JK Rowling New Book ‘The Little Brown’ In Stores Soon, To Read Like ‘The Bible But for Atheists’
If your idea for a great chummy bedtime story is occult sex magic, blood orgies and homosexually fueled typhoons of shameful sodomy, look no further than JK Rowling’s new ‘adult book’ named The Little Brown.
JRK Rowling, renown cult atheist and author of explicit children’s book series The Lord of the Rings.
As you know, JKR Rowling is the dangerous man behind the entire Lord of the Rings series. A story of sexually frustrated midgets and eccentric ogres, clamoring through a world of demonic dragons, gay-oriented sorcerers and subliminal-marijuana legislation trees that are called ‘ents’, Lord of the Rings is currently ranked by CW Catholic and Protestant quarterly in the Top Ten most dangerous literary pieces of all time.
We all know the statistics all too well. Young men who saw the trilogy were 16% more likely to smoke addictive drugs like marijuana and a nearly double that, 23%, more likely to secretly ‘dock’ when someone of the same gender.
The statistics were even worse for young women, who bought into the ‘Possession Ring Pop’ parties that followed the movies. The central theme of Rowling’s work is that Satan can possess the mind of humans with but a ring. Once a ‘possessor’ ring is placed on a human, it is ‘natural’ for a person to strip off clothing, writhe on the ground and act like a coked meth whore.
The parties hit the nation hard for a decade. “Ring Pops” were laced with LSD and quaaludes, sending young college women into a confusing state of flourescent colors, loosesned sinsholes and propensity for phallus lusting. Needless to say, these ring pop parties caused a sharp rise of STD, pregnancy and abortion raves at colleges throughout the world.
And even after all these offenses, Rowling is ready to bring this brand of mindaltering wordsmithing to full-fledged adults. Imagine housewives reading whatever erotica this maniac writes, her fragile mind bending to his stern, confidence brow and all knowing smug smile as he causes her juices to bubble and marinate at the thought of what fornication the next page holds. The men of America, can we imagine a fate, broken as they are possessed via kindle or Android on lunch break?
While the details of ‘The Little Brown’ are being kept very secretative, it’s revealed the story is another atheist praise anthem of escapism and a schizophrenic reality. The ‘Little Brown’ is presumably the hero of the book an anti-Christ figure that will fuel the atheist’s desire to ‘trump’ the Bible. It’s rumored Rowling is calling this book a more popular ‘version of the Bible’ for adults.
Just know, that when this book hits shelves we will organize burnings and pray for this nation, so that this British miscreant’s words don’t destroy whatever children were lucky enough to escape his LOTR book series and movies, keeping their minds unpossessed until adulthood.
- Sinful
- Suspicious
- Scared
- Sad
- Amused
- Laughing Out Loud
Author: Abe
If you don't like what you just read here you can just get out of my country. Now how about that smart-alack.
Follow me on twitters. Poke me as your New Friend on Facebook!!
2:44 am
I told you atheists, but you’ll still deny it. Here’s solid proof that there is atheist literature that is meant to replace the bible, and I bet it’s filled with techniques to lead Christians astray from the word of god as well.
Praise or Condemn:
10 
8
9:59 am
This isn’t proof you dumb bitch. He could have (and am 100% sure that he did) make it up. Someone who actually knows about Lord of the Rings and Harry Potter knows that
A. JK Rowling is a Christian WOMAN
B. JRR TOLKEIN wrote Lord of the Rings
C. JRR Tolkein inspired C.S. Lewis (Chronicles of Narnia) and JK Rowling (Harry Potter) to write their books. All of these books have Christian views, not your “Atheist Pedophilac Blood Orgies” or what every bullshit you dumbasses made up
Praise or Condemn:
10 
5
2:04 pm
In fact the Lord of the Rings has very strong Christian views hidden not too subtly. There’s stuff to do with good vs evil, temptation, corruption and you can even compare one character, who happens to be the one EVERYONE in the book is against, to the Devil. Guess what he gets defeated.
Praise or Condemn:
4 
2
9:54 pm
Bullshit. Tolkein explicitly denied that LOTR was a religious allegory.
Praise or Condemn:
1 
4
10:56 pm
can you provide evidence that Tolkein denied LOTR was a religious allegory?
Praise or Condemn:
2 
3
11:08 pm
I think you are thinking of C.S. Lewis.
Praise or Condemn:
2 
1
11:36 pm
what? You said(correctly i might add) that Tolkein explicitly denied that LOTR was a religious allegory
Praise or Condemn:
1 
2
11:37 pm
its right above that comment i made asking you to provide evidence of this
Praise or Condemn:
1 
2
11:47 pm
Huh? So you’re saying I’m right but you want me to provide a citation for something you already know to be true?
Praise or Condemn:
1 
1
1:28 am
what? no, im asking you to provide evidence that tolkein denied LOTR was a religious allegory, but then you said I was thinking of C.S. Lewis. Your just switching around your own words since you couldn’t provide evidence that tolkein denied LOTR was a religious allegory.
Praise or Condemn:
1 
2
2:39 am
In the foreword to the second edition of LOTR, Tolkien wrote: “As for any inner meaning or ‘message,’ it has in the intention of the author none. It is neither allegorical nor topical … I cordially dislike allegory, and have done so since I grew old and wary enough to detect its presence”
As his son Christopher also explains here…
http://www.youtube.com /watch?v=acqOGX62gys
… Tolkien disliked allegories. LOTR has been claimed to be an allegory for World War I, World War II, Communism, Fascism, environmentalism and Christianity. It is none of those things. Sometimes a story is just a story.
Now do I need to get you a copy of Tolkien’s death certificate, or are you now prepared to accept that he did indeed die in 1973?
Praise or Condemn:
1 
2
5:37 am
He also mentioned that although he had not planned it to have Christian metaphors in it but he ended up putting in quite a few without realising it so he just went with it. The thing about him saying it wasn’t related to WWII was true though
Praise or Condemn:
2 
1
7:07 am
Recognising in hindsight that something you have written was unconsciously influenced by Christianity is a very different thing to deliberately setting out to create a Christian allegory.
Praise or Condemn:
0 
3
7:16 am
I understand that but he recognised it whilst he was writing it not after. I read a while back that he said that it was something he didn’t know he was doing at first but quickly realised it was there and continued with it consciously.
Praise or Condemn:
2 
1
7:51 am
You have a source for this?
Praise or Condemn:
1 
1
7:52 am
I have already posted sources — Tolkien and his son — saying that this is not true.
Praise or Condemn:
0 
2
8:01 am
To be honest I can’t remember exactly where I read/heard it I have a suspicion it may have been on tv a while back, but the same source did point out that he didn’t base it on anything to do with the wars.
Praise or Condemn:
2 
0
9:53 am
I don’t disbelieve that he died in the late 1900′s, all I’m saying is he’s to dead to be publishing anything.
Praise or Condemn:
2 
1
9:09 pm
You said below, and I quote, “what proof do you have that he has been dead for under 40?”
Rather than just checking Wikipedia to see whether I was correct — which I was — you belligerently challenged me to provide you with “proof” of an indisputable, easily verifiable fact.
It was emblematic of your obtuseness throughout this entire thread.
Praise or Condemn:
0 
2
1:01 pm
Exbrony
I agree Herbert did ask for proof and you provided it. Fair play. The article authors don’t offer proof when questioned to something they claim in their articles or comments. I once got told that if I wanted them to get proof I’d have to send them $30 handling charge and $20 a page for some of their “information” they use on their site. This was, I think, a response to some data they compiled from national surveys such as Census’s.
Praise or Condemn:
0 
1
8:02 am
BTW, themes like good v evil, temptation, corruption, duty and salvation didn’t just fall out of the sky with the bible.
The Mediterranean, Mesopotamia and Asia had literary and religious traditions that had been going on about all of that for millennia before the bible was written.
Which is why so much of the bible (and Christianity in general) has the appearance of having been lifted from other sources.
But sophisticated theologians have explained that this was just “plagiarism by anticipation” on the part of Satan.
Praise or Condemn:
0 
3
8:07 am
I know. Often point out on this that most of Christianity is taken from much earlier beliefs. Only stated that the themes like good v evil, temptation, corruption coming from the bible because Abe claimed that LOTR was Satanic.
Praise or Condemn:
1 
1
8:39 am
I would like to see a Satanic text penned without reference to Christian tropes! I doubt such a thing is possible ..
Praise or Condemn:
1 
2
8:46 am
Satanic texts take a negative view of Christian themes LOTR does not. In fact it is very positive of them.
Praise or Condemn:
1 
1
9:55 pm
Cut out the misogynist insults, please, Herb.
Praise or Condemn:
0 
3
10:35 pm
before i you say i should cut out insults, your side should do the same. Considering i have seen 3 articles about how women are less then men, and a bunch of anti gay/black/jew/mexican/asian insults, you have no right to ask somebody to not insult another
Praise or Condemn:
2 
1
10:43 pm
I didn’t say you should cut out insults altogether, just the misogynist ones.
“Fuckhead” and “asshole” and “blithering, mush-brained cretin”, for instance, are perfectly good insults that are in no way misogynist (or racist or homophobic).
Just cut out the misogyny, OK?
Praise or Condemn:
0 
1
10:54 pm
fair enough. But this website does have an article posted by Susan B. Xenu about how women are less then men.
Praise or Condemn:
2 
1
11:04 pm
There is all sorts of misogyny all over the internet. I am very glad, however, that you will no longer be contributing to it. I applaud your principled stand.
Praise or Condemn:
1 
1
6:30 pm
Thank you Ex-atheist for telling me about this, I will download that to my Kindle.
Praise or Condemn:
2 
2
6:31 pm
Oh wait, I thought you were saying that it was a good book, but I re-read what you said. Guess i’ll cancel the download.
Praise or Condemn:
3 
1
6:45 pm
ummmmmmmm, I’m pretty sure that the bible is “the Qur’an, except for christians”
Praise or Condemn:
0 
1
6:51 pm
This is true. Almost all modern day religions in fact are pretty similar once you get down to the very basics. Same story told in slightly different ways.
Praise or Condemn:
1 
0
2:54 am
Why is this guy still even allowed to sell books after all the trouble Lord of the Rings caused?
Praise or Condemn:
6 
4
10:02 am
Lord of the Rings was written by JRR TOLKEIN, not the WOMAN JK ROWLING. What trouble did Lord of the Rings cause? Oh wait, never mind, you will either give me made up bullshit or not respond.
Praise or Condemn:
4 
5
2:06 pm
The author of the Lord of the Rings isn’t writing any more what with him being dead for around 50 odd years. Also the books have not caused any trouble.
Praise or Condemn:
2 
3
3:00 am
That Rowlings woman looks very shrill and strident in that photograph.
I’ll wager that this new book has something to do with a little man in a boat.
Praise or Condemn:
4 
4
10:06 am
“That Rowlings woman looks very shrill and strident in that photograph.” because that isn’t JK Rowling. That is a man.
Praise or Condemn:
5 
2
1:58 pm
To be more precise that is Richard Dawkins
Praise or Condemn:
3 
1
9:40 pm
… who Christians always describe as “shrill” and “strident”.
Praise or Condemn:
1 
1
10:37 pm
none of my christian friends call him shrill and strident.
Praise or Condemn:
2 
1
10:44 pm
And what a huge sample size you must have there.
Praise or Condemn:
0 
1
10:54 pm
12 is big enough.
Praise or Condemn:
1 
2
11:09 pm
No it isn’t. 12 is not a big enough sample size for anything.
Praise or Condemn:
1 
3
11:10 pm
Google “Richard Dawkins” and “strident”. 1.5 million hits.
Praise or Condemn:
0 
2
11:14 pm
you said christians ALWAYS describe him as shrill and strident. I found 12 that have NEVER described him as shrill and strident. Even 1 example would have been big enough to prove you wrong.
Praise or Condemn:
1 
2
11:20 pm
Oh, so we’re splitting hairs, are we? OK, fine. Not *all* Christians call Dawkins shrill and strident.
Just lots and lots of them.
Praise or Condemn:
3 
0
11:22 pm
um, how do you know lots and lots of christians call him shrill and strident?
Praise or Condemn:
1 
2
11:42 pm
Herb, it seems that you don’t follow the culture wars too closely. Dawkins is constantly being called “strident”. So much so that it has become a running joke among atheists and secularists.
Praise or Condemn:
0 
2
11:45 pm
still no proof of this I see
Praise or Condemn:
0 
2
11:49 pm
Fuck me. Do your own reading and catch up on your own time.
http://www.google.com.au/search?sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8&q=dawkins+strident#hl=en&sclient=psy-ab&q=%22richard+dawkins%22+strident&pbx=1&oq=%22richard+dawkins%22+strident&aq=f&aqi=g-v1&aql=&gs_sm=3&gs_upl=655814l661799l0l662071l26l26l0l0l0l0l375l6916l2-20.5l25l0&bav=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.r_qf.,cf.osb&fp=5e05badbe80dede4&biw=1600&bih=779
Praise or Condemn:
1 
0
11:58 pm
ok, you found points. but on none of these sites it said that these people were christians. and google has plenty of hits about everything.
Praise or Condemn:
1 
1
12:09 am
You read 1.5 million web pages already? And here I was thinking you were a little slow.
Praise or Condemn:
1 
0
5:54 am
Exbrony
12 is a pretty decent sample size for some topics and finding 1.5 million hits for a search term on google means nothing. I found 37 million for Christianity stupid 77 million for Christianity wrong and 5.7 million for Christianity rubbish
Praise or Condemn:
1 
2
6:39 am
Does that mean that Christianity is stupid. rubbish or wrong? I think not, it is a faith and to call anyone’s beliefs stupid, rubbish or wrong is disrespectful as long as their faith doesn’t disrespect others.
Praise or Condemn:
1 
2
7:03 am
Jonny, In the time it took you to lecture me about Google hits not necessarily meaning anything (well, duh!) you could have clicked any link on the first page of results and seen exactly what the hell I’m talking about.
But instead of taking those few seconds to acquaint yourself with what’s going on, you choose to try to lecture me about sample sizes. That doesn’t make you look silly at all.
Praise or Condemn:
1 
2
7:11 am
Exbrony
How do you know I didn’t take the time to read the first result? It isn’t difficult to read from another site then post within a short period of time.
Praise or Condemn:
2 
1
8:45 am
I don’t really understand why Jonny is so keen to argue himself horse against objective reality ..
Praise or Condemn:
1 
3
4:12 am
Oh no! You messed with the wrong fandom! The Lord of the Rings trilogy (was not actually intended to be a trilogy) was written by J.R.R. Tolkien, a decent Christian man. It was written as a form of expressing whatthe world was coming to during WWI (or WWII, I can’t remember exactly). However, Tolkien was the one who led C.S. Lewis, the author of the Chronicles of Narnia, to Christianity. Both series, LotR and CoN, express clear Christian views, as does Harry Potter, which J.K. Rowling (who is a woman, and Catholic I might add) wrote. There is a book dedicated to decifering the faith based undertones of the Harry Potter series.
I skimmed the article, I must admit, but one thing I’d like to say is that marijuana is not physically addictive. You have to smoke twice your body weight in a short period of time to become physically addicted to it. People can become addicted to the high you receive from smoking mary jane, but that’s all psychological and can be overcome easier
Praise or Condemn:
3 
7
9:51 am
HOORAY FOR FANDOM!
Praise or Condemn:
3 
3
6:50 pm
You don’t have any evidence. Your argument is invalid.
Praise or Condemn:
3 
2
8:12 pm
Christwire never has evidence…this entire site is invalid…
Praise or Condemn:
3 
3
9:59 pm
This is a news site. They’re the ones doing the reporting and finding the facts firsthand.
Christwire is the one people cite when creating articles.
Praise or Condemn:
3 
6
10:40 pm
nobody who isn’t brain dead cite’s this website. And there is no proof of any of your research. We actually research because we don’t make up stuff like you imbeciles
Praise or Condemn:
1 
3
11:10 pm
I would be happy if we can teach that girl how to cite references.
Praise or Condemn:
2 
1
11:14 pm
But they are unwilling to provide how they obtain this information, they either insult is or beat around the bush when we ask them where they got this info.
Herbert is right: only an idioit would cite this site as a source.
Praise or Condemn:
3 
2
11:16 pm
what new girl? Are you talking about Ouroborus or me?
Praise or Condemn:
2 
2
11:20 pm
Herbert: I’m talking about Ravynne.
Ouroboros: Some of the staff such as August and Blanche cite references in their articles.
Praise or Condemn:
1 
2
11:23 pm
I have yet to see any references in the short time I’ve been here. Even readin some old articles, they just make stuff up.
Praise or Condemn:
2 
1
11:26 pm
ex-Otaku, i was just wondering. Im not a woman, so i thought you might be talking, and i was thinking, “why would you think i was a woman?”
Praise or Condemn:
1 
2
11:30 pm
I’m currently typing this from my Android, and at the time you o
Praise or Condemn:
1 
1
11:31 pm
Whoops. Accidentally touched the submit comment button. long story short, I understand that you aren’t a women. My comment was targetting Rayanne.
Praise or Condemn:
1 
1
11:32 pm
ok. thanks for clearing that up
Praise or Condemn:
1 
1
11:33 pm
Which means Christwire does need a mobile site.
Praise or Condemn:
2 
1
10:41 pm
We have used more evidence on this article then anyone on your side has used on every article in the past 2 months.
Praise or Condemn:
2 
1
5:48 am
Abe is on her evil computer again look out everyone.
Praise or Condemn:
3 
3
2:08 pm
Spouting lies as usual. I thought Christians were supposed to be against lies.
Praise or Condemn:
2 
1
7:49 am
JRR Tolkien wrote the Lord of the rings and the Hobbit
Jk Rowling wrote Harry potter
Both are christians
Praise or Condemn:
3 
3
9:57 pm
Tolkein was a Roman Catholic, so he wasn’t a real Christian.
Praise or Condemn:
1 
2
10:42 pm
There is no such thing as a “real” christian.
Praise or Condemn:
1 
2
11:11 pm
Or a true Scotsman.
Praise or Condemn:
1 
1
11:18 pm
which side are you on? Sometimes you post onto my side, then on the side of the christwire christians.
Praise or Condemn:
2 
1
11:36 pm
What are you talking about? What makes you think I’m on anyone’s “side”?
Praise or Condemn:
0 
1
11:39 pm
its just, you argue against my said and the christian side, and considering nobody else on this site has every been fighting on both sides im a little confused
Praise or Condemn:
1 
1
11:55 pm
Why are you so keen to pigeonhole me?
Do you think that anyone who ever disagrees with anything you say or do must be on some “other side”?
That’s an unhelpfully tribal mentality. No wonder you’re confused.
Praise or Condemn:
0 
0
1:31 am
no. its just common knowledge that when someone disagrees with you on one topic, they are on the other side of said topic. On this article, you have said argued for/against my side.
Praise or Condemn:
1 
1
2:55 am
I point out facts and I argue in favour of things with which I agree and against things with which I disagree. That is all.
If you have some obsessive need to put people in boxes I can’t really help you.
Perhaps you can just put me by myself in a box with my name on it. Or, better still, get yourself an irony detector.
Praise or Condemn:
0 
0
10:04 am
irony detectors aren’t real.
Praise or Condemn:
1 
1
9:13 pm
Oh how I wish they were. I’d establish a charity that supplied them to needy people like you.
Praise or Condemn:
0 
0
1:57 pm
Abe
You article is filled with nothing but lies. Firstly you have gotten three different people mixed up in this article. JK (Not JKR) Rowling is a FEMALE author of the Harry Potter series. She is Christian, goes to church. There is a struggle between good and evil throughout the Harry Potter series and good wins EVERY TIME hardly a book that praises immoral choices.
The genius who wrote “The Lord of the Rings” was JRR Tolkien. He hasn’t published anything in ages what with him being dead for around 50 odd years. Again he was a Christian. The series is crammed full of Christian metaphors. Again mainly about the struggle between good and evil and again good triumphs.
The main antagonist is Sauron. He is the person every good character is fighting. He is given titles and names such as “the Abomination”, “the Dread Abomination”, “the Necromancer” “the nameless enemy” “the enemy” “The Dark Lord” and “The Deceiver”. He corrupts the pure of heart with false promises and gifts twisting them into his own monstrous slaves. He wants dominion over all. I believe the Bible has a very similar character in it who also gets referred to by many names. Who is it again? I think he is most commonly referred to by a name beginning with “D”.
There is also various corruption and temptations with power shown through the metaphor Sauron’s ring of Power. There are multiple times when characters desire the ring believing that it is possible to use this evil power for good and turn against their friends to get it. Gandalf even states, when offered the ring, that he doesn’t want to take it as he’d be tempted to use it for good but instead he would become twisted and evil like Sauron.
The third person you have added is Richard Dawkins. Congrats you finally found an atheist. However he has nothing at all to do with this post.
Finally JK Rowling is writing a new book for adults. However she is very secretive about it. Its name remains unknown. The only thing known about it, aside from being an adult book, is the publisher that has the rights for the English language worldwide publications. A little publishing company called “Little, Brown”. Well done you’ve confused a publishing house with a novel title.
Praise or Condemn:
2 
1
2:09 pm
‘There is a struggle between good and evil throughout the Harry Potter series and good wins EVERY TIME hardly a book that praises immoral choices.”
You call satanistic homosexual witchcraft good?
Praise or Condemn:
3 
4
2:16 pm
There is magic in the books yes. I’ll admit that. However the spells used by the good guys all have something to do with lighting up dark rooms, healing, mending broken objects, disarming and disabling those that are trying to cause a person harm. There are three spells that are made to do a person harm, such as torture, enslave and kill. Interesting point about these spells is they are collectively known as the unforgivable curses. Use of one of these means life imprisonment. See good deeds such as healing accepted evils like murder torture and enslavement shunned greatly.
Praise or Condemn:
1 
1
2:25 pm
I don’t see them thanking Jesus for these miracles.
Praise or Condemn:
1 
5
2:34 pm
That is because in this work of FICTION they are not miracles from Jesus. They are as mundane and everyday as going to the doctor and getting some medicine. Do you thank Jesus every time you follow doctor’s orders and get better?
Praise or Condemn:
3 
1
2:41 pm
On second thoughts you probably don’t go to the doctor’s. It would not surprise me if you believed medicine was witchcraft.
Praise or Condemn:
3 
1
4:51 pm
You unquestioningly accept the legitimacy of “magic spells” in these demon books yet you probably deny the healing miracle power of Jesus’ holy water. Typical.
Praise or Condemn:
2 
2
5:19 pm
The ‘”magic spells”‘ are fiction. No one that’s commented here – Christwire flock or not – believes that these spells are real or actually happened. It’s fiction. Not real. Unquestably not real. No one’s going to deny that. But it just a series written for entertainment. It’s not meant to teach immoral doings, Satan, homosexuality, do drugs, ect. The idea of magic in the book isn’t meant to represent Satan, just something fun/interesting to read about.
Unlike the Harry Potter series though, Jesus’ holy water healings are supposedly true and supposedly false. People always argue about whether he was real or really did heal with holy water. That’s not fiction, that religion – either you believe it happened, it supposed to teach a moral, or you don’t believe it. It’s arguable. But the books are definately made up. No argument over that.
Praise or Condemn:
1 
1
9:01 pm
The “magic spells” in Harry Potter are all words from ancient dialects. Aramaic (the language Christ spoke), Latin, and Greek, being a few of them. If anyone would like to see the list of spells, their origins, and derived meanings, you can email me at akuroku4ever@gmail.com
Praise or Condemn:
1 
1
9:11 pm
Ravynne, what did I tell you about giving out personal information on the internet?
Sometimes I really think there’s no helping you emos…
Praise or Condemn:
1 
2
9:14 pm
What did i tell you not being condescending because the fact is you are moronic.
Praise or Condemn:
2 
1
9:33 pm
Whoa whoa whoa! Rein in the hatred there, little buddy!
Sounds like somepony trod on your tail in the stables last night!
Praise or Condemn:
0 
2
9:49 pm
Little buddy, why do you call me that?
Trod on my tail, somepony, you dont have to keep using pony terms, I hope you are at least intelligent enough to know i am human.
Praise or Condemn:
2 
1
9:53 pm
I call you little buddy because I thought we were buddies now. I even paid you a compliment on another thread yesterday.
I said you had integrity because you had agreed to stop using misogynist insults.
Now if only you could get your brony Herb do do the same…
Praise or Condemn:
0 
1
10:16 pm
But why LITTLE buddy, why not just buddy. Give Herb a chance.
Praise or Condemn:
1 
0
10:20 pm
I call you “little” buddy because you are still a schoolkid, and because ponies are small *shrug*
Praise or Condemn:
0 
1
10:21 pm
Why do you say i am a school kid, what evidence have you of that, and like i said before, i am a brony and my picture is of rainbow dash, that doesn’t make me a pony.
Praise or Condemn:
1 
0
10:25 pm
I thought you said you were 14 or 16 years old or something. Have I been labouring under a misapprehension?
Praise or Condemn:
0 
1
10:52 pm
Yes
Praise or Condemn:
1 
0
10:53 pm
So you are in fact an adult?
Praise or Condemn:
0 
1
5:48 am
Real Merican (Really is it that hard to include the “A” in “American”? Is leaving out 1 letter saving you that much time/effort?)
Pretty sure I stressed the fact that magic was fiction. That means it isn’t true.
Praise or Condemn:
1 
1
9:50 pm
Tolkien hasn’t been dead for “50 odd years”. He hasn’t even been dead for 40 years.
Get your facts straight.
Praise or Condemn:
0 
0
10:47 pm
what proof do you have that he has been dead for under 40? And even if he was dead for 2 years, it still means he can’t be publishing/writing anything, considering he’s DEAD.
Praise or Condemn:
1 
1
10:50 pm
Criminy, you are dense, and astonishingly belligerent to go with it.
Tolkien died in 1973. You don’t have to take my word for it. You’re on the internet; look it up.
Praise or Condemn:
0 
0
5:43 am
Wow turned I was a few years out. Doesn’t cancel out the fact he hasn’t published anything in decades.
Praise or Condemn:
1 
0
5:57 am
I shall admit I was wrong about him dying 50 odd years ago. I was under the impression he died sometime in 1950/1960 which would make it roughly 50 years ago
Praise or Condemn:
1 
0
7:05 am
Ha! I know. I was just being annoying. =)
Praise or Condemn:
0 
0
7:13 am
Fair enough. You proved me wrong about the date he died so I accept that.
Praise or Condemn:
1 
0
7:19 am
I admit and accept it when it turns out I’m wrong about something unlike some people on this site. That was not aimed at you by the way, it is actually aimed at others on this site that don’t admit they’ve gotten something slightly wrong and instead call the proof offered false.
Praise or Condemn:
1 
0
7:37 am
Oh yeah, that gets real annoying =)
Praise or Condemn:
1 
0
4:48 pm
The godless atheists on here really crack me up. They’ve been so corrupted by the liberal LAMEstream media that they unquestioningly accept that a little magic devil boy is somehow “wholesome”, and that these books are “classics.” It comes as no surprise that I’ve read reports how these books have been force-fed to American children in PUBLIC schools. I will pray, pray, PRAY for you all tonight.
Praise or Condemn:
2 
2
6:08 pm
it’s not you who wnat to “force-fed” children to christianity in Public school ?
Praise or Condemn:
1 
1
5:21 pm
I suggest you people at the very least find and read a short summary of books and their authors before writing about them here.
Praise or Condemn:
1 
1
5:54 pm
Why did you post a picture of a man? JK Rowling is a woman. And she didn’t write Lord of the Rings wtf? You guys are terrible at researching stuff.
Praise or Condemn:
2 
1
9:36 pm
Hey bigmouth, you don’t recognise Richard Dawkins when you see him? It figures. The empty vessels make the most sound.
Praise or Condemn:
0 
1
10:50 pm
Richard Dawkins is a man. He said that picture is a man. Thats all.
Praise or Condemn:
2 
1
6:01 am
Just because Ex-Christian didn’t name the guy as Richard Dawkins doesn’t mean he didn’t recognise him. As for not recognising him, Abe clearly didn’t as he claimed that Richard Dawkins was JK Rowling, why didn’t you call Abe out on that?
Praise or Condemn:
1 
0
6:41 pm
The bible is nothing more then a book about magic and fairy tails I mean people coming back to life really now.
Praise or Condemn:
3 
1
6:44 pm
You guys know that the Nazis also burned books they disagreed with right.
Praise or Condemn:
2 
1
6:54 pm
The Nazis also ate food and drank water. Does that make YOU a Nazi too?
Praise or Condemn:
0 
3
7:03 pm
You really are a “real merican”. Stupid and fat.
Praise or Condemn:
2 
1
7:12 pm
Newsflash junior, my avatar is a picture of Hank Williams Jr., AKA my idol (after Jesus). Should I go ahead assume that you’re some kind of reject from an Aphex Twin video from YOUR avatar?
Praise or Condemn:
2 
2
7:16 pm
Hmm touche on the avatar part. But junior I am not. And why would a fictional person such as Jesus be a idol? That’s like some twihard having Edward Collen has a idol. Because lets face it, both the Bible and Twilight sucks.
Praise or Condemn:
2 
1
7:47 pm
Well jesus did exist but he wasn’t the son of god.
Praise or Condemn:
1 
1
9:25 pm
Anonymous Atheist, Why do you assume that “Jesus did exist”? There’s zero evidence that he existed outside of Christian scripture.
Praise or Condemn:
1 
0
9:29 pm
Actually he is present is Roman records and that of the jews, why are you agreeing with ex-christian, i am confused.
Praise or Condemn:
1 
1
9:35 pm
There are NO Roman records and NO Jewish records.
You can prove me wrong by providing just one.
Praise or Condemn:
0 
0
9:47 pm
http://www.bandoli.no/historicalrecords.htm
here ya go
Praise or Condemn:
0 
1
10:24 pm
Hey big buddy, I suggest you actually *read* the link you just posted.
It supports my position, not yours.
Praise or Condemn:
0 
0
11:59 pm
I did but the points they argue against are valid ones, although the article has led me to come into doubt about wether Jesus was real.
Praise or Condemn:
0 
1
12:06 am
So you agree that the point of the article is that we have no contemporary accounts of Jesus having walked the earth?
And that later mentions of Jesus by Roman historians who weren’t even born at the time are either hearsay or interpolation?
Praise or Condemn:
0 
0
6:21 am
Exbrony
There are a few sources outside the bible that actually reference Jesus. It is difficult to find non-religious texts referring to him, Tactius refers briefly to him but little remains of what he wrote, but Jesus does appear in different religions including Islam.
Praise or Condemn:
0 
1
7:44 am
Jonny, Tacitus wasn’t even born until more than 30 years after Jesus was supposed to have died.
I am talking about contemporary accounts, of which there are none. Zero, zip, nada.
If Jesus really was wandering about Palestine preaching to crowds of upwards of 5000, we might have expected someone to have mentioned his existence.
Absence of evidence isn’t necessarily evidence of absence — and who knows, maybe some evidence will finally turn up tomorrow. But at the moment there ain’t none.
Gods tend not to leave footprints — which is why faith is such a wonderful thing!
Praise or Condemn:
1 
1
7:49 pm
Except EVERYONE on earth drinks water and eats food, it is nessecary to survive unlike burning books which you do not need to survive and is only done by,
A) Nazis
B) Fundamentalist Muslims
C) You
Praise or Condemn:
1 
1
7:54 pm
I don’t even understand what kind of point you’re trying to make, anon. WE ARE NOT NAZIS. There were some nutty libs on here the other day defending Hitler, so maybe you’re confusing us with them.
Praise or Condemn:
3 
1
8:01 pm
I remember, i told you we Weren’t defending hitler, we were saying he is christian, which in our mind is not defending. You are like Nazis because you burn books you disagree with as did they. Burning a book is horrendous it is a terrible thing for anyone to do.
Praise or Condemn:
1 
2
8:04 pm
You say that, but atheists burn the bible everyday.
Praise or Condemn:
1 
2
8:13 pm
No we don’t that is a blatant lie, we do not burn the bible at all nonetheless every day.
Praise or Condemn:
2 
2
11:48 am
Atheist don’t burn the bible, they just don’t buy them or read them. Once again you were proven wrong Ex-atheist.
Praise or Condemn:
1 
1
11:53 am
But if you insist that we do, that can be arranged.
Praise or Condemn:
1 
0
10:07 am
dont forget the KKK
Praise or Condemn:
1 
1
8:10 pm
That’s Richard Dawkins, an English biologist, J.K. Rowling looks like this
Praise or Condemn:
0 
0
8:11 pm
Here’s a better image since it didn’t work the 1st time
Praise or Condemn:
1 
0
8:43 pm
It looks like she grew her hair out and dyed it blonde.
Praise or Condemn:
1 
2
8:44 pm
Praise or Condemn:
0 
0
8:59 pm
It’s a known fact that the feminist witch hermione is a character insert for JKR Rowling.
Praise or Condemn:
1 
2
9:05 pm
Praise or Condemn:
1 
1
9:18 pm
Spidey, I have to say this. By posting the pictures, you are making yourself appear childish. If you could hold an actual debate, that would make you more likable, but photo-bombing is a pointless act and is rather annoying. Thank you.
Note, Ex-Atheist isn’t gonna listen to a word/ photo you post. They’re convinced that they are correct, which honestly makes them ignorant and dogmatic. However, if you try to argue, please do so in the form of an actual statement
Praise or Condemn:
6 
1
9:27 pm
Well said, Ravynne.
Praise or Condemn:
1 
2
10:20 pm
I simply ignore everything spiderman posts since it’s really Claire’s second account.
Praise or Condemn:
2 
3
10:22 pm
Praise or Condemn:
0 
0
10:24 pm
And I’m not claire. Claire is a cat. I am Spiderman.
Praise or Condemn:
0 
0
10:25 pm
And moonwater, I tried holding serious debates on here before under another name. but that’s like putting a screendoor on a submarine.
Praise or Condemn:
1 
0
10:37 pm
Then why do you still post as Claire?
Praise or Condemn:
0 
2
10:45 pm
Praise or Condemn:
0 
0
10:46 pm
Praise or Condemn:
1 
0
2:06 am
Grow up Spidey, go back to saving Mary Jane or taking down the Green Goblin and Venom.
Praise or Condemn:
1 
1
11:27 am
Praise or Condemn:
0 
1
11:01 pm
It’s funny how we are incorporating fiction books into religion
Praise or Condemn:
2 
0
11:04 pm
What’s the difference Herbert?
Praise or Condemn:
1 
1
11:19 pm
hahaha true.
Praise or Condemn:
1 
1
11:55 pm
One is worth reading?
Praise or Condemn:
2 
0
12:11 am
Fairy tales are worth it.
Praise or Condemn:
4 
0
1:28 pm
One can teach children good morals that can help people function as a part of society and the other is religion
Praise or Condemn:
1 
0
12:48 am
Oh look, the atheists are being snide, sarcastic, and exclusive again.
So glad I left your hell bound cult and joined a flock that’s loving, inclusive, and above all else mature.
Praise or Condemn:
3 
2
2:00 am
+1 for you Ex-atheist! That was the same reason why I became a Christian. Except I still like manga, anime, and video games, but I don’t obsess over it like when I was an otaku before.
Praise or Condemn:
4 
1
4:30 am
ya we have seen how “loving” your cult is.
Praise or Condemn:
1 
1
4:35 am
If you find out a city worships a different god, destroy the city and kill all of it’s inhabitants… even the animals. (Deuteronomy 13:12-15)
Yep so much love.
Praise or Condemn:
3 
1
2:49 pm
I have a couple of friends with different religions and races (majority are Asians), and my parents taught me to love one another. Even through a different city worships another god, I respect their intrests and leave them alone.
Praise or Condemn:
2 
0
2:56 pm
I agree with Ex-Otaku. But KBLME was making a point on how some of the members of ChristWire view others that are NOT Christian and don’t worship the same god.
Praise or Condemn:
1 
0
4:41 am
If you’re going to quote scripture please do it accurately. That passage actually reads:
“If thou shalt hear say in one of thy cities, which the LORD thy God hath given thee to dwell there, saying,
Certain men, the children of Belial, are gone out from among you, and have withdrawn the inhabitants of their city, saying, Let us go and serve other gods, which ye have not known;
Then shalt thou enquire, and make search, and ask diligently; and, behold, if it be truth, and the thing certain, that such abomination is wrought among you;
Thou shalt surely smite the inhabitants of that city with the edge of the sword, destroying it utterly, and all that is therein, and the cattle thereof, with the edge of the sword.”
Praise or Condemn:
1 
1
6:31 am
And KBLME’s point is still there. Seems petty to point out the fact KBLME didn’t quote it exactly how it was written. Also there are several versions of the bible maybe what KBLME put is an EXACT quote from one of them.
Praise or Condemn:
1 
0
6:33 am
KBLME’s point is still there. Seems petty to point out the fact KBLME didn’t quote it exactly how it was written in your version. Also there are several versions of the bible maybe what KBLME put is an EXACT quote from one of them.
Praise or Condemn:
1 
0
7:49 am
That’s just me being annoying again. You might say it’s a hobby of mine.
Praise or Condemn:
0 
1
9:00 pm
Shut up you blasphemous whore.
Praise or Condemn:
1 
0
8:59 pm
Haha. Jokes on you because hell is fucking awesome this time of year, or any time for that matter.
Praise or Condemn:
1 
0
4:42 am
I have a Idea That we need to start finding (photo shopping) pictures of hells whores like Mr. Rowling doing things like burning Korans. Or eating greasy bacon by hand while handling a Koran and posting them on Muslim Mohammed Wire like sites and let the godless destroy the godless!! There is something so elegant about turning Gods enemies against each other!
Praise or Condemn:
0 
0
6:27 am
For someone who chose the name “Endless” love you sure are bitter and filled with hate
Praise or Condemn:
1 
2
7:49 am
Jonny, do you even own an irony detector?
Praise or Condemn:
0 
1
7:54 am
Yes I do which is why I mentioned the ironic nature of endlesslove’s chosen display name
Praise or Condemn:
1 
0
8:06 am
Yes, it’s ironic in nature. Do you also think it might also be ironic in intent?
Praise or Condemn:
0 
1
8:12 am
Can never really tell for certain with some people on this site. You have lots of people saying stuff about respecting others then seconds later they spout abuse at almost everyone who is different from them.
Praise or Condemn:
1 
0
8:13 am
The emos/bronies/Black Veil Bride fans are the worst for that =)
Praise or Condemn:
0 
2
8:22 am
The “Christians” such as Susan, Albert, August and Bruce are quite guilty of it as well
Praise or Condemn:
1 
1
11:55 am
“The emos/bronies/Black Veil Bride fans are the worst for that =)”
Don’t make me laugh. Really? Sure some of them are like that, but you’re grouping ALL of us together. Which is clearly not true. Also the band’s name is Black Veil Brides not Bride.
But it’s probably just you being annoying again, isn’t it?
Praise or Condemn:
2 
2
1:03 pm
Emosexual who’s name is too sinful to type out,
You talk about tolerance while at the same time telling us to “get fucked”.
Maybe if you stopped being so condescending, and stopped laying with tiger cubs, and started to practice what you preach… Then maybe you can be as tolerant as us over here at Christwire.
Praise or Condemn:
1 
1
1:39 pm
I don’t lay with animals you moron.
Maybe if you stop spouting lies then I wouldn’t tell you to “get fucked”.
Praise or Condemn:
0 
1
9:15 pm
Well put, Ex-atheist, not that any of these Black Veil Bores will listen.
Praise or Condemn:
1 
1
6:29 pm
exbrony:
It’s Black Veil Brides. The band isn’t called Black Veil Bride. ‘Black Veil Bores’? Nice insult (note that I’m being sarcastic). Please refer to us as fans, the BVB army, the Black Veil Brides Ushers and Bridesmaids, or something along thse lines. But your right, we won’t listen.
Ex-athiest:
According to your god, everyone (including you and the Christwire flock) is sinful. I doubt typing an ordinary person’s screen name, which is only made up of band names and numbers, is ‘too sinful’ for you. Please post your proof of BVB666HIM laying with tiger cubs. The Christwire flock is not tolerant. Just like other people’s comments, you insult us. You also make up lies and lame degratory remarks about anyone who doesn’t agree with you or isn’t a white, american, hard-core christian. I know we insult you back, but can you honestly expect anything less when you make up lies, can’t cite the proof of those lies, unles it’s on Christwire (which isn’t valid since we’re TALKING about Christwire ON Christwire), and constantly insult us for simply not agreeing with you on views and interests?
Praise or Condemn:
1 
1
5:46 am
“Please refer to us as fans, the BVB army, the Black Veil Brides Ushers and Bridesmaids”
Aha! Ahahaha!. Ahaaahahahhaahahahahahahahahah!
Please refer to me as His Grand High and Most Purple Pooh-Bahness the Great Exbrony. And then tickle my nuts with an ostrich feather.
“But your right, we won’t listen.”
Yes, I was right. You won’t listen. And you can’t spell “you’re”, either.
Praise or Condemn:
0 
1
12:25 pm
Just call them fans. Then there is no need to call them any of the other names suggested. Although I disagree completely with what you said completely, I have to admit the insult used had some intelligence behind it. Not like the usual insults the fans get.
Why an ostrich feather? Seems like an odd addition. If it is OK with you shall just continue to call you exbrony.
Praise or Condemn:
1 
0
12:38 pm
Uh.. what? I will continue to call them emos and idiots.
How can you possibly disagree with the nothing I said in that comment?
Ostrich feather? Well, I imagine that back in the old days the pharoahs and the sub-Saharan warlords used to like having people fanning them with ostrich feathers. And probably tickling their nutsacks with them too.
And in the circumstances I didn’t see my teste-tickling demand being any more ridiculous or optimistic than whoever-she-was demanding that I address her by her various silly self-styled honorifics.
Jonny, I do hope you’ve addressed my more serious questions way upthread.
Praise or Condemn:
0 
1
12:53 pm
Calling them emos is fine. Most are emos. I disagreed with the fact they are boring. Their comments make for some interesting reading. sorry if that wasn’t clear. Also I understood the fact the wild name and testicle tickling demand was ridiculous, which is why I focused on the reason behind the ostrich feather. I was going to include something along the lines of “I Shall just continue to call you exbrony. Unless you chop down the tallest tree with a herring.” However was unsure if anyone would get the Monty Python reference and didn’t want to explain it so I left it out.
As for addressing your more serious comments I believe I have addressed most and responded to most of the comments you have directed me in the appropriately serious manner. I am unsure if I addressed all concerns that were raised though so will check again. I just saw this comment as an opportunity for a ridiculous reply so I took it.
Praise or Condemn:
1 
0
5:29 pm
‘Aha! Ahahaha!. Ahaaahahahhaahahahahahahahahah!’
Am I supposed to care if you find this funny?
‘Please refer to me as His Grand High and Most Purple Pooh-Bahness the Great Exbrony.’
I won’t, but if that’s what you want, then that’s what you want. (And I know you’re being sarcastic.)
‘And then tickle my nuts with an ostrich feather.’
I find this statement gross. But since it’s part of your own joke, I don’t really care much.
‘Yes, I was right. You won’t listen. And you can’t spell “you’re”, either.’
I’m glad you understand that we won’t listen. We done with that now? As for ‘you’re’, it’s a typo. I’ve always gotton the two spellings confused. I thought the idea was stupid when I was younger so I barely ever used the right version. Now a-days I just forget every now and then that I’m supposed to use the apostrophe, ‘v’, and ‘e’ in place of ‘you are’. It’s easier and/or quicker to write ‘your’ than ‘you’re’, isn’t it? I think it is.
Praise or Condemn:
1 
0
1:22 pm
Rani-Girl… First off how is the number of the beast somehow now okay to type out?
Second off, you liberals act as if tolerance is the ultimate thing to strive towards, and that includes “tolerating” things that are immoral. I don’t know about you, but I wouldn’t “tolerate” murder and rape. So by no means am I going to tolerate things that are equally as vile.
Praise or Condemn:
0 
1
5:18 pm
Because it’s just numbers. I know 666 is a symbolic number meaning evil to a lot of people, but it’s just numbers. I don’t believe it will kill you, especially if there are other letters and/or numbers there. You might argue about that, but it’s just what I believe.
I wouldn’t tolerate a murder or rape either. I only brought that up because you people in the Christwire flock accuse people of being immoral for how they choose to dress or music interests or anything of that sort. Not criminal offenses. As for ultimate tolerance – we just want people to quite being so judgmental. You can hate us all you want for things like music interest or clothing choice, but do you have to voice it all the time in harsh ways or try to demonize it?
Praise or Condemn:
1 
0
5:24 pm
Now I know that that statement is false. My cousin is the owner and proprietor of the 1st Edition in the Imperial City, and I’ve never seen this book in his stock.
Praise or Condemn:
1 
0