited wooded areas.”
Which would explain my not having heard about them. There is so much wooded area up here, that only the Forest Rangers would know about the majority of these. Also from the State site…
“Because of Maine’s sparse population, there have not been significant amounts of property damage or personal injury.”
Guess we’re low on sinners up here.
Now back to YOU, Bruce.
“There was even a tornado in Maine on Thanksgiving, and you call it “God’s Country”.”
Your point? I wasn’t aware that Thanksgiving was a High Holiday. Is it Religion based? I think it’s more “heritage” based. So your point is moot.
“Also, I do not live in the Tornado Belt or anywhere near your made up M-D line.”
The Mason-Dixon Line is very real, I assure you. With the old maps you seem to be using, it should be clearly drawn out in bright red. Look again. You may have just missed it. Sooo, what state DO you live in? I told you where I live. Quid pro quo.
Praise or Condemn:
0 
0
10:55 pm
Maniac58, please let the good lord baby jesus into your heart, let go of your homosexual rage and embrace the mighty wrath of our god of the mountain El Shaddai!
Also, Bart Simpson is gay.
Praise or Condemn:
0 
0
10:04 am
I love the charts! So in-depth, so informative!
Praise or Condemn:
1 
1
10:25 am
You forgot “so pretty”. After all, it was a woman who produced them. Isn’t that the response they should be looking for?
You also forgot “so biased”. Again I ask you, what is your source for these outrageous numbers? C’mon. A link, even just the names of the sites themselves. PROVE your numbers, my dear. Where…are …your…FACTS?!?!
That’s why no one takes your constant barrage of derogatory “articles” seriously. You refuse to provide the FACTS they are based on. The occasional “so true”, “well researched” and “great article” from your cronies don’t make the article true. It only proves that, like the rest of the “sheople” on here, you’ll believe ANYTHING you read because of who wrote it and not because it was based on FACTS. And you want us to vote in one of YOUR constituents? Fat chance of THAT happening if they also believe everything they read as Gospel without checking it out first.
(womanizing hate-mongers)
Praise or Condemn:
0 
0
11:44 am
If you are a christian as you have claimed why do you keep calling us sheople? You sir, are the one insulting Blanches work by referring to it as pretty.
I bet she put lots of work into them. I bet she spent hours slaving away on the computer instead of slaving away at the oven. Think of the sacrifices her husband had to make, eating at McDonalds so that we could read this very well written AND informative piece, yet you insult her and her hard work and the heart burn that her poor husband had to suffer thru so you can get a sick little laugh!
WELL HA HA SIR! HA HA!
Now you have your laugh you sick man!
Praise or Condemn:
2 
0
11:47 am
I have a feeling (inspired by god?) that this is really the trolling work of Claire. I imagine that she realized that as an outed asexual lesbian she would never get us to accept her homo gay agenda. So she created a new account and is pretending to be a grouchy supposedly saved man so that she can infiltrate our group and start turning us one by one into homo gays. Well it’s not working Claire! I see thru you!
Praise or Condemn:
0 
0
1:51 pm
Wrong. When those comments were posted my dad and I were lugging shit out of my dorm room, then I was taking the final exam for my Statistics class. Then we finished moving me out. This is the first time I’ve been on the internet today.
Praise or Condemn:
1 
0
2:11 pm
Susie, you really ARE as naive as I originally thought you were. I was going to give you a little credit where it was due, but I’ll be damned if I can find anything.
(smiley for ya)
I call you “sheople” because you BLINDLY and without question follow the rules of some masochistic, women-loathing, bigoted, racially biased and just plain hateful MEN!!!
“You sir, are the one insulting Blanches work by referring to it as pretty.”
Sorry, but it IS pretty. Such beautiful, bright colors. You don’t think it’s pretty, Susie? I guess I’m not the ONLY one who is insulting.
“Think of the sacrifices her husband had to make, eating at McDonalds…”
WHOA!!! Hold the horses. Isn’t there an article on this site somewhere about NOT eating at McDonald’s because they’re Communist or supporting the “homogay agenda” or some other ridiculous reason like that? Soooo, why would Blanche’s husband eat there? Surely in a city as big as yours, there MUST be other places he could have eaten. The heartburn is a “curse from God” for eating there.
“…so that we could read this very well written AND informative piece…”
Mm-hm…’nuff said right there. It’s a “piece” alright. But, I’ll let others comment on what it’s a piece of.
Back to you and may God bless.
Praise or Condemn:
0 
0
2:32 pm
Claire your not fooling me one bit. you have obviously learned some new bigger words and opened a new account!
Dear Clair/Maniac I do not care to hear about you and your father lugging jars of fecal matter out of your apartment…that is just gross
Manic/Clair: My name is Susan not susie. No one has called me that since my late husband. Unless you are trying to fill his size 15 shoes (and a yankee like you could never fill a real mans shoe)do not call me that, or I will have to hire ninjas (christian ninjas of course) to dispatch you.
Praise or Condemn:
0 
0
11:37 am
I almost trusted this article until I realized that it was written by a woman. Stop trying to mislead all these good Christian people, sister. It’s obvious that if it couldn’t be understood by women, a good white Christian man needed to author the article so that you could understand it, sister. Please replace this article with the original article by the original Christian white male author. Thank you.
Praise or Condemn:
2 
0
2:45 pm
“Claire your not fooling me one bit. you have obviously learned some new bigger words and opened a new account!”
Learned some new bigger words? Unlike you, who hasn’t the slightest clue of which form of your/you’re to use, I have had good vocabulary, spelling, and grammar for quite some time now. And no, me and maniac are not the same person.
“Dear Clair/Maniac I do not care to hear about you and your father lugging jars of fecal matter out of your apartment…that is just gross”
By “shit” I meant “stuff” (i.e. clothing, books, boxes), and they were from my dorm room. I do not have an apartment.
“Manic/Clair: My name is Susan not susie. No one has called me that since my late husband. Unless you are trying to fill his size 15 shoes (and a yankee like you could never fill a real mans shoe)do not call me that, or I will have to hire ninjas (christian ninjas of course) to dispatch you.”
And my name is Claire not Clair.
Praise or Condemn:
0 
0
3:06 pm
“Claire your not fooling me one bit. you have obviously learned some new bigger words and opened a new account!”
Ahh-ha-ha-haa!!! Oops, sorry, Now, where was I. Oh yeah.
Susie, you just keep amazing me. I haven’t laughed like that in so long. I’ve been accused of being “other people” on other forums, but this is a first for here. I’m proud that you think Claire is me and I’m Claire. Means I’m doing a good job at fighting the “good” fight. You are right though, it is a new account. It’s just MINE and not Claire’s.
“(christian ninjas of course)”
Kind of an oxymoron given the statement you did in another thread about them being “half-humans”, was it?
Almost forgot…BANG!!! There it is.
“(and a yankee like you could never fill a real mans shoe)”
BIGOT!!! (so, so bitter) Why would I only want ONE man’s shoe? I prefer to have BOTH my feet covered, thank you.
Praise or Condemn:
0 
0
3:40 pm
maybe our right Claire is a little harpie but she never insults us with encoded smileys.
What is the deal with “AND BANG THERE IT IS” it is very annoying how you do that on every post.
Keep dreaming your cold yankee feet will never fill my dead husbands shoes or my throbbing woman hole…you sick sick perverted man.
Praise or Condemn:
0 
1
3:56 pm
“…with encoded smileys.”
Again I ask you, if they are so evil, WHY ARE THEY ACTIVATED!!! You REALLY need someone who knows a little about how to run one of these forums to do the “back of the house” work. I’d offer to assist you, but I’d be afraid of just what might BE in the back of the house.
“What is the deal with “AND BANG THERE IT IS” it is very annoying how you do that on every post.”
It’s very annoying because you people just keep spitting out the racist, bigoted, WHITE SUPREMACIST statements in every post. (Get used to it. I will point them out every time I see one.
)
“…my throbbing woman hole…you sick sick perverted man.”
WOW!!! You talk about your “throbbing woman-hole” and call me a pervert in the same sentence. AMAZING!!! It’s okay though. You only managed to point the finger right back at yourself. (pervert)
Praise or Condemn:
0 
0
4:10 pm
you insult jesus with your sinful posts
Praise or Condemn:
0 
1
6:03 pm
Susan’s a whore.
Praise or Condemn:
0 
0
10:49 pm
cast not the first stone harlot!
If you guys are not the same person why are your posts ALWAYS one after the other?
Praise or Condemn:
0 
0
11:20 pm
“…cast not the first stone harlot!”
Mad because she beat you to it, Susie?
“If you guys are not the same person why are your posts ALWAYS one after the other?”
Well, if they weren’t one after the other, they’d be the SAME post, now wouldn’t they. See, now if you REALLY read what I write, you would have noticed where I said that I have worked on MANY forums. (Yup, back of the house maintenance and member control.) I know how to navigate much faster than you do, apparently. Doesn’t take a genius to figure out that if you watch the right side of the screen, you can see when someone has posted. I follow you and Blanche around like that. Actually it’s easier with you two (and Bruce makes three). You three are the most vocal and love to have “discussions” with Claire. If she posts, you’re sure to be on it like sharks to blood.
Praise or Condemn:
0 
0
3:40 pm
Well written BB. Your knowledge of the economy rivals that of a man. However your ability to put it to a child’s level is so eloquent. The local school district is going to use your article to introduce male second graders to the world of fiscal responsibility.
Praise or Condemn:
2 
1
5:03 pm
So glad to help the children.
Praise or Condemn:
1 
1
6:09 pm
But not female second graders? Why not?
Praise or Condemn:
0 
0
6:28 pm
It would be “un”Christian to educate a female, Claire.
Haven’t they hammered that home enough yet? Good question though. I can’t WAIT for the answer. Should be good. Most of them are….NOT!!!
Praise or Condemn:
0 
0
9:24 pm
Its not ““un”Christian to educate a female” Maniac 43.
In our local school district, girls do not get economics until 9th grade checking.
Praise or Condemn:
0 
0
9:40 pm
“Maniac 43″
Why is it when I am civil and call everyone by their name, you people STILL insist upon being childish? So sad.
“Its not ““un”Christian to educate a female”…”
As long as they STOP after high school, right. God forbid they should get an education that might put them on the same level as a MAN.
“…girls do not get economics until 9th grade checking.”
For real? You have a whole class dedicated to writing checks? I learned how to write a check in about 5 minutes. Talk about a waste of “educational” time.
Praise or Condemn:
0 
0
10:01 pm
Don’t worry Maniac, these people can’t read worth shit. After all, they can’t read their bible, but they claim to be Christians.
Praise or Condemn:
1 
0
4:36 pm
“Susan B. Xenu
May 16, 2011
“you insult jesus with your sinful posts”
I do? I think you’d better go back and reread what you said to me earlier and then ask yourself who is insulting Jesus.
YOU insult his intelligence if you think he can’t “read” through you. You have a potty mouth that is epic for a Grandmother. Someone needs to scrub YOUR mouth out with soap. I would have expected to hear what you said in some pornographic novel, but NOT from a Grandmother. (hypocrite)
Praise or Condemn:
0 
0
4:59 pm
Excuse me Mainiac12, but you need to remove the camel from your smote.
You are relying on an outmoded stereotype of what a “grandmother” should be to harass and harangue Susan, yet expecting her to amend her opinions to meet your narrow, silly views.
You have the debating skills of lint, but not nearly the weight.
Praise or Condemn:
1 
0
5:15 pm
amen sister blanche
Praise or Condemn:
1 
0
5:37 pm
“Excuse me Mainiac12,”
Put your glasses back on. You got my name wrong yet again.
“you need to remove the camel from your smote”
Again with the riddles, Blanche? The only meaning I can find for “smote” is a verb and yet you use it like a noun.
“You are relying on an outmoded stereotype of what a “grandmother” should be to harass and harangue Susan…”
Not really, my dear. I know some Grandmothers who talk the way she does, but they are FAR from Christians. I expected better from her than the filthy language she uses.
“yet expecting her to amend her opinions to meet your narrow, silly views.”
Really? I was just following the lead of your members. Isn’t that what YOU expect from anyone who doesn’t conform to YOUR way of thinking? (Twisted as it is.)
“You have the debating skills of lint, but not nearly the weight.”
Now THAT I would have expected from you, Blanche. (Thank you for not letting me down.);) Debating skills of lint? Really? You’re not being serious, right? You people redirect the topic every time you can’t come up with a “fact-based” answer and I don’t know how to debate? You resort to name-calling and the occasional “Jesus loves you” as responses and I don’t know how to debate? Please.
(hypocrite)
Praise or Condemn:
0 
0
5:00 pm
what are you even talking about?
Praise or Condemn:
1 
0
5:44 pm
Oh Heck. Let’s just bring the whole post.
“Susan B. Xenu
May 16, 2011
3:40 pm
maybe our right Claire is a little harpie but she never insults us with encoded smileys.
What is the deal with “AND BANG THERE IT IS” it is very annoying how you do that on every post.
Keep dreaming your cold yankee feet will never fill my dead husbands shoes or my throbbing woman hole…you sick sick perverted man.”
THAT is what I’m talking about. Potty mouth. No one wants to hear your vile description of your “secret place”. I suppose I should remember what my Communications Professor said and make my post easy enough for a three year old to understand. I’ll try to remember that in the future. Sorry for confusing you…..more.
Praise or Condemn:
0 
0
6:56 pm
your the one that is trying to get into my granny panties sicko. How is that any dirtier than anything else on this webpage.
You said that you had been saved over 40 years ago, but are now quoting your communications professor? Unless you went to school just a few years ago I think you are not what you claim to be. I imagine your one of those internet troll that I hear about on here.
well Mr. troll you will never win, you will never get us to turn from the truth for we are on the side of truth.
Praise or Condemn:
0 
0
7:31 pm
“your the one that is trying to get into my granny panties sicko”
Again you try to twist my words to suit your “agenda”. THAT is a disgusting thing to say. (Also, the picture that you just put in my head is making me a little ill.) You seem to be very good at “reading between the lines”. Not very ACCURATE, but very good. I’m starting to think you kind of like me. Am I the “bad boy” you’ve always wanted to experience? Dream on. (pervert)
“You said that you had been saved over 40 years ago, but are now quoting your communications professor? Unless you went to school just a few years ago I think you are not what you claim to be.”
Wrong yet again. You really should stop making assumptions. Actually, I’m BACK in school to further my education. Tried it? You really should.
My favorite class was Professional Writing, none of which I’ve seen in ANY of the articles you hacks “mass produce”.
Praise or Condemn:
0 
0
7:43 pm
I am not having sex with you. Please stop trying!
If your such a great writer then you write something!
Praise or Condemn:
0 
0
8:02 pm
“I am not having sex with you. Please stop trying!”
WOW!! Your fantasies run pretty deep, don’t they. I wonder if your late husband is in Heaven watching what you’re doing. (TWISTED pervert)
“If your such a great writer then you write something!”
I would, but your heads would probably explode from all the FACTS and sources I would provide. Not the “pulled out of thin air” facts that YOU people “mass-produce”, but the real, “provable” kind.
Well, that and it has to be posted under “Hate Mail” and it wouldn’t be. ENLIGHTENING maybe, but not hateful like the ones here.
Praise or Condemn:
0 
0
5:40 pm
Those charts were made to be confusing, whether or not you admit it. I could understand that they were full of “kind words” for Obama while praising Bush, however. Everyone here is full of shit! Including me! Maniac, this is a troll site if you havent already noticed. In that spirit:
Praise or Condemn:
0 
0
5:47 pm
Yeah, I know, Capt. I just LOVE being a Troll hunter. Can you IMAGINE the damage they could do to our society if one of these…..trolls escaped? I shudder to think about it.
Praise or Condemn:
0 
0
6:59 pm
See there you go! people talking about trolls! What in the world. And why is that girl in front of such a giant tv screen? I don’t get it…
what does WTF and WASD mean? I am familiar with WWJD but not those…are they homo gay code?
Praise or Condemn:
0 
0
7:46 pm
“what does WTF and WASD mean?”
I’d tell you, but then I’D have to wash my mouth out with soap.
(‘Nuff said.) Trust me, they aren’t “homogay” code. Heh-heh…
The “troll” comments were directed at you fact-dodgers. Since it’s NOT a real meaning for anything other then a “fictional monster”, I had to do a bit of “research” to find you an answer. This is from WordIQ.com.
“On the Internet, troll is a slang term for a person who posts messages intended to create controversy or provoke an angry response rather than to add content to a discussion.”
YOU are guilty of this. I have stated facts that couldn’t be disputed and YOU have resorted to name-calling and “fact-dodging” to try to provoke an angry response, NOT to add content to a discussion. NOW you know what a troll is.
Praise or Condemn:
0 
0
10:04 pm
Mainiac85, I am so glad you have decided to finally admit to being an “internet troll” just to get us angry, and for even providing a definition of the word for us. Now that we cleared the air about that, which basically means, you agree with us completely, but were trying to amplify the discussions, I welcome you back whole-heartedly.
Praise or Condemn:
1 
1
10:04 pm
I also forgive you for calling me a mexican from south America.
Praise or Condemn:
1 
1
10:40 pm
“…you have decided to finally admit to being an “internet troll” just to get us angry, and for even providing a definition of the word for us.”
Don’t even try it, boy (as in YOUNG. Not the way I’m sure you’d LIKE to turn it around). You’re out of your league. I have done nothing but ask for FACTS and PROOF. If that angers you then stop spreading such blatant lies and I won’t ask for FACTS or PROOF anymore.
I only provided a definition because Susie seemed confused as to it’s meaning.
“…which basically means, you agree with us completely, but were trying to amplify the discussions…”
NO I DON’T and NO I WASN’T!! (Just figured I’d get both of your accusations out the way at the same time.) The only reason that people like myself get….”amplified” is because you are SO good at skirting a topic. You do know what that means, right? You bring up some outrageous topic and then, when you get asked to back it up, you dance around it like witches around a burning sacrifice.
“I also forgive you for calling me a mexican from south America.”
All the proof I need that you will twist words and skirt the subject to “win” a discussion. That’s not a win. It’s cop out. Am I going to have to go get the post that started all that? You accused me of being waaay up here, so far from civilization, so I figured you must live “down there” IN civilization. Not ONCE did the words Mexico or South America. You might want to talk to your Grandmother, Susie, about that. SHE’S the one who brought Mexico and South America into it.
Oh and just in case you’re still using an “old” map, Mexico is part of NORTH America. Central America doesn’t even start until you leave the most southern tip of Mexico. Just a little FYI. (You seem to have some REALLY screwy maps in your possession. You might want to get your money back and buy some REAL ones.)
Praise or Condemn:
0 
0
11:00 pm
I took college when I was younger but felt, along with my very loving and virile pastor, that books would make me hate Jesus and turn to hairless adult men for companionship.
Also, Bart Simpson is gay!
Praise or Condemn:
0 
0
10:41 pm
I am still kinda sore on him calling us mexicans but jesus told us to forgive…even trolls I suppose…
Praise or Condemn:
2 
1
10:58 pm
Yes, even trolls. So, I forgive you for being a troll, Susie.
“I am still kinda sore on him calling us mexicans…”
No your not. You’re sore because I turned down your advances by trying to “turn me on” with mental pictures on your old, naked body in your granny panties. All it did was manage to make me throw up in my mouth a little. (pervert)
I think I’m going to bring a link to that particular thread here. That way everyone can see where this whole racist discussion started. I was going to just bring YOUR post, Susie. After all, you were the one defending Bruce after doing a little of your “creative” reading between the lines.
I’ll be RIGHT back.
Praise or Condemn:
0 
0
11:36 pm
your words say no but your smileys say YES!!!
Praise or Condemn:
1 
0