4/20 –Satan’s Holiday
Every year, thousands of irresponsible criminals take part in the twisted celebration that is “4/20.” This evil ceremony of Satan is “Marijuana’s birthday party” — and hundreds of youths in YOUR community may be taking part! We truly are, a country in crisis.
Over thousands of people are hurt every year doing something reckless as a result of marijuana abuse. Whether it be operating a table saw to create a homemade “bong”, using a surfboard in the ocean, or “chilling” with friends, the facts state that marijuana use will cripple you, mentally and physically. Oh, but the liberal media will have you believe that it’s holistic and natural, good enough to be given as medicine. But in reality, Marijuana makes people lazy and dangerous, and is extremely harmful to the body. It causes impotence, fatigue, purchasing of Ecko brand clothing, and malaise.
Marijuana is grown by dirty Mexicans — drug lords, that is. They often lace their marijuana with other strains of lethal, potent drugs. “Angeldust”, “PCP”, “OG Kush” and “Head Band” are names of popular strains of marijuana that contain other drugs from Viagara to Cocaine. These toxic combinations are responsible for raping our children.
And today is the celebration of all of it. Today pot smokers will continue to disappoint their families, friends and loved ones and partake in an all-day orgy of “weed.“ These unemployed, often unclean drug abusers will be a drain on society, like always.
(Years of marijuana abuse rendered Amy Winehouse’s life obsolete)
Perhaps drug users will bake commemorative “pot brownies” as a desert dish, similar to cake. Maybe they will watch sinful programming such as “Robot Chickens” or “Super Jail” or the “Tim and Erics Great Job Awesome Show.” I really don’t know what they will do, because I have never soiled my body by partaking in the wretched herb. And to be honest, I doubt anyone smoking these “pots” will be able to do much of anything, what with the crushing side-effects that come with “freebasing” this dirty, destructive plant.
Don’t let people fool you with Bible scripture proclaiming marijuana to be safe per God’s decree. A majority of people who use this argument are Rastafarians, a cult of brain-dead idiots who believe that God has existed in the last 100 years in the form of an emaciated leader of a decaying, worthless, third-world pagan country. In fact, a majority of people who celebrate today are Rastafarians who have nothing better to do; they obviously have no family relationships or job-related commitments because, c’mon — they’re Rastafarians.
If you see anyone smoking anything that resembles marijuana, don’t hesitate to call the police. If you know anyone whom you think may smoke marijuana it is a good measure to e-mail your local police chief with information; you don’t want to make Jesus sad, do you?
God bless, and have a safe 4/20.
- Sinful
- Suspicious
- Scared
- Sad
- Amused
- Laughing Out Loud
Author: Mark E. Figs
Mark is an award-winning children's author, and Christian Conspiracy Theorist can be found on Facebook and Twitter -- (Mark E. Figs)
1:43 pm
i have caught my nephew watching pornagraphic films while smoking this illegal substance. i find the two and two are frequently related
Praise or Condemn:
2 
3
3:40 pm
Pictures are of woman who did meth, there is a difference.
I didn’t even bother to read the article. Its the same old song and dance.
Praise or Condemn:
7 
3
4:54 pm
Mr. Hanky2000 — Myself, along with several other of my fellow Christwire authors/brethren think that you CAN’T read. There’s a difference.
Praise or Condemn:
2 
9
5:22 pm
Praise!
Praise or Condemn:
1 
6
6:01 pm
You post a picture of a woman on meth and say she was on marijuana, then accuse someone of not being able to read.
Praise or Condemn:
6 
1
3:17 pm
Why do you think i am unable to read?
I am able to type, no? Odds are, if I can type, I can read.
I wasn’t even sure of the point of what you just said either. At least you said “think” instead of “know”.
Praise or Condemn:
3 
1
8:17 am
I’ve smoked cannabis..I look okay..I’m catholic by birth and do not belive in God as the church or any other ”interpreters”, prophets etc. God is an abstract idea, something ideal you should look upon..not worship like a scared caveman..I agree drugs can destroy but what drugs? are they all the same? those ”God created” like marijuana or man made heroin etc. you should be more careful and know what you really preach..if you preach unconditional love why do you pry in other people’s bussines? are those conditions of your ”uncoditional love”? Peace \m/
Praise or Condemn:
1 
0
3:04 pm
Ok… 1st of all *double facepalm*
You do know that woman on the picture is not Amy Winehouse? Besides, as far i know she was on kokain and heroin and not weed.
Now let’s do some quotes:
“But in reality, Marijuana makes people lazy and dangerous, and is extremely harmful to the body. It causes impotence, fatigue, purchasing of Ecko brand clothing, and malaise.”
Not true. Smoking weed don’t make you lazy or dangerous.
I didn’t hear from a case when someone would get impotente from smoking weed. It does cause fatigue, but is that bad? Purchasin of Ecko brand clothing is bad? hahahaha
And you can get malaise only if you smoke too much.
“Marijuana is grown by dirty Mexicans — drug lords, that is.”
It grows all over the world.
“These unemployed, often unclean drug abusers will be a drain on society, like always.”
I know alot of people who have jobs and still smoke weed.
“In fact, a majority of people who celebrate today are Rastafarians who have nothing better to do; they obviously have no family relationships or job-related commitments because, c’mon — they’re Rastafarians.”
So god did make that plant so we wouldn’t use it? Do you know any real Rastafarian? They are quite peacefull people.
“If you know anyone whom you think may smoke marijuana it is a good measure to e-mail your local police chief with information; you don’t want to make Jesus sad, do you?”
hahahahahahhahaha… this one made my day. thanks
Also please watch this video:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0psJhQHk_GI
You might learn some more. And don’t start with “liberal” comments. It does help.
You do might not know, but there was actually a law in the USA (not really sure in what year), where you could go in the prison, if you didn’t agree with the weed farming. Weed was used before the oil in many different ways (like clothes, medication, etc). But after they did discover the oil and did see that they can make alot of money with it, they did made a bad commercial to it (with making negative comments about it), because they knew that the price for weed won’t go up as much as with oil. But in the last few year, people realize again the value and the different ways of use of marijuana.
Praise or Condemn:
3 
1
4:31 pm
You do realize marijuana does no harm to the body, right?
Praise or Condemn:
5 
1
4:57 pm
Except for stunting growth and destroying brain cells. Smoking a regular bag of street-grade “pot” is the same as smoking a 32 oz cup full of paint.
Praise or Condemn:
3 
6
5:56 pm
Proof?
Praise or Condemn:
2 
1
6:25 pm
No, weed is a herb. There is legalized marijuana for certain illnesses and of course it is used for recreational use. Marijuana does not hurt the lungs like tobacco does and weed is a safer drug. I hope pot is legalized in the near future.
Praise or Condemn:
3 
1
6:27 pm
No, weed is a herb. There is legalized marijuana for certain illnesses and of course it is used for recreational use. Marijuana does not hurt the lungs like tobacco does and weed is a safer drug. I hope pot is legalized in the near future.
Praise or Condemn:
7 
1
8:24 am
That you know from personal experience or..? and you seem to put a lot of faith in science..that same science that negates God in that generalized, church propaganda image.. ergo you do not really know what you are saying…btw if you smoke a joint or a blunt is not the same if you do it, for example, from a bong? tell me other than physical smoke what real exact proof do you have that marijuana is lethal or damaging for a human body…vine for example, in abundant quantities can do a lot more damage than the same amount of marijuana…
Praise or Condemn:
0 
0
9:20 am
Being an R.N I am well aware and highly informed that marijuana actually helps re-grow and sometimes even fully regenerate dying or damaged brain cells. There is years of studies behind this, also if you are partaking in natural original strain or marijuana at its pure, it is not harmful to the body in the long run. Yes feelings of being lathargic, hungry, happy etc. No one in recorded medical history has ever died from marijuana.
Praise or Condemn:
0 
0
5:19 pm
The greenery substance that these “satantic” individuals are smoking is one of the god given plants to this earth. A plant that grows from the ground. It enligtens brain cells and is gonna proceed to for eternity. i dont see the growth being stunted anytime soon.
Praise or Condemn:
2 
1
7:12 pm
Maddy,
Smoking cannabis does cause lung cancer and lung infections. It can also cause anxiety, depression and psychosis.
http://www.drugs.health.gov.au/internet/drugs/publishing.nsf/content/marijuana
Praise or Condemn:
0 
3
9:49 pm
Mkay well then I will give you points on the lungs, I didnt know that even though it is less harmful than common legal drugs. But most of the symptoms listed is just while your smoking weed. It does no more harm than alchol or tobbacco so why shouldnt it be legal?
Praise or Condemn:
3 
0
10:21 pm
“even though it is less harmful than common legal drugs”
What drugs are you talking about? Alcohol and tobacco? Sure, it’s generally less harmful than those — but it does depend on the individual.
Sure, there are arguments for and against it being legal. The biggest one I can see in favour of it is that legalising it would strip billions of dollars from drug cartels. And taxing it could provide billions of dollars of revenue for governments.
But don’t be fooled — cannabis is not harmless. Far from it. If you’re going to take it you should educate yourself on the risks.
Praise or Condemn:
0 
1
10:31 pm
“But don’t be fooled — cannabis is not harmless. Far from it. If you’re going to take it you should educate yourself on the risks.”
So is alcohol and tobacco, and both are completely legal. Marijuana is also a highly controversial subject. People say there aren’t any negative results directly from cannabis use, and some people argue that there are. There’s too many blurred lines and neither side are being completely open. Even if there are negative side effects associated directly with marijuana, saying that it’s because of those effects that it shouldn’t be legal is hypocritical when you’ll let tobacco or alcohol roam free.
Praise or Condemn:
3 
0
10:36 pm
“So is alcohol and tobacco, and both are completely legal.”
So? Why not legalise heroin then? When safely administered it has no real side effects other than constipation.
I think cannabis should be at the very least decriminalised. The only point that I’m making is that it’s not harmless.
“People say there aren’t any negative results directly from cannabis use,”
And those people are ignorant or lying.
If you have an honest interest in this do a proper search of PubMed or Google Scholar to look at the peer-reviewed research on the health effects of cannabis use. There is mountains of it.
You can’t just wave your hands and say it’s harmless because you wish that was true. Wishing doesn’t change reality.
Praise or Condemn:
0 
1
10:57 pm
“So? Why not legalise heroin then? When safely administered it has no real side effects other than constipation.”
Actually, I’ve been contemplating on that issue. I can’t remember who exactly said this, but some big wig important guy actually suggested legalizing all drugs, because that would put a heavily blow on the criminals who sell it and the fact that since tobacco and alcohol are legal and dangerous, it should be either all-or-nothing.
“I think cannabis should be at the very least decriminalised. The only point that I’m making is that it’s not harmless.”
Which is a fair enough point.
“And those people are ignorant or lying.”
We have quite a few liars that masquerade as experts on both sides.
“If you have an honest interest in this do a proper search of PubMed or Google Scholar to look at the peer-reviewed research on the health effects of cannabis use. There is mountains of it.”
I don’t have an honest interest in this, but there have been quite a few news outlets that I go to that talk about the subject.
“You can’t just wave your hands and say it’s harmless because you wish that was true. Wishing doesn’t change reality.”
No, but there is misinformation abound in this world. Quite a few people would do anything for their beliefs if they’re intent on making it so.
Praise or Condemn:
0 
0
11:03 pm
“it should be either all-or-nothing.”
That might be superficially attractive but that’s about it. Should crystal meth be legal? That’s one drug on which most people would draw the line.
“We have quite a few liars that masquerade as experts on both sides.”
Which is why the peer-reviewed scientific researcg is the best place to look to try to gain a real understanding of it.
“I don’t have an honest interest in this, but there have been quite a few news outlets that I go to that talk about the subject.”
What does that mean? It seems a bit of a non-sequitur.
Praise or Condemn:
0 
0
11:13 pm
“That might be superficially attractive but that’s about it. Should crystal meth be legal? That’s one drug on which most people would draw the line.”
Even so, in some ways, if someone’s stupid enough to do something that would kill them, should it be up to the government to protect them from their stupidity? Even if you don’t agree, it’s still an interesting idea to contemplate.
“Which is why the peer-reviewed scientific researcg is the best place to look to try to gain a real understanding of it.”
Even so, most people are only going to care about the ‘expert’ that they agree with.
“What does that mean? It seems a bit of a non-sequitur.”
I generally only talk about drugs whenever someone else brings the subject up, and it’s not a subject I dedicate a lot of time to, but quite a few places that I go to do spend some time on it occasionally, which kind of explains why I know so much about a subject I don’t actively go out and study.
Praise or Condemn:
0 
0
11:18 pm
“Even so, most people are only going to care about the ‘expert’ that they agree with.”
Well, then they are being dishonest and aren’t at all interested in the truth.
Why the scare quote around “expert”? Some people really are experts, you know. The ones who do the proper science.
Praise or Condemn:
0 
0
11:21 pm
“Why the scare quote around “expert”? Some people really are experts, you know. The ones who do the proper science.”
Because there are also people who call themselves experts who exaggerate the truth of things, whether or not they do actual research or testing.
Praise or Condemn:
0 
1
4:01 am
Your attitude suggests that you are incapable of distinguishing between real experts and fake ones and that you have no interest in doing so.
Too hard to sift fact from fiction, so let’s not try?
Praise or Condemn:
0 
0
11:30 am
Except quite a few people tend to lie, and when more and more of those people bring up proof, who’s right and who’s wrong? In some cases, it’s just a matter of leaving out certain details just because the person doing the research finds it irrelevant. The best solution at that point is to basically meet in the middle.
Praise or Condemn:
0 
1
1:38 pm
“The best solution at that point is to basically meet in the middle.”
No, that’s a lazy cop-out.
Praise or Condemn:
0 
0
1:43 pm
Well, what do you suggest then? If two extremes collide, what are they to do?
Praise or Condemn:
0 
0
1:52 pm
In this case we have on the one hand a good deal of solid, peer-reviewed scientific literature detailing the effects of cannabis use on mental and physical health.
On the other hand, we have a lot of hand-waving dope-smokers saying “No way, man! It’s natural! It can’t hurt you!” with no evidence to back this up.
In this case, I’m inclined to go with the scientific literature.
Cannabis is by no means the most dangerous drug on the planet, but it certainly isn’t harmless for everyone.
Praise or Condemn:
0 
0
2:13 pm
“On the other hand, we have a lot of hand-waving dope-smokers saying “No way, man! It’s natural! It can’t hurt you!” with no evidence to back this up.”
Actually I meant the “Marijuana will kill you the moment you inhale it” crowd versus the “It’s all gravy” crowd.
“Cannabis is by no means the most dangerous drug on the planet, but it certainly isn’t harmless for everyone.”
Which accurately describes the middle-of-the-road I was talking about between the two groups.
Praise or Condemn:
0 
0
2:23 pm
Actually I meant the “Marijuana will kill you the moment you inhale it” crowd versus the “It’s all gravy” crowd.
Ah, OK. I misunderstood.
“Which accurately describes the middle-of-the-road I was talking about between the two groups.”
But reflexively taking a “middle” position between two points of view without looking at the evidence isn’t a good way to go.
When one side is right and the other is wrong, taking a position in the middle only means that you’re wrong, if not half-way to crazy town.
Praise or Condemn:
0 
0
2:37 pm
“Ah, OK. I misunderstood.”
To be fair, I might’ve been a bit vague as to who I meant.
“But reflexively taking a “middle” position between two points of view without looking at the evidence isn’t a good way to go.”
When both sides are offering only evidence that they agree with, there isn’t much else one can do.
“When one side is right and the other is wrong, taking a position in the middle only means that you’re wrong, if not half-way to crazy town.”
True, but if both sides aren’t exactly spilling the beans, it means that others have to pick out the truths and see what’s the most reasonable explanation they come up with. In one way, it’s like a novel murder mystery; if the guilty party is lying, you have to pick out the lies from what the others gave out in order to find the truth.
Praise or Condemn:
0 
0
2:39 pm
“When both sides are offering only evidence that they agree with, there isn’t much else one can do.”
You can look at the evidence. That’s my whole point.
Praise or Condemn:
0 
0
2:41 pm
Remember Hitchens’ Razor: What can be asserted without evidence can be dismissed without evidence.
Praise or Condemn:
0 
0
2:47 pm
True, but I’m still talking about the view points of OTHER people. They’re going to only focus on one thing: their opinion. They aren’t going to listen to the other side, and the people who are in the middle are going to have difficulty telling apart what’s true and what isn’t. Yeah, there is evidence that leads to the truth, but picking it out from a wave of lies is the tricky part.
Praise or Condemn:
0 
0
2:50 pm
“Yeah, there is evidence that leads to the truth, but picking it out from a wave of lies is the tricky part.”
Which is why it is important to learn to think critically and to be able to identify logical fallacies.
Praise or Condemn:
0 
0
2:52 pm
“Which is why it is important to learn to think critically and to be able to identify logical fallacies”
Agreed.
I get the feeling that we’re in agreement, it’s just difficult to explain howso.
Praise or Condemn:
0 
0
10:41 pm
If it harms less than a legal drug than weed itself should be legal. You tell me educate myself on the risk if I plan on smoking pot. Yes I do need to see risks first but than again so does everyone buying legal drugs at the local corner store.
Praise or Condemn:
0 
0
10:45 pm
“If it harms less than a legal drug than weed itself should be legal.”
Not necessarily. You have to take into account how much harm might be inflicted by making it legal.
But, as I said above, I think cannabis should be at least decriminalised. It would free up police and courts to focus on more important things and it would keep people from having their lives ruined for being busted with a small quantity of pot.
Praise or Condemn:
0 
0
11:03 pm
I agree that it should be decriminalised because one of my freinds reputation is ruined for being in possesion although she has never smoked the pot herself.To be honest if it were legal alot less kids would do it because most of them would find it less exciting.
Praise or Condemn:
1 
0
11:05 pm
The earlier you start smoking cannabis the more likely you are to suffer ill effects from it.
The human brain is not fully developed until the age of 21 or so.
Praise or Condemn:
0 
0
11:19 pm
I still don’t really see a problem with marijuana. Many people I know smoke it both teenagers and adults and none have I seen suffer from side effects yet, not saying that they definatly won’t have side effects it just doesnt seem very likely. Use it as your own risk but also use legal drugs at your own risk same goes for both.
Praise or Condemn:
1 
0
4:07 am
“I still don’t really see a problem with marijuana.”
That’s because you’re not acquainted with the scientific evidence.
“people I know smoke it both teenagers and adults and none have I seen suffer from side effects yet”
I know one person who died from lung cancer. She wasn’t a smoker. I know plenty of people who smoke, but none of them have lung cancer.
That doesn’t mean that smoking doesn’t cause lung cancer.
Praise or Condemn:
0 
1
12:45 pm
There is also scientific evidence about the dangers of alcohol and cigarettes, yet these are legal and brushed away when brought up.
I’m not saying weed is better than alcohol or cigarettes, i don’t smoke and drink only socially.I’m just noting that criminalization, to which the U.S. government is entitled, worked.
Praise or Condemn:
0 
1
1:39 pm
“criminalization, to which the U.S. government is entitled, worked.”
Huh?
Praise or Condemn:
0 
0
2:52 pm
I read that:
“… Multiple efforts to reschedule cannabis under the Act have failed, and the United States Supreme Court has ruled in United States v. Oakland Cannabis Buyers’ Coop and Gonzales v. Raich that the federal government has a right to regulate and criminalize cannabis, even for medical purposes.”
Exerpt from: Legal history of cannabis in the U.S.- Wikipedia
I just found the wording interesting….the right to criminalize..
Praise or Condemn:
0 
0
2:54 pm
But how did it “work”, in the sense of you saying “I’m just noting that criminalization … worked”?
Praise or Condemn:
0 
0
3:35 pm
That might have been awkward wording on my part.
What i meant is that criminalizing weed and the propaganda that came with it led to society seeing weed as evil on principle, while the Marlboro man was a national icon.
All that is not entirely true anymore of course, but still many people have only the opinion that they have seen or heard time and time again.
Praise or Condemn:
0 
0
3:45 pm
And i do not mean you have such an opinion, i was just saying that in general.
Praise or Condemn:
0 
0
7:40 pm
So Satan is an American or what? Because where i come from, there is no 4/20 holiday.We do not have 20 months a year.
So the godly people here have to thank you filthy Americans for evil on earth.Good going Yankees.
Completely unrelated to that, the pictures you used relate to meth-users.Meth, or crystal meth, or N-methylamphetamine or desoxyephedrine is not weed, or pot, or cannabis.
One is natural, means grows wildly, the other is synthetic respectively half-synthetic if gained via desoxydation of ephedrine, mormon-tea.
Regardless of discussing drugs in general, freely growing plants without human interference and human designer-drugs, be they cheap or luxury items, are two different things.
Yes, even naturally growing substances can be very dangerous, be they from the opium family, or malt, or tobacco..
But when you want to bash weed, bash weed.
“Today pot smokers will continue to disappoint their families, friends and loved ones”
They do, yes.Because society incrimnates them on one side which also causes the feeling of shame in an individual who smokes it but has lots of social contacts who don´t, because not all effetcs of weed are beneficial and because it is illegal.
And i still do not get why it is perfectly ok to get drunk as HELL and get in a fight worst case scenario, ending up in a hospital with your belly being pumped out but smoking pot is evil.
Why do taxpayers have to pay for cirrhosed livers and lung-cancer victims when people can eat a delicious cake?Oh yea, psychosis….can happen with alcohol too.You do not even need any substance for that, you just need to live in the western world.
Moral of the story: everything can be a poison, it all depends on the dose, personal attributes and other stuff i do not know about or do not go into now.
Drugs are for losers…..so shall we stop eating and drinking?And internetsing?…..
Praise or Condemn:
0 
2
7:44 pm
Figure out on your own where to put the winking smileys.
Praise or Condemn:
0 
1
8:58 pm
After glancing at your glaring, lengthy comment — the forum comment version of Benito Cerreno, mind you — I could only conclude that you were EXTREMELY drunk on meth to write all of that and think that anyone would actually read that.
So, like what my son Bobbi Dale texts me sometimes — TL;DR
Praise or Condemn:
1 
4
9:14 pm
You can’t be ‘drunk on meth’ you idiot. Not only that, but apparently you don’t like hearing any kind of opposition. You ever thought about actually opening up your mind, or are you incapable of doing that?
Praise or Condemn:
4 
2
5:01 am
DSNC
Praise or Condemn:
0 
1
8:02 pm
Did you know Hitler was born on 4/20?
The Columbine Massacre was also done on 2/20.
Obviously there was some connection with the devil’s weed.
Praise or Condemn:
2 
3
8:08 pm
Yeah, they all happened on the same day of the same month. The events of those days have nothing to do with one another.
Praise or Condemn:
1 
1
8:12 pm
But according to you liberals, just because Christmas and Easter are on the same days as pagan holidays that means we’re celebrating them.
Obviously by that logic Satan’s Stoners are celebrating the death of 12 students and the death of 2 million jews.
Praise or Condemn:
2 
1
8:25 pm
Except the very intent of those holidays are the exact same. Saturnalia was a day where people partied and gave each other gifts. Christmas is a day where people party and give each other gifts. You can say ‘no, Christmas is about the birth of Jesus’, but then why do we give each other gifts?
Praise or Condemn:
1 
3
1:15 pm
The columbine massacre and 4/20 both involve delinquents.
Hitler was once one of those unemployed artsy liberal types, much like what most stoners are.
See there’s the same intent, there’s your connection.
Praise or Condemn:
1 
0
1:17 pm
We could also make connection with Hitler to Christians (or Christians on this site). Both think whites are the best race. Both want nothing to do with other races. Both want to kill all other races (there have been articles stating this).
Praise or Condemn:
0 
1
1:20 pm
The Columbine Massacre was because of two extremely frustrated teenagers who decided to go violently insane, and Hitler was only unemployed because it was during the Great Depression that he gained power. As for being an ‘artsy liberal’, why is it that so much of what he did and wanted to do clashes with what liberals want? He wanted to run a tight ship, and that everything be devoted to his cause.
Praise or Condemn:
0 
1
1:23 pm
Don’t lie to prove a point XC.
If Hitler were really christian he would have understood not to eliminate god’s people.
Praise or Condemn:
1 
1
1:25 pm
“If Hitler were really christian he would have understood not to eliminate god’s people.”
If these people were really christian, they would understand not to want to eliminate god’s people. Hitler didn’t kill just Jewish people, there were a number of groups that were killed as well.
Praise or Condemn:
1 
1
1:25 pm
“The Columbine Massacre was because of two extremely frustrated teenagers who decided to go violently insane.”
This isn’t normal behavior, but on Marijuana it is.
“He wanted to run a tight ship, and that everything be devoted to his cause.”
Like Obama, or Al Gore, or any other liberal president.
Praise or Condemn:
1 
0
1:30 pm
“This isn’t normal behavior, but on Marijuana it is.”
No it’s not, there was a hell of a lot more going on, and you’ve yet to give any proof that marijuana was involved with what happened.
“Like Obama, or Al Gore, or any other liberal president.”
Bullshit, when did Obama or Al Gore state that only one religion should be allowed and that all others should be eliminated? When did they become intolerant of any other views to a point where they executed their opponents?
Praise or Condemn:
0 
1
1:31 pm
“Hitler was only unemployed because it was during the Great Depression that he gained power.”
What? Hitler was never unemployed during the Depression. He had been continuously employed by the Nazi party since the early 1920s.
Praise or Condemn:
1 
0
1:42 pm
“What? Hitler was never unemployed during the Depression. He had been continuously employed by the Nazi party since the early 1920s.”
Must’ve been before WWI then, I distinctly recall him being unemployed and even being thrown in jail once or twice for various reasons.
Praise or Condemn:
1 
0
12:27 am
It’s not a coincidence that fascist marijuana junkies have chosen their hero’s birthday to celebrate their drug of choice.
The junkies that smoke on their “joints” on the downtown street corners in my hometown are definitely hitlerian fascists. They are the brown shirts of our day with their middle finger attitudes toward authority, law abiding citizens, and all forms of American decency. I could see a modern day beer hall putsch from their likes.
Praise or Condemn:
4 
2
4:10 am
Rest easy, Brother Cassidy. These pot-heads are too high and disoriented to organise themselves.
It’s all they can do to make it to the 7-Eleven for their “munchies”, while repeating their internal paranoid mantra: “Don’t look stoned, don’t look stoned, don’t look stoned.”
Praise or Condemn:
1 
2
7:21 am
I sure appreciate your words of comfort, Exbrony, my dear friend in Christ.
But I fear that the stoner’s docile minds are ripe for the type of influence that these liberal fascists would infect them with.
And yes, stoners won’t take up political action while Adult Swim is on but there is a period of time during the day when those of sound adult, god-fearing mind are at work and not watching these greasy bums and that is the source of my concern when fascists present them their empty promises.
Praise or Condemn:
1 
2
12:09 pm
I know MANY stoners who have more of an interest in politics than I do. In fact, my cousin and her mum were having a discussion about politics while I was around. My cousin was stoned and her mum was sober but my cousin made very good points. Adult Swim is annoying, unless it’s Saturday night, then it’s an anime marathon!!!!!
Praise or Condemn:
0 
1
12:28 pm
The price of freedom is eternal vigilance.
Praise or Condemn:
0 
0
9:53 pm
all, apparently my nephew played a cruel joke by giving me a picture of a criminal. this is my real photograph, from my picture that was taken at work.
Praise or Condemn:
1 
0
9:57 pm
this is terrible, I changed my photograph like my nephew said and it is still the same picture
Praise or Condemn:
0 
1
10:48 pm
Satan promotes drugs because they destroy our brains and only people with damaged brains (like atheists, liberals, muslims etc.) do not believe in God.
Praise or Condemn:
2 
3
11:01 pm
Dear god you’re stupid.
Praise or Condemn:
4 
1
11:02 pm
You don’t even know if you control your mind or if Satan does.
Praise or Condemn:
1 
3
11:13 pm
I do know that I control my own mind. You, on the other hand, have NO mind whatsoever.
Praise or Condemn:
1 
1
11:20 pm
L.N.I’d say that Satan has control of your tongue.
Praise or Condemn:
2 
2
11:23 pm
How do you know it ? without circular reasoning ?
You can NEVER know it 100%.
Praise or Condemn:
1 
0
11:27 pm
Except, again, if Satan is in Hell, and Hell is in a prison, how can Satan do anything on Earth? Your entire point relies on the fact that Satan is capable of walking on Earth.
Praise or Condemn:
0 
1
11:29 pm
And he IS capable that, read the Bible again IDIOT.
Praise or Condemn:
1 
1
11:31 pm
So then Hell isn’t a prison, and why doesn’t God keep Satan in check? There are half a dozen holes when it comes to Satan’s existence as ANYTHING when it comes to the Bible, but you’re so sure that your insane version is the right one. Well, dumbass, here’s a curve ball: what if the ‘holy men’ in the Bible were actually agents of the devil to lead people away from God? What if he was those men himself?
Praise or Condemn:
1 
1
11:39 pm
“what if the ‘holy men’ in the Bible were actually agents of the devil to lead people away from God? What if he was those men himself?”
No. I know it because i have God in my life and he has revealed the truth to us Christians.
Praise or Condemn:
1 
3
11:48 pm
“No. I know it because i have God in my life and he has revealed the truth to us Christians.”
To wit, I also say, what if Satan is this supposed God? Why would the devil convince people he doesn’t exist when so many believe in him? Would it not be better for him to convince the followers of his enemy to believe that he is the ultimate force of good? You can say ‘no’ all you want, the fact is you’re NEVER going to truly know, all you’re going to have is faith, something that you shouldn’t try to force onto other people, and yet you do anyway like the idiot you are.
Praise or Condemn:
1 
2
11:59 pm
You don’t have God in your life so you will never understand this but I KNOW.
I am 100% sure that the Bible is the word of God and that Christianity is the only true religion.
But YOU can NEVER know because your precious science can never be 100% sure about ANYTHING.
We Christians KNOW that we are Right and you atheists CAN NEVER know it.
Praise or Condemn:
1 
2
12:03 am
“But YOU can NEVER know because your precious science can never be 100% sure about ANYTHING. ”
The only thing that’s 100% true in this world is that at some point, we die. You’re also so damn sure that you’re right that you refuse to see the world at large. You’re basically sitting there, and tell everyone that the years and years of research and development and discoveries made that prove that the world and the universe are older than 6000 years old, or however old the bible says it is, and that the Earth is NOT the center of everything, and that logic and reason have no right to exist.
Praise or Condemn:
2 
1
4:18 am
“if Satan is in Hell, and Hell is in a prison, how can Satan do anything on Earth?”
False premise. Neither Jews nor Christians nor Muslims claim that Satan has no power on Earth.
In fact, Muslims say he even tricked Mohammed into writing some satanic bullshit into the Koran.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Satanic_Verses
Praise or Condemn:
1 
0
11:38 am
“False premise. Neither Jews nor Christians nor Muslims claim that Satan has no power on Earth.”
Oh, I know that, the thing is, it’s still somewhat contradictory with the descriptions of Hell. If Hell is supposed to be a prison and Satan was sent there not to be ruler, but to be imprisoned, then he can’t leave or influence people on Earth. It ties with the fact that there are so many little things that just don’t make sense, and yet when you see all of those tiny things together, you see the massive hole that they create.
“In fact, Muslims say he even tricked Mohammed into writing some satanic bullshit into the Koran.”
Which actually adds to my point, who’s to say that certain people in the Old Testament (and possibly the New Testament) weren’t tricked by the devil? I mean, if he IS capable of wrecking havoc on Earth, then there’s a chance that he convinced one or two important people or prophets to do something evil and get those deeds forever imprinted on the Bible.
Praise or Condemn:
0 
0
12:27 pm
“If Hell is supposed to be a prison”
That is the false premise. It’s not. Show me where it says that in the bible.
Praise or Condemn:
0 
0
12:42 pm
“God did not spare the angels who sinned, but cast them down to hell and delivered them into chains of darkness, to be reserved for judgment” (2 Pet. 2:4)
Sounds like a prison to me.
Praise or Condemn:
0 
0
12:58 pm
Well, it’s true that Second Peter says that, but Second Peter is pseudepigraphical.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Second_Epistle_of_Peter#Date
Praise or Condemn:
0 
0
1:03 pm
Besides, Satan is God’s buddy. Like in the story of Job where they make a bet that Satan can make Job curse God.
God tells Satan to do his worst, up to and including all Job’s kids — which Satan promptly does.
Satan isn’t imprisoned; he’s God’s sting operator and hitman (children a specialty!). Don’t let a second-century forgery make you think otherwise.
Praise or Condemn:
0 
0
1:06 pm
Some people are going to hold anything and everything in the bible as irrefutable proof and ignore comments that state otherwise.
Praise or Condemn:
0 
0
1:11 pm
That’s because every word of the bible is literally true, especially the bits where it contradicts itself.
Praise or Condemn:
0 
0
1:14 pm
* Not including all the forgeries like 2 Peter, 1 & 2 Timothy and Titus.
Praise or Condemn:
0 
0
1:16 pm
See? It’s imperfect, and yet so many hail it as being perfect and the only tool that should be used by mankind to live. This part of the thread started when CI decided to just say something stupid and claim it was backed by God.
Praise or Condemn:
0 
0
2:57 am
So god did creat satan and weed and now you blame satan for smoking weed? lol
Praise or Condemn:
0 
1
3:02 am
By the way… Do you drink or smoke cigarets?
Praise or Condemn:
0 
1
1:21 am
Columbine High School shooting was on 4/20
Hitler’s birthday was on 4/20
Yet all people can write about is weed. Assholes.
Praise or Condemn:
1 
1
4:51 am
Also 4/20 is national DNA day.
Praise or Condemn:
0 
1
7:25 am
DNA Day?
How does the 420 contingent celebrate DNA Day, by exchanging fluid from their dna sin sticks with whatever orifice is nearest?
Praise or Condemn:
1 
0
10:24 am
http://www.genome.gov/10506367
What you mean is this:
http://www.collegehumor.com/article/2972418/national-sex-day
Praise or Condemn:
0 
0
8:11 am
I could honestly care less about weed and 4/20.
Praise or Condemn:
0 
1
11:57 am
What is it with you guys and posting about what we just talked about in my health class?! O.O Anyhow, weed is not dangerous. PCP is NOT a strain of marijuana, it is a drug of it’s own and that IS dangerous. It depends on if the weed is stativa or indica for it to determine if you become lazy or ready to move around and get active. I believe stativa does the latter. Your picture is of a woman who used methamphetamine, which is MUCH more dangerous than weed.
Marijuana can be used for medicinal purposes. For example, a friend of mine is severely underweight (6′ 1″ and 116 pounds – male) and he smokes weed to have an appetite in order to gain some weight. Another friend experiences horrible migraines and stomach problems. She will smoke weed to relieve the pain that can not be taken care of by mere acidominaphine or ibuprofen. Also, there is a form of cannabis oil that has been shown to CURE a form of cancer. “A study done at UCLA in 2006 showed that not only does smoking marijuana not cause lung cancer, as had been previously thought, but that smoking cannabis actually protects the lungs from cancer” (Brown, Santa Cruz Patch).
As you can see from the graph, marijuana has as much a dependency level as caffine, which I’m sure almost everyone drinks each morning to get a nice buzz to get ready for work.
Praise or Condemn:
1 
1
11:58 am
Okay, I seriously hate the way that your comment system is set up. It’s impossible to see whole images
Praise or Condemn:
0 
1
12:03 pm
Oh! Also, the term “420″ came from a group of friends in California who always met at 4:20 in order to go smoke weed. It has become a common term among both stoners and also even for police to use when refering to marijuana.
Praise or Condemn:
0 
1
12:42 pm
Should I trust the word of a bunch of addicts or the word of accomplished historians?
Praise or Condemn:
1 
0
12:45 pm
Accomplished historians? Please, these people are not historians. Don’t bother telling me I’m wrong because I really don’t care.
Also, this might be a little off-topic but why do you have a random picture of a women as a Avatar. I thought you were a man.
Praise or Condemn:
0 
1
12:47 pm
I get that statement a lot. :/
Praise or Condemn:
0 
1
12:47 pm
Honestly it looks like a young Ellen Page. I mean like teenage-years Ellen Page.
Praise or Condemn:
0 
1
12:55 pm
I do love Ellen Page. Beautiful women and good actress.
Praise or Condemn:
0 
2
2:14 pm
Please don’t objectify women XC.
Praise or Condemn:
1 
0
12:46 pm
What historians have claimed that 420 is related to the birth of Hitler or the Columbine Massacre?
Praise or Condemn:
0 
1
11:36 am
If you’re calling me an addict, then you’re a horned fish. And who are the “accomplished historians” of which you speak?
Praise or Condemn:
0 
1
12:25 pm
“Anyhow, weed is not dangerous.”
Bullshit. Go to PubMed or Google Scholar and look at the research. Wanting something to be true doesn’t make it so.
“Marijuana can be used for medicinal purposes.”
So? So can amphetamines. We’re not talking about medicine; we’re talking about habitual recreational use.
“Also, there is a form of cannabis oil that has been shown to CURE a form of cancer. ”
I’m gonna call bullshit on that. Show us the study — and not a bullshit story from a stoner website or magazine. This sounds very much like a stoner urban myth.
Praise or Condemn:
1 
0
1:30 pm
“Bullshit. Go to PubMed or Google Scholar and look at the research. Wanting something to be true doesn’t make it so.”
At least there’s less death cases (if even) from it as from tobacco and alcohol.
“So? So can amphetamines. We’re not talking about medicine; we’re talking about habitual recreational use.”
Marijuana is way less agreessive as those chemichal pills.
“I’m gonna call bullshit on that. Show us the study — and not a bullshit story from a stoner website or magazine. This sounds very much like a stoner urban myth.”
It’s an almost 1 hour documentary about it:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0psJhQHk_GI
It’s all explained well in it.
Praise or Condemn:
0 
1
1:39 pm
“At least there’s less death cases (if even) from it as from tobacco and alcohol.”
I don’t understand why potheads use this excuse. It doesn’t merit why cannabis should be legalized, instead they’re making more of a point to illegalize tobacco and alcohol.
Praise or Condemn:
1 
0
4:01 pm
It’s a fact, not an excuse.
And of course i’m for to illegalize tobacco and alcohol. I had lung problems myself because of smoking and i don’t wish that anyone else to have the same thing (we don’t even need to talk about cancer do we?).
Praise or Condemn:
0 
1
1:47 pm
“Marijuana is way less agreessive as those chemichal pills.”
Explain what this means. What “pills” are you talking about? And how does marijuana treat the diseases/conditions for which those pills are described?
Or were you just posting meaningless nonsense without any evidence to back it up?
Speaking of chemicals, cannabis is full of them. You might have heard of the one called THC.
I asked for a link to the study that Stephanie claims exists, not a link to a YouTube video.
Praise or Condemn:
0 
0
2:06 pm
Whoops, yes I did. Thanks for picking that up.
Praise or Condemn:
1 
0
2:11 pm
Claire is so helpful
Praise or Condemn:
2 
0
2:19 pm
Dr. Claire, do you ever make cats smoke catnip?
Praise or Condemn:
1 
0
4:11 pm
“Explain what this means. What “pills” are you talking about? And how does marijuana treat the diseases/conditions for which those pills are described?”
Medical pills in general meaning.
“Speaking of chemicals, cannabis is full of them. You might have heard of the one called THC.
I asked for a link to the study that Stephanie claims exists, not a link to a YouTube video.”
Sure i did hear about the THC. And i see you didn’t even bother to watch the video.
Maybe this will help you then?
http://www.nowpublic.com/thc_marijuana_helps_cure_cancer_says_harvard_study
Praise or Condemn:
0 
1
10:29 pm
“Medical pills in general meaning.”
That is an utterly meaningless statement.
That link you provide is hyperbole.
1) Harvard does not claim that marijuana “helps cure cancer”, much less that it cures it. The headline is sensationalist and inaccurate.
2) If anything in this amateur article is to be believed, it is that these tests have been done in vitro and in mice. Results in such studies frequently cannot be replicated in living humans.
There have been similar results using a compound found in turmeric. Nobody sane is claiming that eating curry cures cancer.
It may well be that scientists will be able to isolate chemicals from cannabis that can be put to good therapeutic use.
But you can’t go around saying that smoking pot prevents or cures cancer because that is bullshit.
The fact remains that nobody has found a link to Stephanie’s mysterious study.
Praise or Condemn:
0 
0
3:33 am
“1) Harvard does not claim that marijuana “helps cure cancer”, much less that it cures it. The headline is sensationalist and inaccurate.”
Most researches who were made was from Harvard. They don’t claim that it cures it 100%, but it reduces the growth, which is way better then a chemotheraphy, which can damage you even more.
About the headline. If you didn’t notice most of journalist puts different headlines just to get more attention. So read the article carefully.
“2) If anything in this amateur article is to be believed, it is that these tests have been done in vitro and in mice. Results in such studies frequently cannot be replicated in living humans.”
Are you really that stupid?
They do most of such researches on mices, because they have a similar strocture of brain as we have. If they would do it on a human and something would go wrong, who would you blame?
“But you can’t go around saying that smoking pot prevents or cures cancer because that is bullshit.”
I didn’t say smoking pot does cure it or prevent it. But it can reduce the growth of the cancer cells in some cases.
Praise or Condemn:
0 
0
4:46 am
“Are you really that stupid?”
No, you are that fucking stupid.
Yes, they test drugs on mice and other animals.
Sometimes promising results of animal tests are not replicable in human tests because humans are not fucking identical to other animals.
But this is not the question at issue.
The questions here are:
1) Is smoking cannabis harmless?
2) Does smoking cannabis cure or prevent cancer.
The answer to both is NO.
Praise or Condemn:
0 
0
5:15 am
“No, you are that fucking stupid.
Yes, they test drugs on mice and other animals.
Sometimes promising results of animal tests are not replicable in human tests because humans are not fucking identical to other animals.”
Need to use insults. lol
Anyway… i didn’t said we are identical. I said similar. That’s different.
“The questions here are:
1) Is smoking cannabis harmless?
2) Does smoking cannabis cure or prevent cancer.
The answer to both is NO.”
1. I did never claim it’s harmelss. But did you ever read anywhere about a death case, because of too much smoking marijuana? I didn’t.
2. I can just copy/paste what i said before.
I didn’t say smoking pot does cure it or prevent it. But it can reduce the growth of the cancer cells in some cases.
Praise or Condemn:
0 
1
11:59 am
Marijuana can help with ADHD/ ADD, at least indica does. It slows the brain down to what everyone else wants of ADHD wired people. Amphetamines are used for the same thing but have so many more harmful side-effects.
Side effects of Adderal (common ADHD medication):
# Loss of appetite (anorexia)
# Dry mouth
# Difficulty sleeping (insomnia)
# Headaches
# Abdominal pain (or stomach pain)
# Temporary increases in blood pressure
# Weight loss
# Emotional changes
# Nausea, upset stomach, or vomiting
# Dizziness
# Diarrhea
# Feeling of weakness (asthenia)
# Increased heart rate (tachycardia)
# Infection, including urinary tract infection (UTI)
# Fever
# Heartburn.
Of those, weed causes:
– Dry mouth
– Emotional Changes (no duh, you’re high)
– Weight loss (if you have sativa)
– Increased heart rate (sativa)
Cannabis may contain chemicals, but compared to the crap that is allowed on the market, weed is much better. Did you know that Marinol resulted in 7 deaths during the trial study. It contains lots of harmful chemicals with a little bit of cannabis oil. Yet, there have been NO deaths, count them, zero, from only weed.
Praise or Condemn:
1 
1
4:26 pm
No deaths from weed? Apart from suicides, cancer and chest infections, you mean?
Praise or Condemn:
0 
0
4:27 pm
And vehicle and industrial accidents?
Praise or Condemn:
0 
0
2:35 am
“No deaths from weed? Apart from suicides, cancer and chest infections, you mean?”
Suicides? There’s alot of things which can affect someone to go do a suicide. There’s no prove that people do suicide because they did smoke weed.
Cancer? Most of people who smoke weed, smoke ciggarets as well. Besides, since cancer it’s genetic, you can get it without smoking weed, so you don’t have a prove for that either (i don’t say it’s not possible, but you don’t hear that someone did died from cancer, because he/she did smoke weed).
Chest infection? This might happen, but as i said before, such cases are really rare. Specialy if they smoke ciggarets aswell, because they can’t really tell then what caused it.
So even if there are death cases, it’s way less, then from any other drugs (ciggarets, alcohol, cocaine, heroin, etc).
Praise or Condemn:
0 
0
11:43 am
It’s a shit load less dangerous than any other drugs that are out there. And it’s even less dangerous than the crap that my mum has to take all the time.
Amphetamines are pretty much watered down meth and when kids take them, they no longer age mentally. Weed doesn’t cause this, at least from what I’ve seen. I know people who have been smoking since they were in high school and are in their 30′s now and act their age.
I can’t find the original study. I heard about it during my health class yesterday. However, I did find an article about cannabis oil being very effective in the cure for cancer. http://www.naturalnews.com/033757_cannabis_oil_cancer_cure.html And it isn’t a “stoner website or magazine.”
Praise or Condemn:
2 
1
2:20 pm
Awesome explaining!
Praise or Condemn:
0 
1
4:32 pm
It was not an awesome explanation.
Amphetamines are not “watered-down meth”. There are many different kinds of amphetamines. Meth is just one of them.
“when kids take them, they no longer age mentally”
Not true. Provide evidence for this.
“I can’t find the original study. ”
That’s because IT DOES NOT EXIST.
Natural News is worse than any stoner website or magazine. It is the most notorious anti-scientific pseudo-medical website on the net.
http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/NaturalNews
You need to learn to evaluate the reliability of your sources much better.
Praise or Condemn:
0 
0
2:18 am
Then according to your link, in which you belive it’s true, this should be true aswell: http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/ChristWire
Praise or Condemn:
0 
0
2:54 pm
i love you
Praise or Condemn:
0 
0
1:55 pm
This shit is funny as hell, the ignorance of you Christians amazes me.
Praise or Condemn:
5 
1
4:26 pm
amen to that
Praise or Condemn:
3 
1
5:03 pm
[IMG]http://i44.tinypic.com/erh455.jpg[/IMG]
Praise or Condemn:
0 
1
5:05 pm
darnit
Praise or Condemn:
0 
1
12:01 pm
Hey! Don’t be roping all Christians together! There are some who actually have brains, they just are not admins for this site of crazy people. I’m Christian, yet I actually have a brain and am willing to think for myself, not just quote the Bible and listen to propaganda.
Praise or Condemn:
2 
1
12:38 pm
I apologize, I was referring to the admins >.<
Praise or Condemn:
0 
1
4:33 pm
You listen to stoner propaganda, and much worse, Natural News.
Praise or Condemn:
1 
1
5:07 pm
And what are you basing that on? And also I don’t believe in the news because I think they’re like manipulating us bro.
Praise or Condemn:
0 
1
5:49 pm
“I don’t believe in the news because I think they’re like manipulating us bro.”
Stoner Paranoia?
Well I mean he knows that the media has a liberal slant, but it’s not like the TV emits betawaves that control your mind.
Praise or Condemn:
1 
1
6:32 pm
Based on the fact that Natural News specialises in bogus cancer cures and conspiracy theories. Read the RationalWiki link I posted.
The people who are manipulating you are the peddlers of conspiracy theories and anti-scientific quack remedies.
Praise or Condemn:
2 
1
8:13 pm
Haha oh lord this is great. This website has become my new entertainment when I need a laugh or two because all of this is the most ignorant bullshit…hahaha.
Praise or Condemn:
4 
1
8:22 am
Ex-atheist, I don’t mean manipulated by some sort of waves, I mean that people think the news is so trustworthy, but it isn’t, Many people are manipulated by means of believing everything that is said on the news. That’s why i don’t pay attention to the news because i believe that most of the stories are told differently from what actually happened. As for exbrony I already stated i don’t watch the news.
Praise or Condemn:
0 
1
8:30 am
Where do you get your info from?
Praise or Condemn:
0 
2
11:50 am
I didn’t get it from anywhere I’m just stating my thoughts on the news.
Praise or Condemn:
0 
0
2:52 pm
whoever wrote this article was dropped on they’re head when they were born. You are a complete dumbass. idiots like you are the actual problems
Praise or Condemn:
1 
0