The Spork: Hell’s Shovel
It has been famously said that there are no non-combatants in the war of ideologies. And never has this observation been so true as to the area of eating utensils. Liberals commonly and facetiously succumb to the Asian menace by embracing chopsticks, eagerly demonstrating to their friends their treason and gastronomic adeptness with two sharpened sticks that could just as easily threaten law enforcement.
But while the Red Menace has yet to truly occupy our God given land, chopsticks give way to a far more immediate and dangerous menace to our society – the spork.
“Why would a spork pose a greater threat than chopsticks?” you may ask. Well I’m glad you did.
Forks are obviously a masculine tool to promote mastication. Spoons, with their libidinous curves, are naturally feminine. They work in conjunction with one another. Ask yourself, how could one eat spaghetti with only a fork? Or with only a spoon? It can’t be done.
Now, consider the spork.
Is a spork masculine? Is it feminine? It’s neither. It crosses, confuses, and ultimately destroys gender lines. It’s a needless dietary invention whose secret purpose is to convince normal Americans that it’s okay to be a sexual pervert. It’s disgusting. It’s ingenious. What will America’s Fifth Column think of next?
God created “Adam” and “Eve”. He didn’t create “Ave”. He didn’t create “Edam”. He created a world where two genders, two eating utensils, compliment each other in order to make a whole.
Genesis 2:23 clearly states, “This is now bone of my bones and flesh of my flesh; she shall be called ‘woman,’ for she was taken out of man.”
God goes onto state that this is why a man leaves his father and mother and is united to his wife – “they become one flesh.”
In the course of researching this article, it was learned that the chief culprits among the spork pushers (much like drug pushers) were KFC (Republican), Boston Market (liberal, obviously), Taco Bell (Mexican), Panda Express (Chinese), Chick-Fil-A(!) and others. But today, few restaurants distribute sporks anymore. The reason is simple. Perversity has won in America. In a world where chopsticks, sporks, and other un-American utensils can be inserted into one’s orifice, we live in a world where any object can be inserted into one’s body for sexual gratification.
Some may scoff at the influence of the spork but former Philanderer-In-Chief Bill Clinton didn’t. Standing before a coven of liberal media witches in 1995, Clinton openly boasted of his love of the spork and how he hoped it would transform dietary habits among America’s youngest and most vulnerable. Holding up a plastic spork to the crowd he chortled, “This is a spork! Maybe if you tried to get through lunch with one you wouldn’t eat so much.” After proposing to destroy the American food industry he continued, “This is a symbol of my administration.”
I need not say more. It is time to return to purity and red meat. Pick up that knife and fork.
- Sinful
- Suspicious
- Scared
- Sad
- Amused
- Laughing Out Loud

Great article! I don’t like these bisexual utensils. That’s why I eat at Americas Restaurant. Arbys.
Praise or Condemn:
7
1
We never have sporks in Tennessee. I don’t think people down here would go for such a liberal and frankly nutty idea. It’s a bit insulting that they try to push this on people, sort of reminds me of all the science freaks pushing “global warming” theories on the public when the public just isn’t buying it. Sometimes these scientists, for all their education and college, really aren’t that smart when it comes to common sense.
Praise or Condemn:
2
0
Thank you for your kind words, August. When I first began my research I had no idea how far this rabbit hole went.
Praise or Condemn:
3
0
Wow. Androgynous, transsexualist cutlery has become so normalised in our debased modern culture that it never even occurred to me that sporks posed such a threat to our Christian moral values.
Thanks for prising the scales from my eyes, Kelvin!
Praise or Condemn:
4
0
ThinkGeek.com, an evil trinket company peddles two manners of titanium spork.


…and an additionally insidious star trek spork. The evil nature of star trek has been documented extensively in the Chris†wire.
Praise or Condemn:
5
0
This abomination will catch on with liberals, who are too lazy and ignorant to learn decent etiquette.
Praise or Condemn:
2
2
Ummmm, why? Why the fuck would you go there? Yes people are fucking lazy!!! That makes no fucking sense!!!! Really? Are you Fucking serious?! Shut the fuck up!! All of you morons are making my fucking brain hurt with your stupidity!!
Praise or Condemn:
2
8
Maybe you would be happier if you joined a pagan group?
Praise or Condemn:
3
3
and YOU…where do you get off telling people what to do this isnt the 1800′s or the middle east where the males own their wives. i CANT BELIEVE you are so FUCKING RETARDED to BELIEVE THE SHIT ON THIS SITE.
Praise or Condemn:
2
1
Did you forget to take your meds or are you just drunk on cheap liquor again?
Praise or Condemn:
3
4
I don’t drink. I don’t need medication. I would have been otherwise given some by the fucking hospital had I needed it.
Praise or Condemn:
3
3
I sent you smoke signal.
Praise or Condemn:
4
2
Maybe you need to GROW THE FUCK UP and leave people alone you sick fuck
Praise or Condemn:
0
3
“GROW THE F*CK UP…sick f*ck”
Looks like the atheists have arrived. You can always tell from their lack of manners and poor grasp of punctuation/grammar.
No doubt “Brexxie” was “learned” in public schools LOL.
Praise or Condemn:
2
3
“Ask yourself, how could one eat spaghetti with only a fork? ”
After reading this article, this statement stuck in my head…While you can’t eat spaghetti with just a spoon, you can easily eat spaghetti with just a fork. Eating spaghetti with a spork is difficult though…
Praise or Condemn:
0
3
It figures an animal like you would make a statement like that. Proper consumption of spaghetti requires one to twirl the noodles in the tines of the fork WHILE balanced within the bowl of the spoon.
Praise or Condemn:
4
1
I’ve only ever seen someone eat spaghetti with both a fork and spoon once and it looks tedious. Its honestly easier to just use a fork. The spaghetti stays on the fork pretty well without use
Praise or Condemn:
0
3
My apologies, I accidentally hit submit before I was done…
I’ve only ever seen someone eat spaghetti with both a fork and spoon once and it looks tedious. Its honestly easier to just use a fork. The spaghetti stays on the fork pretty well Without using a spoon.
Eating without the spoon dosen’t make it wrong
Praise or Condemn:
0
3
Your attitude comes as no surprise to everyone.
Praise or Condemn:
3
1
It’s just a utensil, you people simply hate all from of change don’t you.
Praise or Condemn:
1
2
I have never read something so stupid, so fucking moronic I can’t even comprehend how the fuck you are even smart enough to still be breathing.

Praise or Condemn:
3
2
Oh, my turn!!!
In case the pic is too big, here’s the link: http://28.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_lzt334Os5F1rpgw8so1_500.jpg
((This image was made by a former commentor on this site, a very “Odd” fellow))
Praise or Condemn:
2
1
I mean, seriously? There is utterly no way you can try to argue this one. This is just 100% absolute bullshit. I could eat alphabet soup and shit a better argument than that piece of trash.
Praise or Condemn:
1
1
Also, fuck you grammar nazis.
Praise or Condemn:
1
1
Questions!
May I asked when you stated:
“Genesis 2:23 clearly states, “This is now bone of my bones and flesh of my flesh; she shall be called ‘woman,’ for she was taken out of man.””
How that has anything to do with a spork? Yes, I have read your article, and I understand it has been a slow news day, but what I don’t get is how the are interlinked? Does the bible truly say in some roundabout fashion that man must not eat with a spork?
And to add to that, does the bible truly state that man must eat spaghetti with both a fork and a spoon, because to me if the bible does not say this then eating spaghetti with just a fork cannot be barbaric.
And finally, what gender would we class the knife may I ask? As you could say with the curve you find with a butter knife is quite feminine, but the serrated points of a steak knife could be said to be masculine.
Cheers for clearing up any of the confusion, also may I also add, these are genuine points I would like you to clear up for me, and at no point have I been offensive, so I would appreciate the same in your response, else this will just degrade into something it shouldn’t.
Praise or Condemn:
4
4
If you were to approach this issue with some humility and grace instead of coming across as a smug, over-intellectual bigot, you might see the truth is right in front of you kiddo.
Praise or Condemn:
5
5
“If you were to approach this issue with some humility and grace instead of coming across as a smug, over-intellectual bigot, you might see the truth is right in front of you kiddo.”
Says the pot to the kettle.
Praise or Condemn:
1
3
I’m sorry, but at no point was I trying to be smug, I’ll take the over intellectual as a compliment, and deffinately not a bigot. But my questions still remain unanswered, so as the good loving Christian you are, have you volunteered yourself to enlighten me Billings?
Praise or Condemn:
2
2
“I’ll take the over intellectual as a compliment…”
Yeah, definitely NOT a compliment. Pretty arrogant of you to take it that way, Common Bloke.
Praise or Condemn:
2
3
Over-education implies the will to be educated. That is certainly never a bad thing, and nearly all of the time it’s quite beneficial.
Praise or Condemn:
0
2
Well some who is intellectual highly educated, so someone who is over intellectual would be someone who is excessively so, the fact I have been to university would support this. Therefore why should I not take it as a compliment? My attitude is not arrogant Real Merican, so could you leave the derogatory comments out of this please.
Praise or Condemn:
1
1
I apologise, that first sentence should reads “Well someone who is intellectual is highly educated…”
Pretty ironic or what.
Praise or Condemn:
1
1
Haters are not welcome here, my friend. Please save this garbage for your next communist conspiracy meeting.
Praise or Condemn:
3
4
Billings, can we please keep the insults out of this as at no point have I offended you or anyone on this thread. If its throwing insults at one another then I will happily oblige, but first could you please stop hiding behind your offensive tongue and answer the questions that I have posed, or are they too difficult for you to answer?
Praise or Condemn:
1
3
Thank you Stephenson. Truer words have never been said.
Praise or Condemn:
5
2
Except, in any other instance of truth. You shut your whore mouth and stay silent for as long as I am alive. But don’t count on my death coming soon, for the Blood of Heroes run through my viens.
Praise or Condemn:
1
2
Spaghetti was not actually invented during the time of Jesus, nor was it invented anywhere near the Middle East. So no, the bible is pretty much silent on the proper form of eating pasta. Usually it is customary to eat with both fork and spoon in polite company.
Praise or Condemn:
0
2
If everything in books is true, by Christwire logic it is, so where the fuck is my Alicorn and when do I get to fight dragons with Harry Potter and Frodo?
Praise or Condemn:
0
2
Could you please re-phrase your screed in the form of English? Thanks.
Praise or Condemn:
2
2
They are characters from books you unread troglodyte.
Praise or Condemn:
1
4
Did you hear that Ouroboros? Even your own I’ll disagrees with you.
Praise or Condemn:
4
2
Damn autocorrect. I-L-K
Praise or Condemn:
4
3
I never said you can’t eat spaghetti with both utensils, I just metioned you don’t have to use both.
Praise or Condemn:
1
5
You can also slurp spaghetti off the floor with your mouth. Do you do that too?
Praise or Condemn:
1
1
Oh silly Kelvin, let’s put this in a way you understand, you’re logical skills are like that of an atheist mexican satanic homogay playing skyrim.
Are you honestly going to be that stubborn and clearly arrogant to think that the way that you ear spaghetti (albeit others too) is the only way allowable to eat spaghetti? Or is it not just Christianity that should be followed exactly the same way as you, should we all lose our individuality and become an ignorant self centred arsehole to believe we should do everything exactly the same way?
Soon you will be saying that we should all be earning the same, and it will keep escalating…
Ohhh… It’s just clicked, you want America to degrade into communism. It all makes sense now! Do you also want to become the next “Dragonlord” as I’ve seen you people call the leader of the Chinese?
Praise or Condemn:
0
1
You’re confusing me with your rainbow farting friend, Anonymous Atheist.
Praise or Condemn:
0
1
In what way? You already believe we should follow your ideals and emulate your actions to the point we eat spaghetti like you else we are reduced to eating it off the floor? So please give me a real response that does not side step the issue, as I’m beginning to believe you are unable to do so.
Praise or Condemn:
0
1
“They are characters from books you unread troglodyte.
Characters from the sort of trashy fantasy books that nerds and halfwits read, nothing that anyone with half an intellect needs to read.
Praise or Condemn:
2
4
The words I understand, it’s the relation to the article that I don’t understand. Maybe if you read what I wrote you may be able to get where I’m coming from philistine.
Praise or Condemn:
2
0
I am glad to say that a sport has never touched my lips…
However, I take issue on the impossibility of eating Spaghetti with a fork. It is possible. But God invented the spoon to be a helpmeet to the fork, to assist and enhance the fork. The eating of Spaghetti is perhaps God’s greatest lesson about forks and spoons (and, if I may, about man and woman). The fork can easily manipulate the Spaghetti without assistance, just as Man was designed to live without woman. But God provided us with a spoon to ease the work of the fork in bringing the Spaghetti (a metaphore for the world) to our lips in order to consume it. The spoon cannot bring the Spaghetti (the world) into order so we may consume it. The spoon (woman) needs the fork (Man) to provide sustenance to the body and to consume the Spaghetti (the world). The spoon (woman), though, can assist the fork, support it, provide a swirling surface, a resting place for the fork (man) while it (he) does the all-important work of sustaining the body (and consuming the world).
The spoon was God’s great gift to the fork and to man…
Hallelujah!!!
Praise or Condemn:
1
1
Fucking Spellcheck… Sport = spork
Praise or Condemn:
0
2
The way I see it, you stick the fork into the bowl, spin, pull out, eat. No need for a spoon. Therefore he spoon can sit ideally by waiting to be used. Now if we were to talk about noodle soup, something you can’t eat without assistance from both fork and spoon in a co-dominant fashion (as men and women are equal) then the meataphore would extend.
long story short, spaghetti can be taken solely whilst spoon is making the fork a sandwich or getting it (him) a beer, much like die hard Christians believe that woman are inferior. Noodle soup requires equal help from both the fork (man) and spoon (woman) to complete the task. Although a spork (in my meataphore an ethnic group) can also be used in place of either or both. I like my metaphore better as it strengthens equality and diversity!
Praise or Condemn:
0
0