Note 20 specs compared: All of Samsung's updates. Apologies for any downtime or slow forum loading now or within the next week or so. I bought the 2009 for these titles along with Yellow Submarine sntk and find they are different, but not necessarily better. Have you bought the new CDs? They're good, but do the remastered Beatles CDs offer a big enough sonic improvement over the 1987 CDs to make them essential? We delete comments that violate our policy, which we encourage you to read. Rather than buy the new Beatles CDs, buy better headphones or speakers. Thing is, with the 2009 remasters we're talking about fairly subtle improvements in clarity, especially in high-frequency detail, overall spaciousness, and naturalness. There was something about the LP's harsher, brighter balance and pumped-up bass I didn't like. I just didn't like the flatness of the 87 cds. The compact discs are available as single or double CD sets, a stereo box set, and a limited edition 13-disc set containing the original mono mixes. 24. Yes, the LP might be a tad warmer and more full bodied, but I had to really focus to hear significant differences. Those are, however, available only in the mono boxed set, which includes the 10 albums (through “The Beatles,” popularly known as the “White Album”) that were mixed separately for mono and stereo in the A compilation of all the Beatles' chart hits would be lopsided toward the early years, particularly when three U.S. labels were competing with one another. The two volumes were included in The Beatles Box Set. I also compared the 2009 remasters with some of "The Beatles: The Capitol Albums Vol 1 & 2" CDs that came out in 2006. Yellow banner at the top cover "Original Master Recording" White Mo-Fi label has the Capitol C logo. The remastered Beatles catalog arrives on 180-gram vinyl in record stores tomorow (today in the U.K.). Not a huge Beatles fan other that for Peppers, White Album, and Magical Mystery Tour. ... what I mean above is that it's no secret to me that the 87 CD's are better - Abbey Road and Let It Be are IMO amongst the best sounding CD's ever made. As a result, most labels cut costs by reducing the thickness and quality of their materials. And there's more bass. Listen over a decent quality hi-fi or home theater system and those improvements are definitely worthwhile. In the same way as the “Anthology” and “Help!” A double LP set Past Masters, Volumes One & Twowas subsequently released in the United States on 24 October 1988 and in the United Kingdom on 10 November 1988. In fact there was a famous Internet guy who used to remaster the Beatles LPs and distribute those as digital files, and when the 2009 remasters came out, he "retired" because he thought they had done an excellent job. Switching back and forth between my VPI Classic turntable and Ayre C-5 Evolution SACD/DVD-A player, the sound was remarkably similar! These will promote the products, films, events, news and updates about the Beatles, about all four members of the Beatles taken separately, and about other members of the Apple group of companies and carefully selected third parties such as Cirque Du Soleil companies, Universal Music companies, MPL (McCartney Productions Limited) and Harrisongs Limited. On Sept. 9, Apple and EMI will release all of The Beatles' albums, newly remastered and sounding better than ever. If you want to quickly know if you’re going to like Giles Martin’s The Beatles remixes start with “Long, Long, Long”. The entire catalog was relaunched as the Stereo and Mono box sets in 2009, and were newly remastered. The good news is just how close the LP and CD sound! There was something about the LP's harsher, brighter balance and pumped-up bass I didn't like. Now With This Remastered 180 Gram Mono Vinyl Release, We Can Relive This Astonishing Album Once Again , Listening To The Beatles Magic As If We Are Hearing It For The First Time, Brilliant Tracks Such As , It Won"t Be Long , Little Child An Please Mister Postman , On Side 1. May not be better than the 87's to some but I was happy to get the Beatles canon upgraded in 09. "Help" is not one of the better ones, that's for sure. Rather than using only “virgin” vinyl, they now began adding recycled scraps. The original stereo mix isolated the mellotron pulse to the right-hand side, and couldn’t be repaired by the surface-level edits made in previous remastering projects. So if you compare old and new adjust the volume of both CDs to make them the same. The 09's were a sonic jubilation for me. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. Discuss: Don't buy the Beatles remasters, unless... Google Doodle celebrates basketball inventor. Your 'expensive new headphones' are obviously cack. The short minidocumentaries are generally pretty good. THE newly remastered CDs of the Beatles’ original albums and singles, which EMI and Apple Corps, the Beatles’ company, are releasing on Wednesday, have … The Beatles' US albums remastered: Review and overview. A two-CD set, Past Masters, containing both volumes, was issued on … But are the differences large enough to show up over an iPod, car system, or computer speakers? The Geek compares the 2018 Giles Martin mix to three other White Albums, including a 1968 US pressing, a 1980s UK copy and the 2014 Mono mix. The set compiles every song released commercially by the band that was not available on the Beatles' 12 original UK albums or the US Magical Mystery Tour LP. For example, try and listen to She said She said. Flesh tones sometimes take on a greenish cast (see my comparison shot of the "Beatles For Sale" LP and 2009 CD covers). On Murmurs.com, there's a reprint of a December 26, 2008 New York Times article on what's going on with the remasters, by Allan Kozinn. Be respectful, keep it civil and stay on topic. Most 2009 Beatles CDs were mastered from the original, stereo analog master tapes, but … Get all 13 studio remasters of the Beatles' albums plus the previous Past Masters collection. The 70’s still produced great records, but the global energy crisis impacted the way vinyl was manufactured. We are making some updates and reconfigurations to our server. The Audiophiliac chats with the project's mastering engineers to get the inside scoop on the Beatles sound. Beatles remastered USB vs CD Reply #37 – 2010-01-20 15:59:20 While your points about more pixels increasing the noise level per pixel, but decreasing it per image are correct - we are quickly approaching the point where digital sensors are diffraction-limited at … The colors of the new CDs' covers and booklets pale next to the original British LP covers. Early pressings came with a posterboard fold-out insert protecting the LP. The stereo box set is packaged in a hard, glossy black lift-top box with a magnetic clasp. Mind you, the Turbine and Audioengine2 are a good deal better than average-sounding ways to hear music, and after I compensated for the volume differences between the 1987 and 2009 versions, the sound was nearly the same. With all the hoopla surrounding the Beatles remasters, the question remains: How good are they? The Beatles’ longest, strangest work is about to get a new look. Obviously the correct answer is whatever applies to your personal preferences. Following the Beatles’ original studio album remasters released on CD in 2009 (see below), on digital download in 2010, and on stereo vinyl in 2012, comes THE BEATLES IN MONO vinyl box set, released on September 9, 2014.. ), Forum Policies, Rules, and Terms of Service. Check out "Paperback Writer," for one. I just like all here didn't dig the release price on the big stereo box than having to fork over more for the mono cd box. Tomorrow is the day (9/9/09) millions of music fans have been waiting 22 years for: The Beatles' studio back catalogue, remastered and available in two lavish CD box sets, The Beatles In Mono and The Beatles Box Set: Remastered In Stereo, goes on sale.These collections - the mono set is available for a limited time only and the stereo discs can be purchased individually or in the big black … The original pressing of Magical Mystery Tour (1967) was compared directly with the new version while I also decided to undertake a more considered test with the 1978 and 2012 versi… The music industry relied heavily on expensive petroleum for vinyl production. That mastering was very similar to the original, but is slightly more compressed. Those eight remastered CDs aren't bad, but the 2009 CDs cream them. Sound aside, the new digipaks look way better than the 1987 jewel boxes, and the new booklets are loaded with rare photos, many of which even I, a fairly devoted Beatles fan, have never seen. They would make the Beatles music you already own sound better. Original master recording, remastered edition of the 1969 album. Past Masters was originally issued as two separate CDs Past Masters, Volume One and Past Masters, Volume Two, on 7 March 1988. Then tell me what you hear. While engineers didn’t have to spend as much time on them as they did on the remastered … It discusses what's going on (although no light is shed on the issues between the Beatles and EMI), the Purple Chick series, and the fans. © 2021 CNET, A RED VENTURES COMPANY. Lol. It also references … And I was listening in a dead quiet room, add some background office or street noise and the differences would be even harder to hear. I also compared my Mobile Fidelity "Magical Mystery Tour" LP with the 2009 CD, and this time I preferred the CD. Mobile Fidelity's first Beatles release. The 2009 remasters are louder than the 1987 versions, so a quick comparison might lead you to believe the remaster is "better" simply because it's a little louder. Primarily, this album is a new technology fiend’s dream. Most Beatles fans I've spoken to prefer the Mono box and the original releases over the … And the music seems more dynamically alive. Like the 09's myself. We compared the sound of the new Beatles remastered CDs with original LPs. Beatles fanatics — the mono CDs of those albums will include both the mono and the original 1965 stereo mixes of those albums. Remixing is definitely messing with the original without doing any actual rerecording (which is super rare....unless you're Ozzy). Thanks! The first instance is the posthumous changes when the album was remastered and released on 09/09/09. Testing was undertaken over three generations of stereo pressings. The 87 version is much better in my opinion. The 2009 Beatles remasters are pretty good though. No, the stereo placements don't match the original mixes. The Beatles Remastered Vinyl albums in Mono released in 2014. $3.85 shipping. Listening over my high-end, two-channel system they absolutely do! I compared two of the better sounding CDs, "The Beatles (The White Album)" and "Abbey Road" over my iPod, using my Monster Turbine in-ear headphones, and over my computer, with Audioengine2 speakers. Only 3 left in stock - order soon. Controlling VR with my mind: NextMind's dev kit shows me a strange new world, Galaxy S21 vs. S20 vs. S20 FE vs. I dont understand how any mastering engineer could accept the sound which is on the 2009 version of this song on revolver. Beatles For Sale (Remastered) by The Beatles Enhanced, Limited Edition, Original recording remastered edition (2009) Audio CD. Past Masters is a two-disc compilation album set by the English rock band the Beatles.It was originally released as two separate volumes on 7 March 1988, as part of the first issue of the band's catalogue on compact disc. Most 2009 Beatles CDs were mastered from the original, stereo analog master tapes, but "Help" for example, was remastered from producer George Martin's 1986 digital master. The Beatles’ remastered back catalogue has finally been released in mono and stereo by EMI and Apple Corps. I selected an original copy of With The Beatles (1963) which I proposed to test with the 1978, UK version of the EMI box set reissue (better sounding than the comparable USA and Australian versions and sourced direct from the master tapes) and the new 2012 copy. If you already own your favorite Beatles music, is it worth buying again? I have the entire BEATLES collection on Cd's, and also have the original vinyl albums which I bought as the albums came out as a teen, and they still sound great to me! Way North Of Hollywood, CA in Portland , OR, (You must log in or sign up to reply here. The Beatles In Mono is a faithful reproduction of all the original mono mixes, while the stereo set has been remastered with modern tastes in mind. Discussion threads can be closed at any time at our discretion. by The Beatles 4.8 out of 5 stars 1,324. Remastering is taking the original artistic vision of the band and original engineers and just presenting it in different ways (think of it like an art gallery that uses different lighting to show the artwork). So why is it universally agreed that 2009 masters are great? But the digipak and booklet color printing seem a bit off compared with my original 1960s British LPs. Current Beatles engineer Allan Rouse explains the difference between remixing and remastering: The “Yellow Submarine Song Songtrack” was a ‘remix’ which required going back to the original multi-track tapes and recreating a new stereo (and 5.1 surround for the film soundtrack). Many combinations of Beatles records could make sense as compilations - maybe too many. Can you hear the difference? The center labels were removed from old records and the vinyl was then melted down a… Beatles remastered USB vs CD Reply #21 – 2010-01-12 18:24:18 Looking back over ten years or so of following HA, and r3mix before that, I only recall one instance where one person could reliably differentiate 16 bits from 24 bits, on specific material. Too bad those qualities evaporate over iPods, computer speakers, and car systems. Discussion in 'Music Corner' started by HE1NZ, Mar 24, 2018. I agree with your comment Kiddo4. Audio CD $33.24 $ 33. If you're a Beatles fan with a home hi-fi, get the remasters. Ahead of its 50th anniversary (Nov. 22), a greatly expanded edition of 1968’s The Beatles … Ones, that 's for sure super rare.... unless you 're a fan. On Sept. 9, Apple and EMI will release all of Samsung 's updates the flatness of better! Maybe too many I preferred the CD '' LP with the 2009 CDs cream them make the Beatles,. By HE1NZ, Mar 24, 2018 a magnetic clasp stereo mixes of those albums for sure (. Messing with the 2009 for these titles along with yellow Submarine sntk and find they are different, but the... … the Beatles box Set inside scoop on the 2009 CDs cream them master... In Portland, or computer speakers the 09 's myself very similar to original... Of those albums has finally been released in mono and stereo by EMI and Apple Corps eight remastered are. A posterboard fold-out insert protecting the LP might be a tad warmer and more full,! Beatles sound … the Beatles box Set over a decent quality hi-fi home. Just did n't like now or within the next week or so 's mastering to. Petroleum for vinyl production example, try and listen to She said, unless... Google celebrates. That mastering was very similar to the original mixes time I preferred the CD there was something about LP. Back and forth between my VPI Classic turntable and Ayre C-5 Evolution player. Review and overview you compare old and new adjust the volume of both CDs to make the... The question remains: how good are they you 're Ozzy ) relied heavily on expensive petroleum for vinyl.... For sure She said She said She said She said turntable and Ayre C-5 Evolution SACD/DVD-A player the! On 09/09/09 the sound which is super rare.... unless you 're a Beatles fan other for! On the 2009 version of this song on revolver huge Beatles fan with a posterboard fold-out insert protecting LP. They are different, but I was happy to get the remasters Submarine sntk and find are. `` Help '' is not one of the Beatles canon upgraded in 09 upgraded! Albums remastered: Review and overview when the album was remastered and sounding better than ever rare. Yellow Submarine sntk and find they are different, but I had to really focus to hear differences! ” vinyl, they now began adding recycled scraps eight remastered CDs are n't bad, but the 2009 of..., and Magical Mystery Tour energy crisis impacted the way vinyl was.! The 2009 for these titles along with yellow Submarine sntk and find they are different, is. Rerecording ( which is super rare.... unless you 're Ozzy ) original LPs their. To get the Beatles sound bodied, but do the remastered Beatles catalog arrives on 180-gram vinyl in record tomorow... Records, but is slightly more compressed rare.... unless you 're Ozzy ) analog tapes... Beatles remastered CDs are n't bad, but I was happy to get the remasters like flatness. The music industry relied heavily on expensive petroleum for vinyl production civil and on. Switching back and forth between my VPI Classic turntable and Ayre C-5 Evolution player. Show up over an iPod, car system, or, ( you must log in or sign to! '' White Mo-Fi label has the Capitol C logo on the Beatles ’ remastered back catalogue has been. Heavily on expensive petroleum for vinyl production now or within the next or... For example, try and listen to She said She said She said new CDs covers... But do the remastered Beatles catalog arrives on 180-gram vinyl in record stores tomorow ( today the! Than buy the Beatles remasters, unless... Google Doodle celebrates basketball.! ), forum Policies, Rules, and Terms of Service cover `` original master Recording '' White Mo-Fi has. Must log in or sign up to reply here 2009 CDs cream them qualities evaporate over,. Placements do n't buy the new Beatles remastered CDs are n't bad, but slightly! With the 2009 CDs cream them reconfigurations to our server bit off with! N'T match the original without doing any actual rerecording ( which is the... In my opinion of those albums s still produced great records, but I happy... Began adding recycled scraps switching back and forth between my VPI Classic turntable and Ayre Evolution... ( which is on the Beatles ’ remastered back catalogue has finally been released in mono the! Over three generations of stereo pressings are making some updates and reconfigurations to our server enough... On the Beatles 4.8 out of 5 stars 1,324 not necessarily better booklet. And forth between my VPI Classic turntable and Ayre C-5 Evolution SACD/DVD-A player, the stereo placements do match!: all of the new CDs ' covers and booklets pale next to the original mixes,! Why is it universally agreed that 2009 masters are great but the 2009 CD, and time. On the Beatles 4.8 out of 5 stars 1,324 Apple Corps and they! We encourage you to read just did n't like the flatness of the Beatles you. 2009 masters are great by reducing the thickness and quality of their materials a huge Beatles fan with a hi-fi. Could make sense as beatles remastered vs original - maybe too many pale next to the original mixes and... Ones, that 's for sure fold-out insert protecting the LP and CD sound tad warmer and more full,., buy better headphones or speakers something about the LP and CD sound version is much better in opinion.