Under Investigation for Campaign Finance Violations, Viacom Cancels Stephen Colbert’s “Colbert Report”
Years of political mudslinging and questionable financial schemes have finally caught up with popular Comedy Central host Stephen Colbert. Sources inside the Federal Election Commission have revealed that an investigation was launched some weeks ago and has now garnered the interest of the FBI. According to the website Politico.com and others, the focus of the examination involves Colbert’s curiously-named Super PAC “Americans for a Better Tomorrow, Tomorrow.” The news marks a shocking fall from grace for the liberal icon. For the record, Mr. Colbert has not responded to repeated media requests for comment.
Sources close to the investigation have noted that Colbert’s political action committee first drew the attention of authorities when it attempted to funnel payments to Republican leaders in South Carolina in an effort to influence the primary election there. Questions about exactly how much the group has raised also became a focus. According to filings made with the FEC, the super Pac has only $1.02 million on record, while an external audit pegged that figure to be far higher. A further look at the advertising company that produces the PAC’s marketing campaign revealed a series of unexplained payments to a Colbert family member and personal expenses for private jet travel.
While Mr. Colbert often presents a cheery, charismatic façade on television, rumors about an erratic and increasingly paranoid media figure have circulated on the internet for years. It has been suggested that the allure of power simply grew too great for the comedian, who has been known to suffer from bouts of egocentricity and prolonged libidinal dysfunction. Indeed, the PR team at Comedy Central has had to work overtime to quash stories about Colbert’s extensive personal security detail and construction at a compound he is building in upstate New York. According to complaints, neighbors worry about the large wall planned to enclose the property and local officials complain that a series of elaborate “safe rooms” violate fire safety regulations. One inspector noted seeing what appeared to be an arsenal of munitions on the property, only to find no trace on a subsequent visit.
Mr. Colbert’s mental health concerns underscore other issues media critics have had with the television star. Since the launch of “The Colbert Report” in 2005, some have accused the program of unfairly representing conservative and Christian voices in America. Often the program seems little more than political advertising for the Democrat party, pushing an extreme form of progressive politics on a naëve public without fully disclosing its financial links. From the beginning, Stephen Colbert’s agenda has been to do an end-run around campaign finance laws. In the process, he has promoted voter fraud and illegal marijuana abuse, disrespect for our military and the communist sympathies of union organizers.
As this journalist first reported several years ago, Stephen Colbert is simply not funny and he is not a comedian. Mocking Christian tradition and American patriotism may win you fans among the extreme leftwing, but it does little to further the political discourse in a nation struggling with serious internal problems. There is no humor in kicking an injured child as it struggles towards the Light of God, yet Colbert has banked millions doing just that. His performances are crude and rife with disinformation. He leers at his audience with an intent that feels almost sexual, as if he harbors a devastating combination of genital greed and psychological inadequacy. It shall come as no surprise, then, that the secretive and maniacal Colbert would so brazenly embezzle from a highly visible political organization. Maybe the man has lost all sense of compunction and decency, any awareness of faith and morality. Would anyone be surprised to learn that there is an addiction problem behind this degree of recklessness? One can surmise it could possibly be cocaine, due to its popularity among the Hollywood set, or even something more profane and obscure, like a hardcore sexual fetish for bondage and animals.
Is this a teachable moment for Stephen Colbert’s liberal fan base? Will progressives finally admit the corruption and moral fallacy at the heart of their socialist maneuvers? Time will tell if the liberal media will fully investigate this growing scandal. Any hint of sexual impropriety that involves animal abuse would surely become a democrat cause célèbre were it to involve a conservative figure, yet this case will test how far Hollywood insiders will go to protect one of their own. At this junction we must ask if other celebrities are involved in Colbert’s alleged cocaine and bestiality parties on private jets paid for with political donations. Was the president himself made aware of these details? What did Mr. Obama know and when did he know it? The president’s unexplained silence on this issue surely raises concerns.
Comedy Central’s parent company, Viacom Inc. has not released any additional information about this unfolding news story. In a brief notice posted on their website Thursday morning, they noted “Stephen Colbert has been temporarily suspended from Comedy Central due to issues that, on advice from our legal counsel, we cannot comment on at this time.” Many media experts note that this is the first move in a process of fully canceling the show and insulating Viacom’s board of directors from federal prosecution. By Thursday afternoon, speculation was circulating that Viacom is now cooperating with authorities.
- Excited
- Fascinated
- Amused
- Bored
- Sad
- Angry





Yeah, total bullshit. Turns out there was a family emergency and he isn’t doing the show for at least the rest of the week.
You might wanna get your facts right before you decide to open your mouth for once, jackass. You might also wanna know that the Colbert Report is a guy who makes jokes using news headlines as the baseline for them.
Praise or Condemn:
14
6
Is this like when John Edwards had a family emergency. You liberals love to try to twist everything to get away with whatever crimes you want.
Praise or Condemn:
4
11
http://insidetv.ew.com/2012/02/16/stephen-colbert-shuts-down/
http://blogs.wsj.com/speakeasy/2012/02/16/stephen-colbert-suspends-production-of-his-show/?KEYWORDS=colbert
And hell, even in the legitimate article that Billings the Fool posted only states that it was cancelled for Wednesday and Thursday, and even states it’ll be back on schedule next week!
Care to say it’s ‘liberal spinning’ again and prove you’re an idiot?
Praise or Condemn:
3
3
Try to find a respectable independent news source there, champ.
Praise or Condemn:
3
4
Aww, mad that someone else made something that’s actually credible? Mad that I pointed out that in your own source, it mentions that Colbert only cancelled this week’s new episodes?
Praise or Condemn:
1
3
I believe my journalism stands on its own merits. Your imbecility, on the other hand, is so massive it seems to have its own gravitational field. I fear for those simpletons such as Claire and Comedian who are drawn into your orbit.
Praise or Condemn:
4
4
Journalism? JOURNALISM?! That is complete utter bull shit.
Praise or Condemn:
4
3
What merits? Merits of lies? Apparently you call yourself some kind of certified journalist but you never bother to produce evidence of this. Clownboy comes along and calls you a doctor while sucking your dick and you start rolling with that and call yourself a doctor as a result (even saying you can prove it), and let’s not forget that: you have trouble spelling people’s names, you confuse people with someone else, you can’t even name the right people responsible for something, and you somehow, in some twisted way, think that adult material is for children.
Praise or Condemn:
2
3
“I believe my journalism stands on its own merits.”
THREE times now you’ve posted the wrong photos and you constantly refuse to provide any evidence that you have “credentials”.
“I fear for those simpletons such as Claire and Comedian who are drawn into your orbit.”
Billings, me and Comedian have been on this site longer than L.N (no offense, L.N).
Praise or Condemn:
3
2
Catlady catfight, laughing out loud!
Praise or Condemn:
3
3
“Catlady catfight, laughing out loud!”
First of all, L.N is a guy. Second, we were not fighting. You’re a douchebag.
Praise or Condemn:
2
3
“Catlady catfight”? Billings, for one thing, I’m not a lady, nor do I own cats. Secondly, what fight were Claire and I having? She said she and comedian have been here longer, which is true. YOU were the one who somehow worded it so that I was here longer than them. Do you even bother reading things at all, or do you just sniff glue and type up the aftermath?
Praise or Condemn:
1
2
Rrrreeeoowww!
Praise or Condemn:
4
1
Billings’ responses are proof that he’s NOT a journalist.
Praise or Condemn:
0
3
I believe we know each other well enough Claire to allow for some familiarity. Can’t you ever relax for one moment? You seem weirdly uptight lately.
Praise or Condemn:
3
2
Billings, you’re nothing but a coward who avoids answering questions. You can’t even respond to what I said before!
Praise or Condemn:
1
6
Eat SHIT Billings….Better yet, eat old Susan’s rotten CUNT!!
Praise or Condemn:
0
1
“I believe we know each other well enough Claire to allow for some familiarity. Can’t you ever relax for one moment? You seem weirdly uptight lately.”
Weirdly uptight? Please elaborate and provide some examples.
Praise or Condemn:
0
0
This news story is still developing, though I’m not surprised you’d buy into the liberal coverstory without one shred of critical thinking or independent verification. Personally, I believe it’s about time that this man answer for his moral failings and corrupt activities. He has been a notorious abuser of our political system for far too long now.
Praise or Condemn:
4
17
I could eat alphabet soup and shit a better argument then you.
Praise or Condemn:
4
3
I saw that meme too… Your argument is about as original as your Guy Fawkes persona.
Praise or Condemn:
2
2
1. Like milhouse, that’s not a meme.
2. You and your comrades hate memes, so how the fuck would you know?
3. Everything is true.
4. 3. is a lie.
5. The above and below are false.
6. 5. is fucking sexy.
7. Your argument is invalid.
Praise or Condemn:
6
1
I’m on a horse.
Praise or Condemn:
2
1
So… how’s the occupy protest going? They allow godless horsef*ckers like yourself there?
Praise or Condemn:
3
2
They let anyone in and I sir am most certainly not a person who fornicates with horses. That’s what pr0nz is for.
Praise or Condemn:
2
3
So, how is your protest going? When your done horsef*cking do you clash with the police? Or do you buy another Starbucks & sit around complaining to your homogay brony buddies about how the world has treated you so badly?
Praise or Condemn:
3
2
Hi Guy, we reserve this space for valid criticism or affirmational messages. Your immature attempts at libel are neither.
Praise or Condemn:
6
2
So saying your ‘article’ is bullshit is libel, but Keyes calling him a horsefucker is perfectly acceptable behavior?
Praise or Condemn:
3
4
It’s only libel if it’s false.
(Insert death threat from L.Z. here)
Praise or Condemn:
2
2
Didn’t I already say I was done with you, you retarded, wife-beating redneck coward? Why would I want to waste my time with a loser who laughs at the men who died in a war? You even admitted that you’re just a bully, picking on people you think are weaker, because you’re dead on the inside.
Praise or Condemn:
0
3
Tell me sir, what is 1+1+1+1+1+1+1*0? That will equal the number of fucks I give about your attempts at an insult.
Praise or Condemn:
2
3
[img]http://media.photobucket.com/image/recent/elfprincessarcher/morganfreemanhemad.jpg[/img]
Praise or Condemn:
1
3
70, so what of it?
Praise or Condemn:
3
1
WOW, Billings, you’re REALLY fucking stupid. I mean, Guy messed up and should’ve put parentheses around the ones to make the point that he doesn’t give a fuck, but you seriously got 70 from that equation? Christ, at least Guy can chalk his error up as a typo, you flat-out fucked up your math.
Praise or Condemn:
0
3
What?
Praise or Condemn:
2
1
Re-read Guy’s mathematical problem. Then see why you’re incredibly stupid. Odds are you won’t though, considering you don’t bother reading all the way.
Praise or Condemn:
1
3
hahahaha L.N. you believe that is a mathematical “problem” ? you really are dumb.
Praise or Condemn:
3
0
What else would you call something that involves numbers and operators? Wait a minute, you never passed elementary school, that’s right.
Praise or Condemn:
1
3
“Operator, I need the number for 911!” Laughing out loud!
Praise or Condemn:
4
3
Apparently Billings’ never got past elementary school either.
Praise or Condemn:
1
4
The stupidity is incredible. Do they even understand when i say
God= square root -1
Praise or Condemn:
2
5
God = i
I don’t understand your point…
Praise or Condemn:
2
2
Of course you don’t you are a fool, it is a joke among atheists, the root of -1 is impossible. Like god so we say god is the root of -1.
Praise or Condemn:
1
3
Well you atheists are idiots because the square root is not impossible.
square root(-1) = i
It is a complex number so obviously you freaks don’t understand it.
Praise or Condemn:
2
3
1*1 does not equal -1 moron.
Praise or Condemn:
2
1
“Well you atheists are idiots because the square root is not impossible.
square root(-1) = i”
It IS impossible, the square root of -1 is an imaginary number, meaning it isn’t an actual number that can be used or has any use in the first place, aside as a placeholder for situations like determining the square root of a negative number, i.e. the square root of -9 is 3i. All ‘i’ does is act as a placeholder whenever negatives are involved.
Praise or Condemn:
1
1
Um guys, the answer was 0. Anything times 0 is 0
Praise or Condemn:
0
0
Stuart, (AKA…The barnyard perv) go screw that pony and make your ewe sheep jealous!!
Praise or Condemn:
1
0
L.D. I see you’re wasting your time on me… I’ve never laughed at anyone, on our side, that died in wars or other military occurrences.
Once again, you continue to build this false persona of me to make yourself appear semi-intelligent.
You should get an imaginary friend & he can be whatever you want him to be. Then you can gut him.
Praise or Condemn:
4
1
Don’t lie, coward, you think they’re stupid for dying while you’re sitting on your fat ass, eating chips and telling your wife to get you more, and then beating her for being Dutch.
Praise or Condemn:
2
4
Again, L.G., you make up your own facts to bolster your argument… And, as we’ve discussed, you’re the coward that anonymously threatens others with death when they disagree with your narrow minded skew on life.
Seriously, consider the imaginary friend route.
Praise or Condemn:
3
5
Why does it have to be military?
Praise or Condemn:
1
2
Did this guy call himself a reporter?
Praise or Condemn:
4
2
Who? Billings? Yeah, his dick must be too small to jack off, so he does it with his ego.
Praise or Condemn:
1
2
Nice one.
Praise or Condemn:
2
2
A great example of your maturity and your creativity, Luap Nor!
Praise or Condemn:
2
2
Why should I be mature to you, considering all of the hate and bullshit you push out to people? Have you EVER admitted to being wrong once? And that’s 9 children you’ve admitted to raping.
Praise or Condemn:
2
2
Is there any more doubt that you are little more than a perv who gets off encouraging teens to swim under your bloated corpse?
Praise or Condemn:
4
2
Ya know, if you’re going to try to insult someone, you might wanna use one that makes sense. I told you that if you kept trying to pry into my personal life by finding out my name, I’d say you’ve raped another child. If you don’t like being told that you’re a child rapist, don’t try to pry into my life. Hell, Prissy and August are at least intelligent enough to realize that Law is indeed my first name, and even ‘Susan’ realizes that Law is my name, he just decides to make it ‘Lawrence’ instead of what’s written on my birth certificate, yet you still insist on trying to ‘find out what my first name is’. You’ll even make up words in some vain attempt to find out what my name is.
Praise or Condemn:
3
2
are you related to martin Lawrence ?
Praise or Condemn:
2
3
Law is my first name, Retard, did you bother reading anything I said, or did your brain go “HOLY SHIT, REASONING!” and then just shut down?
Praise or Condemn:
2
2
What in the world are you even talking about? Your paranoia is getting the better of you, friend. And for your edification, Luap Nor is Ron Paul backwards. I thought you might have the slightest sense of humor in that warped brain of yours but I guess I was wrong. Pathetic? More like tragic if you ask me.
Praise or Condemn:
2
4
“What in the world are you even talking about? Your paranoia is getting the better of you, friend.”
1, I hate you and I hope you die of something horrible, and 2, you’re the paranoid one. Remember all of your crazy theories, like how I’m comedian or that Claire, comedian, and I are the same person, and those are just the two off the top of my head. If anyone’s wearing a tin-foil hat, it’s you.
“And for your edification, Luap Nor is Ron Paul backwards.”
I love how you try to act like you’re smarter than me, while completely butchering the spelling of ‘education’ (and don’t try to act cute, you’re too stupid to even attempt a joke, considering you don’t know what an operator in math is)
“I thought you might have the slightest sense of humor in that warped brain of yours but I guess I was wrong. Pathetic? More like tragic if you ask me.”
Except that relies on the fact that I give two shits about Ron Paul, another one of your conspiracy theories (that I either was Ron Paul or I was a supporter of him), as well as the idea that you’re intelligent (and that you’ve been trying to nit-pick at my name for awhile now, you psychotic fuck) enough to even make that joke in the first place.
Praise or Condemn:
4
2
ed·i·fi·ca·tion /ˌedəfiˈkāSHən/
Noun:
The instruction or improvement of a person morally or intellectually: “the idea that art’s main purpose is edification”.
Praise or Condemn:
2
1
For once you actually got something right. Knowing how incredibly stupid you are though, it’s easy to assume that was a typo. Though, it doesn’t help that it doesn’t make sense grammatically. There’s still the matter of everything else I said though, unless you just want to default to your typical cowardly act of running away.
Praise or Condemn:
4
1
You certainly need both edification and education. Come back when you know what stars are.
Praise or Condemn:
2
2
I’m going to be quick before Billings decides to be stupid (too late for that I suppose), and say that odds are, anonymous atheist was talking to Billings, considering Billings is quite possibly one of the stupidest people to roam the planet.
Praise or Condemn:
1
2
HAHAHAHA that was embarrassing LN. Way to go hahahaha.
But then again, you’re a Christwire insider who’s been hired by them to stimulate discussion so I guess this is all an act anyway.
Praise or Condemn:
0
0
That was directed at billings.
Praise or Condemn:
2
2
Do you seriously not know the word “edification”? Wow!
Praise or Condemn:
1
4
I do know, why do say we do not know.
Praise or Condemn:
2
2
Thanks for this timely story, Brother Billings. As a Christian I will pray for forgiveness tonight because although and I love Mr. Colbert in the Lord, I just don’t like the guy. And to seem him fall so low and miserably feels real good right now.
One less Mr. Smarty Pants to propagate the liberal lies.
Praise or Condemn:
3
4
Colbert is a villain of the highest magnitude! His disingenuous brand of faux journalism is so unlike the sterling standards practiced by Christwire that it is like comparing an Ursus to a Bear!
Praise or Condemn:
3
3
Did you just say christwire has standards, in all of you’r articles there are at least 10 lies.
Praise or Condemn:
1
1
This thread is now spiderman
Praise or Condemn:
0
0
FUCK CHRISTWIRE AND ALL THE CHRISTIAN COCK LICKERS THAT WRITE THIS FUNNY ASSED HORSE SHIT…………YOU CAN ALL LICK OLD SUSAN’S HONEY POT IF YOU CAN PULL BILLINGS OFF HER!!
Praise or Condemn:
2
0
See, I think I’m in good company around here when I disagree with Christwire, but here’s what I get:
LN and Claire, who are one of two things:
a) A pair of colossal morons who have stuck around here for years to debate with this lunatics hopelessly for God knows what reason.
b) People hired by Christwire to get discussions going on the articles.
Aside from them, I have a bunch of whackjob atheists who can’t seem to form a sentence without caps lock and lack basic knowledge of syntax and spelling.
God help me, this place is ridiculous.
Praise or Condemn:
0
0