Has the Time Come to End Animal Testing?
While you’re reading this, millions of mice, rabbits, primates, cats, dogs, and other animals are locked inside cold, barren cages in laboratories across the country. In pain and loneliness, they yearn to roam free as God intended them to do. As He so inimitably put it in His good book, “A righteous man cares for the needs of his animal, but the kindest acts of the wicked are cruel.” (Proverbs 12:10)
My friends, the road to Hell is paved with good intentions. And when it comes to animal experimentation, we have paved ourselves an expressway with no rest stops or exits along the way. There are those that may ask, “What has animal testing gained for us medically?” But even more importantly we should ask ourselves, “What has animal testing gained for us spiritually?” The answer to the former, of course, is nothing. And the answer to the latter? Eternal damnation.
Though some readers may snicker in ignorance with regard to spiritual matters, there’s no denial of the material facts regarding animal testing. The facts are using animals are the product of archaic medical training courses. Even perverse pantheists like PETA (People Ethically Testing Animals) acknowledge this by stating, “Pigs and dogs are cut open and killed and cats and ferrets have hard plastic tubes forced down their delicate throats.” Why? To justify the fifty thousand dollar tuition suburban parents shell out for their children’s sense of entitlement? The answer is apparently, yes.
The Journal of the American Medical Association reported in April 1998 that adverse reactions to prescription drugs kill more than 100,000 humans each year. Animal tests failed to predict these dangers. And why should this be a surprise? Animals cannot relate the most common side effects that occur with prescription drugs such as headaches, dizziness, malaise, depression, or nausea. These symptoms are often the predictors of far more serious problems. And yet, the FDA continues to require animal testing.
It’s often asked why animal testing continues if their use is largely irrelevant. There are several reasons for this. Some point to the “publish or perish” world of academic science which requires little originality or insight. As a result, they take an already well defined animal model, change some variables, and obtain “new” research.
But there is a way out my friends. There are far better alternatives to animal testing, some of which may be staring at you this very moment from your own backyard. That’s right. You guessed it. I’m talking about Mexicans.
The fact is Mexicans, as we know all too well, are extremely capable of expressing symptoms we noted above as common side effects from prescription drugs and avoiding work. Why not use them? Are they being used for anything else? Uninsured Mexicans already flood our hospitals with psychosomatic maladies. Why not ensure they have a sincere reason to visit the emergency room?
Each year, tens of thousands of illegal Mexicans are deported back to their home country. What is gained aside from jobs that no self-respecting American would take? What benefits do deporting illegal Mexicans provide America or for even what passes for a Mexican government? It’s a net loss for Americans. It’s a net loss for Mexico. If a lazy Mexican leeches off of Social Security, Medicaid, and Medicare, who is to say that these same parasites wouldn’t leech off of Mexico’s own government programs? The trip to a private industry medical research lab is far shorter than the trip to the southern border. And I need not point out the price of gas lately.
I have it on good authority from medical practitioners that Mexican physiology is almost human. If this is so, one cannot help but wonder why this solution has not been the subject of more discussion. It’s time to take God’s word into account and treat animals the way they were meant to be treated. Will you join me?
- Sinful
- Suspicious
- Scared
- Sad
- Amused
- Laughing Out Loud
Author: Kelvin Fortescue
Kelvin Maximillian Fortescue is an investigative journalist specializing in science, religion, and politics. Nothing stops him from plumbing the darkest depths of the pantheistic/atheistic liberal agenda. Friend him on Facebook!
2:17 pm
I really hate the idea of them testing things on dogs. That’s just sad and I really don’t want to read about that and how can we know a cancer drug on a dog really works? It takes years after that to try it on humans. Sort of seems like a waste particular with that new drug that everyone is talking about and are we really going to wait ten years for it to be legal in public? In this day and age science should be better than that. If those people in Mexico are suffering and want to try it out, why not? The good news is they could make themselves a decent wage while helping the world. Win — win in my book.
Praise or Condemn:
12 
2
4:53 pm
But you’d probably be fine with them testing drugs on cats, right?
Praise or Condemn:
5 
2
5:56 pm
Sugar, why don’t you read my article first before jumping to conclusions about Stephenson.
Praise or Condemn:
7 
4
8:16 pm
Considering how I’ve been arguing with Billings on here for three years now, I’m not “jumping to conclusions” about anything. I KNOW what I’m talking about and who I’m dealing with.
Praise or Condemn:
6 
3
8:47 pm
Three years? In Canada that’s considered a common law marriage.
Praise or Condemn:
5 
4
8:52 pm
So in Canada if you’ve been emailing somebody who lives in a completely different part of the country for three years, you’re married?
Praise or Condemn:
4 
3
10:01 pm
Let’s put it this way. You’re ChristWire’s honorary mail order bride.
Praise or Condemn:
6 
5
11:55 am
“Let’s put it this way. You’re ChristWire’s honorary mail order bride.”
Too bad for you that I’m a feminist.
Praise or Condemn:
3 
6
12:02 pm
I’m already taken sweety and seeing how many love letters you’ve showered on Billings, I’m glad.
Praise or Condemn:
6 
2
5:37 pm
Once again Claire shows that she assumes she’s the boss of everyone without knowing the first thing about others, even those close to her. Your selfishness continues to shock me, princess, even after all of our years together. You would likely save the life of a cat before that of your fellow man. If that man were a Christian journalist, I doubt you’d even lift a finger to help him if one of your precious little felines was crying for a saucer of milk or if your favorite episode of “Melrose Place” was just beginning.
Praise or Condemn:
4 
4
5:53 pm
Claire claims to be a feminist yet she belligerently defends the use of hateful misogynist insults.
That sound you’re hearing isn’t tinnitus, Claire, it’s cognitive dissonance!
Praise or Condemn:
6 
1
5:57 pm
“Once again Claire shows that she assumes she’s the boss of everyone without knowing the first thing about others, even those close to her.”
Likewise.
“Your selfishness continues to shock me”
How am I selfish?
“You would likely save the life of a cat before that of your fellow man.”
If that “fellow man” was Adam, Tyson, Bruce, Dracula, or Abe then yes, I would save a cat before them. You, on the other hand, I’d probably save you because I’d feel sorry for you, being an old man with no friends and all.
“If that man were a Christian journalist, I doubt you’d even lift a finger to help him if one of your precious little felines was crying for a saucer of milk or if your favorite episode of “Melrose Place” was just beginning.”
I don’t give milk to my cats as cats are lactose intolerant. As for Melrose Place, I don’t even know what the hell that show is even about, let alone watched it.
Praise or Condemn:
2 
4
6:01 pm
“Claire claims to be a feminist yet she belligerently defends the use of hateful misogynist insults.”
The use of the word “bitch” hardly makes someone a misogynist. The fact that you were getting up AA’s ass about his use of the word, despite the fact that there are far more misogynistic people around you (i.e. Adam), indicates that perhaps you simply were having trouble coming up with an argument to counter his.
Praise or Condemn:
3 
4
6:07 pm
“Bitch” is a misogynistic insult. Whether the person using it is a misogynist or not is beside the point.
If you don’t understand that you need remedial Feminism 101.
Praise or Condemn:
3 
3
6:11 pm
““Bitch” is a misogynistic insult. Whether the person using it is a misogynist or not is beside the point.”
Ho-hum, that’s nice, now why don’t you go chat with Adam about the fact that he considers women intellectually inferior to men and that we serve no purpose but to pop out babies?
Praise or Condemn:
2 
4
6:25 pm
“You, on the other hand, I’d probably save you because I’d feel sorry for you, being an old man with no friends and all.”
Get a room.
Praise or Condemn:
4 
1
6:46 pm
How about you and your cigarette get a room, blacklung?
Praise or Condemn:
1 
4
10:37 pm
Believe me when I say you brought a tear to my eye tonight, Claire. I am really touched by your outpouring of support. Maybe things are starting to look up between the two of us?
Praise or Condemn:
3 
1
11:03 pm
Billings, are you drunk and lonely again?
Praise or Condemn:
2 
3
11:38 pm
Claire what is this I hear about you and Bruce divorcing?
I hope you enjoy your sad fallen women status.
Praise or Condemn:
5 
1
12:01 am
Lurlene, Prissy was nothing more than a delusional bastard who had a hard-on for Claire and imagined he was married to her. He’s deranged and psychotic, he thinks he runs a business and has a girlfriend.
Praise or Condemn:
1 
5
12:05 am
Claire, So it’s OK for people to use misogynist insults, but only if they agree with you on other topics?
Liberal moral relativism at its finest.
Praise or Condemn:
3 
1
2:19 pm
“Believe me when I say you brought a tear to my eye tonight, Claire. I am really touched by your outpouring of support. Maybe things are starting to look up between the two of us?”
Outpouring of support? When have I EVER supported you? And no, things are not starting to look up between us. I HATE your guts.
Praise or Condemn:
2 
1
2:21 pm
“Claire, So it’s OK for people to use misogynist insults, but only if they agree with you on other topics?”
Exbrony, so it’s OK for people to overlook the far-worse misogynistic offenses of some people because you happen to agree with them?
Praise or Condemn:
2 
1
7:13 pm
Claire, take the log of cat hair out of your own eye before you remove the speck from your brother’s.
Praise or Condemn:
0 
0
11:30 pm
actually its not considered a “common law marriage” in Canada since there is no “such law”
Praise or Condemn:
2 
5
11:59 pm
Of course I know Canada is lawless now. I’m talking about the past, when they still respected the queen.
Praise or Condemn:
8 
2
12:28 am
Um did you just say Canada is lawless, i have news for you, i have been to Canada, they are not an anarchy.
Praise or Condemn:
2 
4
12:48 am
You’ve clearly never been to a hockey game. And if you think putting gravy on fries isn’t anarchy, then I guess I can see why you’re a dirty communist.
Praise or Condemn:
4 
2
12:56 am
Please tell me you are joking, not having laws would mean there are no police to uphold them, and yet i have seen police there, so why would they have them if they have no laws.QED.
Praise or Condemn:
2 
3
8:03 pm
http://images.memegenerator.net/Instance/Preview?imageID=2451215&generatorTypeID=&panels=&text0=You%20put%20gravy%20on%20your%20fries%3F&text1=watch%20out%20we%20got%20a%20badass%20over%20here.&text2=&text3=
Praise or Condemn:
0 
1
3:21 pm
It’s a common sense solution. Why would God put mexicans on the planet unless He wanted us to use them?
Praise or Condemn:
6 
0
5:11 pm
so why are you here? You are 100% useless. Why? Because I’m spiderman.
Praise or Condemn:
4 
2
11:14 pm
I am Discord, your point is invalid
Praise or Condemn:
1 
0
5:42 pm
You do realize that Mexico hasn’t been around forever, right? That ‘mexicans’ didn’t exist a couple hundred years back. It was the spanish who formed a colony in North America that eventually became the independant country of Mexico. Any ‘mexican’ is descendent of either the spanish, the natives, or both.
Let’s use you for testing first, though, ‘kay?
Praise or Condemn:
1 
3
5:55 pm
Why should we be testing on a tax payer when there are so many tax dodgers available?
Praise or Condemn:
3 
0
6:08 pm
I wasn’t even talking about that. What do taxes have to do with me commenting on Real Merican’s raciest comment towards mexicans?
Praise or Condemn:
0 
2
6:17 pm
LOL @ Rani-Girl. How come whenever I say something about a certain race I am labeled a “raciest [sic]?” Typical lib.
Praise or Condemn:
4 
0
9:56 pm
Well it is if you say that they deserve to have experimental drugs tested on them like animals.
Praise or Condemn:
1 
1
10:03 pm
Excuse me but they’re not animals. That’s the point. Why are you so down on Mexicans?
Praise or Condemn:
2 
0
12:15 am
I am not i do not think they are animals the author of this article said “There are far better alternatives to animal testing, some of which may be staring at you this very moment from your own backyard. That’s right. You guessed it. I’m talking about Mexicans.” So therefore he thinks Mexicans should be tested in place of animals for experimental drugs, LIKE animals.
Praise or Condemn:
0 
2
12:19 am
The author didn’t say he liked animals. He simply suggested that they be used INSTEAD of animals.
Praise or Condemn:
2 
0
12:27 am
By like it means similar to, you can tell by context it is basic grammer.
Praise or Condemn:
0 
1
11:35 am
Well I like this author and I’m in complete agreement with him. He’s obviously intelligent, handsome, and popular with the ladies. An all around gentleman. What a guy.
Praise or Condemn:
5 
0
11:52 am
AA, Fortescue IS the author of this article…
” He’s obviously intelligent, handsome, and popular with the ladies. An all around gentleman. What a guy.”
And now hes just stroking his ego…
Praise or Condemn:
0 
2
11:59 am
You libs could learn how to be a real man like Mr. Fortescue.
Self confident men like him are becoming rare in this feminist whipped society
Praise or Condemn:
5 
0
12:11 pm
” He’s obviously intelligent, handsome, and popular with the ladies. An all around gentleman. What a guy.”
That’s not self confidence, that’s just him adding to is already big ego.
Not a liberal. Just because I don’t agree with you, dosen’t make me a liberal. Got it?
“…becoming rare in this feminist whipped society”
You know what’s really rare in this society? Common sense…
Praise or Condemn:
0 
2
6:20 pm
I agree. Why should honest, hard-working Americans who pay their taxes be subjected to this kind of testing? I don’t think I could ever get behind that sort of thing. Sorry Rani-Girl, that’s a pretty far-out-there suggestion and I’m afraid you’re in the minority on this one!
Praise or Condemn:
3 
0
9:58 pm
No one thinks we should be testing on people, not you not mexicans, look i am against animal testing but it is preferable to human.
Praise or Condemn:
0 
2
10:10 pm
Did you even bother reading the article or Real Merican’s comments. There are plenty of folks who regard this as a compelling solution to animal cruelty. But then again, when have communists like you ever shown compassion to animals? The red swastika in your profile pic makes me want to throw up.
Praise or Condemn:
2 
0
12:21 am
1. I read both.
2. No one thinks it is a compelling solution but you, you want to replace cruelty to animals with cruelty to humans.
3. I am all for compassion to animals, but people come first.
4. It isn’t a swastika it is the symbol for communism.
5. You are about to make another argument about how immoral the Soviets were but i will tell you again what i have before. I agree, the Soviets were horrible, but they weren’t communist, they said they were, but they didn’t follow the principles. I go by Marx’s original writings, which are completely different than the laws of the Soviet Union. Any insults to communism that you direct my way have to be on Marx’s writings, not the actions of the Soviets because I do not believe in the soviet communist method, (which wasn’t even communist really). By the way Marx was a proponent of democracy, which is very communist.
Praise or Condemn:
0 
2
6:32 pm
‘LOL @ Rani-Girl. How come whenever I say something about a certain race I am labeled a “raciest [sic]?” Typical lib.’
Maybe because you were insulting people based on race? THAT’S why.
‘I agree. Why should honest, hard-working Americans who pay their taxes be subjected to this kind of testing? I don’t think I could ever get behind that sort of thing. Sorry Rani-Girl, that’s a pretty far-out-there suggestion and I’m afraid you’re in the minority on this one!’
I don’t care about taxes or who pays them. When I said you should be tested on, I meant (and sorry I didn’t make it clear enough) that I highly doubt you would like being tested on just because someone decides your other-wise useless and that’s the only reason you’re here. I meant to make you think and you failed at that.
Praise or Condemn:
1 
1
12:23 am
Rani-Girl I sense anger in your post as well as aggression. I don’t need to mention it cause everyone already knows about young women with anger-aggression issues and the disgusting, vile things their fathers did to them. BTW who cares when the Mexicans got to Mexico. There here now so clearly it’s God’s will to use them for whatever.
Praise or Condemn:
3 
1
12:29 am
Clearly, where in the bible does it say that.
Praise or Condemn:
0 
2
11:36 am
You know as much about the Bible as you do about communism – nothing.
Praise or Condemn:
2 
1
6:27 pm
I was mad because he was insulting mexicans. How would you feel if someone insulted someone you know and like just because of their heritage? As for the female anger thing you said, I suppose you think every female (and let’s face everyone – male or female – has been angry at least once their lives) had ‘vile things’ done to them by their fathers. Maybe in your family and community, but not everyone’s, Bane.
‘God’s will’? Scientists, racists, and others who work in testing products on living beings are God now? Wow, that certainly clears up who you believe your lord is.
‘BTW who cares when Maxicans got to Mexico.’ He said that God put them on the planet. I was telling him how the country of Mexico hasn’t been around since the Earth came into existence.
Praise or Condemn:
0 
2
12:44 am
“How would you feel if someone insulted someone you know and like just because of their heritage?”
I don’t know. Did they deserve it? If they deserved it then I guess I wouldn’t feel too bad about it I guess.
Praise or Condemn:
2 
0
6:48 pm
Well the offender can’t decide if they deserve it or not if the only thing the offender knows is that person’s heritage. If the only thing the offender knows is ‘that person’s mexican’, then that’s not something they deserve to be by. If the person did something offensive or morally wrong (and no, being mexican in itself is not morally wrong. Believing that makes you either ignorant or racist) then I suppose I’d have to agree. Maybe. It depends. But heritage or race is not a good reason!
Praise or Condemn:
0 
0
6:50 pm
*be insulted by
Praise or Condemn:
0 
0
10:12 pm
You realize that the entire concept of a country is totally arbitrary and if the majority of the world at one point or another wanted to rename America to Spidermanland, America’s new name would be spidermanland, right?
Praise or Condemn:
1 
2
10:15 pm
…says the liberal who’d object to anyone declaring themselves sovereign.
Praise or Condemn:
2 
0
6:04 pm
I wouldn’t object to anyone declaring themselves or their group sovereign if they had legitimate complaints that weren’t being addressed. Like China, most Middle East states, the Oakland commune, etc. Where did you get the idea that I would object to people declaring themselves sovereign, and what does that have to do with anything?
Praise or Condemn:
0 
2
8:53 pm
I agree with the title of this article…but not the article itself…
“Even perverse pantheists like PETA (People Ethically Testing Animals) acknowledge this by stating, “Pigs and dogs are cut open and killed and cats and ferrets have hard plastic tubes forced down their delicate throats.” ”
PETA actually stands for People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals, it even says so on their website…Did you even do any reasearch? Yes they acknowledge the cruel testing, but they sure as hell don’t agree with it.
“I have it on good authority from medical practitioners that Mexican physiology is almost human”
Mexican physiology isn’t “almost human” it’s COMPLETELY human. They are humans after all.
Praise or Condemn:
1 
3
10:08 pm
Ouroboros, since you’re against both animal and Mexican testing, you clearly don’t have any solutions to the problem. So why did you bother even showing up? Did you just finish up your fifth read of Catcher in the Rye?
Wake us up when you’re up to speed on acronyms after you finish medical school.
Praise or Condemn:
4 
1
10:33 pm
While I’d never test on animals, I do understand it’s a neccessary evil because the minute we test on humans and something goes wrong, everyone would be in an uproar and nothing would ever get done…So until we can find a better way to test, I regret to say that animal testing is all we have.
I’ve never even touched a copy of Catcher in the Rye…Everyone I’ve ever talked that has read it to says the book is awful so I just ignore it.
“Wake us up when you’re up to speed on acronyms…”
Up to speed on acronyms? At least I know what the hell PETA stands for. More than I can say for you.
“you finish medical school”
How is this truly relevent? Is it because I’m smart enough to know that Mexicans are actually human so you assume I’m in medical school?
Praise or Condemn:
1 
2
10:41 pm
Well I hope you’re sitting down for this dummkopf because I have some news for you. We already conduct medical tests in the United States on humans. Specifically, prisoners. So I don’t think you’re in a position to lecture any of us on acronyms or medicine.
Praise or Condemn:
2 
0
12:25 am
Well actually he is because he got the acronym right, and when have we done medical tests on prisoners. Oh and whenever we talk in foreign languages we are told by you christians to speak in english. Почему наклоните нас все как раз получают впере
Praise or Condemn:
0 
2
12:46 am
You didn’t know that we do medical tests on prisoners? Wow, you must be new.
Praise or Condemn:
3 
0
12:54 am
Please who me news articles, show me videos, show me any evidence that doesn’t come from christwire or conservapedia. We do some human medical tests but only with permission.
Praise or Condemn:
0 
2
11:38 am
Moving the goal posts eh? Why am I not surprised.
Praise or Condemn:
3 
0
10:50 pm
Listen scheißkopf, it’s true that we do run some medical tests on humans, but it’s usually inolves the test subject to have consented to the tests. They WILLINGLY let themselves be tested, it’s their lives let them do what they want with it. Can you even ask an animal for their consent? No, you cannot.
“So I don’t think you’re in a position to lecture any of us on acronyms or medicine.”
I really don’t think you have the backup to lecture me on acronyms when you got an easy acronym (PETA) wrong when five seconds of research would of showed you the answer. AS I said before; ” …I’m smart enough to know that Mexicans are actually human…” it isn’t about having medicinal knowledge, it’s about common sense
Praise or Condemn:
1 
1
11:54 pm
I accept your surrender.
Praise or Condemn:
2 
0
11:59 pm
I didn’t surrender dumbass. Your just afraid of losing and making stuff up.
Fight back you coward!
Praise or Condemn:
0 
2
12:27 am
Are you afraid of the grammar police? If not, you should.
Praise or Condemn:
2 
0
12:32 am
Um dummkopf, you are still not responding to his arguments, admit you lost and stop insulting.
Praise or Condemn:
0 
2
12:38 am
So I used “your” where I should of used “you’re”. Mistake on my part, big deal.
You’re completely dodging my argument!
Just fight back or admit that you’ve lost and move along.
Praise or Condemn:
0 
2
12:44 am
I only need to beat you once, not twice.
Praise or Condemn:
3 
0
12:48 am
You never even beat me once…
Is your ego just so massive that you think you win even when you obviously lose?
Praise or Condemn:
0 
2
12:58 am
Ourboros said
“Listen scheißkopf, it’s true that we do run some medical tests on humans, but it’s usually inolves the test subject to have consented to the tests. They WILLINGLY let themselves be tested, it’s their lives let them do what they want with it. Can you even ask an animal for their consent? No, you cannot.
“So I don’t think you’re in a position to lecture any of us on acronyms or medicine.”
I really don’t think you have the backup to lecture me on acronyms when you got an easy acronym (PETA) wrong when five seconds of research would of showed you the answer. AS I said before; ” …I’m smart enough to know that Mexicans are actually human…” it isn’t about having medicinal knowledge, it’s about common sense”
than you said ” I accept your surrender”
but he never surrendered, so you never won. QED
Praise or Condemn:
0 
2
12:27 am
I’d be a lot happier knowing that science stopped using animals and paid Mexicans the wages of a serf to do testing on them. Doing the animals is just so wrong!!!
Praise or Condemn:
4 
0
12:30 am
And yet doing it on Mexicans for serf wages is okay, you are what is called a sociopath, hitler also loved animals and valued them over jewish life, i guess you are the hitler of mexicans.
Praise or Condemn:
0 
2
11:39 am
Annoying atheist I’m just a animal lover that’s all.
You see my solution provides poor Mexican people the opportunity to earn an income while helping all mankind. And no animals get tests done on them. Everybody Wins!!
Praise or Condemn:
5 
0
11:44 am
You know who else was a communist atheist?
Hitler.
Praise or Condemn:
4 
0
6:07 pm
Hitler was socialist. And as of now, people still debate his religious affiliation, which he publicly claimed to be Christian.
Praise or Condemn:
0 
3
6:31 pm
It’s a known fact that Hitler’s religion is a mix of paganistic Pre-Islamic Iranian occultism and the racist atheist ideals of Nietzsche.
His claims of Christianity are no differen’t than Romney’s or Obama’s false claims.
Praise or Condemn:
3 
0
7:35 pm
1. Hitler killed off communists and threw them in concentration camps as well as jews and trade unionists.
2. Hitler was nationalist socialist.
3. It is a know fact hitler claimed to be christian.
4. What you stated is not a known fact, it is a outright lie with no evidence to support it.
Praise or Condemn:
0 
3
7:47 pm
Now I’ve seen everything. We have two people here, FredtheFailLord and anonymous athiest defending HITLER? Does the depravity of athiest liberals know no boundaries?
Praise or Condemn:
4 
1
7:56 pm
Were not defending Hitler you middle school dropout. We are saying that her facts are incorrect. We believe Hitler was a douche, but we don’t lie and say he is a part of a different religion.
Praise or Condemn:
1 
3
11:07 pm
it is a known fact that the rain in Spain falls mainly on the plain.
Praise or Condemn:
1 
0
11:08 pm
He was Buddhist
Praise or Condemn:
1 
0
12:11 am
Hitler was a socialist in the same way that the People’s Democratic Republic of North Korea is democratic.
Praise or Condemn:
0 
0
12:25 am
I completely agree, he was not socialist he was nationalist socialist, world of difference believe it or not.
Praise or Condemn:
0 
2
12:33 am
Hitler was in fact a Catholic, like Santorum and Gingrich. See him here smooching with the cross-dressing pedophiles in elaborate embroidered dresses.
Herman Cain/Sarah Palin for 2012! Praise be, amen!
Praise or Condemn:
2 
0
12:46 am
Lurlene, you’re quite right. And there is a much closer correlation between Catholicism and Fascism even than there is between atheism and communism.
Hitler, Mussolini, Franco, Ante Pavelic, the Argentinian generals — all of them fascists, all of them Catholic.
Anonymous Atheist, you’re quite wrong. There was no socialism in National Socialism any more than there is democracy in any country whose name begins with “People’s Democratic Republic of…”
Praise or Condemn:
1 
0
1:07 am
Yes i agree that is why i said they are worlds apart.
Praise or Condemn:
0 
3
1:16 am
Well stop calling it socialism, then. Call it what it is: fascism.
Praise or Condemn:
1 
0
12:40 pm
Here’s some information about medical testing on prisoners in the US:
http://www.afaceaface.org/2011/02/medical-experiments-on-prisoners-and-mental-patients-in-u-s/
http://www.nytimes.com/2006/08/13/us/13inmates.html?pagewanted=all
There’s lots more out there.
Praise or Condemn:
0 
0
11:06 pm
I think we are on a good transition but it sounds way too indiscriminate well, also discriminate. I mean Mexicans? we need to change it to hipsters and douchebags.
Praise or Condemn:
3 
0
8:25 pm
Douchebags for sures. XD
Praise or Condemn:
0 
0
1:26 am
I just talked on the phone to Ingrid Newkirk from PETA, and she agrees that we should be testing on female immigrants, not animals (http://www.bwvaktboom.com/). I can post the transcript later.
Praise or Condemn:
2 
0
5:04 am
It’s true that we do run some medical tests on humans, but it’s usually inolves the test subject to have consented to the tests. They WILLINGLY let themselves be tested, it’s their lives let them do what they want with it. Can you even ask an animal for their consent? No, you cannot.
Many inhabitants of Central and South America, Asia and Africa would gladly volunteer for a paid gig as a medical experiment subject. The pay need not be much and out sourcing is all the rage. Is it a truly compassionate idea? I am not sure, but I know many people who are hopeless or starving and see no way to feed their family would likely consider it a reasonable sacrifice both for their loved ones immediate welfare and for the good of mankind and medical science as a whole in the long term.
Praise or Condemn:
1 
1
5:08 am
You would rather kill human guinea pigs than actual guinea pigs? Sure, why not?
Praise or Condemn:
2 
0
4:37 pm
As the christwire population believes Mexicans have no purpose other than costing tax payer money, christwire Christians are scaremongering who feed on the hateful feelings towards the rest of the world. So should we not vote, christwire Christians or Mexicans to be sent for research? As a scientist, I know which I would rather see very heavily sedated in my lab!
Praise or Condemn:
0 
1
8:51 am
Okay, I’m very against animal testing, but I don’t think we should start testing on people because of their ethnicity.
Praise or Condemn:
0 
1
8:58 am
What criteria would you use, then?
I’d be in favour of experimenting on emos. We’d probably pick up a few Mexican emos in the dragnet, but you know what they say — you can’t make huevos rancheros without breaking a few eggs!
Praise or Condemn:
0 
1
9:15 am
You and every other insane person on this site.
I don’t think we should test on people at all. If you have to test it, then it isn’t worth using because it could be potentally dangourous.
Praise or Condemn:
0 
0
9:55 am
All medicines have a test period. Do you think we should go ahead and stop making every single product that requires testing before use? Should we also stop all lab experimentation?
Praise or Condemn:
0 
1
9:22 am
OK, then. No more medicine and no more black mascara for you and your emo friends!
Praise or Condemn:
0 
0
9:49 am
That’s funny because I don’t wear make up. And medicine is differant, I ment things you dont really need, make up ect.
Praise or Condemn:
0 
0
11:13 am
Wonderful, so we’re in agreement. No testing mascara on Mexicans. Medicine is okay.
Suki, how do you feel about crash testing Mexicans for the automobile industry? I’m still pondering that one.
Praise or Condemn:
0 
1
2:03 pm
I ment different because medicine is something we need, people would die with out it. But testing stuff that could potentially be dangous on humans is wrong.
And thats why they invented test dummys.
Praise or Condemn:
1 
0