Proving Atheists Wrong with Science
How can a man understand science, when he does not understand He who is the Creator of all? – Reverend Mariam Wardley
Dear friends, those words from our beloved and passed Reverend Wardley still hold true to this very day. The subject of that quote are a group of people known as ‘atheists’. These are people who somehow have come to the conclusion that with only five senses, humanity can detect every known portion of existence. These people believe that ‘empiricism’ is limited to tests and senses that we, as humans, can only possess.
If an atheist cannot test something and get data from it to their liking and observance, then they conclude that it obviously must not exist.
This sort of backwoods thinking oft times shocks readers, to think that there could actually be people so arrogant and absent-minded. In the world of atheism, there is no room for faith or morality. Only angry words and raw emotion, the telling signs of people who have not considered any other viewpoints.
What atheists fail to realize is that in their attempt to claim science for ‘themselves’ and no one else, they are denying a world of possibilities. Look into a clear winter’s night sky. Behold the stars magnifcently gleaming in heaven. Is it so hard to think that somwhere in all those stars, is a color that exists that we could never test or observe? A taste or new concept that we ‘sense’ with abilities we never knew we had within us?
Such philosphy destroys the minds of atheists and their weak logic leaders like Richard Dawkins, PZ Mayers and Neill DeGrasse Tyson. Like all atheists, these men speak big and brave words, but when confronted with the very science that God created, they cringe and get catty. They want to test God when such things are akin to a zygote trying to understand the finer nuances of string theory. It just will never happen. The zygote paradox even pales to comparison in how low we are compared to our God of creation, love and mercy.
If you really want to stump an atheist, you only have to provide rudimentary science. Here is a sample sent from ChristWire reader Dana Simmons of Rhode Island. I found this example to be a real treasure:
- Sinful
- Suspicious
- Scared
- Sad
- Amused
- Laughing Out Loud
Author: Abe
If you don't like what you just read here you can just get out of my country. Now how about that smart-alack.
Follow me on twitters. Poke me as your New Friend on Facebook!!
6:36 am
As an Atheist, I understand that there are mysteries in this world and throughout the universe that we cannot solve. That dosen’t mean that a higher power created them.
Also as an Atheist, I don’t use science as the backbone of my belief…Hell, I’ll be the first to admit that science confuses the fuck out of me sometimes. I just don’t believe in god, end of story.
Atheism aren’t all arrogant. Hell, if you knew me in real life, you’d see that my opinion of myself isn’t all that great.
Praise or Condemn:
17 
12
2:28 pm
You are a typical arrogant atheist. Your username informs everyone that you are an atheist, yet you feel it necessary to declare that you are an atheist every time you want to say something. Then you go on to say that you have a low opinion of yourself…
This just shows that atheism is just a cry for attention. Atheists personalities are all about being atheist rebels and are devoid of any type of character.
Christians on the other hand (like myself) are well-rounded folk. We do not possess your arrogance. We know we are special because God loves us, but we don’t smother you with it.
Praise or Condemn:
9 
19
2:37 pm
You guys try to smother your god on us all the time. And all Christians are full of arrogance. They still believe the earth is 6 thousands years old.
Praise or Condemn:
10 
4
2:41 pm
You consider yourselves better than everyone just because you believe in some almighty deity. If that isn’t arrogance I don’t know what is.
I don’t consider Atheism as a title or anything, just what I believe. I only bring up the fact I’m Atheist when you guys attack me for it, it isn’t arrogance it’s defense.
I don’t consider myself a rebel or anything. I don’t make attacking religion a hobby. Sure I attack you guys, but that’s because of your stupidity. Everyone has character and personality, is not a Christian thing
Also, you DO smother us with your religion at every chance
Praise or Condemn:
12 
7
2:44 pm
You come to this website by your own decision and then say that WE are attacking YOU? You come to a widely respected Christian media source and try to shove your atheism down OUR throats, and then you try to play the victim.
Typical atheist
Praise or Condemn:
8 
16
2:49 pm
“widely respected” yea sure, just keep believing that
Sure I showed up on my own free will, but if people like me didn’t come here, your stupidity might get taken seriously.
Articles like this are created to mock us, we have the right and ability to defend ourselves from this shit.
Also, I’ve NEVER tried to turn anyone on here into an Atheist. I don’t care what your religion is, I’m just protecting my beliefs
Praise or Condemn:
9 
4
2:52 pm
Your beliefs mock themselves. Just look at the science we have laid out for you.
Praise or Condemn:
6 
13
2:55 pm
Look at some of the comments below us, people have broken the so called “science” you have tried to use.
How exactly does my belief mock itself?
Praise or Condemn:
7 
4
3:33 pm
Atheism is not a blunt belief in whatever you might think “science” is. It is much simpler: THERE IS NO GOD! I know It is hard for you to understand but we don’t worship science.
Praise or Condemn:
13 
1
3:46 am
I see many article wanting to Nuke China Japan invading Canada and Great Britain as well
and You want us to lets you be ?
Praise or Condemn:
1 
1
3:28 pm
Im a christian
and i am not “Well Rounded”
Praise or Condemn:
5 
0
3:29 pm
I, however, am not and odd atheist, but a perfectly normal one. I simply enjoy gaming and having a computer that runs a linux-based operating system (too many big words for you?). As I have said before, I personally dislike you out of everyone who posts articles on this site the most. Please, for everyone’s sanity, stfu.
“We do not possess your arrogance. We know we are special because God loves us, but we don’t smother you with it.”
You sound stupider and stupider every time you post a comment. You prove my point for me.
Praise or Condemn:
1 
0
3:30 pm
sorry, not you Nyuu, That was addressed to Nicholas.
Praise or Condemn:
0 
0
3:15 am
i kind of knew that
Praise or Condemn:
0 
0
8:22 pm
Most forms of Christianity actually preach that god loves everyone, no matter who they are or what they believe in.
Praise or Condemn:
1 
1
7:18 pm
If science confuses you how are you in a position to criticize an argument meant to be a scientific one? If you can’t even debunk the above argument why should we take your claims about God seriously?
meh..
Praise or Condemn:
0 
7
7:51 pm
Overweight, addicted to programs made for toddlers AND self-loathing? You’re really making a great case for atheism son! Laughing out Loud!
Praise or Condemn:
2 
6
8:10 pm
Only idiots spell LOL out.
I’m only overweight because of muscle. You on the other hand are the one with the fat face.
My Little Pony is actually aimed for girls, not toddlers. I’m not watching fucking sesame street.
I am not self-loathing, I just don’t have high self-esteem.
Why don’t you go stick your fat face in a boiling vat of oil while a masochistic clown rips your intestine out from your back and fornicates with them
Praise or Condemn:
6 
5
11:37 pm
You took the point out of lol.
Praise or Condemn:
6 
0
8:20 am
The human population increased to 6 billions during the last 2 centuries plus there is a lot of water underground,which flows to the ocean through underground tunnels.All this water is resupplied by rain and so the circle goes on,we will never actually “drink” every last drop of water on this planet.
Praise or Condemn:
13 
1
7:44 am
I am not sure that I believe in this rain cycle theory that is promoted in public schools but never mentioned in the bible. It sounds like Eastern mysticism to me.
If this theory were true then Mars and the moon would be covered in oceans but they are as dry as your faith.
Score again for Jesus!
Praise or Condemn:
0 
3
11:22 pm
mars and the moon don’t have any water on them because there is no water to recycle water just doesn’t magically appear out of nowhere there aren’t any of the materials required to make water on mars or the moon
Praise or Condemn:
2 
0
8:36 am
Oh my god this is hilarious.
The human body doesn’t stock the water you drink. Your body rejects water when it’s not usable anymore. And your body does that by making you pee or sweat.
If you can’t understand that, then you’re missing an important part of your own body. Which would be hilarious.
There is this chemical rule, invented by a french scientist, Antoine Lavoisier. It’s also known as the Law of Conservation of Mass. Here it is :
“After the precipitation reaction, the mass of the products still equals the mass of the reactants. This demonstrates the Law of Conservation of Mass.”
Your stupid theory doesn’t respect one of the most important rule of the modern scientific world. This rule has been proven true a few millions times already.
That means, you’re not proving us wrong at all, you just though you found THE ULTIMATE WAY TO PROVE ATHEISTS WRONG, but then your lack of basic scientific knowledge made you look like a fool.
But at least you provided some sources. Couldn’t use them correctly, but it’s a start.
Praise or Condemn:
11 
4
10:22 am
I’ll tell you why religion’s not a scam, in my opinion: tide goes in, tide goes out. Never a miscommunication. You can’t explain that.
See, the water, the tide comes in and it goes out, you dumb atheists. It always comes in, and always goes out. You can’t explain that.
Praise or Condemn:
2 
5
11:30 am
Yes WE CAN.
Tides are the rise and fall of sea levels caused by the combined effects of the gravitational forces exerted by the moon and the sun and the rotation of the Earth.Most places in the ocean usually experience two high tides and two low tides each day (semi-diurnal tide), but some locations experience only one high and one low tide each day (diurnal tide). The times and amplitude of the tides at the coast are influenced by the alignment of the sun and moon, by the pattern of tides in the deep ocean and by the shape of the coastline and near-shore bathymetry.Tides vary on timescales ranging from hours to years due to numerous influences. To make accurate records, tide gauges at fixed stations measure the water level over time. Gauges ignore variations caused by waves with periods shorter than minutes. These data are compared to the reference level usually called mean sea level.While tides are usually the largest source of short-term sea-level fluctuations, sea levels are also subject to forces such as wind and barometric pressure changes, resulting in storm surges, especially in shallow seas and near coasts.Tidal phenomena are not limited to the oceans, but can occur in other systems whenever a gravitational field that varies in time and space is present. For example, the solid part of the Earth is affected by tides, though this is not as easily seen as the water tidal movements.
Praise or Condemn:
11 
1
4:26 am
These are all just liberal talking points.
Praise or Condemn:
0 
3
12:17 pm
Bill O’Reilly.
Praise or Condemn:
0 
2
12:54 am
Bill O’Reilly must have gotten that from me. I was in Harlem eating at Sylvia’s when he and Al Sharpton were at the table next to us and must have overheard.
I went and found out that there was no difference between Sylvia’s restaurant and any other restaurant in New York City. I mean, it was exactly the same, even though it’s run by blacks, primarily black patron-ship.
I’m sure Bill shared my sentiments.
Praise or Condemn:
1 
0
1:05 am
I thought it was a guest on the show who said that?
Praise or Condemn:
0 
0
4:31 am
Yea sure, Bill O’Reilly took something you said from you…Just keep thinking that and the men in white coats with the fun belted jacket will be there soon
Praise or Condemn:
1 
0
2:32 pm
religion is a scam asking money to the poor people already while they already have plentiful of wealth It’s clearly a scam
Praise or Condemn:
2 
0
3:48 pm
Religion is the worlds first scam
Praise or Condemn:
1 
0
12:13 pm
Time to dissect this.
“How can a man understand science, when he does not understand He who is the Creator of all? – Reverend Mariam Wardley”
Any scientist who claims to understand something doesn’t know what he’s talking about. There’s always more to know.
” These are people who somehow have come to the conclusion that with only five senses, humanity can detect every known portion of existence.”
You fail to define atheist. An atheist is someone who does not believe in any higher power. No more, no less.
“These people believe that ‘empiricism’ is limited to tests and senses that we, as humans, can only possess.”
That’s true.
“If an atheist cannot test something and get data from it to their liking and observance, then they conclude that it obviously must not exist.”
Nope. We conclude that it either does not exist or we haven’t figured out how to detect it.
“This sort of backwoods thinking oft times shocks readers, to think that there could actually be people so arrogant and absent-minded.”
Backwoods? Don’t you mean “the voice in my head told me to kill my own son” or “this staff thing will make an entire river turn to blood” or “there’s not enough wine here”?
“In the world of atheism, there is no room for faith or morality. Only angry words and raw emotion, the telling signs of people who have not considered any other viewpoints.”
Hey, if you replace atheism with religion, the sentence becomes true! Don’t believe me? 9/11!
“What atheists fail to realize is that in their attempt to claim science for ‘themselves’ and no one else, they are denying a world of possibilities. ”
Who else should we claim it for? It’s not as if any plants or non-humans are asking us to explain cellulose or thermodynamics.
“Look into a clear winter’s night sky. Behold the stars magnifcently gleaming in heaven. Is it so hard to think that somwhere in all those stars, is a color that exists that we could never test or observe? A taste or new concept that we ‘sense’ with abilities we never knew we had within us?”
Yes, it is. We just haven’t found it yet.
“Such philosphy destroys the minds of atheists and their weak logic leaders like Richard Dawkins, PZ Mayers and Neill DeGrasse Tyson. ”
No it doesn’t.
As for the image, what your “reader” fails to mention is that when we die, or go to the bathroom, or sweat, or leak fluid in any way, shape, or form, we return water to the earth. It’s a zero-sum game, meaning that while the total water stays the same, when one of the values (in this case amounts of water in humans collectively and amounts of water in the world excluding humans) changes, the other must change to make up for it. Also, comets and asteroids lose water in our atmosphere.
Praise or Condemn:
9 
1
1:08 pm
omg stien he is awesome
Praise or Condemn:
2 
0
3:47 pm
firstly: soul eater? Respect.
also: agreed, you will notice that they fail to give actually definitions for atheist or any other term they come across. We will not be fooled by long sentences, we are smarter than you.
Praise or Condemn:
3 
0
4:22 pm
This is airtight. Anyone that disagrees is obviously a STD-riddled fruitcup, walking down the path of Satan.
Praise or Condemn:
3 
6
4:34 pm
Airtight? It’s riddled with holes…
Praise or Condemn:
5 
3
4:41 pm
try reading the comments, ignorant bastard
Praise or Condemn:
3 
0
7:23 pm
Well you clearly said that you were to confused with the science to debunk the above argument. So you should assume that it is indeed airtight jusqua preuve du contraire by you. Since you admitted to being to confused you reject the argument by faith alone.
Also, OddAtheist, do you realize the nature of this site?
Praise or Condemn:
0 
1
7:26 pm
We know the nature of this site, I, for one, simply don’t like you.
Praise or Condemn:
1 
1
7:30 pm
And you are? I never interacted with you here once, I guess you must hide under big rocks when the sun is up.
Also if you are familiar with the nature of this site why bother? why not simply enjoy the articles? You know little missy, its time like these that make me think your parents should of washed your sinfull mouth with soap when you were young. This could not pass in Louisiana, non monsieur!
Praise or Condemn:
0 
2
7:35 pm
Me? I’m new here.
The only reason I hide from the sun is because I steal code (that was a joke btw, you people seem to hate linux users… and a lot of other groups of people)
I can’t enjoy this site, it is horrible.
Praise or Condemn:
0 
0
7:40 pm
Hubner, I said I’M confused by some science in general. The article is riddled with holes that my fellow friends have already broken in their comments.
Me personally being bad with science dosen’t mean the article is true, it just means I personally can’t fight with pure scientific fact.
I do relize the nature of this site, it’s obvious satirical
Praise or Condemn:
1 
5
5:12 pm
I fated it must have been god telling me this was bull crap.
Praise or Condemn:
6 
0
7:54 pm
Your logic, if you could call it that, is beyond stupid Abe.
As for your little picture, did you bother to take into account the amount of water that’s expended from the human body? You’re doing only taking, no giving, which completely negates EVERYTHING and makes your point moot. The amount of water on Earth can never change. That’s because it’s ALWAYS somewhere within the Earth’s atmosphere, it can’t just leave. Someone drinks some water and sweats it off, the sweat evaporates and goes into the air, it then rains and then goes into other bodies of water and then gets pumped into treatment facilities wherever it lands, just for the cycle to continue over and over again. Not only THAT, but your math itself is wrong on so many levels. The Earth’s been around for billions of years, yes, but how does that impact the math? We’ve effectively been recycling the water now for quite some time.
Praise or Condemn:
4 
0
2:15 am
just a little mention I found a study about if we use all the water contained in everyone body we could replenish half the atlantic ocean ( I talk about the 7 Billions of people )
Is it true I don’t know
Praise or Condemn:
0 
0
11:17 pm
It’s not like we have shit loads of underground water, nor does water recycle itself along with the rest of the earth. You’ve really got this time Abe. You kicked our asses with science that is totally not riddled with holes and absolutely no concept of science whatsoever.
Do us all a favor and lay off the cat shit like I keep telling you. You can’t handle it!
Praise or Condemn:
1 
1
3:20 am
I just lol’d
our body doesnt stock all the water we drink, if it did we would be giant water balloons
Praise or Condemn:
3 
0
4:34 pm
So we are suppost to believe something even more illogical; Some hairy guy decided to make Earth from the clouds? o.0 wtf.
Praise or Condemn:
3 
0
11:14 pm
You need to go to Sunday school and brush up on your Bible knowledge, young lady. Not before wiping that whore’s mask though.
Praise or Condemn:
0 
5
11:18 pm
Yeah she can keep the makeup. Going to a church would give her more ammo to use against you, though.
Praise or Condemn:
0 
0
11:36 pm
Or wake up her up and make her put her life of SIN and DEBAUCHERY behind her. I’m going with the latter.
Praise or Condemn:
0 
5
11:53 pm
Firstly: DEBAUCHERY!!!!!
Second: OR…She could do something useful with her life, I’m gonna go with that.
Praise or Condemn:
1 
0
11:55 pm
Nothing is wrong with debauchery. It just has negative connotations. Like decadence. You know who else was against decadence? Hitler.
Praise or Condemn:
0 
0
12:09 am
Oh, that was a spongebob reference
Praise or Condemn:
0 
0
11:55 pm
I must disagree about Richard Dawkins, it’s amazing what the man can prove with Douglas Adams quotes alone…
Praise or Condemn:
0 
0