Email
Tumblr
Youtube
Scientists at University of Dallas Create Harry Potter Invisibility Cloak
Twitter
Facebook
Delicious
Digg
Stumble
RedditEnchanted by the ‘witching’ technology of Harry Potter, student scientists at the University of Dallas have created the very sinful invisibility cloaking technology seen in the Harry Potter films.
Harry Potter was a movie about demonic witch demons that worked to destroy Christianity in America, as told by the recluse writer JRK Tolkien.
The technology is being researched by the US Federal government and let us hope that the governments shuts down all projects and takes all researchers involved down for a chat in Gitmo. The only people who can be trusted with this technology is the US ARMY after the year 2012, when Obama is voted out of office.
- Excited
- Fascinated
- Amused
- Bored
- Sad
- Angry
If you don't like what you just read here you can just get out of my country. Now how about that smart-alack.
Follow me on twitters. Poke me as your New Friend on Facebook!! A Progressive Voice For The Free Thinker
Amazing Facts About Your Brain and Body
by Kayleigh Tatum
5 May 2013 at 9:44am
Topekas News - A Progressive Voice For The Free Thinker Kayleigh Tatum
The brain is clearly the mo...
34 Delicious Two Ingredient Recipes
by Kayleigh Tatum
5 May 2013 at 9:33am
Topekas News - A Progressive Voice For The Free Thinker Kayleigh Tatum
1. Nutella + Eggs = Flourle...
The Matrix Retold By Mom
by Aaron Albright
2 May 2013 at 1:01am
Topekas News - A Progressive Voice For The Free Thinker Aaron Albright
Here, Mom retells the Matri...
Terrorists Slip Poison Into Drinks At Starbucks
by Kayleigh Tatum
1 May 2013 at 3:35pm
Topekas News - A Progressive Voice For The Free Thinker Kayleigh Tatum
San Jose, California – Poli...
Talk About Topeka, Brickyard Barn Inn and Catering
by Emersyn Wachovia Watson
22 Apr 2013 at 3:32pm
Topekas News - A Progressive Voice For The Free Thinker Emersyn Wachovia Watson
Web series Talk Ab...
Thank you for visiting!
Well, this could be useful for our men overseas. You know, so that they can go around stealthily taking out the other guys.
Praise or Condemn:
4 
1
Scientists need to clear all their projects with the church to make sure no evil is performed.
Praise or Condemn:
1 
5
Why? Science has nothing to do with religion. In fact, science intends on proving that religion is nothing more than fallacies.
Praise or Condemn:
4 
1
Science AND religion? wow this site really can’t stay on one side can it first it’s bad now it’s good next month i guess Science will be bad again.
Praise or Condemn:
2 
0
This is what you call an illusion. It’s basically what a magic trick is.
Praise or Condemn:
2 
1
This cloak is a false attempt at hiding sin from the heavens.
Praise or Condemn:
1 
3
No, it is an attempt to give us an edge on the battle field you dolt. You guys want to have a great and powerful army, yet when a scientific innovation that might give us the edge is introduced, you automatically call it a sin. You guys need to sort out your priorities.
Praise or Condemn:
2 
0
We have the weapons we need to win all battles already. The tactical thermonuclear device and the Hydrogen Bomb.
Praise or Condemn:
1 
2
Yes, but the problem with that is that, according to the Geneva Convention, you cannot use them. Therefore, you need to find other ways of winning your wars. Hence the “invisibility cloak.”
Praise or Condemn:
2 
0
Then we need to remove Geneva first.
Praise or Condemn:
2 
3
Wow, you really are an idiot. The moment we remove Geneva, we will get bombarded with Nukes from all over the world. You really need to read up on what you are saying first.
Praise or Condemn:
2 
1
Only the USSR has the capability of hitting us with a nuclear weapon. And as most of their missiles target blue states, I think we can assume acceptable losses.
Praise or Condemn:
1 
3
August is correct. We need to remove any and all elements that would be in conflict with American Sovereignty like the Geneva Convention, UN, Red Cross, and atheists.
Praise or Condemn:
1 
2
So, you want to become Iraq under Saddam. Interesting. Well, carry on.
Praise or Condemn:
2 
0
It’s not called the USSR anymore, Dracula.
Praise or Condemn:
4 
0
We can always just nuke Geneva. Without America, there would be no ‘Geneva Convention’. We should just do away with the UN so Europeans can stop hiding cowering behind the false hope that the US needs to abide by any law but our own.
Saddam thought that was the case but now he knows otherwise that he is roasting in Hell.
Praise or Condemn:
0 
3
Please, Adam, use your brain. Even though it may be the size of a pea, you have enough smarts to know that you are wrong and that that would be a stupid thing to do.
Praise or Condemn:
2 
0
Geneva convention was agreed by I think all of european countries and the commonwealth (canada and australia come in mind ) and Russia Japan and china as well
Therefore destroying Geneva you sign your death treaty already by being ennemis of the world
Praise or Condemn:
4 
0
China is done with a few choice nukes to Beijing. Russia is always an evil threat and Europe is a joke. They could not even stop a simple German dictator and were on the verge of defeat before we came in and saved their sorry butts.
Praise or Condemn:
0 
2
Too bad adam Now its not 1945 Nuke are prohibited from every countries to do it so if you move your ass out of UN you are no Longer protected by “terrorist” like North korea and everyone can atatck your country you so called ” preemptive strike” are no Longer in effect, and you will Lost a lot of privilege
Military speaking
economic speaking
and diplomatically speaking
and you will Plainly become ennemy of the world and be destroyed on the proceed You relaly Think european did that for Themselve they could have won the war without you the soviet were there
so before you said utter bullshit know you little history european doesn’t need your protection
Praise or Condemn:
2 
0
Damien’s right. It’s so we’ll have an advantage during war.
Praise or Condemn:
2 
0
Yes and No you have stealth fighter but they can also be detected by means ( if the country you are attacking have the technology ) but USA tehse day have found to kill Muslims and arab
Praise or Condemn:
3 
0
Damien, they’re all obviously joking.
Praise or Condemn:
4 
0
I know. But it is fun to troll.
Praise or Condemn:
2 
0
guys, there is another reason why this is better. the nuclear exsplosive device also sets fire to the soot in cities. this causes a LOT of smoke. this smoke then makes a gigantic cloud. That cloud can block out the sun, bringing a nuclear winter.
(search up the term on wikipedia : Nuclear Winter). A small nuclear exchange between pakistan and india can devastate mankind. This is not a weapon of any god. These CAN be mankind’s destruction.
Praise or Condemn:
3 
0
We have clean burning nukes. By adding American technology we have made the Nuke burn hotter and creating a incineration device that also destroys pollution.
Praise or Condemn:
0 
2
Um….no, they’re not. It would still kick up the cloud, and would still cause nuclear winter. Unless you have the proof for what you are saying, don’t say it. Thank you.
Praise or Condemn:
1 
0
fire in itself cause pollution Just saying CO2 is the primary cause of pollution
it’s why many people and countries never used nuclear even japanese are scared of it ( actually they even intend to dismantle american nuclear facilities and sue an alternative one for energy)
Praise or Condemn:
2 
0
They should appreciate all the help we’ve given them after all the sorrow they brought to us. If I were president, I’d give them another nuclear black eye to match.
Praise or Condemn:
0 
1
heh glad you arent president or in any position of power thenn
Praise or Condemn:
1 
0
And two days from now Adam will completely deny that he ever said he wanted to re-nuke Japan.
Praise or Condemn:
1 
0
should appreciate your facilities almsot destroyed the entire cities and therefore You just Think they are babies or little kids and you need to “take care of them by protecting them” good thing enough is if you attack Japan by any means the treaty will be Void
Praise or Condemn:
1 
0
Forgive my horrible spelling and grammar. Old keyboard.
Praise or Condemn:
2 
0
Only spinster Claire worries about such things. No need to apologies in the least. We welcome you and all peoples views LOL. Please come back
Praise or Condemn:
0 
2
That’s okay. Your spelling and grammar are much better than August’s.
Praise or Condemn:
2 
0
And dont call me a treehugger. Its just stupid.
Praise or Condemn:
2 
0
No one did. Are you one?
Praise or Condemn:
1 
1
That is really cool. Perhaps a more practical application is not far down the road.
Praise or Condemn:
2 
0
Humm is there any other use for it other than in wars?
Wars are kinda primitive in my opinion.
Praise or Condemn:
1 
0
well hidden security guards, a wicked game of man hunt-legal uses all the others i came up with are illegal
Praise or Condemn:
1 
0
on a side note if you don’t know what man-hunt is id be happy to explain it(the game.not when police are looking for someone).
Praise or Condemn:
1 
0
The author of the article needs to do a fact check. The research was not done at the University of Dallas. It was done at the University of Texas AT Dallas.
Praise or Condemn:
0 
0