Pelosi Drops Bombshell: Newt Gingrich Is Actually Transgender, Hid “Secret Pregnancy” From Wife
The incidence of male-pregnancy is one you would not expect to see mentioned alongside the powerful name Newt Gingrich, the would-be GOP candidate for US presidency. Gingrich is known for his penchant for scandal and irreverence to humility, but today’s bombshell by Pelosi may be even too much for Ironsides Gingrich to navigate. This may be the sinking of the Newt Gingrich campaign.
To break this story easily to already wide-eyed Repubiclans, we’ll look into the backstory of this issue. It involves science. There is a condition of humans called “Male Pregnancy”. It can occur when an XX woman decides she is actually a man, and therefore, undergoes hormone therapy to develop an external male phenotype.
A transgender man may have received hormone therapy, cosmetic surgery and other alterations to achieve a goal of bigger muscles, curves and sexualization. But there is one thing that may not change: the “secret place”, as the holy right here are fond of saying.
And when a transgender decides to keep the internal parts natural, well, they can still be fertilized and pregnant with child. The other half of the backstory today has to do with the SRY gene. Jamie Lee Curtis may actually be an XY genotype, a male. But, because she lacks the SRY gene to do anything about the Y chromosome, her body made her a very attractive female by default. At any point, Jamie Lee Curtis could have decided she was a man and undergone hormonal therapy to develop a masculine shell for her internal desires, but kept her womanhood intact.
Undated photo shows a emotionally comfortable New Gingrich gently caressing his impregnated belly.
You know who else could do this? Newt Gingrich.
In the shocking photograph at right, Newt Gingrich poses for a candid photo in which he clearly is several months pregnant. We may remember that several years ago, Gingrich stepped down as Speaker of the House.
Such a move from a position of power, especially for a man of Gingrich’s stubborn nature, does not fit his M.O. It is unheard of for the Speaker of the House seat to be so easily abandoned.
Soon after fleeing from the public spotlight, a more recluse Gingrich was spotted around the DC metro area and in ‘rural Massachusetts’ several times. Paparazzi photographers captured images of Gingrich that showed the politician had an unprecedented bought of weight gain.
While some speculated Gingrich was simply eating his stress away to cope with a non-political life, sources close to the family claimed the Newt was stressed because he had somehow managed to conceive a child.
External Media: Unusually Pudgier Gingrich takes to Iba strip to allegedly relieve post-partum blues.
Newt’s wild, provocative sexual escapades are well known throughout DC. While Newt eagerly confesses to most affairs with females, he shies away from accusations that he may have experimented with seeming homosexuality. The fact of the matter, putting together the pieces from Pelosi’s coming bombshell, is that Newt is actually confessing to all the same sex affairs, because at the root, Gingrich is actually an XX female whose taken hormones to seem like a man.
The most telling aspect of Newt’s sexuality is what’s known as a ‘lesbian’s haircut’. On the street, this is also called a “Lesbro” haircut. While the term may sound basal and crass, it refers to the fact that many transgender women do not experience pattern baldness that is more common to males. Thus, as they age their hairline is not indicative, as it would be a natural XY male.
- Chaz Bono (formerly chastity), sporting a “lesbro haircut” that is common to transgender women living as men. The haircut and temple lines reflect that of a young high school boy, though Chaz is far older. This haircut is often one of the most ready ways to detect potential genetic women living as phenotypic and social men.
Gingrich’s healthy, unusually thick bed of geriatric hair is a dead giveaway that his genes are not purely XX, as the rest of the evidence suggests. This suggests that the candidate’s overt hatred of homosexuals arises from his own fears that an expose into his own sexuality would compromise that which he loves most: political power and a political career.
- Sinful
- Suspicious
- Scared
- Sad
- Amused
- Laughing Out Loud
Author: Rachel Aschner-Barsky
Former circuit gymnast and now retired from the sport, I'm now embarking on a career in my field of college study: journalism. These guys at ChristWire have hired me and I do not plan to back down for my "crazy liberal" views. Join me and let's bring the biased 'conservatives' down a notch or two.
6:17 pm
That pic of “pregnant Gingrich” is so fake its not even funny
Praise or Condemn:
3 
2
6:30 pm
I dunno, I got a kick out of it.
Praise or Condemn:
4 
0
6:31 pm
yea, it is kinda funny
Praise or Condemn:
4 
0
6:34 pm
Everything on this site makes me laugh.
Praise or Condemn:
5 
1
3:04 am
Wow IdiotAtheist, you dislike something but then your devil master Ln tells you she likes it and you change your tune. Interesting.
Praise or Condemn:
1 
0
3:36 am
We agreed on the picture being funny…I was being funny with my first comment…Does no one on this site get a fucking joke?
I don’t even know L.N. I tend to agree with HIM on most subjects becauses HE’s right whereas you guys are completely wrong all the time.
Your the fucking idiot
Praise or Condemn:
0 
0
6:35 pm
I don’t know how to feel about this. I’m voting for Rick Perry but I don’t really like or trust Nancy Pelosi.
Praise or Condemn:
0 
4
6:35 pm
This slander must stop. This site is about truth and values.
Praise or Condemn:
1 
5
6:45 pm
If it’s so truthful then why is the whole article on Skyrim is so full of lies?
Praise or Condemn:
1 
1
7:38 pm
Then why can’t you come up with actual numbers then, jackass? 115%? Do you not know how math works?
Praise or Condemn:
2 
0
7:57 pm
115% is a real number.
Praise or Condemn:
0 
2
8:02 pm
It’s a percent, when you’re talking about percentages with set numbers, you can’t go over 100. 115 is a real number, 115% is not an actual percentage. You’d think a grown man who fancies himself as some retried electro-whatever worker would at least know how numbers and percentages work. If there are 100 people in a room, you can’t say that 101% of the people did something, it just does not work on any kind of level, and that’s basically what you went and implied.
Or, because that’s too long for your tiny brain to handle, 115% is not an actual percent.
Praise or Condemn:
1 
0
12:52 am
Yes, you can. Percentage increases can go over 100%, child.
Praise or Condemn:
0 
1
12:56 am
On a theoretical level, yes. If there’s some kind of unknown variable, possible. When measuring something, very much so.
But when you’re counting something, you can’t go over 100%. Prove to me that just by counting, not measuring, can you go past 100%.
Praise or Condemn:
0 
1
2:02 am
No, it does not have to be theoretical. Here is a listing of economical differnces in economies now destroyed by Obama.
http://www.gfmag.com/tools/global-database/economic-data/10403-total-debt-to-gdp.html#axzz1glzJFci3
Praise or Condemn:
0 
1
2:33 am
That’s also comparing other numbers. Point is, if you have hard, physical objects, you CAN NOT GO PAST 100%. Fucking cretin. I asked you to prove to me that you can go past 100% just by counting.
The short answer is, you can’t. If there are ten people in a room and they all shout out the letter “A” (it’s a random example, please try to wrap your head around that), then 100% of the people in that room yelled out the letter “A”. Are you really that fucking stupid that you think it’s possible for 115% of the people in that room to yell out the letter “A”? Apparently.
Praise or Condemn:
0 
0
3:00 am
Yes, LN, you get percentages by comparing numbers. Maybe you should try a remedial course in math before trying to have a discussion with the big kids? And also, math is not always in the capability of all women. Maybe you should focus on your print or Kegel exercises.
Praise or Condemn:
0 
1
3:09 am
Maybe I can explain it to you like this, LN. I really do feel sorry for you.
Let’s say your husband gives you a nice, crisp $10 bill because you made him happy with all your Kegel exercise fitness.
One day you decide to be a Jezebel and use your heightened abilities to work Skid Row. You gain 10,000 more $10 bills in a year’s time!
So now, you little harlot, you’ve increased the amount of bills you’ve experienced a 1,000% increase in 10 dollar bills. Monetary notes are physical objects. Pretty simple, ey, you little dyke harlot?
As I said, if you practice your manners and print, maybe you won’t have to resort to such a lifestyle. You should shy away from math too, because you may start thrusting your pelvis toward every stranger with a wallet.
Praise or Condemn:
0 
2
3:20 am
Adam, are you in support of homosexual marriage? Why are you suggesting that a man gets married? Ah, I see, you’re actually gay, aren’t you? Just one big ol’ flammin’ jackass who wants it up the ass.
And you’re little example, you faggot, is an example of multiplication and increase. It’s also apart of the theoretical level of percentages and has the potential for a variable in there, meaning it’s quite possible for the value to go past 100%, the original amount.
However, we’re dealing with counting people. Can you understand that? Do I have to repeat myself? Are you too retarded? I know you can’t read, seeing as how you constantly confuse me and call me a woman. Do I have to explain what a percentage is to you? Alright, just because you’re that fucking stupid, I’ll do you that favor.
A percent is a type of measurement so that someone can see either how much progress was made or what their efforts amounted to. There are other ways of applying it, but it’s typically associated with measurements. Some times, you CAN go over 100%, which is to say, more than what’s allotted, but this can only apply when the objects in question are a lot more flexible.
Are you following me? Keep up my slow friend!
When you are counting people, you can’t go over 100%. That is to say, you can’t say that people who aren’t apart of the particular group you’re measuring can impact what it is you’re measuring in the first place. Is that a difficult concept for you to understand? If so, reread what I said. I know you flunked out of high school, since you show people that crayon drawing of a PhD where you turned the ‘e’ backwards, but please try to keep up stupid.
Praise or Condemn:
0 
0
9:08 am
Everyone please take note. When you put a radical feminist lesbian in her place, it changes subjects and resorts to personal insults. Percentages can go over 100%.
Praise or Condemn:
0 
0
4:58 pm
Oh really asshole? You think I changed the subject? How often do you play the Hitler card because you lost the argument? And how hard is it to say that ‘it is impossible for percentages to go over 100 if we’re talking about counting, like counting people’? Unless you can come up with a reasonable explanation as to why 115% people can do something that actually makes sense, you’re just stalling like the twerp you are.
Praise or Condemn:
0 
0
5:17 am
And twerps make me horny.
Praise or Condemn:
0 
0
8:02 pm
How can you be 115% sure about that?
I mean really, nobody uses that as a real persentage number. You don’t go higher then 100%.
Praise or Condemn:
0 
0
4:44 am
I’m 1000% sure was and still is a very common expression of confidence. LN is just mad because once again she’s been cornered and like a catty beast, she’s lashing out with desperation. Percentages can be over 100%, eggs.
Praise or Condemn:
0 
1
6:24 am
What, you don’t have a better insult than calling me a woman, you dropout? Your pea-sized brain can’t come up with anything else? You’re nothing but a sexist bastard who’s afraid of anyone who’s smarter than you. You must have some mommy issues if you think women are beneath you. You can’t possibly fathom why a man would argue against you, so you just assume anyone who calls you ‘sexist’ is a woman! You’re too stupid and blind to see the truth!
Hell, you can’t even keep a track or hold on the argument! My point is percentages involving people can’t be over 100, yet you’re insisting that people who couldn’t possibly affect them are! Admit it, you lost the argument as soon as you tried to argue it, jackoff.
Praise or Condemn:
0 
0
9:02 am
We all know you’re a lesbian. We don’t judge you for it, so don’t worry. That’s God’s job and it’s a pretty clear cut case. You have your entire life to repent and not go to hell, kiddo.
Praise or Condemn:
1 
1
4:56 pm
I suggest you take your self-hating ways elsewhere, no one wants to hear about your mommy issues or how you hate yourself for being a woman.
Praise or Condemn:
0 
0
3:13 am
Personally I judge Ms. LN for being a clam dabbling lesbian sodomite.
Praise or Condemn:
1 
0
5:15 am
Susan I wish you were my mommy so i could breast feed from your pendulous melons!
Praise or Condemn:
1 
0
6:30 am
You know what I think? You’re actually a woman who hates herself. You want to be a man, you so desperately hate being a woman, you fake your identity. Your real name isn’t ‘Adam’, it’s something else entirely. You can’t stand up to the truth, so you just lie. You’re afraid of the truth, because to you, the truth means admitting that you’re a woman, something you despise ever so much. You certainly aren’t a doctor, nor are you educated about the world at all, you’re just a self-loathing woman who wants to put other women down because they’re confident, and you point and call out other men ‘women’ just because you’re envious of the fact that they were born with a penis.
Yeah, that sounds about right. It’s why you keep calling me a woman, and why you insult other women. You hate men because you aren’t one, and you hate other women because they’re proud of who they are. You know that God has rejected you, you know that God and Jesus hate you, so you take your anger and frustration out on others. You believe that if God doesn’t love you, then no one else should get God’s love.
Praise or Condemn:
0 
0
3:16 am
LN we have all been open about who we are and what we are. You are the one that lives in obscurity. Why are you so secretive about who you are. Why are you ashamed to even post any kind of picture?
Praise or Condemn:
0 
0