Does Public Breastfeeding Have a Place in Civilized Society?
It is one thing to be on Grandpa Joe’s farm or on wild safari when you see a stretch-mark addled sow breastfeeding her young, but when a man is at the workplace there is a certain decorum that must be held. There is a degree of professionalim and class that make it requisite for a lactating mother to keep her sagging udders behind a thick blouse and supported bra. Men should at no point, at work or even shopping, have to turn their head to avoid a mother who insists on ‘breastpumping’ or ‘milking’ herself via her child’s gaping mouth.
Today’s topic kicked off fresh today after an irate shrewdness of knuckedrugging feminists lamented and rallied after a mother was kicked off a bus for pulling out her mammaliam ludicrosities and letting a child ogle her until milk come out. The feminists beat their hairy chests and cried in natural fashion, claiming that the mother had every right to expose everyone to a disgusting feeding session.
Now many of you young men may not find the problem with this. Great, a free eye-show. Just know that the girl you’re dating now is a deceiver. Sure, she may look tight and supple now, but give it 10 years and five kids yanking on her dairy teats. You will see her body stretch like playdo and the only thing tight about it will be her shrewd coldness in the bedroom as Junior greedily feasts upon her dairy farm and you lay on the otherside, blueballed and rocking yourself to sleep. Sounds dismal? Good, because it is your wither chested, flabbing wife that is ruining the public domain for the rest of us who want to go a day without seeing a bare sag-chested woman and her suckling litter of vermin.
Women have every much right to breastfeed as I have to splurge my man essence all over the bent over slutty secretary’s backside. Oh, sounds bad? Good. Because it is absolutely disguting that in this day and age, in our culture, that women think the public is fair grounds for a National Georgraphic Display.
At this point some feminists are mad and will try to say a Christian should not talk like this. It is natural and of God for a woman to feed a child. To these loud-mouthed disrespecters, I challenge you this.
Do you feel artificial when you eat a Taco Bell bean burrito meal and need to unleash porcelain Armageddon after lunch break? Do you really think I want to watch you stream yellow fountains of caffeinated corrosion after you and your little gossip harpies down Mountain Dew after Mountain Dew during your shopping day?
No!
If we did natural functions wherever the hell we wanted, Earth would look and smell like the hippo cage at the zoo, with a slight essence of tit milk. You feminists harpies screech and scratch for the most insane rights, as if a woman really has the right to force me to see her breast, especially off-guard.
There is also the sick issue of how long mothers breastfeed their children. Some of these kids must be upwards of 8 months or even a year. What sort of sick person has a child suckling her tit as she proudly lets the sun shine and my eyes shine and every other damn person’s eye shine on what she is doing, giving a coy look if your eye dares stand around too long in absolute horror and disgust. Where does the line between motherhood duty and perversion exist in this sick, new world we live in?
There is no cause to be had here, but as usual Hollywood has reared its ugly head. There is now a massive movement to nationalize women’s right to breastfeed wherever they want. How will the law work? Let’s put it like this.
A black guy sits down for lunch at your store. You tell him, “Stop being black here or get out!” You just violated his Civil Rights. Women who breastfeed are now getting that same immunity. Yes, the Democrats are working to make breastfeeding a Civil Right. And at the helm, Hollywood milk bombs.
Selma Hayek feeds a gaping mouth in this publicity shot, one of a set of 3o that just get worse and worse from this image. Look at how she forces us to look at her milk-addled yet surprisingly firm and taut milk sacs. Look at her let that baby sloppily lap its lip on her delicate protrusions, even though the child is not even hers. This just shows you how resolute Hollywood is to strip our right away to not be forced seeing everyday, melting silicone chested mothers go through this nasty ritual.
The day of doom is coming for many men. There will be harassment suits and vomiting of bile when all is said and done, for there is not much worse a fate than seeing your wife stretched and waddling around like a cow, then taking it to the next level by lactating milk that the young suck from her. Gross, feminists and you greedily selfish mothers. Get a room.
- Sinful
- Suspicious
- Scared
- Sad
- Amused
- Laughing Out Loud
Author: Derek Van Buren
10:46 am
Oh my sweet baby Jesus sleeping soundly!
This is unreasonable. Breast juicing is not the extreme couponing answer to purchasing formula in convenient boxes for the children. If you must breast feed your little Romulus and Remus, for pity sakes wear a tent or burka.
There should be a law against this abomination.
Great Article Derek.
BB
Praise or Condemn:
2 
5
3:17 pm
In once area of Atlanta they did try to pass a law but the feminists and strippers (an odd mix) banded together to fight the law and even stages a boob feeding milk in at the city hall!
Praise or Condemn:
1 
3
4:16 pm
ok put it this way,
u and ur wife are trying to have a nice dinner. then little jr. son of a bitch is crying his brains out cus he’s hungry. wouldn’t u like for him tp shut up? Well mama has to feed him with ur love humps. Plus all the guys can have a nice look at what he likes unless he’s gay. So i can sense some gays here, which is all the men, or at least the ones who call themselves “men”
Praise or Condemn:
2 
2
4:46 pm
The men on here are definitely not gay. Gay guys are awesome people and most would be far less upset at seeing a woman breastfeeding her child in public. The gay guys I know don’t view the breasts as ugly or sexual – they view them as beautiful, something that you’d see in an old painting.
Praise or Condemn:
3 
2
6:48 pm
As a gay male, this “Claire” offends me.
Praise or Condemn:
2 
0
4:48 pm
Hey, did you get the “little jr. son of a bitch” thing from Family Guy?
Praise or Condemn:
3 
0
5:18 pm
Ok, I see, Claire is friends with or is this AllisonManson person. That explains her posts here and elsewhere.
Praise or Condemn:
0 
2
5:41 pm
lol yea! i love them! plus it’s true, i love kids but if the little dude is hungry then shove one of those lumps in him and lets move on with life!
Praise or Condemn:
3 
0
1:15 pm
I love your tough, no-nonsense approach to this bizarre situation. I’m disgusted every time I walk into a treatment room and there is the mom with breasts shining and baby lapping. Very disgusting.
Praise or Condemn:
0 
4
1:46 pm
So you’d prefer if the baby was crying loud enough to make you cover your ears?
There’s a certain middle ground that should exist. Women should either be in a more discrete area or have some kind of sheet so that the feeding isn’t seen, I’ll give in that much, but when you have a baby and you HAVE to be out and about, sometimes that baby just wants to fill it’s tummy up and it ain’t waiting for it to get home.
Praise or Condemn:
4 
0
2:47 pm
No, the mom can feed it at home or bottle feed the thing. The last thing I want to see when walking into an exam room is a feeding. If I wanted to see that I’d plan a day at the zoo.
Praise or Condemn:
2 
4
3:17 pm
Ok, then you’ll have to deal with a screaming baby that’s demanding food, and you’ll have only yourself to blame. Oh wait, you’ll just kick the woman out because you think she shouldn’t be outside of a kitchen.
Praise or Condemn:
3 
0
4:59 pm
I cannot kick a patient out for that reason, because PC-law. I can tell her to put herself away so she or the child can be treated. What is really frustrating is when they bring the baby in for ‘fussiness’ or adominal distention, then are stupid enough to feed the little things before examination.
I’d love to be able to kick the whole lot of them out. A crying child is not an emergency. Burp it and feed it from a bottle, some crying is good for the little brat.
Praise or Condemn:
1 
3
6:17 pm
Adam, why are you always practically forcing me to have children when you yourself view them as little brats?
Praise or Condemn:
3 
0
9:01 pm
Adam, you DO realize just how often a baby is fed, right? There’s also the fact that you can’t FORCE a baby to eat. Baby’s are VERY fickle, and bitching about the mother for the actions of her child is not helping. It’s one of those situations where no one wins, no matter how hard you try, and if you WERE given the option to kick them out (like I knew you would), then you wouldn’t be helping matters at all.
And Claire has a point, why the hell are you trying to get women to have children, when you keep bitching about babies AND all of the women who are single, ESPECIALLY when you aren’t helping matters either when you have an affair on your break time.
Praise or Condemn:
1 
0
9:39 pm
I don’t care when their child eats, just as long as it eats from a bottle and not a breast when in public. Can you get that through your feminist skull?
Praise or Condemn:
1 
2
11:33 pm
Women DO try to have their baby be fed from a bottle, but again, babies are very fickle eaters and sometimes just refuse to drink from their bottle.
Praise or Condemn:
0 
0
1:28 pm
As long as sexist, chauvinistic men have a place in civilized society, then public breastfeeding does too.
Praise or Condemn:
4 
1
1:58 pm
Young man,
“Sexist, chauvinistic men have a place in civilized society”
No they do not – and neither does public breastfeeding.
When I was growing up we kept it where it belonged – on the farm.
Praise or Condemn:
2 
3
2:00 pm
You’re pretty pathetic, did you know that?
Praise or Condemn:
3 
1
4:23 pm
dude im more than positive that on that poll that says “should a man be allowed to “gentaly” beat his wife” u voted yes and if there was a poll that said “is it fine for a man to slap a woman that is breast feeding a crying child?” u would vote “FUCK YES!”
Praise or Condemn:
2 
0
4:26 am
im just going to say all of you christwire reporters are idiots when it comes to babys if a ababy is hungry itll cry and just so you know most woman cover the feeing in a blanket unless their in a hospitle even then some do
Praise or Condemn:
1 
0
2:46 pm
No, public nudity is not okay.
Praise or Condemn:
2 
1
2:50 pm
Great piece, Derek. I find this sort of activity absolutely disgusting. There is no reason whatsoever that women need to show off their nudity like this in public. It’s simply liberal exhibitionism. Rather perverted if you ask me.
I was particularly impressed by your insights regarding the aging of such a woman: “You will see her body stretch like playdo and the only thing tight about it will be her shrewd coldness in the bedroom as Junior greedily feasts upon her dairy farm and you lay on the otherside, blueballed and rocking yourself to sleep. Sounds dismal? Good, because it is your wither chested, flabbing wife that is ruining the public domain for the rest of us who want to go a day without seeing a bare sag-chested woman and her suckling litter of vermin.”
Praise or Condemn:
3 
2
3:23 pm
Billings, if you’re allowed to show your face and your enormously saggy body in public, then women should be allowed to breastfeed in public.
Praise or Condemn:
3 
0
4:29 am
heres a quote for you “when did the breast become a sexual objest? When we covered it up” by the way as i said earlier most carry a sheet with them for when the baby gets hungry
Praise or Condemn:
0 
0
3:20 pm
Hey, I have an awesome solution! Support abortion! Then you’ll be subjected to far less public breastfeeding escapades!
Praise or Condemn:
1 
1
5:10 pm
This Claire must be a troll. Either that or she is the most illiterate and uneducated person on the planet.
Praise or Condemn:
2 
0
6:15 pm
Illiterate and uneducated? Please provide some evidence.
Praise or Condemn:
0 
0
6:22 pm
Young man,
Read any random sampling of your contributions here on Christwire and I suspect even you would be forced to draw the same conclusion.
Praise or Condemn:
0 
1
7:18 pm
Well it looks like you took the easy way out, Harriet. How about providing me with some solid evidence?
Praise or Condemn:
1 
0
6:51 pm
Where did you go to school then? Online degree, ITT, trade school?
Praise or Condemn:
0 
0
7:15 pm
Sir Dr. Who,
He attended Devry Institute.
But no matter. Credentials are meaningless given the slew of uneducated children graduated from these glorified baby-sitting institutions we call colleges.
A person is either coherent, or not. Carl / Claire is clearly not.
Praise or Condemn:
0 
1
7:21 pm
I see you failed to provide me with some proof that I’m illiterate and uneducated.
I’m waiting.
Praise or Condemn:
2 
1
9:40 pm
http://www.mountida.edu/
Praise or Condemn:
0 
0
7:26 pm
I got sucked into reading this site after seeing it featured on BBC earlier. This is prime stuff. However after reading scores of pages you must be the most unloved, offensive person ever. You Claire need to get a life, friends, and a hobby, quick.
Praise or Condemn:
1 
1
7:33 pm
Ah yes, still failing to provide evidence, I see. What exactly were you trying to prove, again?
Praise or Condemn:
1 
0
10:11 pm
Adam, Is that link some joke? I just read a review of that school in US News. They listed Mount Ida as the worst higher education institution in America.
Praise or Condemn:
1 
0
11:03 pm
Care to share a link, Dr. Who?
Oh, P.S. you’ve still failed to provide evidence that I’m illiterate and uneducated.
Praise or Condemn:
0 
0
11:11 pm
It was in this month’s print copy of USA Today school rankings. I read it on the plane today.
You don’t really go to this school do you? Is this some kind of prank you are pulling on me? Is my brother Jim behind this? We were just talking about the article at dinner.
Praise or Condemn:
0 
0
11:30 pm
Hmm, I did a google search for “america’s worst colleges mount ida” and I saw no link to USA Today. I also went on the USA Today website and did a search for “mount ida” and the only results were for some place in Arkansas, Greek mythology, Hurricane Ida, and some random sports crap. Methinks you’re lying out of your ass.
And yes, I do really go to Mount Ida.
P.S. I’m still waiting on your evidence that I’m illiterate and uneducated.
Praise or Condemn:
0 
0
11:33 pm
Everything you post is an example. Your self-centered and pretentious. You seem to enjoy the attention this site provides you and your fake throne. And as a openly gay male. Some things you have said are offensive to me personally. Let’s not start that my older sister is handicapped and you constantly use the “r” word.
Praise or Condemn:
0 
0
11:38 pm
1. “Your self-centered and pretentious” should be “You’re self-centered and pretentious”. Who’s the uneducated one now, eh?
2. “And as a openly gay male.” Once again, which one of us is illiterate and uneducated? I seem to have forgotten.
3. “Let’s not start that my older sister is handicapped and you constantly use the “r” word.”
Please point me to where I have used the “r” word”. If I “constantly” use it, it shouldn’t be too hard for you to scrounge up an example, should it?
Praise or Condemn:
0 
0
11:41 pm
Ok, so your one of those kind of trolls who make fun of people on cell phones typing “your” to save time. Obviously you are too irrational to converse with. I will speak to you no further you hate filled imbecile.
Praise or Condemn:
1 
0
11:48 pm
Translation: “I can’t provide evidence for any of my accusations and on top of that I’m a hypocrite, so in lieu of making a bigger ass out of myself I’m going to forfeit under the guise of that mean Claire being too ‘irrational’ and ‘hate-filled’ to talk to.”
Enjoy your lousy British attempt at SciFi.
Praise or Condemn:
1 
0
12:03 am
Oh by the way, unless I’m mistaken it was YOU who initiated the conversation with me by calling me illiterate and uneducated (while consistently refusing to provide proof), yet you’re the one who’s now bitching that I’m “hate-filled” and turning your back like a petulant child.
As they say, you should never be the one to start fights, but you should always be the one to finish them. I’m not the one running with my tail between my legs.
Praise or Condemn:
0 
0
1:08 am
1. “Your self-centered and pretentious” should be “You’re self-centered and pretentious”. Who’s the uneducated one now, eh?
Claire, I honestly hate to come to a bloody limey Brits defense but really, what you wrote is the definition of pretentious!
But none the less good job of running him back to his little island of inbred monarchs.
Praise or Condemn:
0 
1
4:30 am
claire is a troll against trolls also “drWho” id prefer the person who takes on that name act like the doctor and not some sexist close minded idiot
Praise or Condemn:
0 
0
3:54 pm
You [the author] are truly an ignorant idiot.
Praise or Condemn:
4 
1
4:43 pm
Funny how the men on this site are so pro-life yet want nothing to do with the little bastards once they’re born. They’ll push and push for anti-abortion laws to be passed and they’ll try to tell women that they HAVE to have babies, that that’s what we’re here for, etc, yet once the women have endured the blood, sweat and tears of child-rearing you men start bitching about how babies are so loud, have disgusting and inconvenient feeding habits, and how their penises are getting the silent treatment because *gasp!* their wives just might be in some pain after giving birth and would rather cater to the needs of their helpless newborn.
Time for the men of the world to grow the fuck up!
Praise or Condemn:
5 
0
8:16 pm
Wow, this Claire really is stupid. I see she wrote a satirical article doubling back to really mean gays are all into bestiality and are child molesters. How sick.
Praise or Condemn:
0 
3
11:08 pm
My article was not meant to be satirical at all. It was meant to counter the hate that’s spewed on this site. If you truly think that I’m the enemy, then that’s your right, but the truth is that I have marched and protested for gay rights despite not being gay myself and am a big supporter of the LGBT community. If you don’t believe me, that’s your problem, not mine.
Praise or Condemn:
0 
0
10:14 pm
Dr. Who, I thought a school like Mount Ida could not exist until seeing that link. I think it’s a daycare program they have for students at Harvard.
Praise or Condemn:
0 
0
11:10 pm
Adam you’re so stupid it’s unbelievable. I see you’re attempting to jump on the “Mount Ida is in the backyard of Harvard and thus caters to the spoiled brats of Harvard faculty who aren’t smart enough to get into a university” bandwagon, but you failed miserably when you tried to say that the Harvard students THEMSELVES go to Mount Ida.
Praise or Condemn:
0 
0
11:15 pm
“but you failed miserably when you tried to say that the Harvard students THEMSELVES go to Mount Ida.”
This doesn’t make any sense.
The whole post is one giant illogical run-on sentence.
Why does this person care about Mount Ida and type in all caps?
Praise or Condemn:
0 
0
11:24 pm
Gee, perhaps I care about Mount Ida because I go there. And writing one word in all caps automatically means that I write every word in all caps?
Praise or Condemn:
0 
0
11:26 pm
Isn’t that the school that was in this week’s US News as being the worst in the states?
Praise or Condemn:
1 
0
1:11 am
Poor Claire, if you had not hen pecked your husband maybe he would come to your defense.
Praise or Condemn:
0 
0
10:56 pm
That thing in the first photo does look like Arnold swartzenners nanny/baby moma.
Praise or Condemn:
0 
0
12:58 am
I thought this was a satire site, similar to the Onion… but after looking at the comments I’m not so sure. Everyone is oh-so-angry and oh-so-serious. If you don’t want to look at breasts… well, then don’t.
Praise or Condemn:
0 
0
1:44 am
I see no problem with a women breast feeding in public as long as she tries to cover it. I mean you wouldn’t tell any one else they can’t eat in public so why stop a little baby from being able to eat?
Praise or Condemn:
1 
0
6:49 am
wow…. im kinda appaled that anyone can you be so blind and arrogant, wrighting this post, as a man i don’t feel awquerd knowing someone is breast feeding even in public, a number of things on the subject i found to be completly wrong…. first you cannot compare breastfeeding with going for a wee… i mean breast milk is a food and wee is a waste product, i think you are obviously suffering with your own issues with the human body i realise that some people in this western culture might think of boobs as a sex object but at the end of the day they are not for sex in any way, they are mammary glands that produce milk for feeding our offspring,
2nd point, babys are naturaly meant to breast feed for 2 years minimum (6 months of just breast feeding and the other 18 months integrating other foods as well as breast feeding for anyone whos unsure)also for non western world the breastfeeding lasts longer that this, the irony is that its natural for this to happen yet you seem to see it as some sort of strange behavuer,
unfortunatly your articule , in fact your whole webpage , just further confirms what i had already thought about organised religion , you really have done yourself no favours , you sound like a silly immature man who needs to grow up
Praise or Condemn:
0 
0