Top 5 Reasons Homosexuality Is Wrong, By Their Own “Logic” And So-Called Beliefs
We all know that the bible says homogays are an abomination. All the good Christians in God’s America know that homosexuality is wrong. But what about science? What about the law? This author does not believe in science, as it’s barely one step removed from witchcraft of some kind, but let’s just play “devil’s advocate” (pun intended) and prove that the homogays are wrong, by their own rules and so-called logic. What better time to learn the truth about this than s0-called “Gay Pride” weekend.
1. Evolution
Evolution is the belief that random genetic mutations that are advantageous to a species get passed on to offspring, and the best improvements are the ones that help the species adapt and survive. If homosexuality were the norm for an entire species, absolutely zero genetic traits would be passed down, because the homogay can’t reproduce. So if evolution were a real thing, the homogay would be extinct. If homosexuality were natural, the human species would be extinct. Neither of these things has happened. Your move, so-called “science”.
2. Civil Rights
The crooked liberal politicians and their equally criminal monopoly of the media would have you believe that so-called civil rights are a boon to society. But the supposed limit to these so-called rights is where your right to do something infringes someone else’s rights. Sodomy infringes on a man’s god given right to have his body unharmed by the disgusting desires of the sodomite. By allowing this fad to continue, the homogay is infringing upon its own civil rights, as well as the good people of Christianity’s right to not be disgusted.
3. “Pride”
So-called “Gay Pride” weekend is a celebration of the anniversary of The Stonewall riots in Jew York City (pun intended) where an illegal sodomy club was raided by the police, and the homogay criminals assaulted police and broke law after law. Jesus preached the virtues of “turning the other cheek”, but these degenerates decided to slash the other cheek with a broken bottle. Slashing the tires of police cars which they also attempted to overturn, throwing bricks, rocks and trash cans, these homogays were criminal thugs. They set the bar on fire. They sang degenerate songs to provoke the peace-keeping police, such as, “We are the Stonewall girls/ We wear our hair in curls/ We don’t wear underwear/ We show our pubic hairs”. Now the homogays celebrate their act of terrorism every year. Terrorism is nothing to be proud of, Osama Bum Lovin’.
4. GLAAD
According to their website, “The GLAAD Media Awards were established in 1989 to ‘recognize and honor media for their fair, accurate and inclusive representations of the lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender community and the issues that affect their lives.’”. Meanwhile, GLAAD was formed in 1985 in order to dishonestly suppress the media’s accurate portrayal of the homogay spreading of AIDS. Now these gay bullies force people to kowtow to their agenda. Gay bullies sounds familiar. Oh, that’s right. Gay bullying is supposedly an epidemic causing homogay teens to kill themselves. Meanwhile, GLAAD engages in gay bullying themselves, bullying Tracy Jordan into apologizing. If Tracy Jordan kills himself, we all know who is to blame. Hypocritical much, GLAAD?
5. “Faith”
Not content to be Godless heathens, some degenerate homogays have started to twist the bible to support their disgusting lifestyle. The Chicago Coalition of Welcoming Churches is an organization that ignores the fact that the Bible clearly states that God hates homogays. Real Christians do not support sin. It wasn’t enough for individual gays to go to hell, now they’ve formed congregations of hell-goers. Looking for a group discount on your trip to Hades, homogays? As if your disgusting lifestyle weren’t enough to send you to hell in a handbag, now you’re worshiping false idols. You are like a scientist who tries to change the so-called laws of physics so he can fly like Superman. News Flash, “Superman”: You’re not even Wonder Woman, no matter what wig you put on. If there is real justice in your so-called “religion” anyone in league with you will end up burning in hell for all of eternity, as God’s America watches and laughs.
- Sinful
- Suspicious
- Scared
- Sad
- Amused
- Laughing Out Loud
Author: Frederick Ford
Persecuted Christian Warrior in Christ's armor, Korean War Veteran, White, Republican Man. More endangered than that owl the hippies cry about.
10:19 am
The scientific community hasn’t a reached or claimed a consensus on the root cause(s) of homosexuality yet, and most readily admit that there are probably multiple factors such genetic variation, biological changes and environmental factors.
Regardless of how you consider it from an ideological standpoint, it’s been documented in almost every area of the world, and the estimate of 1 to 10 percent of humans having had homosexual feelings at some point (includes bisexuality) has so far been validated in every major study.
I’m a designer, not a scientist, but it’s not so hard to envision ways that homosexuality might have evolved. Personally, I’m betting that it’s a ‘built-in’ genetic solution to population control, a way to ensure an ideal ratio of healthy adults to young that must be protected and raised.
However, it’s also possible that the occurrence of homosexuality is analogous to (but clearly more complex than) the gender of alligator embryos, which develop into male or female depending on the overall average temperature during their time in the egg. That would be the biological+environmental factor bit.
Point being, it’s too early to say that science has been wrong… or right, for that matter! We just have to wait and see. Or, ya know, keep studying.
Praise or Condemn:
24 
3
12:45 pm
Why aren’t there more people like you in the world?
Praise or Condemn:
17 
3
10:52 am
“1. Evolution”
You’re trying to make it seem as if ALL humans are either gay or straight. Here’s an idea: homosexuality might be a failsafe that’s built into our genetic structure so that we don’t over populate the planet and drain more of our resources.
“2. Civil Rights”
You’re talking more about rape than two consenting adults. You really couldn’t have failed harder on that point if you tried.
“3. “Pride””
Aside from the antisemitism, you really had no point. You’re talking about how ‘dem gays didn’t turn de other cheek’ and yet you’re the one who’s viciously attacking them and everyone else. The whole concept of the Pride Parade and whatnot is to make people understand that it’s alright of someone’s gay, that their sexuality doesn’t define them as a person (something you’re so caught up on that you forgot what it’s like to even be human).
“4. GLAAD”
There’s more homophobia than there is homosexual acceptance in America, and you’re talking about the concept of equal rights. You’re saying that it’s wrong of someone to demand equal treatment on a social level, and yet you don’t care if someone demoralizes and torments someone for being different.
“5. “Faith””
You claim that homosexuals are twisting the bible, and yet that’s exactly what YOU do instead. Can you prove that homosexuality is a bad thing using the bible? You can’t use Leviticus’ infamous saying since he said a ton of other shit you don’t care about, and it’s possible that the phrase meant vastly different things back in those times. You can’t say ‘Sodom and Gomorrah’ either since there was more going on than gay sex (rape, pillage, murder, all kinds of other nasty things, and yet you’re going to try to say that the biggest reason why it got nuked was because of the gay sex-the gay sex that was more than likely rape at the same time).
Hot debate. What do you think?
26 
6
1:48 am
1. Wrong. Homo-gayness is a choice.
2. Every year more men are raped than women.
The homogays are a threat to all normal Christian males (of all ages).
3. Why are you supporting terrorism ?
4. Criminals don’t deserve equal rights, why do you want to protect child-raping, earthquake-causing, terrorists ?
5. You are a delusional moron. The Bible clearly says that homosexuality is an abomination.
Praise or Condemn:
2 
24
4:01 am
Where in the bible does it say that its an abomination? Is it in the old testament? Because when Jesus came, he abolished all the rules of the old testament. When you go back and continue to bitch about things from there, you’re basically saying that Jesus died for nothing.
Praise or Condemn:
4 
1
6:43 pm
“Jesus died for nothing”
Really? Did you really just say that?! Sometimes it amazes me how quick people are to throw away all that is good in the world in defense of godless homosexuals.
Praise or Condemn:
0 
2
4:14 am
1. Wrong. There are no “homogays”. Also go ask homosexuals, if they did choose it.
2. Do you have any prove of that? And again… there are no “homogays”.
3. He didn’t mention terrorism at all.
4. And you’re ok than with soldiers who kill people?
Also gays are not criminals.
5. Quote it then. Also there are gays who are christian aswell.
Praise or Condemn:
13 
1
5:52 am
1. If there are no “homogays”. How do you explain the existence of people like Jerry Sandusky, Daniel Tosh and Obama ?
2.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/cifamerica/2012/feb/21/us-more-men-raped-than-women
3. GLAAD is a terrorist organization.
4. I don’t know in what disgusting secular socialist country you live in (Canada ?, UK?, Vatican City?) but here in Christian America, rape is a CRIME.
5. Leviticus 18:22 & 20:13
Romans 1:26-28 & 1:31-32
Corinthians 6:9-10
Timothy 1:10
These should be enough…
Praise or Condemn:
2 
12
4:04 pm
1. none of them are homogay.. There not even homosexual/gay. Theres no such thing as homogay in any dictionary, you sound like an idiot
2. stop choosing sites from other christians, its not good for your health
3. who cares
4. Bibles don’t help to prove anything other than faith, using them is like me saying that God is more evil than Satan because God commited genocide twice and satan has yet to kill anyone. Your following a faith where your own God has commited genocide twice, might as well go follow nazism as well.
5. You still fail.. Congrats
Praise or Condemn:
9 
1
5:21 pm
1. Do you know the meaning of the word “homogay”? It’s illogical.
2. Let me quote it:
“Those numbers are not quite correct, but they are nonetheless horrifying. First of all, “sexual assault” is not always the same as “rape” and includes a variety of behaviour that wouldn’t meet the legal standard for rape. So it’s not clear that there are actually more rapes of men than women, or more rapes of prisoners than non-prisoners.”
Also the name of the article is a question and not a statement.
3. Just because you say it so, it doesn’t mean that they are. It’s also well writen for what GLAAD does stand and what they do.
4. I didn’t said raping is ok. I just pointed out other criminal things.
Rape is a crime probably everywhere.
And american is not christian.
5. Even if bible says so, you think that they care about it? lol
Praise or Condemn:
5 
1
12:42 am
Yo bro, the bible isn’t real! Some extremely brilliant person wrote it to give to you so that he could sit back and laugh his ass of at how stupid you are!
Praise or Condemn:
4 
0
1:57 pm
So you come here to show that not all christians are bad. yet you do the opposite and make yourself look like a retarded bigot. good job faggot
Praise or Condemn:
0 
0
12:19 pm
Okey dokie…
1. It’s not a choice, I am bisexual, and I never asked or wanted to be.
2. Where the fuck did you get that information? I’m atheist, I need proof, I don’t believe just because someone said so (you know, like Christians do?)
Also, no, Christians are not normal just because of there religion, and to be honest, there is no real normal in humanity, everyone is different.
3. HOMOSEXUALITY IS IN NO WAY TERRORISM, YOU FUCKING MORON.
4. Straight people rape kids too, there’s no sexuality to pedophilia. We don’t cause earthquakes, sudden release of built up pressure in the tectonic plates does that. As I said in point three, we’re not terrorists. Seriously, search me for a bomb.
5. And the true delusional moron is you. The bible is JUST A BOOK. A bed time story, so you can sleep at night after a long day of making perfectly innocent people feel wrong. No one knows who wrote that fucking book which is the plague of the earth sometimes.
Ok, I’m done here. But seriously, practice what you preach, don’t just pick and choose which bits you wish. I thought one of your rules was to love your neighbour, or something. Do that.
Praise or Condemn:
2 
0
12:09 pm
This is so incredibly ridiculous and unfounded, I can’t help but laugh. Well-played, Ford, well-played.
Praise or Condemn:
9 
0
12:48 pm
The puns in this article are just horrible…Someone needs to take a comedy lesson or two…
Praise or Condemn:
11 
1
2:27 pm
What a brilliant article!
The thin lines homogays have to defend their sin saddled lifestyle are being cut one by one.
Praise or Condemn:
6 
15
2:29 pm
What part of anything that this mad man said was ‘brilliant’? He makes shit up and twists words just because he can’t find any actual evidence.
Praise or Condemn:
9 
3
2:34 pm
1. There is no “evil”utionary benefit to homogayism.
2. Civil Rights for liberals involve shoving their lifestyle in our face, violating our Civil Rights.
Praise or Condemn:
4 
11
2:59 pm
“1. There is no “evil”utionary benefit to homogayism.”
Like I said, what if it’s a fail safe, and you’re acting as if everyone is gay. You also forget that there’s a difference between sexual preference and reproduction. If need be, a gay man can find a woman that would act as a surrogate mother to give birth to his child.
“2. Civil Rights for liberals involve shoving their lifestyle in our face, violating our Civil Rights.”
So does that mean that the crazies who stand outside and preach about Jesus and shit are also violating MY civil rights? Does that mean that I can go and take away their right because what they’re saying offends me? You’re trying to argue that your civil right to be an asshole and to oppress others should take priority over the freedoms that others are being denied because of you.
Praise or Condemn:
10 
5
7:07 pm
Don’t be silly now. If you look at population curves of animals, they rise until something happens to stop them over populating and starving/becoming extinct. Ever thought that maybe homosexuality is the way in which humans do this? Since we have no natural predetors? No, I didnt think you had.
How would a gay couple in the street violate your civil rights any more than a straight one?? I, as a straight person, get just as offended when I see a straight couple playing tonsil tennis on the street as I do a gay couple, simply because I do not wish to see that level of slobber!! MANY Christians violate the civil rights of others by shoving THEIR lifestyle in the face of others, not only by demonstrating it, but by trying to force it on other people.
Isn’t the whole point of Christianity to love all of God’s children (that includes everyone), to have mercy on others, and to treat eachother the way in which you yourself would want? I assume that that would be with love, acceptance and respect. Pay other people the same curtosy.
Praise or Condemn:
1 
0
5:03 pm
“The thin lines homogays have to defend their sin saddled lifestyle are being cut one by one.”
When will you get that there are no “homogays”?
Praise or Condemn:
7 
5
6:29 pm
How many times do you have to bring this dumb grammatical argument up only to get proven incorrect every single time?
Praise or Condemn:
2 
6
12:15 am
homogays isnt a word. he hasnt been proven incorrect yet… but you continue to sound like a little priss that just wont stop being such a plug
Praise or Condemn:
5 
2
4:17 am
I will do it so many times, unless you will finaly get the illogical meaning of it.
Also, you never did prove me incorrect. But i did prove you incorrect. Twice. And i’ll explain it to you over and over again, till you get it (even if that probably never will happen).
Praise or Condemn:
5 
0
4:05 pm
Awe how cute, she thumbs’d be down again. All she’ll ever be good for is Pressing the thumbs down button. How sad…
Praise or Condemn:
5 
2
4:46 pm
Gays have been around for ever, long before Christ ever came around. I think its pretty safe to say no matter how many gays are burned at the stake they will always come back, it’s a part of nature and no amount of ignorant Christian idiots is going to stop it.
Ex atheist you are such a sheep, and an ignorant, hateful one at that. A big difference between gays and people like you is that we don’t care about your beliefs, we’re ok with you having them even though you have not one scrap of proof that god is real, or even cares who’s gay. But you guys sure care about our beliefs, why can’t you just butt out of our lives? We leave you alone.
In regards t
Praise or Condemn:
4 
0
4:58 pm
“We all know that the bible says homogays are an abomination.”
Bible don’t mention “homogay”, because there are no “homogays”.
“and prove that the homogays are wrong”
There are no “homogays”…
“1. Evolution”
http://pull.imgfave.netdna-cdn.com/image_cache/1336631207985545.jpg
“2. Civil Rights”
They all should have the same rights, no matter if you’re christian, muslim, white, black, straight, gay or whatsoever.
“3. “Pride””
Same as americans are proud to be americans, so can gays be proud to be gays. Don’t judge them for the pride. They have all the right to be proud.
“Gay bullying is supposedly an epidemic causing homogay teens to kill themselves.”
What? People like you bully them for beeing gay. There are no “homogays”.
“5. “Faith””
There are gays in ever religion. Get over it.
And once again… there are no “homogays”.
Oh yeah… and before i forget…
Apperantely you’re gay, since you look fat on the photo according to this article: http://christwire.org/2012/06/fat-people-are-gay/
Have a nice day.
Praise or Condemn:
2 
0
5:05 pm
Well that’s exactly the point. Idiots like this think that if they’re not allowed to oppress others then they’re the ones who are being oppressed.
What do you expect from people who eat their own god?
Praise or Condemn:
1 
0
5:35 pm
This here in one article is why I can’t take religion seriously. Look here, people. If you are going to discuss science, do it intelligently. Do it so that you get your point across without sounding like a stubborn preschooler. And most importantly: never use the phrase “I don’t believe in science”. Really. You don’t believe in science? I suppose that the laws of physics are merely a figment of our collective imagination? Or perhaps marine biology is really a government conspiracy to allow superintelligent squids to overtake America? Science is so much more that just evolutionary studies. Denying that is to allow one’s ignorance to show.
Also: You say that gays bully others? Oh well, thay’s funny when they’re all busy being oppressed and stripped of rights. How can you even pretend to worship a God that loves all its children (I won’t say His because no deity would have use for a gender identity) when you are spreading hate and inducing fear in the very people you claim it loves equally? Why in the world would a God hate a human that has done nothing but love who he/she was born to love? I say born to love because being homosexual is NOT a decision. I don’t suppose any of you woke up and decided to start having intercourse with the opposite sex? Didn’t think so.
One final topic: asexuality. I myself am asexual. I do not feel any drive to produce offspring. Therefore, if it was genetic, my ancestors would have had to been raped to create me. This is not the case, obviously. My parents are both sexual. By your logic” humanity would be extinct if asexuality
Praise or Condemn:
2 
0
5:38 pm
existed. No, it is not. Your lack of a reasonable thought process disturbs me highly, although it is not much of a surprise as you do not seem to value intellect very highly. Good day, my wayward human being, and may you some day look back and see what an utter moron you are acting like.
Sincerely, an asexual atheist.
Praise or Condemn:
1 
0
6:01 pm
You know, Freddie, the more of your articles I read the more I think you REALLY need a new…….hobby. Breaking this “article” down to explain everything that is wrong with it is a waste of time. Let’s see if we can make it a bit easier for the readers. Start at the top and as you read down, just keep saying “wrong…wrong…wrong…wrong…wrong”. That should just about cover it.
(idiot)
Praise or Condemn:
6 
3
6:09 pm
I understand that critical thinking is a stress on your limited intellect, so I wouldn’t expect you to be able to break down what you’ve deluded yourself into thinking is “wrong” with my well thought out article. If you think you can do a better job, please, show me links to your published work.
Praise or Condemn:
5 
9
6:14 pm
Like your “published works” even matter since they are just overflowing with lies and hatred.
A published journalist you are not Freddie
Praise or Condemn:
10 
3
6:17 pm
Those who can, do. Those who can’t, post anonymous comments on the internet. You’re obviously a dumb can’t.
Praise or Condemn:
2 
9
6:19 pm
…and then “those that can’t” slip through every once in a while. Case in point…this “article”.
Praise or Condemn:
8 
2
6:23 pm
And you can do…What exactly? Spew lies and hatred from that imbecilic mouth of yours?
Praise or Condemn:
5 
2
12:46 am
Those who are dumb fucks, like you, believe in Christianity. And the proper form of that is “those who can write do, those whose cant teach” and you sir, suck at both!
Praise or Condemn:
2 
0
6:23 pm
If I had any, I would be more than happy to give you links to them. At least they would contain facts and not ridiculous gibberish.
…and if you’re using this site as a reference point for YOUR published works…….I wouldn’t. It’s still nothing more than a poorly managed and moderated “online forum”.
Praise or Condemn:
5 
1
6:28 pm
Yes, many “online forums” have best-selling books for sale. As braindead children such as yourself would say, “FAIL”. Not only an “Epic” “FAIL” for that, you are a bigtime “FAIL”ure for not having written anything yourself. Put up or shut up. Here’s your sign!
Praise or Condemn:
2 
7
6:46 pm
“Yes, many “online forums” have best-selling books for sale.”
If you’re referring to “The Christwire Handbook”, you shouldn’t. Not exactly a good jumping off point. Perhaps you should do a little Google search to find out what readers REALLY think of it. I do believe it IS climbing the Best Sellers list though…..under Comedy/Parody.
http://books.google.com/books/about/The_Christwire_Handbook.html?id=YWa7aRSAd0oC
“…you are a bigtime “FAIL”ure for not having written anything yourself.”
I never said I had never written anything. I did, however, say I was not published. (I also said that on here, neither are YOU.)
“Put up or shut up.”
Well, you already put up. Do you think we could get YOU to shut up?
“Here’s your sign!”
Checked for copyrights on that, have you?
Praise or Condemn:
5 
1
6:54 pm
Hey Maniac, ever wonder why it was listed under comedy/parody?
Praise or Condemn:
5 
0
7:16 pm
Not at all, Erich. I’ve read the interview done with founders of this site and writers of that book. There is NO doubt in my mind why it is where it is. No doubt whatsoever.
Praise or Condemn:
2 
0
9:17 pm
So Fred the Fatty is gloating over the fact that he put up a shitty article on a shitty site that released a shitty book long before he came here?
Praise or Condemn:
5 
1
9:43 pm
Pathetic isn’t it?
(…and to think he called my POST a FAIL. At least it was just one post.
)
Praise or Condemn:
2 
0
6:17 pm
“5. Faith”
Laughing Online at self-delusional homogays! Many say they “love” Jesus but then go and flamboyantly violate his Word. What kind of sick, dysfunctional “love” is that?
Praise or Condemn:
5 
2
6:20 pm
It’s the kind of “love” that spreads the homogay AIDS and destroys good Christian families. These animals want to have their rainbow colored Oreo and eat it too.
Praise or Condemn:
3 
4
8:56 pm
Please enlighten me on why rainbow-coloured Oreos are such a problem. I’m pretty sure they would just be adding food coloring to the icing.
Praise or Condemn:
6 
0
9:09 pm
It’s not about the food coloring, it’s about what they represent. Pride (a sin) and the homogay agenda.
Praise or Condemn:
0 
6
9:25 pm
You represent: Gluttony, Sloth, Envy, Wrath, and Pride.
Gluttony due to your weight, Sloth due to your inability to lose it, Envy due to you being jealous of people who are in love, Wrath because you hate those that have accepted themselves or because they’re different, and Pride because you believe you’re better than people just because you posted a piece of shit on a site that will accept damn near any submission. To compare, it’s like you getting all high-and-mighty because you got a balloon and I didn’t on Free Balloon Day. You shouldn’t feel special, and yet you still think you’re better and smarter for some reason.
Praise or Condemn:
8 
1
12:50 am
Homogay is not one word!
Praise or Condemn:
2 
0
4:20 am
There is no “homogay AIDS”, idiot.
Praise or Condemn:
4 
2
12:48 am
Homogay is not a word! Especially ONE word!
Praise or Condemn:
2 
0
11:29 pm
Too far sir, I’ve put up with your sick and depraved hate-mongering for far too long. What right do you have to speak of twisting God’s and Jesus’s love when the first commandment is Love the lord your God with all your heart mind soul and strength.
The second is like it, love your neighbor as yourself. Well guess what sir, I, your friendly neighborhood “homogay,” am your neighbor. And I am here to tell you that the “homogay,” agenda is not to destroy America, it is not to bring down the family structure or morals or anything like that. I happen to be very much in love with another man, and he loves me back. It is our hope one day to raise a morally strong and CHRIST-centered family. But people like you stand in our way,
Whose cause are You serving. Our mutual God’s (because suffer no delusions, I worship the same Father in Heaven as you) or are you serving the deciever’s cause, and spreading his anti-Christian hatred through the world and blinding people to the true light and love that is Jesus Christ.
Praise or Condemn:
1 
0
4:19 am
There are no “homogays”, idiot.
Praise or Condemn:
3 
2
6:32 pm
Praise or Condemn:
14 
3
9:05 pm
1. Evolution actually does support homosexuality. If there is homosexual animals in a herd they will not produce offspring and they cam focus on helping other animals with their babies and potentially increase survival rate. And not all of the animals are gay, only a few, so the others would still reproduce. Humans are animals so that applies to us as well. And homosexuality might be something to help slow population growth.
2. Being gay isn’t something that “infringes someone else’s rights.” If it’s people of the age of consent then I don’t see anything wrong. I know gay and bi people they don’t infringe upon my rights.I’ve been told by someone on this site that when I get married I need to give my husband blowjobs when I’m on my period. Isn’t that sodomy?
3. Really? Just really? Do you have proof or did you just make up a derogatory lie to try and corrupt the image of these people? One of the only differences besides sexual preference between you and an average gay person is that they don’t look down on you for being straight. The whole point of the Pride Parade is to convince people that people are people, gay, straight, bi, pansexual, they are still people.
4. If people were to bully someone of christian faith you would be livid, right? But when someone goes around bullying people for something they can’t control it’s another story? Just for being or doing something you don’t agree with?. What those people are doing is enforcing equal rights.
5. Being mad at someone for doing something against your religion is like being mad at someone for eating cupcakes when you’re on a diet. They aren’t corrupting the bible if you they are trying to get people to not be overly-critical of them.
Praise or Condemn:
9 
1
9:13 pm
If homogays wanted pride parades to be about how they’re normal people all they would need to do is just act like normal human beings. Instead they make noises, wear fruity costumes, and sodomize each other in public.
Instead perhaps they could play football, but even then I’d imagine they would pervert that too.
Also pansexual isn’t a sexuality it’s a bullshit term that doesn’t exist since gender is such a core element of our being, right down to our intelligently designed genetics.
Praise or Condemn:
3 
7
9:20 pm
“If homogays wanted pride parades to be about how they’re normal people all they would need to do is just act like normal human beings. Instead they make noises, wear fruity costumes, and sodomize each other in public.”
It’s a movement to show that assholes like you who would torture and torment someone for being gay are wrong, and that the people you hurt shouldn’t have to take it, that they should be proud of who they are, and so forth.
“Instead perhaps they could play football, but even then I’d imagine they would pervert that too.”
Only because you’d look for it.
“Also pansexual isn’t a sexuality it’s a bullshit term that doesn’t exist since gender is such a core element of our being, right down to our intelligently designed genetics.”
Pansexuals tend to not give a shit, they see a person for who they are and they are capable of loving that person, regardless of their gender or gender identity.
Praise or Condemn:
5 
2
9:40 pm
“…pansexual isn’t a sexuality it’s a bullshit term that doesn’t exist…”
Odd. Merriam-Webster says it exists. Huh. Funny how that works.
http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/pansexual
“: exhibiting or implying many forms of sexual expression…”
‘Pan’ meaning “all”, then pansexual covers ALL the forms.
“…act like normal human beings.”
Any good psychiatrist will tell you there is NO such thing as “normal”. Normal is an opinion.
Praise or Condemn:
3 
2
2:32 pm
Merriam Webster says god exists as well. Yet you cretins deny his glory.
And how can there be more than one form of sexuality? We exist as a gender binary, there is no “third gender” there is no “fourth sexuality”. The definition of pansexuality is purposefully vague. It’s to convey the absolute non meaning the term itself represents.
Praise or Condemn:
1 
2
3:03 pm
“…it’s a bullshit term that doesn’t exist…”…”
“Merriam Webster says god exists as well.”
Are you going to say the same thing about Merriam-Webster for that statement? (By the way, God should be capitalized.)
Praise or Condemn:
2 
2
4:42 am
“If homogays”
Idiot.
“Also pansexual isn’t a sexuality it’s a bullshit term that doesn’t exist since gender is such a core element of our being, right down to our intelligently designed genetics.”
Didn’t you use that word in some other articles before?
Praise or Condemn:
3 
1
1:04 am
No where in the bible does it say that God HATES homosexuals.He does state that they won’t come back in the Resurrection and inherit the Earth. But he states that he loves all of his creations as well.
Before you call me an athieistic person, I am not athiest, but merely agnostic. I believe in God but not in the system of the church, for they have been too corrupted for me to believe they do anyone any REAL good. The opinion above was partly a discussion I had with my Jehovah’s Witness grandmother.
Praise or Condemn:
6 
0
1:21 am
“He does state that they won’t come back in the Resurrection and inherit the Earth”
Oh really? What bit of the bible is that in?
BTW, if you believe in god you’re not an agnostic.
Also, the Jehovah’s Witnesses are a pernicious and batshit-crazy cult. Consider yourself lucky not to be a member.
Praise or Condemn:
2 
4
1:49 am
All you folks talking about there being possible adaptive reasons for the existence of homosexuality in humans and other species need to remember a couple of things.
1) There is not actually any evidence that this is true. It might be a nice idea that having a lot of gay helper-uncles around increases the survival-and-reproduction prospects of younger heterosexual relatives, but that is merely a hypothesis that so far has no real evidence to support it.
2) There doesn’t always have to be a “reason” for a particular trait to exist. It doesn’t have to confer an evolutionary advantage. Some traits can be neutral, conferring neither an advantage nor a disadvantage. Even disadvantageous traits can persist, in some cases because at the genetic level they come in a package with advantageous traits that make that package a net plus.
Praise or Condemn:
2 
2
4:23 am
Hi ford you must be new to the crap site hope you can be better then most the new people who fail on this site.
Praise or Condemn:
0 
1
6:19 am
first of all , america is `not` a christian nation . they allow homosexuality to flourish . they are unclean and are all going to hell ….
Praise or Condemn:
2 
0
4:07 pm
GG my friend. GG
Praise or Condemn:
3 
1
11:42 am
You are such a fucking dumbass…
1. Evolution is linked with natural selection. Survival of the fittest. Now, I don’t know about you, but the latest deaths in the papers have been of presumably straight people, otherwise the media would have had a field day.
2. You’re talking about rape. There is no crime in two CONSENTING people having anal. Even straight people do it.
3. Al-Qaeda spreads terrorism. Not gay pride. But thanks for reminding me, I have to ask my cousin how it was.
4. You do know straight people have AIDS too right? It’s passed through intravenous drug use also. Example: Girl A shoots up and gets infected from a dirty needle. She later has unprotected sex with boy A. Guess what boy A has now?
5. You’re saying that because of an old ass FICTION book. It wasn’t even good fiction.
Praise or Condemn:
4 
0
1:48 am
Let us define “Homogay” shall we.
First we’ll start by checking if it’s a word at all. From my sources it’s not.
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/Homogay?s=t
http://oxforddictionaries.com/spellcheck/?region=us&q=homogay
http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/homogay
That enough proof for you?
Because “homogay” is not a word let us take it apart and analyze the meaning of both of the word parts.
“Homo-” The first part of you’re supposed word.
Dictionary.com defines the Greek word “Homo-” as a combining form appearing in loanwords from Greek, where it meant “same” ( homology ); on this model, used in the formation of compound words ( homomorphic ).
So we can logically conclude that the “Homo-” part of your word means along the lines of “Same.”
Now onto the next part of the word “homogay.” This for those of you who cannot infer for yourselves (looking at the people siding for this article) would be the “Gay” part.
As defined by Dictionary.com the word Gay in it’s most literal sense means “Bright or Showy…”
Now we can logically conclude the proper meaning of the word “Homogay.” Which, when properly analyzed, would mean Something that is the equivalent to being bright and showy, or more literally The same as bright and showy.
So, when “Christian Intellectual” posted “1. Wrong. Homo-gayness is a choice.” He actually means “1. Wrong. The act of being the equivalent of bright and showy is a choice.” Which of course it is.
Another quote, this time from your beloved “Frederic Ford,” showing what is actually meant. “It’s the kind of ‘love’ that spreads [something that is the equivalent of bright and showy] AIDS and destroys good Christian families…”
Now when ever you use the word “homogay” replace it with it’s real definition, of course with a few words substituted so that it matches the proper word tense as was used for the original word.
With all my despise for your hypocritical ways,
The Dragon Feeder.
Praise or Condemn:
3 
0
2:04 pm
Nice explanation. Hope they will learn it now.
Praise or Condemn:
1 
0
12:49 pm
You are not very knowledgeable. Have you never heard of a portmanteau, you simpleton?
Praise or Condemn:
0 
2
12:53 pm
That still don’t make a logical meaning of it. Now learn to use gay or homosexual, because “homogay” as you see is not a word and don’t have any logical meaning behind it.
Praise or Condemn:
2 
0
11:22 am
Evolution is just bad science, all one has to do is stare at the sun for a couple of hours and it is clear the science in the bible is all you need.
Praise or Condemn:
0 
3
1:10 pm
Only a bible-thumping idiot would suggest staring at the sun for a couple hours to prove the “science” in the bible.
Praise or Condemn:
2 
0
2:01 pm
Science in the bible?
hahahahahha
Thanks for making my day.
Praise or Condemn:
2 
0
10:24 am
თქვენ გამოდის მე ავადმყოფი. ველოდი უფრო გარეთ ქრისტიანული რწმენა, რაღაც კიდევ ითვლება სარწმუნო.
Praise or Condemn:
2 
0
2:11 pm
* sigh * this is so stupid.
I’ve fought this battle many times and will continue to do as a Glambert and as LeftLover.
THEY ARE HUMANS TOO! THEY DESERVE RESPECT LIKE US ALL! HOMOSEXUALITY IS FOUND IN 300 ANIMAL SPECIES, HOMOPHOBIA ONLY IN 1
I don’t care that I go to hell.
see you all there
Praise or Condemn:
3 
0
2:07 pm
From an anthropological point of view, heterosexual men shouldn’t be intimidated by homosexual men. In nature, males of the species compete with each other for the favors of the females of the species. In the race to breed, the heterosexuals are headed towards one goal, while the homosexuals are headed for another. Heterosexuals should be as intimidated by the homosexuals as the St. Louis Rams should be intimidated that the New Jersey Devils will score in the next quarter. The only reason a heterosexual could be intimidated by a homosexual is if they have latent homosexual feelings that scare them, their afraid of being seen as feminine. Hey, gays can be tough too! Few things are manlier than cowboys, and the guys from Brokeback Mountain were total rump rangers. And I bet either one of them could hold his own in a fight.
Praise or Condemn:
3 
0
2:09 pm
(Snicker) I said hold his own…
Praise or Condemn:
2 
0
9:45 pm
How about a compromise to the religion versus science argument: maybe God used science as a tool. Nothing wrong with that.
Praise or Condemn:
0 
0
5:42 am
I AM THE ,ASTER OF NECROMANCY BOW BEFORE ME
Praise or Condemn:
0 
0
8:42 pm
No, not an expert. Is there anything incorrect in what I just said?
Praise or Condemn:
1 
3
9:04 pm
Is there anything incorrect in what I wrote? If so, please point it out.
Praise or Condemn:
1 
3
11:44 am
“It doesn’t matter if what you said was right or wrong.”
Yes it does. That’s the only thing that matters. I know that you want so very much for me to be wrong, but on this occasion I can’t oblige.
“You’re still probably getting this information from the internet and then posting it as though you knew it all along.”
No. It’s not that hard to read a few books, you know.
Praise or Condemn:
0 
2
9:11 pm
For starters:
“1) There is not actually any evidence that this is true. It might be a nice idea that having a lot of gay helper-uncles around increases the survival-and-reproduction prospects of younger heterosexual relatives, but that is merely a hypothesis that so far has no real evidence to support it.”
You still aren’t disproving the fact that it could be a built-in fail safe to keep us from overpopulating the planet.
“2) There doesn’t always have to be a “reason” for a particular trait to exist.”
You JUST fucking said that there’s ‘no real evidence to support’ the claim, and you’re saying THIS? Pony Boy, are you only capable of tripping over your own words? Do you not see the hypocrisy within every single damn thing you talk about?
Praise or Condemn:
3 
1
9:14 pm
“You still aren’t disproving the fact that it could be a built-in fail safe to keep us from overpopulating the planet.”
So you believe in Intelligent Design now ?
Praise or Condemn:
1 
3
9:23 pm
“So you believe in Intelligent Design now ?”
No, human evolution is quite an astounding thing. Evolution period is amazing, but all of these little details about the human body show that they are quite capable of adapting. If Intelligent Design were true, then absolutely nothing should be the way it is now.
Praise or Condemn:
2 
1
9:33 pm
Only an Intelligent Designer can explain your theory of the built-in fail safe.
Praise or Condemn:
0 
3
9:39 pm
“You still aren’t disproving the fact that it could be a built-in fail safe to keep us from overpopulating the planet.”
Built in by who? Evolution does not have a forward-thinking plan.
“You JUST fucking said that there’s ‘no real evidence to support’ the claim, and you’re saying THIS?”
Yes, and I’m not contradicting myself at all.
Praise or Condemn:
2 
1
9:57 pm
“Only an Intelligent Designer can explain your theory of the built-in fail safe.”
Except if Intelligent Design were true, there would be no need for a fail safe, we wouldn’t have bones and organs that are no longer necessary, and technology would not have advanced at all.
“Built in by who? Evolution does not have a forward-thinking plan.”
Depends on how you look at it. If a species goal is to populate the entire planet, then it becomes a bad thing. However, in this day and age, humanity is at the top of the food chain and thus the idea of population is something that isn’t important to us in terms of growing. Something negative in one person’s eye can be something positive in another’s.
Praise or Condemn:
3 
0
10:51 pm
“if Intelligent Design were true, there would be no need for a fail safe, we wouldn’t have bones and organs that are no longer necessary, and technology would not have advanced at all.”
You are just making dumb assumptions that is not necessarily true.
Not a single evolutionary scientist believes that evolution has some kind of goal in mind, your understanding of evolution is completely WRONG.
Praise or Condemn:
1 
2
11:02 pm
“Depends on how you look at it.”
No, it doesn’t. Evolution does not have a plan. It is a passive process.
“If a species goal is to populate the entire planet…”
Species don’t have goals. Rats, cockroaches and bacteria don’t sit around little tables plotting world domination.
Individual animals might be said to have a goal only in as much as they have an instinct to reproduce (and, of course, to survive long enough to reproduce, and in some cases to protect their offspring). That’s as far as it goes.
Praise or Condemn:
1 
1
11:11 pm
“You are just making dumb assumptions that is not necessarily true.”
You assume that you speak for God and you refuse to use logic or understanding for anything.
“No, it doesn’t. Evolution does not have a plan. It is a passive process.”
We have plans, and evolution helps us realize just how certain things work.
“Species don’t have goals. Rats, cockroaches and bacteria don’t sit around little tables plotting world domination.”
No, but they DO look for food and try to live to see tomorrow and want to make sure that they have descendants. Hence, they have a goal: survival and keep their population up.
“Individual animals might be said to have a goal only in as much as they have an instinct to reproduce (and, of course, to survive long enough to reproduce, and in some cases to protect their offspring). That’s as far as it goes.”
Congrats, you understand what I meant.
Praise or Condemn:
1 
1
11:19 pm
“We have plans, and evolution helps us realize just how certain things work.”
Huh? What does this mean?
Like I said, evolution doesn’t have a plan or a goal, and neither do species.
Individual members of a species have instincts to survive and reproduce. That is all.
Praise or Condemn:
1 
1
11:22 pm
“Individual members of a species have instincts to survive and reproduce. That is all.”
You don’t consider that a very basic goal or plan?
Praise or Condemn:
2 
0
11:33 pm
Like I said, you could call it a “goal” for individual animals.
But a species as a whole doesn’t have a goal.
And the process of evolution does not have a goal or a plan. The process of evolution is not a sentient being. It is just a process.
Praise or Condemn:
1 
1
2:28 am
“We have plans, and evolution helps us realize just how certain things work.”
So you believe that evolution is like a god ? I have been right about you all along.
Thanks for finally admitting that evolution is your religion/faith.
Praise or Condemn:
1 
4
11:50 am
“So you believe that evolution is like a god ? I have been right about you all along.
Thanks for finally admitting that evolution is your religion/faith.”
Only a complete idiot like you could take what I said and get THAT out of it.
Praise or Condemn:
3 
0
6:55 pm
“Only a complete idiot like you could take what I said and get THAT out of it.”
Knee-jerk reaction, L.N. (With the emphasis NOT on knee.)
Praise or Condemn:
0 
0