The Greatest Hoax – When Climate Perception Becomes Reality
“My point is, God’s still up there. The arrogance of people to think that we, human beings, would be able to change what He is doing in the climate is to me outrageous.” – Senator James Inhofe
Like the thickness of a ‘wooly bear’ caterpillar, The Farmer’s Almanac used to be the reference of choice for climate prediction. Somewhere in the fine print of the 2000 Farmer’s Almanac is a prediction of the coming millennium. Basically it says one can expect an increase in the number and frequency of confrontations stemming from “tribal versus technological” climate perspectives. Reading this in December of 1999 one might pause, but give the passage little significance because all the mainframe computers were going to die sending the world into a spiraling maelstrom of data doom come January 1. Common sense prevailed then and it will prevail today, because both are lies.
“The Greatest Hoax: How the Global Warming Conspiracy Threatens Your Future” by Senator James Inhofe is a conservative common sense standpoint on the climate debate. Senator Inhofe weaves a semi-autobiographical account of his early years as a developer wading through the muck of government oversight, trying to move a fire escape because it ruins the look of a pretty building and his statue worthy efforts as Oklahoma’s Julian Assange ‘OkieLeaks’ of his day by exposing the protected names on a Discharge Petition to bring a bill to the floor of the Oklahoma House of Representatives. He lets the reader know with a wink how it is okay to break rules and use subterfuge when a person is right and has God on his side.
Inhofe’s prose is layered with all the prancing ponies and dog whistles we expect. Vice President Al Gore is portrayed as a corpulent gypsy dancing the seven veils of greenhouse gases while greasy Democrats pick the pockets of a salivating public that really likes those singing penguin movies. Obama and the government want you driving a tiny soundless clown car while they laugh and toss money in the air like a flower girl on crack for one clear and diabolical reason. It is a reason that is abhorrent to all true conservationists like Inhofe.
The purpose of the climate change controversy is to make money for the Hollywood types and fund the Democrat cause while eliminating the middle class. Books, movies and so many ‘politically correct’ thinkers depend on the unwitting populous to fund green initiatives like using feckless ‘green’ detergents, environmentally friendly packaging, and (gag) recycling while the garbage man, truck driver hauling caustic chemicals for detergents or the lumber jack that harvests trees is out of work. The money to be made drilling in Inhofe’s home state becomes less lucrative when everyone drives an electric car. One really has to ask who this green movement benefits.
“Controlling carbon is a bureaucrat’s dream. If you control carbon, you control life.” – smart fellow, MIT climate scientist, Richard Lindzen
The Senator lets the reader know that conservative and conservation have the same root word. He likes turtles for pity’s sake! Inhofe seats himself squarely on the side of the angels. The Obama administration (as well as all Democrats) is clearly on the side of Satan and his minions. Inhofe is a “one-man truth squad” and “the most dangerous man on the planet” for exposing the greatest hoax of climate change.
Folks have really fallen for the environmental impact reasoning that supposedly supports climate change thinking. In some ways the reasoning is more diabolical than the imaginary problem it tries to support. In coal country, like West Virginia, some brave attorneys addressed the ‘green movement’ centered report that links an increase in birth defects with mountain top removal mining techniques. The birth defects were obviously due to inbreeding, not environmental toxins. It’s West Virginia, people! Sometimes the most obvious reason is true.
If we are ever to return to the high levels of production like we experienced in the United States during the two terms of President George W. Bush, we need to reject these climate change money makers, drive the biggest car we can afford, increase our carbon footprints and understand that our environment is governed not by man, but is in the domain of God.
A single flap of a butterfly’s wings cannot cause a hurricane. Milkweed is disappearing, making the green reasoning obsolete. We could poison all the butterflies, yet we still will have hurricanes and deadly tornadoes. At some point it is time to abandon this ‘man is the root of all bad things that happen’ and accept that the weather is out of our control.
- Sinful
- Suspicious
- Scared
- Sad
- Amused
- Laughing Out Loud
Author: Blanche Beecham
"Blanche Beecham lends a soft, learned hand to the fourth estate with incite-full investigations on diverse topics such as Politics, Love, and Lifestyle. Her many years experience as a wife, mother, ladies book club president and financial auditor make her well suited to ferreting out the truth and giving it a sound shake." - Rev. Jackson Lee Whitebelley, Publisher and Editor of "The Incubator" - Follow me on Twitter! @BLANCHEBEECHAM
3:51 pm
So a Christian woman who believes that women shouldn’t have rights and are inferior to men and should remain silent is trying to speak her mind.
Back in the kitchen, wench.
Praise or Condemn:
4 
4
4:05 pm
Women may impart truth to men in a limited capacity, but it is up to them to believe. I know you didn’t go to Chruch, so here are the passages for your home study.
“And he began to speak boldly in the synagogue: whom when Aquila and Priscilla had heard, they took him unto them, and expounded unto him the way of God more perfectly.” Acts 18:26;
“In the last days, God says,
I will pour out my Spirit on all people.
Your sons and daughters will prophesy,
your young men will see visions,
your old men will dream dreams.” Acts 2:17;
“The woman then left her waterpot, went her way into the city, and said to the men, 29 “Come, see a Man who told me all things that I ever did. Could this be the Christ?” 30 Then they went out of the city and came to Him.” John 4:28-30,
John 4:39 “And many of the Samaritans of that city believed in Him because of the word of the woman who testified, “He told me all that I ever did.”
John 4:42 “Then they said to the woman, “Now we believe, not because of what you said, for we ourselves have heard Him and we know that this is indeed the Christ, the Savior of the world.”
L.N.
You speak word of Satan. I finished the dishes, leaving my waterpot, to speak truth and write words that might lead some to Christ. As a minion of the Devil, you lie and twist the Bible to keep me from this task. Your lies and name calling are proof of this.
BB
Praise or Condemn:
7 
2
4:10 pm
Woman, you are to remain in silence, for you are nothing but a Rib.
Praise or Condemn:
1 
7
5:25 pm
I can’t believe these dirty liberals think they can alter the world God, and only God, hath created.
Praise or Condemn:
5 
3
5:28 pm
The fucking didn’t. They pointed out a problem hazardous to our future that we have to stop, or at least postpone, and you guys shove your fingers in your ears and go “GODGODGODGODGODGODGODGODGODGODGODGOD”
Praise or Condemn:
4 
3
8:02 pm
Technically we can alter the world, we have genetic engineering, and climate change, hell one day we will even have terraforming, than we can change whole planets.
Praise or Condemn:
3 
3
1:40 am
Genetic engineering?
Sounding a bit like Hitler there AA.
Praise or Condemn:
4 
2
6:46 am
“Humans have altered the genomes of species for thousands of years through artificial selection and more recently mutagenesis. Genetic engineering as the direct manipulation of DNA by humans outside breeding and mutations has only existed since the 1970s. The term “genetic engineering” was first coined by Jack Williamson in his science fiction novel Dragon’s Island, published in 1951″(Wikipedia, what else)
So Hitler was not the first and not the last interested in this stuff.
And when i say that one day humans won´t be pushed out through the neighbour of anus but may be grown in a tube, do i then sound a bit like Aldous Huxley.
Praise or Condemn:
0 
1
10:29 pm
Get off the man’s “evil” computer and make me a dinner.
Praise or Condemn:
1 
3
10:51 pm
Many believe that the global warming hoax is an attempt to further the agenda of globalist organizations and to repress capitalist business practices for socialist ends. In many ways, the Kyoto agreements force individual nations to give up their soverignty to a global organization (the U.N.) which represents the worst, most repressive dictatorships on the planet. By no measure is the U.N a democracy, or even a representative organization. It seeks to maintain the status quo of its members. By forcing lesser member nations to accept emission protocols, they are limiting the freedom to develop in the third world. This only benefits major corporations and the imperialist powers. No wonder Obama is so big on the idea.
There has been widespread fraud in so-called global warming science. We have seen consistently fabricated data, emails revealing conspiracies to fabricate data and green lobbying groups specifically funding this fraud. Scientists who promote the globalist agenda are awarded professorships and grants and even jobs in the private “green” sector or in governments.
I care about this planet and the environment, but this is clearly a dangerous route to go down. Why does loving the planet mean we must give up our freedoms and promote socialism?
I really do look forward to reading Senator Inhofe’s book, Blanche. We really need to educate the public about this evil globalist agenda
Praise or Condemn:
4 
0
11:15 pm
There are a significant number of monetary gains for $50 light bulb inventors, but little for the common man within this climate-gate conspiracy. Fraud is rampant and discussed within his book.
Inhofe’s book is rich with support for the sinister nature of the Kyoto agreements and the United Nations. In the end, the benefactors of Climate science are socialists, corporations, – and more notably Obama.
Inhofe’s book is a ray of hope in the darkness.
Praise or Condemn:
4 
0
6:58 am
“Why does loving the planet mean we must give up our freedoms and promote socialism?”
Because if everybody continues to do as he/she/it pleases, we better get those rockets to Mars soon and hope the tickets will be affordable.
Giving up individual freedom for the Greater Good.
Sounds like a dilemma to me.And that is not sarcasm.
Praise or Condemn:
1 
3
2:49 am
Maybe in 10,000 years human beings will change the weather, but right now this is all malarkey. You little hippies just want to bring down capitalism and run around in your hemp dresses singing Elton John. Sick.
Praise or Condemn:
2 
1
12:58 am
Historically speaking, the Earth has gone through many vacillations in temperature throughout the past. Some of these have been warmer than that which we are now experiencing. Others–even comparitively recently–have moved in the other direction. These are natural cycles and we should not be alarmed at them, for they are evidence of the order which God has set in place to govern and regulate life on our world.
Moreover, it is nothing more than the sin of PRIDE to assume out-of-hand that human beings are capable of rewriting God’s plan for creation. What profound arrogance and hubris!–it borders on that of Lucifer in Paradise Lost.
Praise or Condemn:
4 
1
6:14 am
“Historically speaking, the Earth has gone through many vacillations in temperature throughout the past. Some of these have been warmer than that which we are now experiencing. Others–even comparitively recently–have moved in the other direction. These are natural cycles and we should not be alarmed at them”
Oh good, I’m not the only one who knew this already…Glad to see someone say it because I was just about to…
” He lets the reader know with a wink how it is okay to break rules and use subterfuge when a person is right and has God on his side.”
This bugs me…You are basically saying its ok to cheat as long as you’re cheating for God? That dosen’t sound right at all…
Praise or Condemn:
0 
5
3:45 pm
Climate change happens. The problem is whether it is natural or manmade.
There has been global warming since the last ice age. Are we to blame for it all?
Praise or Condemn:
4 
0
8:17 pm
Nope just god but that’s what you say after all.
Praise or Condemn:
1 
1