Can You Count The Passes?

Mike Watson
• ChristWire
October 2, 2011 11:19 pm17 comments

Drop everything you are doing right now and get ready for a bit of science. Ready?

First, you need to watch the following video. See how well you can do with the experiment. You’ll have to watch very intently, as it’s a bit tougher than it looks.

free video hosting
Free Video Hosting

Ok, how did you do?

Yeah, I felt the same way at first. If you would like, feel free to burn off some steam and relax, listen to some scrubby guys sing Beethoven’s Fifth Symphony. If you want to find out about the science behind the little experiment, read on!

So what exactly happened here, and why am I asking so many questions?

Well, the questions are so we can get a bit of space in between the video and explanation, and the answer is related to a neat phenomenon related to humans.

Human Awareness

The human brain is simply amazing; a complex command center capable of many things, from issuing coordination to abstraction.

Like every thing in nature, however, the brain does have its limits.

One of those limits, as demonstrated in this example, involves the potential for diminished attention when focusing on new tasks.

If you were truly intent on counting the number of passes made by people in the white shirts, and became narrowly focused, your brain perhaps made you subject to a state of awareness coined by Irvin Rock and Arien Mack as INATTENTIONAL BLINDNESS.

In this video, for those who missed the big visual event, there are several explanations as to what could have happened.

You’ll note, that the unexpected object in the video was fully and blatantly visible. If you don’t believe it, and as you likely have already done by this point, re-watch the video and only look for the object you may have missed the first time around.

Now if you missed the unexpected event, that does not mean anything is wrong with your brain. In fact, that means you were intently focused and paying attention to a primary task. Your failure to notice the unexpected event likely had nothing to do with the nature of the huge honkin’ gorilla, but more with the fact that your overall attention was limited in scope due to full engagement of a particular task. That is, your brain may have been selectively excluding sensory data.

Was It Really Blindness?

That’s a very good question and the answer may be yes, no, or yes and no. There are other possibilities to explain this phenomenon, though from research inattentional blindness is readily explored.

The brain constantly processes and responds to stimuli. The question presented by the idea of inattentional blindness is do we miss -significantly- unexpected events, that is potential visual stimuli, when engaged in tasks? In application to the video, this means that you didn’t recall the big dancing gorilla, much like the observers in the film, simply because you did not see it.

Inattentional Amnesia and Agnosia

However, what if you actually did see it? That is surely a possibility. In that case, it could indicate that our brains may experience a sort of memory lapse, that is inattentional amnesia. You may have very well seen the gorilla on the first time around, and even made a quick note of “Wow, a dancing gorilla!”, and continued on your focused task of counting the passes.

By the time you were queried to what you saw in the video (the expected stimuli of a ball being caught N times), you may have totally forgotten about the gorilla. That is, you experienced amnesia.

Another possibility lies within being an agnostic of sorts. Who knows what that implies?

If you said, “I’m not certain”, you are either witty or really just agnostic.

Inattentional agnosia in the event of focused attention and unexpected events, presents itself in a situation where your brain may experience an unknown “thing” but fail to categorize it, leaving it as an ignored enigma, or to say, unknown. That is, you were either partially or fully unable to recognize the gorilla using your typical visual center.

So though you may have actually seen the unexpected event, and it was somewhat observed and therefore processed, it may not register to the brain as being significant and thus not readily recalled or reported.

Implications and Things to Ponder
In all, this leaves us with more questions about the nature of the brain, the way we process events, our limits and even questions about the nature of our evolution.

An interesting study would be to have a group of people, a control, simply observe the overall scene without being told what to expect, including gorilla, while having their brain stimulation monitored. When the unexpected stimulus appeared, would their brains show similar patterns to those who were encouraged to focus on a narrow task?

This also brings another interesting question, or more an implication. Is narrowed focus and discard of seemingly irrelevant “data” a beneficial feature of our evolutionary heritage? Being in a world with increased stimuli, and a brain that is highly equipped to observe and plan based on stimuli, without being able to “tune out” so to speak there exists a possibility that the brain could overload -or not be able to readily focus on tasks- granted the inability to actively lose focus when needed (if through inattentional blindness, agnosia, or amnesia or other explanations).

Is the human tendency to naturally limit attention and discard unexpected stimuli when focused an evolutionary advantage, as opposed to cerebral limitation? One other interesting study would be to see how people with genetic conditions, such as ADD, would perform given the task set in the video. Would their results differ?

Whatever the answers to these questions may be, it is a definite that the human brain is a complex marvel.

So what do you make of all of this and how did you do in the initial experiment?!?

Sources
(listed as abstracts)
Cognition. 2007 Apr 11
The attentional cost of inattentional blindness.

Conscious Cogn. 2006 Sep;15(3):620-7. Epub 2006 Feb 17.
The effects of eye movements, age, and expertise on inattentional blindness

Pyschol Review 2005 Jan;112(1):217-42.
What you see is what you set: sustained inattentional blindness and the capture of awareness.

Perception. 1999;28(9):1059-74
Gorillas in our midst: sustained inattentional blindness for dynamic events. (outdated, used to reference video)

Blog Widget by LinkWithin
Thanks for rating this! Now tell Facebooked friends and Twitter how you feel through social media. .
How does this post make you feel?
  • Sinful
  • Suspicious
  • Scared
  • Sad
  • Amused
  • Laughing Out Loud
Tags:

17 Comments

  • Interesting, you twist a psychology theory into something that isn’t true. The real idea is that your brain doesn’t need to know how many men are in gorilla suits, and it just ignores the stimuli. Had one been asked just to watch the video, they would notice the gorilla suit guy. ADD is not genetic, it is changes in the brain during development that deviate from the so called “normal” brain. It actually is just a different way of being. I love having it. In most cases it makes the individuals that have it think outside the normal stream of thought.

    I am minoring in psychology for my university degree.

    Praise or Condemn: Thumb up 2 Thumb down 1

    • A few errors but this article was in no way prejudice. Congratulations on the least reactionary article on the site. Thanks for toning it down.

      Praise or Condemn: Thumb up 2 Thumb down 1

    • I never intended for this lesson to be a speaking piece on ADD. And no, many people will not notice the gorilla. The bias of being asked to focus on the video is prudent for this form of testing. An interesting test would be to see the effects of Adderall on various groups, with and without ADHD, and their ability to pick out abnormalities witin the videos.

      In all the times I’ve shown this video to various classes, many fail to miss the obvious. It is pretty neat.

      Praise or Condemn: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 1

      • I agree about the experiment idea. I think that we should examine our differences to help understand one another. I enjoy the dynamic of the comments on this site. It shows how the lest we know about each other, the more we fear and hate each other.

        Praise or Condemn: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 0

  • Mike, your video has been removed by the fascists at Youtube!

    Praise or Condemn: Thumb up 3 Thumb down 1

    • So because it breaks their rules, they’re fascists, but whenever someone breaks your rules, it’s perfectly acceptable to ban them, block them, remove their post, or otherwise punish them.

      Praise or Condemn: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 3

      • Albert Toppers Albert Toppers

        That’s nonsense. Christwire is the most tolerant site on the Internet. Your allegations are baseless.

        Praise or Condemn: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 1

        • if christ wire is so awsome then why do people make things like this http://imgur.com/LB8m3 trust me theres hundreds of things like this or should i say thousands

          Praise or Condemn: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 1

          • Just because bigots protest, does not mean they are right. Why did you make that sign?

            Do you also agree with these people, Raven?

            segregation.jpg

            It seems Democrats have a long history of oppressing the people of progress.

            Praise or Condemn: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 1

          • Those kids are clinton democrats.

            Praise or Condemn: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 1

          • i didnt make that i just googled christwire images just thought you might like to know what people are making about you and no i do not agree with those people in fact my best friend is black

            Praise or Condemn: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 1

          • TheRavenlordif christ wire is so awsome then why do people make things like this http://imgur.com/LB8m3 trust me theres hundreds of things like this or should i say thousands

            But if integration is so awesome, then why do people make things like this, Raven?http://cdn1.newsone.com/files/2010/09/segregation.jpg

            Trust me, there are hundreds of things like this, or should I say thousands?

            Praise or Condemn: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 0

        • Loving the paradoxical nature of this comment. This is gold right here.

          Praise or Condemn: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 0

    • These liberals make it so hard to teach the masses these days. Hopefully the new source works well for the flock and helps them understand their fearfully and wonderfully made brains.

      Praise or Condemn: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 1

  • Blanche Beecham Blanche Beecham

    I love this~!

    I completely missed the gorilla and zoned out on counting passes. Of course I’m the type of person that counts the ceiling tiles and staff in the dentist office to estimate overhead and variable costs while getting my teeth cleaned.

    Praise or Condemn: Thumb up 3 Thumb down 1

  • It’s nice to see this website debunk yet another filthy liberal lie that Christians are adverse to science.

    Praise or Condemn: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 1

    • No this proves that Mr. Watson is in agreement with the experiment done in the scientific method. This article is not proof that all Christians believe in such practice. On another note, stereotypes only make people angry, and are fairly false. Prejudice leads to oppression, and oppression leads to resentment and hatred that divides humanity even more.

      Praise or Condemn: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 0

Leave a Reply


You can add images to your comment by clicking here.