The Perfection of Rush’s Apology
When I was young (and ‘terror birds’ ran the highways plucking off hitchhikers) the sincere apology and acceptance of that apology meant something. Unfortunately, time moves constantly forward and things change. Something has happened to the expression of regret or remorse for one’s actions. For better or worse, the apology has fallen out of fashion like wearing white gloves to lunch or using flatware properly.
I’m glad to see that Rush Limbaugh, the self-described voice of freedom and conservative values, is trying to revive this dying art form.
After a three day on air exploration of the motivations for Sandra Fluke’s testimonal on women’s health and the role of contraception therapies for medical issues other than contraception, the angel voiced Rush has faced a backlash of liberal hate that will imperil the American economy by bullying the sponsors of his program to prematurely pull out – thus spilling the seeds of American profit on barren ground.
Oh a rose by any other name smells just as sweet if we dissect it, so will the well intentioned apology. Let’s vivisect that apology before it dies on the highway, another tragic lost teachable moment smacked down by the 18 wheeler of social media and 24 hour news cycle.
“For over 20 years, I have illustrated the absurd with absurdity, three hours a day, five days a week. In this instance, I chose the wrong words in my analogy of the situation. I did not mean a personal attack on Ms. Fluke.”
This is a great opening for an apology. First he lets everybody know he’s been a working man while she’s been sitting in class or learning to shave her legs. Rush works hard for his money. Like all great Americans he built a home in Costa Rica with his American earnings.
I like how he uses the word “illustrated” because drawing works on radio.
Second, he directly addresses the issue with “in this instance”. Make no mistake; he’s not going to apologize for anything else.
Third, he clearly states that he “chose the wrong words” for his analogy.
I’m actually a little proud that Rush recognized his words as ‘analogous’ to the real situation. The problem with analogy is always paradox. Paradox is where people take issue with calling women sluts and prostitutes to convey anxiety over “taxpayers” covering the cost of contraception not covered in a group’s vision of morality for the individual when the “taxpayers” are paying 100% for his free speech to be heard over American Armed Forces Radio. No one is in the mood for sexy time or moral reflection listening to Rush. Paradox is a mean b*tch; that’s no analogy.
I think it is absolutely absurd that during these very serious political times, we are discussing personal sexual recreational activities before members of Congress. I personally do not agree that American citizens should pay for these social activities.
An all male clergy testified before Congress. Sandra Fluke spoke before an unofficial Democrat hearing of applauding women, not Congress. Her testimony was not included in the Congressional record and her expenses for such probably not reimbursed by taxpayer funded petty cash. I think here Rush is protecting this poor woman from listening to the gristled tales of sweaty social activity confessions from the clergy. We know how some of those Catholics are.
I agree that we shouldn’t pay for these men to talk to Congress about their bathtub, hand holding adventures in blue pill popping. I think it was very gentlemanly that Rush wants to shield this poor woman away from that sort of blue talk.
What happened to personal responsibility and accountability? Where do we draw the line? If this is accepted as the norm, what will follow?
Again, Rush is right on the mark. Here the untaxed, poverty stricken clergy wants the taxpayer to pay for their little trip to DC (See CRS-11, paragraph 5) and have legal sway to gently convince employees to practice the same faith as their employer, not the faith of the individual. When individuals are viewed as able to make choices of a moral nature, things always go awry. It is because organizations should have primary moral authority over the moral deliberations of the individual. It’s about true freedom of religion people!
I think that Sandra Fluke’s testimony about using contraceptives to diminish ovarian cysts has no role in the discussion and Rush makes that clear. Rush had a pilondinal cyst that kept him out of the military, but birth control wouldn’t fix that.
I’m very concerned the Congressional hearing didn’t even include anybody from the ChristWire fellowship, which according to some internet reports is larger than the Vatican! Where’s our freedom to gently sway?! Who doesn’t love this stuff! We could have taken up a collection!
Will we be debating if taxpayers should pay for new sneakers for all students that are interested in running to keep fit? In my monologue, I posited that it is not our business whatsoever to know what is going on in anyone’s bedroom nor do I think it is a topic that should reach a Presidential level.
With these statements, Rush really highlights how far the rabbit hole can go with this argument. Churches try their best to police their own and not tax the judicial system with criminal charges or interjecting a particular religion on others. Shouldn’t they have a say on how they spend their tax free earnings?
One of the best analogies from the clergy’s arguments was of a deli. The ObamaCare contraception legislation is like requiring Jewish deli to serve ham. This raises the question “Why does management have to hire Jewish doctors in a Christian hospital?” Of course the answer to that is so the Jewish doctors can work in the Christian hospital emergency room on Easter and Christmas. Where do we draw the line? What if the individual is a Rastafarian? This woman had no business in that discussion.
I’m glad Rush reassures everyone that what goes on in the bedroom is no one’s business, and I applaud him for implying that the President Who is Not President Bush is reviewing the citizens’ bedroom habits. Who wouldn’t be so engorged with rage they would lash out at someone with poorly chosen words?
My choice of words was not the best, and in the attempt to be humorous, I created a national stir. I sincerely apologize to Ms. Fluke for the insulting word choices.”
He finishes strong and with a powerful finale.
I think it is important to understand that behind this whole crazy debate are two people with hopes, dreams and feelings. Sure one of them might be a private citizen/student/activist. But one of the parties in this very public discourse is a businessman that has made gazillions speaking to the hearts of America with dignity and listening to them after careful pre-on-air vetting by his staff. It is about free speech and freedom of religion. He’s really just above the fray.
I think his apology was perfect.
- Sinful
- Suspicious
- Scared
- Sad
- Amused
- Laughing Out Loud
Author: Blanche Beecham
"Blanche Beecham lends a soft, learned hand to the fourth estate with incite-full investigations on diverse topics such as Politics, Love, and Lifestyle. Her many years experience as a wife, mother, ladies book club president and financial auditor make her well suited to ferreting out the truth and giving it a sound shake." - Rev. Jackson Lee Whitebelley, Publisher and Editor of "The Incubator" - Follow me on Twitter! @BLANCHEBEECHAM
3:37 pm
Only God can guide you in your eloquence Sister Blanche.
Your “dissection”, if you will, of the Rush Limbaugh apology could not be any more spot on.
“I’m actually a little proud that Rush recognized his words as ‘analogous’ to the real situation. The problem with analogy is always paradox……”
Wow! You are truly blessed He is with you.
I appreciate the time you take to educate the masses. Bless you.
Praise or Condemn:
4 
10
8:19 am
Stuart wants Ruch to ass fuck him with a big CUBAN CIGAR!!
Praise or Condemn:
6 
0
4:16 pm
Fluke and this feminist agenda have really disappointed me this time. (To a higher degree than normal.) If you put yourself out there saying birth control should be free. Then you should expect to be made fun of. Why can’t these women pay for their own birth control I will never understand?
Praise or Condemn:
6 
12
4:57 pm
Rush is a real hero in the neck of the woods where I live now. I sometimes will make shopping trips into his hometown. I have to say you won’t find many with an open feminist agenda around here. I think the secret is coon dogs and a lively Sunday school program.
You are so right, August. When a woman speaks out on an issue, she should be shamed. This was about the freedom of religion, not Campus coed shenanigans. If women’s birth control was important we’d see spam emails or web sites with doctors standing by.
These feminists seem to reject the freedom of groups to be moral beings and practice religion. Individuals can’t make moral decisions, not without membership in a group to tell them right from wrong.
Praise be!
BB
Praise or Condemn:
4 
10
10:40 pm
Well, Bitcham, I read it, and yet you’re still speaking out on an issue. You’re talking about how the douche-bag known as Rush Limburger apologized after he started losing sponsors and money, and how you think that Sandra should basically just shut up.
Yet you’re a woman as well, and believe that women shouldn’t speak out on an issue. You’re speaking out against Sandra and speaking out about Rush’s hack apology, yet you are a woman.
Someone’s going to Hell, Bitcham, and I certainly see you going down VERY low.
Praise or Condemn:
6 
5
1:38 am
I understand that pubescent boys are always concerned with visualizing attractive women going down but this kind of filth talk does not belong here.
Praise or Condemn:
4 
7
5:26 am
Christwire is the perfect forum to discuss BLOW JOBS…..Have you every had a really god HEAD JOB, Pen?????? I didn’t think so, but you do have the knees worn out on your pants, FOR SHAME, FOR SHAME!!
Praise or Condemn:
4 
0
5:10 pm
If a married woman needs birth control, then she should try wearing a bonnet. They aren’t just for keeping the sun out of women’s hair, if you know what I am getting at…
Praise or Condemn:
8 
3
10:03 pm
I never understood the liberal fascination with slutty disease ridden harlots. Yes there is something very wrong with a women who can’t control her sex drive, yes there is something very wrong with women who demand to kill children on taxpayer money.
We have the same opportunities as men already. Feminism is pointless.
Praise or Condemn:
5 
4
11:46 pm
Welcome to Birth Control 101
As you can see on the box, you take exactly one pill per day. To make sure it works, you need to take one pill every day at the same time, or it stops working. You take only one pill, and you keep taking them regardless of what you are doing that day.
Hormonal birth control can be used to treat a lot of different diseases, like anemia caused by excessive menstruation. It is a prescription medication that can cost around $15-50 a month. Because it is a prescription medication, it should be covered by insurance, as it treats legitimate health problems.
This is Viagra.
It, too, can treat legitimate health problems like altitude sickness and pulmonary hypertension, but it is usually prescribed for erectile dysfunction. Unlike the Pill, Viagra is taken every time you want to have sex. A lot of health insurance companies cover Viagra, so it costs about as much as your co-pay.
This is a condom.
It is not a prescription medication, and has no health benefits (besides the prevention of STIs and pregnancy). Like Viagra, you must use one before you have sex: indeed, before each sex act. They cost about a dollar per condom.
This is Sandra Fluke.
She testified before a small, Democrat-led hearing after she was cut out of the actual birth control/insurance discussion. Her testimony was about a friend of hers who, because her insurance did not cover birth control, lost an ovary due to an ovarian cyst.
This somehow translates into “I, myself, personally, am having so much sex I can’t afford birth control, and so I want the government to pay for it.”
This is wrong for multiple reasons.
It was about a friend, not her. To say her testimony was about her personally is factually incorrect.
Sex had nothing to do with the testimony – her friend lost an ovary because of medical condition that was left untreated. A medical condition that was completely treatable, but wasn’t, because her insurance wouldn’t cover it. To say that her testimony was about her being “a slut” or “a prostitute” is factually incorrect.
Even if she was having loads of sex, she would still only have one pill a day, not one pill per sex act, so to say “I’m having so much sex I can’t afford birth control” is completely erroneous. The Pill is not Viagra or condoms. To say that she is such “a slut” that she constantly needs more pills is factually incorrect.
The current political debate is not “should the government pay for birth control?” The debate is “should insurance companies, that people and their employers pay for, on their own, be required to cover birth control?” To say that Sandra Fluke wants the government to pay for her birth control is factually incorrect.
Religious organizations do not want to have birth control covered by their insurance, even for employees not of their faith, even if their employees never actually use their insurance to cover birth control. By this logic, they should also not pay their employees, because they could use that money to pay for birth control out of pocket. To say that this issue is about religious freedom and not about women’s health is disingenuous, as Ms. Fluke’s testimony demonstrates.
This is me.
I use birth control. My doctor prescribed it to me. Why? Because I have a hormonal imbalance. What does that mean? It means that unlike most girls, I have a deeper voice, I have low blood pressure, and anger problems. I also can’t have my monthlies unless I take birth control. If I didn’t, I could not regulate, which could damage my uterus, therefore I possibly might not have children in the future. Do you understand? I don’t have sex, I don’t want sex, but when I’m married, and ready, that’s when I’ll have it, and if my hormones were normal, I wouldn’t need to be taking birth control at all. But because I have to, I take it, because if not, it doesn’t matter if I only have sex to have kids or not, because I won’t be able to have them anyway.
I hope that clears some things up.
Praise or Condemn:
9 
2
8:33 am
You could have just submitted this as an article as liberal support for Fluke. I must however commend you for your professed abstinence until marriage. I commend and respect you for that.
Praise or Condemn:
4 
7
9:03 am
I agree with Brother Watson on both points he makes here.
This easily could have been submitted as a liberal take on this situation. Your writing ability far outweighs ANY other liberal writer that has attempted to write an article in recent time.
And, as Brother Watson stated, your chastity is commendable. God would most certainly approve.
Bless you.
Praise or Condemn:
3 
8
1:08 pm
Thank you for commending the fact that I practice my faith, but as ex-Atheist, and exbrony keep professing time and time again, I don’t have enough knowledge about the political position to be neither conservative or liberal. However, since my parents are conservative, I consider myself conservative. Since my mother, however, is the one that has to pay for me to receive Birth Control, and since all of us feel very strongly for my health, then I guess we are liberal in this one instance. The reason why I support Fluke is simple, she is a woman like me, and because of that she understands how birth control works, and opposed to anyone else I’ve heard, she seems to be the only one who does. That’s the only reason I support her.
Praise or Condemn:
6 
0
12:34 pm
Chastity???? That old pecker licker’s panties are always wet…Just like yours, Barn Yard Stuart!!
Praise or Condemn:
2 
1
11:48 pm
Why do you have a sign in your window that reads, “Why?” Also, isn’t that Karl Marx behind you? That is one of the ugliest kitchens I have ever seen.
Praise or Condemn:
0 
8
12:01 am
Billings, you’re an idiot. How do you see a kitchen in that picture?
Praise or Condemn:
6 
0
12:35 am
Awkward moment when this is my old high school art room.
Praise or Condemn:
6 
0
12:38 am
Billings is too stupid to be awkward.
Praise or Condemn:
3 
0
12:49 am
I don’t know. Ask my high school art teacher. It’s his classroom.
Praise or Condemn:
4 
0
5:52 pm
Goodness you’re just a child! Please be careful, our discussion are really aimed at mature adults here. Are you over 16?
Praise or Condemn:
0 
6
6:04 pm
Well gee, stupid, she said it was her OLD HIGH SCHOOL art room, which kind of implies she’s over 16.
Praise or Condemn:
1 
0
9:02 pm
Awkward moment again when I’m turning 19 in two months. Christ.
Praise or Condemn:
2 
0
11:50 pm
Why is that red thing so small?
Praise or Condemn:
4 
10
1:43 am
It’s liberal-sized.
Praise or Condemn:
8 
10
9:04 am
Oh, Brother Pen… You do make me chuckle. Bless you.
Praise or Condemn:
3 
10
12:46 am
Well back to Claire, yesterday she was bragging about using one of her captured felines as a pleasure rag when the time came to wipe up Satan’s pleasure juices. Yuk I’m going to be sick.
Praise or Condemn:
4 
7
7:46 am
EVERYONE WHO BELIEVES THAT SHOVE YOUR OWN FOOT UP YOUR ASS.
Praise or Condemn:
5 
1
2:17 pm
Anyone find it disgusting that Ms. Fluke is profiting from all this? What sort of money makes money from her sexual catting around? Yes, a prostitute. So we have a hooker who wants the Catholic church to pay for her sexual sheninigans. How anyone could support this cretin is beyond me. And yes, even the radical liberals like Claire should know better.
Praise or Condemn:
2 
8
2:54 pm
What money is she making? Stevie, you do nothing but talk shit about people without backing it up. How is she wanting the Catholic church to pay for birth control, which is used to make sure that women’s birth cycle is actually working and not fucked up beyond belief? She’s trying to get birth control to be under health benefits like certain other items are, particularly for men, because that medicine can get expensive for those who have irregular systems.
Praise or Condemn:
3 
0
4:17 pm
@ The Comedian — Fluke has gotten herself in the spotlight only because Rush nailed her on air for being a whorelot. Otherwise no one would care, but you can bet she’s making the most out of it to push her whore-agenda. There is no good just reason the American people should pay out for birth control, like everything else in life… You want birth control go pay for it yourself. People who don’t agree with using birth control should not be taxed for it just so these Godless sluts like Fluke can run amok and screw everything under the sun then expect the government to bail them out. Grow up get a job and see how much you like paying for birth control for people you didn’t even get to bang!!! I say let them seek out coat hanger abortions in back alleys like they always have.
Praise or Condemn:
1 
6
5:52 pm
Except Fluke isn’t wanting the government to pay for birth control so she can have sex all the time, she’s wanting the government to pay for it so that her and every other woman who has or could have problems with their uterus and any other possibly affected organ can be kept healthy. At no point does she EVER mention the fact that it allows her or any/every other woman to go out and have random sexual encounters, it’s all entirely focused on the fact that birth control pills do more than just keep babies out of the oven; it helps keep that oven clean and regulated so that the woman remains healthy.
Praise or Condemn:
2 
0
6:05 pm
You know Comedian, I keep my over clean with these helpful tips:
- I don’t leave my oven on all the time and allow some random stranger to plop a pork roast in it.
- I cover baking with foil to stop spattering all over my oven.
- I wash my oven with baking soda and vinegar.
- I keep the oven seals nice and tight by making sure there are no loose screws on the hinges and door.
- After use, I wipe down with a light mist and damp cloth.
If women took care of their ovens, they wouldn’t be so worried about getting a check to pay for a new one or have a repair bill.
Home maintenance is the key.
Praise or Condemn:
5 
4
7:02 am
I’m sure the mister enjoys your clean oven, my dear.
Praise or Condemn:
1 
6
6:25 pm
Do you know what birth control pills are? To say they “make sure that women’s birth cycle is actually working” indicates a lack of understanding beyond my comprehension. Are you genuinely this stupid?
And you are the person who claimed that he’d let his 14 year old daughter have sex all she wanted and she got pregnant, oh well it’s off to the abortion clinic for her! I shudder to think of how many children you have wanted to endanger.
Praise or Condemn:
2 
6
6:32 pm
Are you genuinely that stupid to not understand what birth control is? Do you not read up on the subject and instead just take whatever is spoon-fed to you by your friends and neighbors? Do you not make any kind of conscious effort to actually learn and read-up on a subject before blindly diving into it, or at least man up and admit that you were wrong?
And when the hell did I ever say that? I mean it, you better pull up where I said that. Knowing you, it’ll take a day and a half for you to realize you’re wrong and by then you’ll have just scurried off like the coward you are.
Praise or Condemn:
2 
0
5:01 pm
I’ve really pondered this the past few days. Who really profits from all this hate slinging? The Masters of Hate – Liberals and Obama.
I know Rush has always seemed to have the voice of the disenfranchised like the mechanic that works all day in the shop only to come home to his disobedient wife that orders him around like the unpaid help to take out the trash and paint her toenails. Listeners are these guys that deliver potato chips to WalMart and have a boss that wants more with less. Or the middle manager that has a 10 point evaluation objectives list that his boss won’t support, but will gladly use to dangle a bonus over his head. They are beaten down, unappreciated in life. Rush has been therapy, a calm voice in the storm that lets a man know it isn’t just him and that together they’ll get through this.
The listeners are the salt of America, not the sponsors. Boycotting sponsors is only legitimizing the power of this man as a lighthouse of hope.
As manufacturing jobs dry up in the flyover zones, they feel frustrated and cheated. Many of his listeners have been kicked to the curb as well – Or really squewed the pooch, like Rush did on this issue. They can i-d-e-n-t-i-f-y with Rush and the womyns screeching over this. Rush gives them justification.
The woman comments are just nuts on the icing. Neither Rush or his listeners like being told they are stupid, heck nobody does. His three hour show is their clubhouse, none of his listeners go to a real country club – its some field of dreams with a clubhouse that has black slime on the ceiling that’s been covered with a drop down.
Liberals need to get their own clubhouse and stop being dicks, pardon my French. Rush will come back stronger with his faithful because of this. Trust. The mouse will roar again.
BB
Praise or Condemn:
1 
6
7:26 am
He called a girl a prostitute when she was asking that employers cover a legitimate medicine and demand she post videos. He is a horrible person.
Praise or Condemn:
4 
1
11:00 pm
As a nation, we need to move on. This obsession with female promiscuity is not helping anyone. It’s a distraction and President Obama seems to encourage it. I guess anything is better than having people examine his record on the economy, or worse: his birth certificate!
Praise or Condemn:
2 
7
11:13 pm
You idiots just love sticking your fingers in your ears and going ‘lalala’ to anything your opponents say, don’t you?
Praise or Condemn:
4 
3
11:21 pm
Excuse me? Sir or madam, that was terribly impolite.
Praise or Condemn:
1 
8
11:35 pm
How so? Obama displayed his birth certificate several times, yet you still ignore it. There’s no obsession with female promiscuity, the debate is that birth control, which affects other things than just preventing a woman from getting pregnant and is a legitimate medicine, should be covered under health benefits. Only an idiot would say those things when this kind of knowledge is out there and well known.
Praise or Condemn:
3 
2
11:38 pm
Oh this is hilarious. Dr. LN is fighting with a real doctor about human biology. For anyone new to this site, ignore this “LN” character. He’s a mentally deficient liberal who spams everyone here.
Praise or Condemn:
2 
6
11:41 pm
Oh? Just because he calls himself a doctor doesn’t mean squat. Clownboy calls you a doctor when you’re just a lonely old man who decided to roll with it because it makes you feel better about yourself. And retards shouldn’t be calling others ‘mentally deficient’, especially when your grammar is atrocious, but you don’t bother doing actual research and even confuse people with different people all the damn time.
Praise or Condemn:
2 
2
11:45 pm
A man with a PhD can indeed be referred to as “Doctor”. Maybe if you had gone to college, you would know that?
Praise or Condemn:
2 
7
11:49 pm
I do go to college. The fact is, neither one of you have presented any kind of certificate saying you are indeed doctors of any kind. It also doesn’t help that you called yourself a ‘credentialed journalist’ and yet never bothered to post anything to prove that, AND the fact that you butcher the English language as well as being unable to do actual research means it’s impossible for you to be a legitimate doctor (and no, clown school PhD’s don’t count as actual education).
Praise or Condemn:
4 
1
11:56 pm
You’re not a current college student, LN. Please don’t try to lie about that.
Praise or Condemn:
3 
9
12:03 am
Care to prove I’m not a college student, Billings? Or are you just jealous that someone has an actual education?
Praise or Condemn:
4 
1
12:08 am
Do you go to SWIC?
Praise or Condemn:
1 
6
12:16 am
What the hell is SWIC?
Praise or Condemn:
3 
2
5:04 am
You just want all these jezebels to be on the pill, so you can sow your liberal oats.
Praise or Condemn:
1 
7
1:43 pm
So August is just going to avoid the question, eh? Not surprising, since he’s basically revealing himself to be a stalker of sorts. First the claim about me living in Illinois, then saying I go to a school in Illinois (yeah, I looked it up, asshole), why, if I didn’t know better, I’d say he’s doing something unsavory like looking up information that’s considered to be private and posting it online against someone’s will! But August would NEVER do something like that, if he values being an actual, reputable member of his cult!
And Mikey? Why do you just want to assume that the whole thing is about sex? Birth control doesn’t just prevent pregnancy, it helps keep things in balance. Did you not read the testimonies of women who support it? Did you not read some of the things that happened to some women who had ovary problems? Why do you have to make it about sex? What’s going to be funny is when it turns out someone you know and care about actually needs birth control pills just to avoid problems like some of these women, and when they can’t get it, they’re going to be extremely sick and you’re going to be part of the blame.
Praise or Condemn:
2 
0
11:50 pm
How rude of you L.N.!
Praise or Condemn:
4 
7
6:15 pm
C Cunts
H Homos
R Rightwing
I Idiotic
S Shit
T Talking
W Weasels
I Into
R Rear
E Entry
Praise or Condemn:
5 
0
10:56 am
Godswill Ministries shared a link.
Wednesday.
Brothers and Sisters! Today marks a pinnacle moment in the history of mankind and, more importantly, in the lives of our congregation. The Ordain-O-Matic is now open for business! Become an official Reverend (just like me!) of Godswill Ministries! It’s just as valid as ANY ordainment available from any institution. You will be able to officiate weddings or any other superstitious ceremonies of your choice. http://godswillchurch.com/ordain/
Ordain-O-Matic
godswillchurch.com
Reverend Duncan
Praise or Condemn:
5 
0
5:06 pm
How are you not in prison?
Praise or Condemn:
7 
5
5:07 pm
You are correct, my little grammarian. Thank you so very kindly for your correction.
BB
Praise or Condemn:
2 
5
5:08 pm
LOL, you didn’t even read the article again!
Praise or Condemn:
3 
7
5:10 pm
Once again, she demonstrates how much better she is than us. God bless her.
Praise or Condemn:
4 
8
5:11 pm
She never reads, just looks at the pictures and checks for grammatical issues in the comment section.
Praise or Condemn:
3 
7
5:18 pm
So you come to a website, make fun of us, but don’t even read the articles, just the comments? You really need help. Even millennium reads the articles.
Praise or Condemn:
3 
8
5:20 pm
Claire,
If you read the article, you could mock and shame me like Rush and others teach us. Maybe you could call me names. That would really seal how far you’ve come in your Fellowship indoctrination.
BB
Praise or Condemn:
1 
6
8:18 pm
actually no I doN,t read they are Boring not even the slightest true or indicative or whatsover ( actually I stopped reading those stupid article Long time ago )
I just need the title and tos ee who is the author to Know what it’s in the article you are boring and previsible, repeating over and over using the same fear tactic what a conservative republican idea
Praise or Condemn:
5 
3
1:31 am
@minimum. You forgot the last step, checking the liberal talking points for the approved retort to spew over and over again on Christian conservative forums. This certainly will complete the “making-a-liberal-ass-of-yourself” cycle.
Praise or Condemn:
3 
6
5:11 pm
Your social group is your parents and your cats. That is why.
Praise or Condemn:
4 
6
5:16 pm
Let’s recap, shall we? “I’ve been on this site since 2005….”
You can deny and hide, Kitten, but we’ve rubbed off on you. Morality from the Fellowship (of which you proudly claim to be a member) has lead you on a righteous path (with a few angry trips into the ditch, but still near the path).
We love you, Claire!
Praise or Condemn:
7 
7
12:40 am
Claire, Claire, Claire… Again this isn’t about you.
“Then how did I decide to avoid drugs, alcohol, and sex when everybody around me was doing them?”
I told you Claire, not every story that appears on CW is about you. You must try not to be so self-centered and look at the larger picture. Which BTW you’re not in.
God bless,
BJB
Praise or Condemn:
2 
6
5:14 pm
For posting links to bestiality Claire. (Even if it was just as a shock)
In 1997 the ninth circuit court of appeals upheld federal restrictions on the trade and possession of animal based pornography. The federal laws in question ban any posting, hosting, possession, contribution to distribution, or distribution of animal pornography. A similar statute bans necrophilia in all forms, including that with animals. What you did by posting that link was distribution, you have committed a felony.
Praise or Condemn:
6 
5
5:16 pm
• Animal torture
• Bestiality
• Hate crimes
• Desecration of dead bodies
• Godless
… there’s more…
Praise or Condemn:
5 
6
5:26 pm
You gleefully described your torture of animals & low class people in earlier commentary on this site. Giving low-classes pets, killing them, burying them. Forcing your cats to watch you self-diddle… Just read your own posts… Sheesh, you really don’t read anything.
Praise or Condemn:
3 
6
5:33 pm
Does you give animals to low-class people? Do you experiment with them? Do you kill those animals? Do you bury them? Does your cat not look like it has seen far too much in it’s short nine lives?
Praise or Condemn:
2 
6
5:35 pm
*Do… apologies.
Praise or Condemn:
2 
6
5:35 pm
Claire, that one link was enough. Although you did post it more than once. Three times to be exact.
That is the only thing I am referring to. You attack us for our opinions. Yet you actually commit a felony.
Praise or Condemn:
4 
5
5:43 pm
Claire, those are moral issues. I am referring to you committing a felony.
Praise or Condemn:
4 
5
5:50 pm
Wow, with that language, it’s like your begging me to turn you in to the authorities. Do you realize it’s a federal crime because you used the internet to do it?
And what is f*$kface? How is that a insult? Are you 9?
Praise or Condemn:
3 
5
4:07 pm
Claire — It is only my opinion, but anyone who uses poor helpless furry animals (including cats) to shove into their muff to use as a pleasure rag should be behind bars. and I’m just repeating your own words from another thread. You disgusting animal abuser!!!
Praise or Condemn:
1 
6
5:19 pm
Blanche, you are so right, I was so blind not to see it. Any morality she does have is because of us.
Praise or Condemn:
7 
7
5:25 pm
No Claire, if loving you was wrong, we wouldn’t do it. That has nothing to do with Heaven.
Praise or Condemn:
1 
5
5:43 pm
What is love if it isn’t wanting the best for one another?
Does anyone in the Fellowship,and yes I’ve only been around for about a year, want you gone? So many tests from you Claire, so many tests. The frightening horrific images, the name calling the staunch rejection of our core values – and yet you remain.
I think you see that love and are drawn to it like a moth to light.
Praise or Condemn:
3 
5
11:18 pm
Actually, thanks to you she’s probably more open to having sex with random strangers than before she came here.
Praise or Condemn:
4 
0
6:28 pm
Blossom, please don’t talk so viciously to your friends.
Praise or Condemn:
1 
5
6:10 pm
I even had several run on sentences in the article just for Claire, but he didn’t read it so those little treats will need to be for someone else.
Praise or Condemn:
3 
6
6:27 pm
Claire does watch a great deal of pornography. Maybe that’s where she learned her “facts of life.”
Praise or Condemn:
1 
6
12:06 pm
Brother Johnathan…You avoided all that fun by being a HOMO NERD!!
Praise or Condemn:
3 
0
12:47 pm
Funny how every single liberal Female on Christwire suddenly requires big government birth control for completely non-slut related activity, you people should form a union!
Praise or Condemn:
1 
1
2:10 pm
That’s just what Obama wants!
Praise or Condemn:
1 
1
1:20 am
Sorry, toots, I don’t want to pay for you to go around sleeping with some random men. Pay for your own birth pills and stop making excuses for slutting it up.
Praise or Condemn:
1 
1
1:49 am
Adam, do you ever educate yourself, or does being retarded just come naturally to you?
Praise or Condemn:
1 
0
6:08 pm
THat was a really great comment Claire! Beautiful and meaningful!
Praise or Condemn:
0 
1
6:32 pm
Is it really patronizing if it’s right? You knocked that one out of the park, Claire. Why can’t I give you an accolade now and again?
Praise or Condemn:
0 
0